FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Korematsu Revisited

When lawyers talk about ‘habeas corpus’, they are not merely referring to an interesting lyric in the first season theme song for Harvey Birdman: Attorney at Law. The term comes from a writ, known as ‘the writ for habeas corpus’ or simply ‘the writ’: it originally was used by the King in order to question the validity of the incarceration of individuals in community courts. It represented the power of clemency that the King could wield, and was primarily used where the due process of law was in question with regard to the prosecution of a prisoner. Hence Sen. Arlen Specter’s reference to how a world without habeas corpus would be like taking civilization back around a thousand years.

The right to petition for a writ of habeas corpus has been recognized as among those procedural safeguards that protect an accused against egregious unconstitutional acts performed by courts against an accused’s rights. Even though the timing of filing a petition for a writ is limited by 28 U.S.C. s. 2241, it has been held that the right to petition for a writ is a procedural safeguard for a person’s rights who may be subject to extradition, for instance. Barton v. Norrod, 106 F.3d 1289 (6th Cir. 1997). A limitation on the petitioning of the federal courts to review potential constitutional violations abridges a person’s First Amendment right to access to the courts; “[t]he right of access to the courts is an aspect of the First Amendment right to petition the Government for redress of grievances.” Bill Johnson’s Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U.S. 731, 741 (1983).

The Constitution guarantees that prisoners, like all citizens, have a reasonably adequate opportunity to raise constitutional claims before impartial judges. Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 351 (1996). Moreover, because access to the courts is a fundamental right, government-drawn classifications that impose substantial burdens on the capacity of a group of citizens to exercise that right require searching judicial examination under the Equal Protection Clause. Lyng v. Automobile Workers, 485 U.S. 360, 370 (1988). Furthermore, members of Congress, including the Senate, have a constitutional duty “to respect the dignity of all persons,” even “those convicted of heinous crimes.” Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 560 (2005).

These considerations are sorely lacking in Congress’s Detainee Treatment Act. The current executive administration draws both horror and fascination as it continues to spit upon traditional conservative, right-wing values. It is not unreasonable to characterize the writ of habeas corpus as a procedural safeguard for those accused of crime; in the case of military tribunals, a writ would be one of the few ways to get the federal justice system re-examine its own procedure after conviction for abuse of process. The denial of writs on the grounds of nationality will lead to the unconscionable result of an innocent man being unable to appeal a crime after he has been convicted. Here, Congress has passed a statute which seems to fail to pass constitutional muster. Why McCain and Specter decided to endorse the bill is beyond me.

While I hope that Congress ­ indeed, the entire country ­ will wake up and see that these sorts of knee-jerk measures (PATRIOT Act included) are wrenching away civil rights with the subtlety of a jackhammer, hope is not what will protect others from suffering from the discriminatory and unconstitutional acts put forth by our politicians in Washington. Leaving these measures for the Supreme Court to try and clean up is irresponsible on the part of the public. When the next step is to accept racial profiling as necessary to the protection of ‘modern’ society, it is clear that the nation’s political machine is slowly marching backwards towards a time when it was acceptable to corral citizens into concentration camps based on where they came from (a decision affirmed by the Supreme Court in Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944)).

JON HUNG is a law student at law student the University of Dayton School of Law. He can be reached at: hungjonf@notes.udayton.edu

 

 

 

 

More articles by:
bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
Weekend Edition
July 19, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Rob Urie
The Blob Fought the Squad, and the Squad Won
Miguel A. Cruz-Díaz
It Was Never Just About the Chat: Ruminations on a Puerto Rican Revolution.
Anthony DiMaggio
System Capture 2020: The Role of the Upper-Class in Shaping Democratic Primary Politics
Andrew Levine
South Carolina Speaks for Whom?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Big Man, Pig Man
Bruce E. Levine
The Groundbreaking Public Health Study That Should Change U.S. Society—But Won’t
Evaggelos Vallianatos
How the Trump Administration is Eviscerating the Federal Government
Pete Dolack
All Seemed Possible When the Sandinistas Took Power 40 years Ago
Ramzy Baroud
Who Killed Oscar and Valeria: The Inconvenient History of the Refugee Crisis
Ron Jacobs
Dancing with Dr. Benway
Joseph Natoli
Gaming the Climate
Marshall Auerback
The Numbers are In, and Trump’s Tax Cuts are a Bust
Louisa Willcox
Wild Thoughts About the Wild Gallatin
Kenn Orphan
Stranger Things, Stranger Times
Mike Garrity
Environmentalists and Wilderness are Not the Timber Industry’s Big Problem
Helen Yaffe
Cuban Workers Celebrate Salary Rise From New Economic Measures
Brian Cloughley
What You Don’t Want to be in Trump’s America
David Underhill
The Inequality of Equal Pay
David Macaray
Adventures in Script-Writing
David Rosen
Say Goodbye to MAD, But Remember the Fight for Free Expression
Nick Pemberton
This Is Heaven!: A Journey to the Pearly Gates with Chuck Mertz
Dan Bacher
Chevron’s Oil Spill Endangers Kern County
J.P. Linstroth
A Racist President and Racial Trauma
Binoy Kampmark
Spying on Julian Assange
Rose Ramirez – Dedrick Asante-Mohammad
A Trump Plan to Throw 50,000 Kids Out of Their Schools
David Bravo
Precinct or Neighborhood? How Barcelona Keeps Rolling Out the Red Carpet for Global Capital
Ralph Nader
Will Any Disgusted Republicans Challenge Trump in the Primaries?
Dave Lindorff
The BS about Medicare-for-All Has to Stop!
Arnold August
Why the Canadian Government is Bullying Venezuela
Tom Clifford
China and the Swine Flu Outbreak
Missy Comley Beattie
Highest Anxiety
Jill Richardson
Weapons of the Weak
Peter Certo
Washington vs. The Squad
Peter Bolton
Trump’s Own Background Reveals the True Motivation Behind Racist Tweets: Pure White Supremacy
Colin Todhunter
From Mad Cow Disease to Agrochemicals: Time to Put Public Need Ahead of Private Greed
Nozomi Hayase
In Crisis of Democracy, We All Must Become Julian Assange
Wim Laven
The Immoral Silence to the Destructive Xenophobia of “Just Leave”
Cecily Myart-Cruz
McDonald’s: Stop Exploiting Our Schools
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Our Veggie Gardens Won’t Feed us in a Real Crisis
CounterPunch News Service
A Homeless Rebellion – Mission Statement/Press Release
Louis Proyect
Parallel Lives: Cheney and Ailes
David Yearsley
Big in the Bungalow of Believers
Ellen Taylor
The Northern Spotted Owls’ Tree-Sit
July 18, 2019
Timothy M. Gill
Bernie Sanders, Anti-Imperialism and Venezuela
W. T. Whitney
Cuba and a New Generation of Leaders Respond to U.S. Anti-People War
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail