FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Free Speech Movement and Howard Stern

 

Forty years ago this month a young man called Mario Savio, 21 years old, climbed on top of a car in Berkeley, California, and let fly with a stream of incendiary rhetoric and the Berkeley Free Speech Movement was born.

I’ll skip the next chapters and go straight to “forty years later”, meaning October 7, 2004, when a fellow two years older than Savio would have been if he hadn’t keeled over a few years ago clambered onto a chair at the corner of Telegraph and Bancroft, right outside the entry to the University of California at Berkeley and let fly with a stream of rhetoric that would have been a lot more incendiary for the crowds in Sproul Plaza if Lenni Brenner had remembered to bring a bullhorn.

These days the Free Speech Movement is comfortably, maybe too comfortably, installed on the Berkeley calendar as an annual event where FSM veterans look back on the Sixties (initial phase), hold panels on such topics as ­ I’m quoting from the Fortieth Anniversary program which stretched across four days ­ on “the FSM: Its Genesis, Meanings and Consequences” and seek to hector youth for their lack of revolutionary zeal.

I agreed to join Lenni for some curb-side ranting, not only because he’s an old friend but also because Berkeley survivors of that period whose judgment I respect say Lenni Glazer, as he was known then, was the fiercest and most mesmerizing speaker, holding crowds spellbound at that same corner of Telegraph and Bancroft, day after day till the University seized an opportunity to have Lenni put away in the state prison at San Luis Obispo for three long years. These days he’s as fiery as ever, though mostly at the other end of the country, in New York.

I was glad, I told the modest throng, to be able to speak at an FSM event on the very day when the newspapers were testifying to the potency and profitability of free speech, as uttered by the radio shock jock Howard Stern, who had just been signed up by Sirius, a satellite radio company for $500 million. There’s money in talking dirty about girls.

Russians have a toast to “those who went before”. You drink to the dead, though you don’t clink glasses. Stern, I said, was standing on the shoulders of many who “went before”, who had sacrificed much that he might enjoy his $500 million for speaking freely about sex. There was Lenny Bruce, harried mercilessly by prosecutors and cops across the country. Times were tougher still in the Forties and Fifties when men like Gershon Legman, Jake Brussel and Samuel Roth (who published the first excerpts of Joyce’s Ulysses in the US) all served prison terms after prosecutions by the Post Office.

Free speech counts most when it’s most risky. In you used the word “Palestinian” in any public place when I first arrived in New York in the early 1970s you risked being punched in the face. “Palestinians” didn’t exist, because Golda Meir, Israel’s prime minister at the time, had said so. Things are better now, though substantively for Palestinians in Palestine they are far worse.

In the second debate, both George Bush even weirdly mentioned his hopes for a Palestinian state twice. He must be looking for the Arab-American vote. Of course Kerry did not, just like every other Democrat. Both Bush and John Kerry proclaimed their undying allegiance to the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution. Both swore they stood four-square for liberty, which was hard to listen to with a straight face (like 98 per cent of the rest of the “debate”) since both deemed the Patriot Act a splendid thing. Of course the Patriot Act embodies the notion that there are indeed times when free speech is too risky.

Lenni was holding my legs so I wouldn’t fall off the chair, and I sensed from the slight pressure of his hands that he wished I might descend to the sidewalk so he could wheel on his next speaker, Jack Heyman of the Longshoremen’s Union at the Port of Oakland, promoting the Million Worker March. Not so long ago Jack and his comrades received very painful expression, in the form of rubber bullets, of the current view of free speech and the right to assemble peacefully, as entertained by the Oakland Police Department and Oakland Mayor Jerry Brown.

So I wound up my hoarse rhetoric with some jabs at the left, as mustered in Berkeley for the FSM anniversary. Probably some 90 per cent of them are dedicated “Anybody But Bush” zealots who have, with varying degrees of venom, been denouncing Ralph Nader for presuming to exercise his rights of free speech, as an independent candidate in the presidential election.

Flowers of the sixties, now gone sadly to seed, have been coursing round the nation’s courthouses, challenging Nader’s efforts to get on state ballots. The older crowd hate Bush, that’s for sure. But they hate Nader more. So here was the great irony. Most of those mistily honoring the FSM don’t much care for free speech when it looks as though it might be risky, might inconvenience their favored candidate, even though the favored candidate, John Kerry, wants to fight a better war than Bush in Iraq and then march on to Teheran.

In fact the original FSM movement was a much bigger tent than people now recall. My old friend Conn Hallinan, who was an FSM militant and arrested in Sproul Hall in the largest mass university arrests (800) in the history of the US, has just reminded me of this. Hallinan says, “We had right wingers, libertarians, conservatives and of course weirdos. There was an FSM activist, who went on to successfully challenge the law forbidding women to hang off the side of cable cars in San Francisco. She was a right-wing libertarian.”

These days the left and PC crowd would find that the woman was opposed to affirmative action, or some such, and would have driven her out with oaths and curses. They have no idea of tactical coalitions. So much for the heritage of Sixties radicalism. Not everyone’s gone to seed, to be sure. There’s Lenni, who finally got me off the chair and actually there are many, many more who understand the importance of the third word that comes after Free Speech, namely “Movement”. Without a movement you have nothing, and you’ve built nothing. That’s what the ABB “leftists” don’t understand now. November 3 will be a bit late in the day to start looking for one.

It’s the long-term movements that count, the ones that don’t sell out every four years, to support someone like Kerry who wants to widen the war in Iraq and then go and burn down Teheran. These days many communities campuses have pro Palestinian groups on them. There were almost none thirty years ago. That’s a real Free Speech Movement, and one that has made a difference and will make a difference long after this campaign is over.

 

More articles by:

Alexander Cockburn’s Guillotined! and A Colossal Wreck are available from CounterPunch.

January 17, 2019
Stan Cox
That Green Growth at the Heart of the Green New Deal? It’s Malignant
David Schultz
Trump vs the Constitution: Why He Cannot Invoke the Emergencies Act to Build a Wall
Paul Cochrane
Europe’s Strategic Humanitarian Aid: Yemen vs. Syria
Tom Clifford
China: An Ancient Country, Getting Older
Greg Grandin
How Not to Build a “Great, Great Wall”
Ted Rall
Our Pointless, Very American Culture of Shame
John G. Russell
Just Another Brick in the Wall of Lies
Patrick Walker
Referendum 2020: A Green New Deal vs. Racist, Classist Climate Genocide
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Uniting for a Green New Deal
Matt Johnson
The Wall Already Exists — In Our Hearts and Minds
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Flailing will get More Desperate and More Dangerous
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Three
January 16, 2019
Patrick Bond
Jim Yong Kim’s Mixed Messages to the World Bank and the World
John Grant
Joe Biden, Crime Fighter from Hell
Alvaro Huerta
Brief History Notes on Mexican Immigration to the U.S.
Kenneth Surin
A Great Speaker of the UK’s House of Commons
Elizabeth Henderson
Why Sustainable Agriculture Should Support a Green New Deal
Binoy Kampmark
Trump, Bolton and the Syrian Confusion
Jeff Mackler
Trump’s Syria Exit Tweet Provokes Washington Panic
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Long Can Nepal Blame Others for Its Woes?
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: When Just One Man Says, “No”
Cesar Chelala
Violence Against Women: A Pandemic No Longer Hidden
Kim C. Domenico
To Make a Vineyard of the Curse: Fate, Fatalism and Freedom
Dave Lindorff
Criminalizing BDS Trashes Free Speech & Association
Thomas Knapp
Now More Than Ever, It’s Clear the FBI Must Go
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: The Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Two
Edward Curtin
A Gentrified Little Town Goes to Pot
January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
Robert Fisk
The US Media has Lost One of Its Sanest Voices on Military Matters
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail