The Harm of Too Much Secrecy

In 1997, former FBI Director Louis Freeh called the FBI “potentially the most dangerous agency in the country” if it is “not scrutinized carefully.” Freeh also called for more congressional oversight.

His warning is prescient. The jury is still out on how post-9/11 developments such as the Patriot Act and secret detentions of American citizens have affected civil liberties and the government’s ability to fight terrorism. However, decades of experience have already shown that abuses and incompetence fester under a blanket of excessive government secrecy.

Like Oedipus, Congress is gouging out its own eyes rendering itself blind. The intelligence reorganization being contemplated by Congress has aspects that could eviscerate public and legislative access to information. This would frustrate oversight – maiming the ability of Congress and the public to improve intelligence when needed – and open the door to abuse.

Pending intelligence reorganization bills would expand the umbrella of a troublesome exemption to the landmark Freedom of Information Act. The language in this new legislation transfers the CIA director’s statutory duty to protect CIA “sources and methods” to the national intelligence director – who will have power over all intelligence agencies. And thus, this exemption – which currently applies only to the CIA – may be applied across the entire intelligence community in one fell swoop.

Secrecy is sometimes necessary, but this blanket development is not. FOIA already contains exemptions to disclosure that intelligence agencies may use to protect legitimate national security secrets. However, proposed expansion of the intelligence “sources and methods” exemption is especially troublesome.

Why? Because intelligence “sources and methods” are interpreted to mean whatever the CIA director says they are. There is not much room for judicial review of these requests for information from the CIA. It is questionable whether the CIA should have such unrestrained power since it is prone to abuse. It is another and even more egregious matter to allow it to expand across a vast swath of the federal bureaucracy.

Unlike the foreign-oriented CIA, many of the other agencies within the intelligence community affect the civil liberties and rights of Americans. For example, domestic agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI would be placed under the authority of the national intelligence director and thus subject to the expanded FOIA exemption.

Many of these domestic enforcement agencies have been plagued by embarrassing blunders and failures in recent years, underscoring the need for strengthened rather than weakened oversight and transparency. For example, a Senate Judiciary Report in 2002 stated, “The FBI’s critical and growing responsibilities make it all the more necessary to confront the serious weaknesses in the bureau’s management and operations that have come to light in recent years (referring to mistakes from Waco to Wen Ho Lee).”

The intelligence reorganization effort was sparked by the release of the 9/11 Commission Report and by the concerns of 9/11 victim families. The 9/11 Report includes some discussion which should guide policy-makers regarding the relationship between secrecy, disclosure, congressional oversight and the effectiveness of the intelligence community.

According to the report, the Cold War culture of secrecy that still pervades the federal government has impaired the nation’s ability to effectively fight terrorism. Officials such as Colin Powell have said the same.

Though not explicitly a recommendation, the report notes that secrecy should be reduced as much as responsibly possible to allow the Congress, the media and the public to provide oversight:

“Secrecy, while necessary, can also harm oversight. The (congressional) intelligence committees cannot take advantage of democracy’s best oversight mechanism: public disclosure. This makes them significantly different from other congressional oversight committees, which are often spurred into action by the work of investigative journalists and watchdog organizations.”

Ironically, intelligence legislation being considered in the name of the 9/11 Commission Report would lead to a massive rollback in FOIA and a harmful increase in secrecy. However, unlike the tale of Oedipus, intelligence reform does not have to end in tragedy. Congress still has time to correct the mistake.

NICK SCHWELLENBACH is a fellow at the Project On Government Oversight, a watchdog group that promotes open and accountable government.


More articles by:
Weekend Edition
March 23, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Roberto J. González
The Mind-Benders: How to Harvest Facebook Data, Brainwash Voters, and Swing Elections
Paul Street
Deplorables II: The Dismal Dems in Stormy Times
Nick Pemberton
The Ghost of Hillary
Andrew Levine
Light at the End of the Tunnel?
Paul de Rooij
Amnesty International: Trumpeting for War… Again
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Coming in Hot
Chuck Gerhart
Sessions Exploits a Flaw to Pursue Execution of Meth Addicts
Robert Fantina
Distractions, Thought Control and Palestine
Hiroyuki Hamada
The Eyes of “Others” for Us All
Robert Hunziker
Is the EPA Hazardous to Your Health?
Stephanie Savell
15 Years After the Iraq Invasion, What Are the Costs?
Aidan O'Brien
Europe is Pregnant 
John Eskow
How Do We Live With All of This Rage?
Matthew Stevenson
Why Vietnam Still Matters: Was Khe Sanh a Win or a Loss?
Dan Corjescu
The Man Who Should Be Dead
Howard Lisnoff
The Bone Spur in Chief
Brian Cloughley
Hitler and the Poisoning of the British Public
Brett Wilkins
Trump Touts $12.5B Saudi Arms Sale as US Support for Yemen War Literally Fuels Atrocities
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Iraqi Landscapes: the Path of Martyrs
Brian Saady
The War On Drugs Is Far Deadlier Than Most People Realize
Stephen Cooper
Battling the Death Penalty With James Baldwin
CJ Hopkins
Then They Came for the Globalists
Philip Doe
In Colorado, See How They Run After the Fracking Dollars
Ali Mohsin
A Disheartening Week for American Death Penalty Opponents
Binoy Kampmark
John Brennan’s Trump Problem
Nate Terani
Donald Trump’s America: Already Hell Enough for This Muslim-American
Steve Early
From Jackson to Richmond: Radical Mayors Leave Their Mark
Jill Richardson
To Believe in Science, You Have to Know How It’s Done
Ralph Nader
Ten Million Americans Could Bring H.R. 676 into Reality Land—Relief for Anxiety, Dread and Fear
Sam Pizzigati
Billionaires Won’t Save the World, Just Look at Elon Musk
Sergio Avila
Don’t Make the Border a Wasteland
Daryan Rezazad
Denial of Climate Change is Not the Problem
Ron Jacobs
Flashing for the Refugees on the Unarmed Road of Flight
Missy Comley Beattie
The Age of Absurdities and Atrocities
George Wuerthner
Isle Royale: Manage for Wilderness Not Wolves
George Payne
Pompeo Should Call the Dogs Off of WikiLeaks
Russell Mokhiber
Study Finds Single Payer Viable in 2018 Elections
Franklin Lamb
Despite Claims, Israel-Hezbollah War is Unlikely
Montana Wilderness Association Dishonors Its Past
Elizabeth “Liz” Hawkins, RN
Nurses Are Calling #TimesUp on Domestic Abuse
Paul Buhle
A Caribbean Giant Passes: Wilson Harris, RIP
Mel Gurtov
A Blank Check for Repression? A Saudi Leader Visits Washington
Seth Sandronsky
Hoop schemes: Sacramento’s corporate bid for an NBA All-Star Game
Louis Proyect
The French Malaise, Now and Then
David Yearsley
Bach and the Erotics of Spring