Why Won’t Moveon.Org Oppose the Bombing of Iran?
John Ross
A Real Day Without Mexicans?
April 15 / 16, 2006
Jeffrey St. Clair
How Star Wars Came to the Arctic
Ralph Nader
Remembering Rev. William Sloan Coffin
Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The Ghost of Shinseki: the General Who Was Sent Out to Pasture for Being Right
Kevin Prosen / Dave Zirin
Privilege Meets Protest at Duke
Thomas P. Healy
Taking Care of What We’ve Been Given: a Conversation with Wendell Berry
Kristoffer Larsson
Are 40 Percent of All Swedes Anti-Semitic?: Anatomy of a Statistical Flim-Flam
Fred Gardner
Continuing Medical (Marijuana) Education
Edwin Krales
New York’s Katrina: the Hidden Toll of AIDS Among Blacks and the Poor
Brian Cloughley
Don’t Blitz Iran: Risking the Ultimate Blowback
John Holt
Walking Off Vietnam with Edward Abbey’s Surrogate Son
Seth Sandronsky
What Billionaires Mean By Education Reform: Oprah, Bill Gates and the Privatization of Public Schools
Rafael Renteria
Making It Plain About New Orleans
Michael Ortiz Hill
In the Ashes of Lament: an Easter Meditation
William A. Cook
An Israel Accountability Act
Gideon Levy
Shooting Nasarin: a Story About a Little Girl
Andrew Wimmer
Stopping the Bush Juggernaut: a New Citizens Campaign
Madis Senner
Talking Points for Easter Weekend: Jesus Didn’t Lie, Mr. Bush
Michael Kuehl
The Sex Police State: Women as “Rapists” and “Pedophiles”?
Mark Scaramella
When Even God Can’t Follow His Own Commandments: the Timeless Scarcasm of Mark Twain
Nate Mezmer
187 Proof: Living and Dying Hip-Hop
Jesse Walker
Playlist
Poets’ Basement
Engel, Laymon and Subiet
Website of the Weekend
Pink Serenades Bush
April 14, 2006
Col. Dan Smith
Candor or Career?: Why Few Top Military Officials Resign on Principle
Saul Landau
Ho Chi Minh City Moves On Without Regrets
Stan Cox
The Real Death Tax
Kevin Zeese
Hersh vs. Bush on Iran: Who Would You Believe?
Brian McKinlay
Bad Times for Bush’s Buddies
Howard Meyers
Dwarves, Knives and Freedom: Bush, Jr. is No LBJ
Ishmael Reed
The Colored Mind Doubles: How the Media Uses Blacks to Chastize Blacks
Website of the Day
Asshole: a Film Strip
April 13, 2006
CounterPunch News Service
Powell’s “Bitch”?
NORMAN SOLOMON
The Lobby and the Bulldozer
Stanley Heller
Time to Shake Up the Peace Movement
Jeff Birkenstein
Bush and Freedom of Speech
Evelyn J. Pringle
Not So Fast, Mr. Powell
Michael Donnelly
The Week the Bush Administration Fell Apart
Kamran Matin
Synergism of the Neo-Cons: What’s Going On In Iran?
Website of the Day
“Don’t Be Afraid of the Neo-Cons”
April 12, 2006
Vijay Prashad
Resisting Fences
Alan Maass
The Suicide of Anthony Soltero
Dave Lindorff
Bush’s Insane First Strike Policy: If You Don’t Want to Get Whacked, You’d Better Get Your Nation a Nuke … Fast
Ron Jacobs
Resistance: the Remedy for Fear
Ramzy Baroud
The Imminent Decline of the American Empire?
Randall Dodd
How a Wal-Mart Bank will Harm Consumers
Missy Comley Beattie
The Boy President Who Cried “Wolf!”
P. Sainath
The Corporate Hijack of India’s Water
Website of the Day
“The System is Irretrievably Corrupt”
April 11, 2006
Al Krebs
Corporate Agriculture’s Dirty Little Secret: Immigration and a History of Greed
Lawrence R. Velvel
The Gang That Couldn’t Leak Straight
Sonia Nettinin
Palestinian Health Care Conditions Under Israeli Occupation
Willliam S. Lind
The Fourth Plague Hits the Pentagon: Generals as Private Contractors
Robert Ovetz
Endangered Species in a Can: the Disappearance of Big Fish
Pratyush Chandra
Nepalis Say, “Ya Basta!”
Grant F. Smith
The Bush Administration’s Final Surprise?
Laray Polk
Loud, Soft, Hard, Quiet: Marching Through Dallas for Immigrant Rights
Francis Boyle
O’Reilly and the Law of the Jungle: How to Beat a Bully on His Home Turf
José Pertierra
A Glimpse into the Mindset of Terrorists: Posada Carriles, Orlando Bosch and the Downing of Cubana Flight 455
Website of the Day
The Dead Emcee Scrolls
April 10, 2006
Ralph Nader
Tinhorn Caesar and the Spineless Democrats
Heather Gray
Atlanta and the Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr.
Uri Avnery
The Big Wink
Joshua Frank
Big Greens and Beltway Politics: Betting on Losers
Seth Sandronsky
Immigration and Occupations
Michael Leonardi
The Italian Elections: “Reality is No Longer Important”
Evelyn Pringle
Did Bush Pull a Fast One on Fitzgerald?
Tom Kerr
FoxNews Does Ward Churchill
Lucinda Marshall
The Lynching of Cynthia McKinney
Website of the Day
Brown Berets
April 7 -9, 2006
Alexander Cockburn
If Only They’d Hissed Barack Obama
Jeffrey St. Clair
The Saga of Magnequench: Outsourcing US Missile Technology to China
Patrick Cockburn
The War Gets Grimmer Every Day
David Vest
The Rebuking and Scorning of Cynthia McKinney
Dave Lindorff
The Impeachment Clock Just Clicked Forward
Gary Leupp
“Ideologies of Hatred:” What Did Condi Mean?
Elaine Cassel
The Moussaoui Trial: What Kind of Justice is This?
Saul Landau
Vietnam Diary: Hue Without Rules
James Ridgeway
“This is Betty Ong Calling”: a Short Film
Ron Jacobs
Why Iran was Right to Refuse US Money
John Walsh
Kerry Advocates Iraqization: Too Little, Too Late
Ramzy Baroud
The US Attitude Toward Hamas: Disturbing Parallels with Nicaragua
Christopher Brauchli
Bush Finds Democracy Has Its Limits
Todd Chretien
What the Pentagon Budget Could Buy for America
Jonathan Scott
Javelins at the Head of the Monolith
John Bomar
What They’re Saying About Bush in Arkansas
Michele Brand
Iran, the US and the EU
Ronan Sheehan
Remember When the Irish First Met the Chinese?
Mickey Z.
Let Us Now Praise OIL
Don Monkerud
March of the Bunglers
Michael Dickinson
The Rich Young Man: a Miracle Play
Website of the Weekend
The Case Against Israel and Munich: Compare and Contrast
April 17 , 2006 The Wages of Consensus Why Won’t Moveon.org Oppose the Bombing of Iran?
By NORMAN SOLOMON
MoveOn.org sent out an email with the subject line “Don’t Nuke Iran” to three million people on April 12. “There is one place where all of us can agree: Americans don’t support a pre-emptive nuclear attack on Iran, and Congress must act to prevent the president from launching one before it’s too late,” the message said. And: “Please take a moment to add your name to our petition to stop a nuclear attack on Iran.”
The petition’s two sentences only convey opposition to a “nuclear” attack on Iran: “Congress and President Bush must rule out attacking Iran with nuclear weapons. Even the threat of a nuclear attack eliminates some of the best options we have for diplomacy, and the consequences could be catastrophic.”
In MoveOn’s mass email letter, the only reference to a non-nuclear attack on Iran came in a solitary sentence without any followup: “Even a conventional attack would likely be a disaster.”
“Likely” be a disaster? Is there any U.S. military attack on Iran that plausibly would not be a disaster?
There’s no way around the conclusion that the signers of the letter (“Eli, Joan, Nita, Marika and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team”) chose to avoid committing themselves — and avoid devoting MoveOn resources — to categorical opposition to bombing Iran.
* * * * *
In preparation for this article, I sent emails to each of the four signers of MoveOn’s “Don’t Nuke Iran” letter, asking them:
1) Why does the letter say nothing against a prospective non-nuclear attack on Iran other than comment that “a conventional attack would likely be a disaster”?
2) Why was the petition confined to opposing a “nuclear” attack on Iran rather than opposing any military attack on Iran?
3) Has MoveOn ever sent out a message to the three-million list taking a clear position against the U.S. attacking Iran (no matter what kind of weaponry would be used)?
4) If the answer to question #3 is “no,” why not?
A response came on April 13 from Eli Pariser, executive director of MoveOn. Here is his three-paragraph reply in its entirety:
“As you know, our focus is on bringing people together around points of consensus. We build our advocacy agenda through dialogue with our members. Since we haven’t done any work around Iran thus far, we saw the prospect of a nuclear attack as a good way to begin that conversation — something everyone can agree was nuts.
“As I mention in the [‘Don’t Nuke Iran’] email, a conventional attack poses many of the same risks as a nuclear one. But just as our Iraq campaign started with a position that attracted a broad membership — ‘Ask Tough Questions,’ in August 2002 — and then escalated, so we’re trying here to engage folks beyond the ‘peace’ community in a national discussion about the consequences of war.
“We wouldn’t have had the membership to be able to run ads calling for an Iraq exit today if we’d confined our Iraq campaign to the true believers from the very beginning.”
* * * * *
I believe that the MoveOn decision-makers who signed the “Don’t Nuke Iran” mass email are almost certainly aware that if they surveyed a cross-section of those commonly referred to as MoveOn members (people who are currently signed-up for MoveOn’s emails), the overwhelming majority would say that they’re opposed to an attack on Iran with any weapons — not just nuclear weapons.
Opposition to any bombing of Iran inherently includes opposition to bombing Iran with nuclear weapons. But vice versa is not the case. And so far it is (so to speak) precisely the ambiguity of confining the MoveOn position to “Don’t Nuke Iran” that MoveOn’s leadership has embraced.
As MoveOn’s mass email stated on April 12, “There is one place where all of us can agree: Americans don’t support a pre-emptive nuclear attack on Iran, and Congress must act to prevent the president from launching one before it’s too late.”
As Eli Pariser wrote to me the next day, “our focus is on bringing people together around points of consensus.”
This approach debases the role of consensus in progressive political organizing. It shouldn’t mean tailing the opinion polls or waving an organizational finger in the wind; nor should it mean taking cues from power brokers among congressional Democrats.
Nor should a progressive organization avoid taking historically imperative positions in real time because they might interfere with feeding cash cows a diet of lines that seem optimum for maximizing the flow of “the mother’s milk of politics” to pay for ads.
The voices in Congress denouncing the prospect of a military attack on Iran, period, are in short supply right now. Yet as it happens, according to a nationwide poll jointly released by Bloomberg and the Los Angeles Times on April 13, the current inclinations of people in the United States are about evenly divided: “Forty-eight percent said they would support military action against Iran if it continues to produce material that can be used to develop a nuclear bomb, down from 57 percent in January. Forty percent oppose military action, up from 33 percent in January.”
As long as MoveOn’s leaders (not to be confused with MoveOn’s email recipients) want to confine MoveOn to mobilizing against use of nuclear weaponry in an attack on Iran, they’re actually aiding a process that can dangerously reframe policy options — so that some kind of military attack on Iran becomes increasingly accepted while much of the debate shifts to arguments over whether use of nuclear weapons in the attack should be ruled out.
Of course the official scenarios for use of nuclear bombs are deranged and must be condemned. At the same time, in logical and practical terms, unequivocal opposition to bombing Iran signifies clear opposition to bombing Iran with nuclear weapons.
Will those who put out MoveOn’s email alerts and green light its advertising campaigns eventually use some of the group’s resources to promote opposition to any and all bombing of Iran? It’s probably a matter of time — but every day of holding back from engaging in solid unambiguous opposition to any military attack on Iran is a day lost that can never be regained.
The MoveOn apparatus is the largest single online mechanism for U.S. progressives to share information, present analysis and take action. But no one should wait for the people who control MoveOn’s mass email flow to come around. There are significant efforts underway to utilize the Internet as part of efforts to prevent any attack on Iran.
For example, as part of broader organizing campaigns, a coalition of groups has begun a Don’t Attack Iran petition. And TrueMajority is promoting an equally valuable Don’t Bomb Iran petition.
An April 14 letter from TrueMajority says: “Click here to send a message to top Democrats, including Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, insisting they speak out loudly, now, against any plans to bomb Iran.”
That’s a message that MoveOn.org hasn’t been willing to send.
NORMAN SOLOMON’s latest book is “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” A link to his recent public radio interview on agenda-building for an attack on Iran is posted at: www.WarMadeEasy.com
Now Available
from CounterPunch Books!
The Case Against Israel
By Michael Neumann
Click Here to Order Michael Neumann’s Devastating Rebuttal of Alan Dershowitz
Grand Theft Pentagon:
Tales of Greed and Profiteering in the War on Terror
by Jeffrey St. Clair