FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Can the Left Sink Any Lower?

 

I am inarguably not the most important intellectual alive. No, I am no Noam Chomsky, but neither am I a monosyllabic, mouth-breathing moron.

I have every confidence in my own personal powers of reasoning, and since the seventh grade (1979-80) have regularly utilized critical thinking skills. So it is that I have the audacity even to give “critical” consideration in regard to the urgent advice being offered by esteemed comrades. The result, unfortunately, is no small amount of confusion.

For months now, from Z Magazine to The Nation, from CommonDreams.org to WorkingforChange.org, I’ve been subjected to diatribes and pleas, to personal opinions and thoughtful analyses predicated on false arguments and supported by gross assumptions never questioned. Disingenuous, dishonest, and above all else blatantly contemptuous of one Ralph Nader, the left has sunk low!

The current trend amongst the celebrity (read elite) left is a convoluted, hyper-intellectualized muddle of profundity that essentially articulates a familiar credo: namely, the end justifies the means. It is a rationale I’ve never appreciated when employed by the right, and it is particularly disturbing when subliminally trumpeted by progressives.

I believe if certain things are worth fighting for, then surely they are worth voting for.

But I am supposed to believe that given current circumstances this is simply a foolish and impractical principle.

I believe we should, at the very least, be willing to preserve the integrity, the original intent, of the franchise — the vote is and should remain an affirmation of personal values and principles. If this is a creed whose time has passed, a foolish and impractical principle, then let us admit the entire shebang is little more than a grotesque sham, completely corrupt.

I could vote for the lesser evil, against my personal ethic, but I would have to admit — to a certain degree — my own collusion with that same said corruption, my accommodation of a systemic defect, my perpetuation of malfunction.

I could vote my conscience, uphold the original intent of the franchise, but I would have to endure — already have — the charge that I help to elect the most evil. (Examine that abstract construct for a few moments: if I vote for a losing candidate, I’ve actually voted for the winner — provided the winner is the worst possible candidate.???)

No, let us go ahead and admit that the entire shebang is little more than a grotesque sham, completely corrupt. In such a case, would it matter one-goddamn-rat’s-ass what I do or how I vote? So then why can’t Norman Solomon, Michael Albert, Stephen Shalom, Paul Rogat Loeb, Naomi Klein,…and all those anti-Nader Nader 2000 leaders get off my back? I am perfectly capable of making my own decision and am perfectly offended by the presumption that I can be cowed by a “Who’s Who of America’s progressive community”(gushes TheUnityCampaign.org) into voting against my own better judgement.

Throughout this election cycle progressives resolutely determined to affirm their values and principles with their vote have been called out and attacked by left luminaries: we don’t care for poor, working people, we fail to understand the dangers of Bush, we’ve fallen prey to infantile hero-worship. Our intellects have been impugned, and we are accused of being too rigid, absolutist, purist. Hmmm.

And I always thought the left stood for something (as opposed to rolled over for something else).

The left elite continues to earnestly plead/intellectually bully for the sacrifice of just some, wee, little, tiny, bit of our integrity. And for what purpose? A Kerry presidency?

Where did all this evangelical faith in the Senator from Massachusetts come from? It came from a Democratic campaign strategy that raised a banner for an ignorant and apathetic segment of the electorate — a segment with seemingly no idea what or who it wants. Progressive leaders can rationalize this Anybody-But-Bush sentiment from now until doomsday, but that doesn’t, can’t, and will never make it a progressive strategy.

Regardless of this election’s outcome, there will be much in the way of healing to do. Bush has not only divided the nation; he has — with the surreal assistance of Noam Chomsky et al — divided the left.

Strange times indeed!

CHRISTOPHER C. CONWAY is currently engaged in a battle against anger, frustration, disillusionment, alienation and the corrupt, corporate duopoly of American politics. A resident of Houston, Texas, he categorically rejects the “safe state/swing state” paradigm. He can be reached at: christophercconway@earthlink.net

 

More articles by:

Weekend Edition
December 07, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Steve Hendricks
What If We Just Buy Off Big Fossil Fuel? A Novel Plan to Mitigate the Climate Calamity
Jeffrey St. Clair
Cancer as Weapon: Poppy Bush’s Radioactive War on Iraq
Paul Street
The McCain and Bush Death Tours: Establishment Rituals in How to be a Proper Ruler
Jason Hirthler
Laws of the Jungle: The Free Market and the Continuity of Change
Ajamu Baraka
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights at 70: Time to De-Colonize Human Rights!
Andrew Levine
Thoughts on Strategy for a Left Opposition
Jennifer Matsui
Dead of Night Redux: A Zombie Rises, A Spook Falls
Rob Urie
Degrowth: Toward a Green Revolution
Binoy Kampmark
The Bomb that Did Not Detonate: Julian Assange, Manafort and The Guardian
Robert Hunziker
The Deathly Insect Dilemma
Robert Fisk
Spare Me the American Tears for the Murder of Jamal Khashoggi
Joseph Natoli
Tribal Justice
Ron Jacobs
Getting Pushed Off the Capitalist Cliff
Macdonald Stainsby
Unist’ot’en Camp is Under Threat in Northern Canada
Senator Tom Harkin
Questions for Vice-President Bush on Posada Carriles
W. T. Whitney
Two Years and Colombia’s Peace Agreement is in Shreds
Ron Jacobs
Getting Pushed Off the Capitalist Cliff
Ramzy Baroud
The Conspiracy Against Refugees
David Rosen
The Swamp Stinks: Trump & Washington’s Rot
Raouf Halaby
Wall-to-Wall Whitewashing
Daniel Falcone
Noam Chomsky Turns 90
Dean Baker
An Inverted Bond Yield Curve: Is a Recession Coming?
Nick Pemberton
The Case For Chuck Mertz (Not Noam Chomsky) as America’s Leading Intellectual
Ralph Nader
New Book about Ethics and Whistleblowing for Engineers Affects Us All!
Dan Kovalik
The Return of the Nicaraguan Contras, and the Rise of the Pro-Contra Left
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Exposing the Crimes of the CIAs Fair-Haired Boy, Paul Kagame, and the Rwandan Patriotic Front
Jasmine Aguilera
Lessons From South of the Border
Manuel García, Jr.
A Formula for U.S. Election Outcomes
Sam Pizzigati
Drug Company Execs Make Millions Misleading Cancer Patients. Here’s One Way to Stop Them
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Agriculture as Wrong Turn
James McEnteer
And That’s The Way It Is: Essential Journalism Books of 2018
Chris Gilbert
Biplav’s Communist Party of Nepal on the Move: Dispatch by a Far-Flung Bolivarian
Judith Deutsch
Siloed Thinking, Climate, and Disposable People: COP 24 and Our Discontent
Jill Richardson
Republicans Don’t Want Your Vote to Count
John Feffer
‘Get Me Outta Here’: Trump Turns the G20 into the G19
Domenica Ghanem
Is Bush’s Legacy Really Much Different Than Trump’s?
Peter Certo
Let Us Argue Over Dead Presidents
Christopher Brauchli
Concentration Camps From Here to China
ANIS SHIVANI
The Progress of Fascism Over the Last Twenty Years
Steve Klinger
A Requiem for Donald Trump
Al Ronzoni
New Deals, From FDR’s to the Greens’
Gerald Scorse
America’s Rigged Tax Collection System
Louis Proyect
Praying the Gay Away
Rev. Theodore H. Lockhart
A Homily: the Lord Has a Controversy With His People?
David Yearsley
Bush Obsequies
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail