FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Party Politics in Connecticut

The recent news regarding Senator Joe Lieberman’s intention to attempt to run as a “petitioning Democrat” should he lose the upcoming August 8 Connecticut Democratic Senatorial primary has put this tiny state in the unusual position of national prominence. Rarely does a state with only seven electoral votes have the chance to affect the national debate on any subject.

Although there are other issues discussed in the campaign, the primary between Senator Lieberman and Greenwich businessman Ned Lamont has become a referendum on Lieberman’s blind support for the invasion and occupation of Iraq, with the Lamont campaign calling for withdrawal of troops and closing of all bases.

The lefty blogs have been leading the Lamont charge since the campaign’s inception attempting to rally anti-war Democrats across the country to support the quixotic efforts of a heretofore relative unknown in CT politics. Their efforts have helped narrow the gap in pre-primary polling to the point where there is a legitimate shot of the biggest upset in Connecticut politics since Lowell Weicker’s victory as an independent for Governor in 1990.

Now with the Lieberman petition announcement, Lamont supporters are having kittens over the “disloyalty” of the Senator’s actions. They feel that the loser should pledge full support for the winner after August 8. Lamont has run radio ads saying he would do so should Lieberman win. But nobody should be surprised by Joe’s actions. This just another instance of opportunism that has been a hallmark of Lieberman’s career since his first campaign for the Senate in the late 1980s when he ran with the support of such “Democrats” as William Buckley.

But what about Ned? Why should he stick to his pledge to support Lieberman if he is the Dem nominee? If Joe won’t support him then why should he support Joe? If the main issue of his campaign is the end of the Iraq war then he should announce that he will petition as well. He can use the same line as Lieberman: “I want the opportunity to put my case before all the people of Connecticut in November.”

It appears as of now that Lamont will put all his eggs in the primary basket. Should he lose then he will be a good Democratic lemming and march along with the pro-war Lieberman “for the good of the party”. What hogwash!

If Lieberman wins the primary then Lamont should immediately pledge his support for a true anti-war campaign, such as the Green Party’s Ralph Ferrucci. Lamont supporters would do well to do the same. It would show that there is a real debate on the Iraq war in Connecticut politics and in turn help foment a real debate in the country this campaign season.

Vincent Maruffi lives in Middletown, Connecticut. He can be reached at: vmaruffi@sbcglobal.net

 

 

More articles by:
August 16, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
“Don’t Be Stupid, Be a Smarty”: Why Anti-Authoritarian Doctors Are So Rare
W. T. Whitney
New Facebook Alliance Endangers Access to News about Latin America
Sam Husseini
The Trump-Media Logrolling
Ramzy Baroud
Mission Accomplished: Why Solidarity Boats to Gaza Succeed Despite Failing to Break the Siege
Larry Atkins
Why Parkland Students, Not Trump, Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize
William Hartung
Donald Trump, Gunrunner for Hire
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Morality Tales in US Public Life?
Yves Engler
Will Trudeau Stand Up to Mohammad bin Salman?
Vijay Prashad
Samir Amin: Death of a Marxist
Binoy Kampmark
Boris Johnson and the Exploding Burka
Eric Toussaint
Nicaragua: The Evolution of the Government of President Daniel Ortega Since 2007 
Adolf Alzuphar
Days of Sagebrush, Nights of Jasmine in LA
Robert J. Burrowes
A Last Ditch Strategy to Fight for Human Survival
August 15, 2018
Jason Hirthler
Russiagate and the Men with Glass Eyes
Paul Street
Omarosa’s Book Tour vs. Forty More Murdered Yemeni Children
Charles Pierson
Is Bankruptcy in Your Future?
George Ochenski
The Absolute Futility of ‘Global Dominance’ in the 21st Century
Gary Olson
Are We Governed by Secondary Psychopaths
Fred Guerin
On News, Fake News and Donald Trump
Arshad Khan
A Rip Van Winkle President Sleeps as Proof of Man’s Hand in Climate Change Multiplies and Disasters Strike
P. Sainath
The Unsung Heroism of Hausabai
Georgina Downs
Landmark Glyphosate Cancer Ruling Sets a Precedent for All Those Affected by Crop Poisons
Rev. William Alberts
United We Kneel, Divided We Stand
Chris Gilbert
How to Reactivate Chavismo
Kim C. Domenico
A Coffeehouse Hallucination: The Anti-American Dream Dream
August 14, 2018
Daniel Falcone
On Taking on the Mobilized Capitalist Class in Elections: an Interview With Noam Chomsky
Karl Grossman
Turning Space Into a War Zone
Jonah Raskin
“Fuck Wine Grapes, Fuck Wines”: the Coming Napafication of the World
Manuel García, Jr.
Climate Change Bites Big Business
Alberto Zuppi - Cesar Chelala
Argentina at a Crossroads
Chris Wright
On “Bullshit Jobs”
Rosita A. Sweetman
Dear Jorge: On the Pope’s Visit to Ireland
Binoy Kampmark
Authoritarian Revocations: Australia, Terrorism and Citizenship
Sara Johnson
The Incredible Benefits of Sagebrush and Juniper in the West
Martin Billheimer
White & Red Aunts, Capital Gains and Anarchy
Walter Clemens
Enough Already! Donald J. Trump Resignation Speech
August 13, 2018
Michael Colby
Migrant Injustice: Ben & Jerry’s Farmworker Exploitation
John Davis
California: Waging War on Wildfire
Alex Strauss
Chasing Shadows: Socialism Won’t Go Away Because It is Capitalism’s Antithesis 
Kathy Kelly
U.S. is Complicit in Child Slaughter in Yemen
Fran Shor
The Distemper of White Spite
Chad Hanson
We Know How to Protect Homes From Wildfires. Logging Isn’t the Way to Do It
Faisal Khan
Nawaz Sharif: Has Pakistan’s Houdini Finally Met his End?
Binoy Kampmark
Trump Versus Journalism: the Travails of Fourth Estate
Wim Laven
Honestly Looking at Family Values
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail