FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Cheerleading the Massacre in Oaxaca

Even by today’s bottomless standards, Mark Stevenson’s article of the 30th October could only by very loose metaphor be described as journalism. Following the trend in the corporate news, Stevenson’s lead paragraph paints a picture of jubilant residents greeting the police as liberators; one doesn’t find out until the sixth paragraph that the ‘strike-weary residents’ comprise about twenty people.

As I’m sure you’re aware, most readers will take in only the headline and perhaps a paragraph or two before moving on to the next headline – leaving the article with the image of Paris, 1945, or Baghdad, 2003. This is irresponsible, and it’s certainly shabby writing – one would be tempted to call it shameful except for the fact that the portrayal of mass protests as the aberrations of a few violent extremists irrationally bent on disrupting the (tourist-friendly) status quo is common enough to be rhetorical cliche. But it still galls.

As does the pro-order anti-demonstration tone of the entire article, suggesting as it does that the violence lay on the side of the demonstrators rather than of the police, as is the norm at large demonstrations. (Those four water tanks – have the images of the civil rights movement really become so distant?) No number of injured is mentioned, although it’s likely to be fairly high, and the seven police injured warranted their own paragraph. The closing sentence remarks with uncritical neutrality that the decision to send in police followed the death of an activist-journalist and two residents, leading one naturally to conclude that this violence must also be reckoned against the demonstrators, when it came from the anti-demonstration paramilitaries, according to several other sources citing eyewitnesses. Ruiz’s bit of empty rhetoric taken as a quote in the penultimate paragraph gives an impression of neutrality and compromise – and to the average reader, one fears, a sense of reasonableness and right.

And on and on. The end result is to write a peaceful teachers’ strike as the rabble-rousing work of a handful of violent persistent extremists. The article creates a context in which the rather chilling bit of information that “50 supporters had been arrested and police were searching houses, looking for protest leaders” won’t conjure up the images it should. The writing is sloppy and the suggestions are misleading, although the somewhat surreal bit about the cold and tired police, camped in the zocalo, wrapping themselves in the protesters” banners was quite scenic. One doesn’t expect miracles of investigation from the Washington Post, but in the interests of at least keeping up appearances, I’d tentatively suggest you find yourself another Mexico correspondent.

Sincerely,

CARL GELDERLOOS

CARL GELDERLOOS lives in Lansing, New York. He can be reached at: carl.gelderloos@gmail.com

 

 

 

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
Ted Rall
Why Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh is a Train Wreck You Can’t Look Away From
Lauren Regan
The Day the Valves Turned: Defending the Pipeline Protesters
Ralph Nader
Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?
Binoy Kampmark
Deplatforming Germaine Greer
Raouf Halaby
It Should Not Be A He Said She Said Verdict
Justin Anderson
Don’t Count the Left Out Just Yet
Robert Koehler
The Accusation That Wouldn’t Go Away
Jim Hightower
Amazon is Making Workers Tweet About How Great It is to Work There
Robby Sherwin
Rabbi, Rabbi, Where For Art Thou Rabbi?
Vern Loomis
Has Something Evil This Way Come?
Steve Baggarly
Disarm Trident Walk Ends in Georgia
Graham Peebles
Priorities of the Time: Peace
Michael Doliner
The Department of Demonization
September 20, 2018
Michael Hudson
Wasting the Lehman Crisis: What Was Not Saved Was the Economy
John Pilger
Hold the Front Page, the Reporters are Missing
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail