FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Harm of Too Much Secrecy

In 1997, former FBI Director Louis Freeh called the FBI “potentially the most dangerous agency in the country” if it is “not scrutinized carefully.” Freeh also called for more congressional oversight.

His warning is prescient. The jury is still out on how post-9/11 developments such as the Patriot Act and secret detentions of American citizens have affected civil liberties and the government’s ability to fight terrorism. However, decades of experience have already shown that abuses and incompetence fester under a blanket of excessive government secrecy.

Like Oedipus, Congress is gouging out its own eyes rendering itself blind. The intelligence reorganization being contemplated by Congress has aspects that could eviscerate public and legislative access to information. This would frustrate oversight – maiming the ability of Congress and the public to improve intelligence when needed – and open the door to abuse.

Pending intelligence reorganization bills would expand the umbrella of a troublesome exemption to the landmark Freedom of Information Act. The language in this new legislation transfers the CIA director’s statutory duty to protect CIA “sources and methods” to the national intelligence director – who will have power over all intelligence agencies. And thus, this exemption – which currently applies only to the CIA – may be applied across the entire intelligence community in one fell swoop.

Secrecy is sometimes necessary, but this blanket development is not. FOIA already contains exemptions to disclosure that intelligence agencies may use to protect legitimate national security secrets. However, proposed expansion of the intelligence “sources and methods” exemption is especially troublesome.

Why? Because intelligence “sources and methods” are interpreted to mean whatever the CIA director says they are. There is not much room for judicial review of these requests for information from the CIA. It is questionable whether the CIA should have such unrestrained power since it is prone to abuse. It is another and even more egregious matter to allow it to expand across a vast swath of the federal bureaucracy.

Unlike the foreign-oriented CIA, many of the other agencies within the intelligence community affect the civil liberties and rights of Americans. For example, domestic agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI would be placed under the authority of the national intelligence director and thus subject to the expanded FOIA exemption.

Many of these domestic enforcement agencies have been plagued by embarrassing blunders and failures in recent years, underscoring the need for strengthened rather than weakened oversight and transparency. For example, a Senate Judiciary Report in 2002 stated, “The FBI’s critical and growing responsibilities make it all the more necessary to confront the serious weaknesses in the bureau’s management and operations that have come to light in recent years (referring to mistakes from Waco to Wen Ho Lee).”

The intelligence reorganization effort was sparked by the release of the 9/11 Commission Report and by the concerns of 9/11 victim families. The 9/11 Report includes some discussion which should guide policy-makers regarding the relationship between secrecy, disclosure, congressional oversight and the effectiveness of the intelligence community.

According to the report, the Cold War culture of secrecy that still pervades the federal government has impaired the nation’s ability to effectively fight terrorism. Officials such as Colin Powell have said the same.

Though not explicitly a recommendation, the report notes that secrecy should be reduced as much as responsibly possible to allow the Congress, the media and the public to provide oversight:

“Secrecy, while necessary, can also harm oversight. The (congressional) intelligence committees cannot take advantage of democracy’s best oversight mechanism: public disclosure. This makes them significantly different from other congressional oversight committees, which are often spurred into action by the work of investigative journalists and watchdog organizations.”

Ironically, intelligence legislation being considered in the name of the 9/11 Commission Report would lead to a massive rollback in FOIA and a harmful increase in secrecy. However, unlike the tale of Oedipus, intelligence reform does not have to end in tragedy. Congress still has time to correct the mistake.

NICK SCHWELLENBACH is a fellow at the Project On Government Oversight, a watchdog group that promotes open and accountable government.

 

More articles by:
September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savior
Mairead Maguire
Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era
Dean Baker
The Bank Bailout of 2008 was Unnecessary
Wim Laven
Hurricane Trump, Season 2
Yves Engler
Smearing Dimitri Lascaris
Ron Jacobs
From ROTC to Revolution and Beyond
Clark T. Scott
The Cannibals of Horsepower
Binoy Kampmark
A Traditional Right: Jimmie Åkesson and the Sweden Democrats
Laura Flanders
History Markers
Weekend Edition
September 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Carl Boggs
Obama’s Imperial Presidency
Joshua Frank
From CO2 to Methane, Trump’s Hurricane of Destruction
Jeffrey St. Clair
Maria’s Missing Dead
Andrew Levine
A Bulwark Against the Idiocy of Conservatives Like Brett Kavanaugh
T.J. Coles
Neil deGrasse Tyson: A Celebrity Salesman for the Military-Industrial-Complex
Jeff Ballinger
Nike and Colin Kaepernick: Fronting the Bigots’ Team
David Rosen
Why Stop at Roe? How “Settled Law” Can be Overturned
Gary Olson
Pope Francis and the Battle Over Cultural Terrain
Nick Pemberton
Donald The Victim: A Product of Post-9/11 America
Ramzy Baroud
The Veiled Danger of the ‘Dead’ Oslo Accords
Kevin Martin
U.S. Support for the Bombing of Yemen to Continue
Robert Fisk
A Murder in Aleppo
Robert Hunziker
The Elite World Order in Jitters
Ben Dangl
After 9/11: The Staggering Economic and Human Cost of the War on Terror
Charles Pierson
Invade The Hague! Bolton vs. the ICC
Robert Fantina
Trump and Palestine
Daniel Warner
Hubris on and Off the Court
John Kendall Hawkins
Boning Up on Eternal Recurrence, Kubrick-style: “2001,” Revisited
Haydar Khan
Set Theory of the Left
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail