Making the World Safer…for Nukes


The Bush administration has dug itself–and all of us—into an incredible hole when it comes to Iran. It is also doing its level best to move the nuclear doomsday clock to midnight.

First we have our war-mongering president blustering scarcely veiled threats about possible military action against Iran and its nuclear facilities–threats which the Iranians know to be bluffs, given that they have spread out their facilities and hardened them underground, and given how overstretched the U.S. military already is in Iraq.

Then we have the threats to seek sanctions from the U.N.–an institution which the same Bush administration has consistently trashed, lied to, underfunded and ignored for five years–and to which we have now dispatched a tarnished ambassador whose open animosity and disdain for the international organization is well known.

Finally, we have the Iranians themselves, victims of decades of abuse, manipulation, destabilization and proxy warmaking–not to mention having one of its passenger jets blown out of the air–by the U.S. This is a country that, finally on its own independent feet, and feeling feisty thanks to a flood of petrodollars and petroeuros coming in at a rate of $62/barrel. This is not a nation that is likely to listen to any orders — or threats–emanating from Washington.

Whatever the flaws of the 1968 antiproliferation treaty, this administration in Washington has single-handedly destroyed the last hope of preventing the continued proliferation of nuclear weapons by establishing, and loudly promoting, the notion that America, as the world’s only “superpower,” has the right to unilaterally invade or attack any nation on the globe on whatever pretext it wants to trump up, not to mention by calling for the development and deployment of nuclear “bunker-busting” weapons designed for use on Third World battlefields. (Bush and his gang should watch the “Spiderman” movie, with its message: With great power comes great responsibility, not omnipotence)

Iran has watched as North Korea, with nuclear weapons already built, has thumbed its nose at the U.S. It has watched as Pakistan, which perhaps more than any other nation, has contributed to the growth and invincibility of Al Qaeda, but which also has nuclear weapons, has remained on friendly terms with the U.S, even receiving supersonic fighter-bombers capable of delivering its nuclear weapons. It has watched India, which also has the bomb, take delivery from the U.S. of bomb-capable fighter-bombers while steadily improving trade relations with America. And of course it has watched neighboring Iraq, which didn’t have the bomb, be invaded and torn apart by American military forces.

It has also, over the years, seen Grenada and Panama, Nicaragua and Haiti invaded, their governments overthrown and their leaders overthrown, killed or jailed at the hands of U.S. forces acting unilaterally or by proxy. It has seen an attempted coup in Venezuela with the clear fingerprints of U.S. direction. It has watched Cuba being strangled by a U.S. decades-long embargo–an act of war.

None of these victimized countries has the bomb, of course.

So tell me: If you were an Iranian government official-or even an ordinary Iraqi citizen-looking at all this, wouldn’t you want the bomb, too?

On its face, it appears clear that countries that have the bomb have little to fear from the U.S., while countries that don’t have it are in grave danger of being invaded, subverted, embargoed or in some other way threatened or bullied by America.

Given that the world is awash in nuclear material and given that most countries have or can hire scientists and technicians with the know-how to fashion it into bombs, current U.S. policy seems purely perverse. It is perfectly designed to promote the spread of nuclear weapons, and not surprisingly that is precisely what is happening.

If things don’t change, and quickly, I predict we’ll soon see a nuclear-armed Middle East, Far East, and Latin America. Even Africa, with its more limited resources, may not be far behind. Certainly Egypt, South Africa and Nigeria have the technical wherewithal and the resources to develop or buy a bomb. And of course, besides the almost inevitable regional nuclear wars that would then occur, the more nukes there are out there, the more likely one will fall into the hands of some group, or even some aggrieved small nation, that will decide to ship one to a U.S. port and detonate it to make a point.

Think about this the next time our Commander in Chief talks about how he’s making America safer.

DAVE LINDORFF is the author of Killing Time: an Investigation into the Death Row Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal. His new book of CounterPunch columns titled “This Can’t be Happening!” is published by Common Courage Press. Information about both books and other work by Lindorff can be found at www.thiscantbehappening.net.

He can be reached at: dlindorff@yahoo.com


















More articles by:

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of ThisCantBeHappening!, an online newspaper collective, and is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).

Weekend Edition
January 24, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
A Letter From Iowa
Jim Kavanagh
Aftermath: The Iran War After the Soleimani Assassination
Jeffrey St. Clair
The Camp by the Lake
Chuck Churchill
The Long History of Elite Rule: What Will It Take To End It?
Robert Hunziker
A Climate Time Bomb With Trump’s Name Inscribed
Andrew Levine
Trump: The King
James Graham
From Paris, With Tear Gas…
Rob Urie
Why the Primaries Matter
Dan Bacher
Will the Extinction of Delta Smelt Be Governor Gavin Newsom’s Environmental Legacy?
Ramzy Baroud
In the Name of “Israel’s Security”: Retreating US Gives Israel Billions More in Military Funding
Vijay Prashad
What the Right Wing in Latin America Means by Democracy Is Violence
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Biden’s Shameful Foreign Policy Record Extends Well Beyond Iraq
Louis Proyect
Isabel dos Santos and Africa’s Lumpen-Bourgeoisie
Nick Pemberton
AK-46: The Case Against Amy Klobuchar
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Promtheus’ Fire: Climate Change in the Time of Willful Ignorance
Linn Washington Jr.
Waiting for Justice in New Jersey
Ralph Nader
Pelosi’s Choice: Enough for Trump’s Impeachment but not going All Out for Removal
Ted Rall
If This is a Democracy, Why Don’t We Vote for the Vice President Too?
Mike Garrity – Jason Christensen
Don’t Kill 72 Grizzly Bears So Cattle Can Graze on Public Lands
Joseph Natoli
Who’s Speaking?
Kavaljit Singh
The US-China Trade Deal is Mostly Symbolic
Cesar Chelala
The Coronavirus Serious Public Health Threat in China
Nino Pagliccia
Venezuela Must Remain Vigilant and on Guard Against US Hybrid Warfare
Robert Fantina
Impeachment as a Distraction
Courtney Bourgoin
What We Lose When We Lose Wildlife
Mark Ashwill
Why Constructive Criticism of the US is Not Anti-American
Daniel Warner
Charlie Chaplin and Truly Modern Times
Manuel Perez-Rocha
How NAFTA 2.0 Boosts Fossil Fuel Polluters, Particularly in Mexico
Dean Baker
What Minimum Wage Would Be If It Kept Pace With Productivity
Mel Gurtov
India’s Failed Democracy
Thomas Knapp
US v. Sineneng-Smith: Does Immigration Law Trump Free Speech?
Winslow Myers
Turning Point: The new documentary “Coup 53”
Jeff Mackler
U.S. vs. Iran: Which Side are You On?
Sam Pizzigati
Braggadocio in the White House, Carcinogens in Our Neighborhoods
Christopher Brauchli
The Company Trump Keeps
Julian Vigo
Why Student Debt is a Human Rights Issue
Ramzy Baroud
These Chains Will Be Broken
Chris Wright
A Modest Proposal for Socialist Revolution
Thomas Barker
The Slow Death of European Social Democracy: How Corbynism Bucked the Trend
Nicky Reid
It’s Time to Bring the War Home Again
Michelle Valadez
Amy Klobuchar isn’t Green
David Swanson
CNN Poll: Sanders Is The Most Electable
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Our Dire Need for “Creative Extremists”—MLK’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”
Robert Koehler
FBI, King and the Tremors of History
Jill Richardson
‘Little Women’ and the American Attitude Toward Poverty