The Harm of Too Much Secrecy

In 1997, former FBI Director Louis Freeh called the FBI “potentially the most dangerous agency in the country” if it is “not scrutinized carefully.” Freeh also called for more congressional oversight.

His warning is prescient. The jury is still out on how post-9/11 developments such as the Patriot Act and secret detentions of American citizens have affected civil liberties and the government’s ability to fight terrorism. However, decades of experience have already shown that abuses and incompetence fester under a blanket of excessive government secrecy.

Like Oedipus, Congress is gouging out its own eyes rendering itself blind. The intelligence reorganization being contemplated by Congress has aspects that could eviscerate public and legislative access to information. This would frustrate oversight – maiming the ability of Congress and the public to improve intelligence when needed – and open the door to abuse.

Pending intelligence reorganization bills would expand the umbrella of a troublesome exemption to the landmark Freedom of Information Act. The language in this new legislation transfers the CIA director’s statutory duty to protect CIA “sources and methods” to the national intelligence director – who will have power over all intelligence agencies. And thus, this exemption – which currently applies only to the CIA – may be applied across the entire intelligence community in one fell swoop.

Secrecy is sometimes necessary, but this blanket development is not. FOIA already contains exemptions to disclosure that intelligence agencies may use to protect legitimate national security secrets. However, proposed expansion of the intelligence “sources and methods” exemption is especially troublesome.

Why? Because intelligence “sources and methods” are interpreted to mean whatever the CIA director says they are. There is not much room for judicial review of these requests for information from the CIA. It is questionable whether the CIA should have such unrestrained power since it is prone to abuse. It is another and even more egregious matter to allow it to expand across a vast swath of the federal bureaucracy.

Unlike the foreign-oriented CIA, many of the other agencies within the intelligence community affect the civil liberties and rights of Americans. For example, domestic agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI would be placed under the authority of the national intelligence director and thus subject to the expanded FOIA exemption.

Many of these domestic enforcement agencies have been plagued by embarrassing blunders and failures in recent years, underscoring the need for strengthened rather than weakened oversight and transparency. For example, a Senate Judiciary Report in 2002 stated, “The FBI’s critical and growing responsibilities make it all the more necessary to confront the serious weaknesses in the bureau’s management and operations that have come to light in recent years (referring to mistakes from Waco to Wen Ho Lee).”

The intelligence reorganization effort was sparked by the release of the 9/11 Commission Report and by the concerns of 9/11 victim families. The 9/11 Report includes some discussion which should guide policy-makers regarding the relationship between secrecy, disclosure, congressional oversight and the effectiveness of the intelligence community.

According to the report, the Cold War culture of secrecy that still pervades the federal government has impaired the nation’s ability to effectively fight terrorism. Officials such as Colin Powell have said the same.

Though not explicitly a recommendation, the report notes that secrecy should be reduced as much as responsibly possible to allow the Congress, the media and the public to provide oversight:

“Secrecy, while necessary, can also harm oversight. The (congressional) intelligence committees cannot take advantage of democracy’s best oversight mechanism: public disclosure. This makes them significantly different from other congressional oversight committees, which are often spurred into action by the work of investigative journalists and watchdog organizations.”

Ironically, intelligence legislation being considered in the name of the 9/11 Commission Report would lead to a massive rollback in FOIA and a harmful increase in secrecy. However, unlike the tale of Oedipus, intelligence reform does not have to end in tragedy. Congress still has time to correct the mistake.

NICK SCHWELLENBACH is a fellow at the Project On Government Oversight, a watchdog group that promotes open and accountable government.


More articles by:
June 20, 2018
Henry Giroux
Trump’s War on Children is an act of State Terrorism
Bill Hackwell
Unprecedented Cruelty Against Immigrants and Their Children
Paul Atwood
“What? You Think We’re So Innocent?”
Nicola Perugini
The Palestinian Tipping Point
K.J. Noh
Destiny and Daring: South Korean President Moon Jae-In’s Impossible Journey Towards Peace
Gary Leupp
Jeff Sessions and St. Paul’s Clear and Wise Commands
M. G. Piety
On Speaking Small Truths to Power
Dave Lindorff
Some Straight Talk for Younger People on Social Security (and Medicare too)
George Wuerthner
The Public Value of Forests as Carbon Reserves
CJ Hopkins
Confession of a Putin-Nazi Denialist
David Schultz
Less Than Fundamental:  the Myth of Voting Rights in America
Rohullah Naderi
The West’s Over-Publicized Development Achievements in Afghanistan 
Dan Bacher
California Lacks Real Marine Protection as Offshore Drilling Expands in State Waters
Lori Hanson – Miguel Gomez
The Students of Nicaragua’s April Uprising
Russell Mokhiber
Are Corporations Behind Frivolous Lawsuits Against Corporations?
Michael Welton
Infusing Civil Society With Hope for a Better World
June 19, 2018
Ann Robertson - Bill Leumer
We Can Thank Top Union Officials for Trump
Lawrence Davidson
The Republican Party Falls Apart, the Democrats Get Stuck
Sheldon Richman
Trump, North Korea, and Iran
Richard Rubenstein
Trump the (Shakespearean) Fool: a New Look at the Dynamics of Trumpism
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Protect Immigrant Rights; End the Crises That Drive Migration
Gary Leupp
Norway: Just Withdraw From NATO
Kristine Mattis
Nerd Culture, Adultolescence, and the Abdication of Social Priorities
Mike Garrity
The Forest Service Should Not be Above the Law
Colin Todhunter
Pro-GMO Activism And Smears Masquerade As Journalism: From Seralini To Jairam Ramesh, Aruna Rodrigues Puts The Record Straight
Doug Rawlings
Does the Burns/Novick Vietnam Documentary Deserve an Emmy?
Kenneth Surin
2018 Electioneering in Appalachian Virginia
Nino Pagliccia
Chrystia Freeland Fails to See the Emerging Multipolar World
John Forte
Stuart Hall and Us
June 18, 2018
Paul Street
Denuclearize the United States? An Unthinkable Thought
John Pilger
Bring Julian Assange Home
Conn Hallinan
The Spanish Labyrinth
Patrick Cockburn
Attacking Hodeidah is a Deliberate Act of Cruelty by the Trump Administration
Gary Leupp
Trump Gives Bibi Whatever He Wants
Thomas Knapp
Child Abductions: A Conversation It’s Hard to Believe We’re Even Having
Robert Fisk
I Spoke to Palestinians Who Still Hold the Keys to Homes They Fled Decades Ago – Many are Still Determined to Return
Steve Early
Requiem for a Steelworker: Mon Valley Memories of Oil Can Eddie
Jim Scheff
Protect Our National Forests From an Increase in Logging
Adam Parsons
Reclaiming the UN’s Radical Vision of Global Economic Justice
Dean Baker
Manufacturing Production Falls in May and No One Notices
Laura Flanders
Bottom-Up Wins in Virginia’s Primaries
Binoy Kampmark
The Anguish for Lost Buildings: Embers and Death at the Victoria Park Hotel
Weekend Edition
June 15, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Dan Kovalik
The US & Nicaragua: a Case Study in Historical Amnesia & Blindness
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Yellow Journalism and the New Cold War
Charles Pierson
The Day the US Became an Empire