FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Guzman’s Fist

He hadn’t appeared in public in 12 years, this former professor and university provost, Marxist philosopher specializing in the thought of Kant, and Chairman of the Communist Party of Peru (PCP, popularly known as Sendero Luminoso or “the Shining Path”). From 1980 he had led what became the most powerful communist insurgency in the Western Hemisphere. By the time of his capture in 1992, U.S. intelligence analysts estimated that up to one-half of Peru was more in the hands of the Senderistas, fighting their Maoist People’s War, than those of the Peruvian state. He was regarded by his followers as the “Fourth Sword” of Marxism, and by his foes and the mainstream press almost everywhere as a “terrorist” responsible for all 70,000 deaths in a long civil conflict. Abimael Guzman (aka Presidente Gonzalo) met the press and the people in a Lima courtroom November 5.

It was reminiscent of a scene in September 1992. The Peruvian security apparatus with assistance from the U.S. had nabbed Guzman and nine others in a safe house in Lima belonging to one of the country’s most talented ballerinas, a party supporter. Computer disks in the home quickly led to the seizure of half the members of the party’s Central Committee. Within days Guzman, dressed in prison stripes and confined in a small cage, was paraded before Peruvian and international journalists in an effort to humiliate him. He responded with a fiery spontaneous lecture urging Peruvians to open their eyes and understand their history of humiliations. “We are here in these circumstances,” declared, referring to the calculated spectacle even as he transformed it. “Some think this is a great defeat. They are dreaming and we tell them to keep on dreaming! It is simply a bend, nothing more, a bend in the road. The road is long and we shall arrive. We shall triumph. You shall see it. You shall see it.” That was the last time he spoke in public.

At this time, the Peruvian government was headed by President Alberto Fujimori and his top advisor, long-time CIA operative Vladimiro Montesinos. After contemplating an informal execution of Guzman, they placed him on trial before a secret military court. All the judges were masked. Found guilty of all charges, Guzman was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole, removed to a specially-built prison on an island naval base, confined to a tiny concrete bunker, and denied any access to family members, physicians, lawyers and journalists. His defense attorney himself was convicted of “abetting terrorism” and imprisoned. In October 1993 Fujimori claimed that his captive had written letters calling for peace negotiations and was giving up the goal of acquiring power through People’s War. Some PCP supporters accepted this as fact; others condemned Fujimori’s allegations as lies. The reconstituted Central Committee of the party condemned the letters as “a sinister and perverse hoax.” Guzman himself, kept entirely from public view, has been unable to speak directly.

Fujimori was discredited by scandals in 2000, and forced to flee into exile in his ancestral homeland of Japan. (He is charged with various crimes in Peru, but escapes extradition, protected by Tokyo, which once took great pride in the first ethnic Japanese head of state of a foreign nation, through the technicality of his dual national status. Having lost any usefulness to the U.S. government, he is also barred from entry into this country.) Montesinos, brought down by a bribery scandal, is in prison in Peru, awaiting trial on charges ranging from drug-trafficking to murder. The government of Alejandro Toledo, who succeeded Fujimori as president, initially enjoying some popularity but now generally despised, tossed out much of the anti-terrorism legislation as unconstitutional. The PCP prisoners must now be retried under a new special tribunal.

Sixteen top leaders gradually arrived in the courtroom last Friday, taking their seats. Guzman was last, dressed in a dark jacket and open-necked white shirt, looking relaxed and fit at 69. Noting the presence of reporters, he smiled their way, briefly lifting his fist before taking his place among the others. Each defendant in turn was asked by the presiding judge to make a statement. Most asked for more time to meet with lawyers. Finally it was Guzman’s turn. His lawyer had already indicated that he would refuse to speak in order to challenge the illegality of “unconstitutional ‘anti-terror’ legislation,” the “draconian penalties,” and the “special tribunal” itself. After a whispered exchange with party leader Elena Iparraguirre, sitting next to him, he and she stood up, turned their backs on the judge, faced the cameras, and shouted “Long live the Communist Party of Peru! Glory to the party of Leninism, Maoism! Glory to Marxism!” The court was quickly adjourned and the press removed. Toledo went on television to denounce the “shameful spectacle,” and announced that a new judge would be appointed to the case. No cameras will be allowed when the trials resume this Friday.

The mainstream press has given relatively little attention to this episode, treating Guzman as an anomaly: a radical academic who inaugurated a “terrorist” guerrilla war in 1980, which soon fizzled out with his apprehension. The press treats the fate of the PCP since his capture as one of inexorable decline, although Senderistas in northern Peru were still able to briefly seize control of several villages in the north on the day of the court proceeding, and still in hundreds if not thousands pose a challenge to the state. The question is: how will this new trial, and the limited ability it might confer on Guzman to publicly express himself, affect the movement’s progress?

Arguably the movement has progressed in the interval halfway around the world: to Nepal, where the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) and its People Liberation Army have now come further towards the seizure of state power than had the Senderistas in Peru as of 1992. “The real fruit of their battles lies,” wrote Marx, referring to the workers’ movement in 1848, “not in the immediate result, but in the ever expanding union of the workers.” These two movements, the one much diminished, the other ascendant, are united by a common assessment of the history of the communist movement and understanding of events in China in the 1960s and 70s. The Nepali Maoists acknowledge they have learned much from the Peruvian comrades; they speak of revolution “from the Andes to the Himalayas.” Both movements see Maoism as a stage in the evolution of Marxism as significant as Leninism became after the October Revolution in Russia; thus they describe their ideology as “Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.” So do quite a number of revolutionary movements throughout the world, most significantly, maybe, in Nepal, India, and the Philippines. In those countries more than most, Guzman’s fist in the air and his defiant courtroom voice may resonate.

GARY LEUPP is Professor of History at Tufts University, and Adjunct Professor of Comparative Religion. He is the author of Servants, Shophands and Laborers in in the Cities of Tokugawa Japan; Male Colors: The Construction of Homosexuality in Tokugawa Japan; and Interracial Intimacy in Japan: Western Men and Japanese Women, 1543-1900. He is also a contributor to CounterPunch’s merciless chronicle of the wars on Iraq, Afghanistan and Yugoslavia, Imperial Crusades.

He can be reached at: gleupp@granite.tufts.edu

 

 

More articles by:

Gary Leupp is Professor of History at Tufts University, and holds a secondary appointment in the Department of Religion. He is the author of Servants, Shophands and Laborers in in the Cities of Tokugawa JapanMale Colors: The Construction of Homosexuality in Tokugawa Japan; and Interracial Intimacy in Japan: Western Men and Japanese Women, 1543-1900. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, (AK Press). He can be reached at: gleupp@tufts.edu

Weekend Edition
June 22, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Karl Grossman
Star Wars Redux: Trump’s Space Force
Andrew Levine
Strange Bedfellows
Jeffrey St. Clair
Intolerable Opinions in an Intolerant Time
Paul Street
None of Us are Free, One of Us is Chained
Edward Curtin
Slow Suicide and the Abandonment of the World
Celina Stien-della Croce
The ‘Soft Coup’ and the Attack on the Brazilian People 
James Bovard
Pro-War Media Deserve Slamming, Not Sainthood
Louisa Willcox
My Friend Margot Kidder: Sharing a Love of Dogs, the Wild, and Speaking Truth to Power
David Rosen
Trump’s War on Sex
Mir Alikhan
Trump, North Korea, and the Death of IR Theory
Christopher Jones
Neoliberalism, Pipelines, and Canadian Political Economy
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Why is Tariq Ramadan Imprisoned?
Robert Fantina
MAGA, Trump Style
Linn Washington Jr.
Justice System Abuses Mothers with No Apologies
Martha Rosenberg
Questions About a Popular Antibiotic Class
Ida Audeh
A Watershed Moment in Palestinian History: Interview with Jamal Juma’
Edward Hunt
The Afghan War is Killing More People Than Ever
Geoff Dutton
Electrocuting Oral Tradition
Don Fitz
When Cuban Polyclinics Were Born
Ramzy Baroud
End the Wars to Halt the Refugee Crisis
Ralph Nader
The Unsurpassed Power trip by an Insuperable Control Freak
Lara Merling
The Pain of Puerto Ricans is a Profit Source for Creditors
James Jordan
Struggle and Defiance at Colombia’s Feast of Pestilence
Tamara Pearson
Indifference to a Hellish World
Kathy Kelly
Hungering for Nuclear Disarmament
Jessicah Pierre
Celebrating the End of Slavery, With One Big Asterisk
Rohullah Naderi
The Ever-Shrinking Space for Hazara Ethnic Group
Binoy Kampmark
Leaving the UN Human Rights Council
Nomi Prins 
How Trump’s Trade Wars Could Lead to a Great Depression
Robert Fisk
Can Former Lebanese MP Mustafa Alloush Turn Even the Coldest of Middle Eastern Sceptics into an Optimist?
Franklin Lamb
Could “Tough Love” Salvage Lebanon?
George Ochenski
Why Wild Horse Island is Still Wild
Ann Garrison
Nikki Haley: Damn the UNHRC and the Rest of You Too
Jonah Raskin
What’s Hippie Food? A Culinary Quest for the Real Deal
Raouf Halaby
Give It Up, Ya Mahmoud
Brian Wakamo
We Subsidize the Wrong Kind of Agriculture
Patrick Higgins
Children in Cages Create Glimmers of the Moral Reserve
Patrick Bobilin
What Does Optimism Look Like Now?
Don Qaswa
A Reduction of Economic Warfare and Bombing Might Help 
Robin Carver
Why We Still Need Pride Parades
Jill Richardson
Immigrant Kids are Suffering From Trauma That Will Last for Years
Thomas Mountain
USA’s “Soft” Coup in Ethiopia?
Jim Hightower
Big Oil’s Man in Foreign Policy
Louis Proyect
Civilization and Its Absence
David Yearsley
Midsummer Music Even the Nazis Couldn’t Stamp Out
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail