FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Will Greens Abandon IRV?

by DON FITZ

 

The Blob is coming. That amorphous ever-changing thing that swallows up whatever tries to live on its own is coming after Greens. But waitlookis it really the Blob? Or is it the Democratic Party?

The Green warrior waves his weapon to slay the hideous slime-creature. On it is scratched “IRV.” Is the Green dropping the weapon? The 2004 election says, “Yes.”

The demand for Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) has been a key element in building the Green Party as an inde-pendent political force. If there is an actual or de facto abandonment of IRV, entry of Greens into the Democratic Party is only a matter of time. IRV means that voters get to rank order their preferences. In the 2000 election, people often explained that with IRV, they could rank Ralph Nader first, Al Gore second and whoever third. If Nader was not one of the final contestants, their vote would transfer to their second choice, Gore.

Between 2000 and 2004 the Democratic Party let out a non-stop whine that the Greens had “spoiled” the election. One of the rarest answers that Greens gave to this attack was that if the Democrats would work to im-plement IRV, they would have nothing to fear in future elections. Of course, with a few exceptions, Democrats have no interest in implementing IRV. Many are well aware that IF Ralph Nader were allowed in presidential debates and IF there were IRV, Nader would win a huge number of votes, perhaps even more than the Democrat.

Democrats would rather lose races to Republicans than give the Green Party the chance to replace it. This is what Greens should have been saying. Instead, a large portion of Green leaders caved in to the Democrats and echoed the argument that their major goal should be preventing the election of Republicans.

In the middle to late 1990s, many Greens used to say that they hoped that they would spoil elections because this would be the only way to push Democrats into working for IRV. After 2000, this argument was noticeable by its absence. It was replaced by a Pollyannaish fantasy that if the Greens would be nice to Democrats then Democrats would support IRV. As if Democratic bosses wanted to do anything to the Green Party other than ex-terminate it.

The election of 2004 set the precedent: if polls predict a close race for president, the Greens should bow out. This logic means that if Greens predict that a state-wide race for Governor or Senator might be a toss-up, they should not run a candidate, no matter how awful the Democrat is. And the same logic keeps Greens out of tight local races. It means that Greens should focus on races where their participation will not hurt a Democrat or run in races where candidates do not declare their party. In other words, other than those highly exceptional locations (such as San Francisco) where Greens can win, they should expend the greatest energy when they are the most irrelevant.

If the Green Party accepts that it should not run a candidate when the Democratic Party shrieks at it, what is it to do? One option is fusion, which means a party can nominate the candidate of another party and the candidate appears on the ballots of two parties. Greens could pretend to be an independent party functioning as an append-age of the corporate Democratic Party.

If this happens, some Green newcomer who does not carry the baggage of rationalizing political twists and turns is likely to ask, “If we only run candidates when the Democratic Party tells us we can, if we nominate the same candidates as the Democrats, and if we work for Democratic candidates we don’t nominate, why don’t we admit that we are Democrats?” The “safe states” emperor can fuss and fume about “Green values,” but his nakedness is exposed.

Many Greens-for-Kerry are falling into the same Democratic Party black hole that co-opted US progressives since before their grandfathers were born. They may claim to be Green for a few years (or a few weeks), but either they or their successors will not be satisfied with their pragmatic mug yearning for votes as a Democrat while their wump is still dragging the Green Party down.

If Greens are going to build a genuine political alternative they will have to rediscover IRV. They will have to loudly proclaim that the Democratic Party is costing itself elections by denying voters the right to rank order candidates. Otherwise…

What do two Greens say to each other as they start to disappear? “See you inside the Blob.”

DON FITZ was Coordinator of the 2000 Eastern Missouri Campaign for Ralph Nader and is editor of Synthe-sis/Regeneration: A Magazine of Green Social Thought. He can be reached at: fitzdon@aol.com

 

More articles by:

Don Fitz is editor of Green Social Thought: A Magazine of Synthesis and Regeneration and produces Green Time TV in St. Louis, Missouri.

February 19, 2018
Rob Urie
Mueller, Russia and Oil Politics
Richard Moser
Mueller the Politician
Robert Hunziker
There Is No Time Left
Nino Pagliccia
Venezuela Decides to Hold Presidential Elections, the Opposition Chooses to Boycott Democracy
Daniel Warner
Parkland Florida: Revisiting Michael Fields
Sheldon Richman
‘Peace Through Strength’ is a Racket
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Taking on the Pentagon
Patrick Cockburn
People Care More About the OXFAM Scandal Than the Cholera Epidemic
Ted Rall
On Gun Violence and Control, a Political Gordian Knot
Binoy Kampmark
Making Mugs of Voters: Mueller’s Russia Indictments
Dave Lindorff
Mass Killers Abetted by Nutjobs
Myles Hoenig
A Response to David Axelrod
Colin Todhunter
The Royal Society and the GMO-Agrochemical Sector
Cesar Chelala
A Student’s Message to Politicians about the Florida Massacre
Weekend Edition
February 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
American Carnage
Paul Street
Michael Wolff, Class Rule, and the Madness of King Don
Andrew Levine
Had Hillary Won: What Now?
David Rosen
Donald Trump’s Pathetic Sex Life
Susan Roberts
Are Modern Cities Sustainable?
Joyce Nelson
Canada vs. Venezuela: Have the Koch Brothers Captured Canada’s Left?
Geoff Dutton
America Loves Islamic Terrorists (Abroad): ISIS as Proxy US Mercenaries
Mike Whitney
The Obnoxious Pence Shows Why Korea Must End US Occupation
Joseph Natoli
In the Post-Truth Classroom
John Eskow
One More Slaughter, One More Piece of Evidence: Racism is a Terminal Mental Disease
John W. Whitehead
War Spending Will Bankrupt America
Robert Fantina
Guns, Violence and the United States
Dave Lindorff
Trump’s Latest Insulting Proposal: Converting SNAP into a Canned Goods Distribution Program
Robert Hunziker
Global Warming Zaps Oxygen
John Laforge
$1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and “Fake” Cleanups
CJ Hopkins
The War on Dissent: the Specter of Divisiveness
Peter A. Coclanis
Chipotle Bell
Anders Sandström – Joona-Hermanni Mäkinen
Ways Forward for the Left
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Winning Hearts and Minds
Tommy Raskin
Syrian Quicksand
Martha Rosenberg
Big Pharma Still Tries to Push Dangerous Drug Class
Jill Richardson
The Attorney General Thinks Aspirin Helps Severe Pain – He’s Wrong
Mike Miller
Herb March: a Legend Deserved
Ann Garrison
If the Democrats Were Decent
Renee Parsons
The Times, They are a-Changing
Howard Gregory
The Democrats Must Campaign to End Trickle-Down Economics
Sean Keller
Agriculture and Autonomy in the Middle East
Ron Jacobs
Re-Visiting Gonzo
Eileen Appelbaum
Rapid Job Growth, More Education Fail to Translate into Higher Wages for Health Care Workers
Ralph Nader
Shernoff, Bidart, and Echeverria—Wide-Ranging Lawyers for the People
Chris Zinda
The Meaning of Virginia Park
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail