FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Slander Campaign Against Nader Hits Wisconsin

 

As the field coordinator of the Nader/Camejo campaign in Wisconsin, my inbox has seen e-mails from excited volunteers, people wanting to sign a petition, desperate pleas telling me that campaign volunteers in Wisconsin represent the “left arm of the Bush campaign” and stubborn claims that Republicans are collecting signatures for Nader in Wisconsin, despite what I, the state coordinator of the campaign had to say in response.

It’s not hard to see why these claims persist. Based on many recent stories in the national press, one would assume that Ralph Nader’s campaign in Wisconsin was being run by right-wing nut jobs and that none of the 4 to 6 percent of the Wisconsin population that supports Nader are organizing to get an anti-war candidate on the ballot. From the meticulous fact-checkers at the New York Times on July 1 we get, “Republicans and some conservative groups in Oregon, Arizona and Wisconsin are feverishly, if not cynically, mobilizing to get him on ballots in those states in a drive to siphon votes from the likely Democratic nominee, Senator John Kerry.” From Newsweek on July 19, “Republicans and conservative groups in battleground states including Oregon, Florida, Wisconsin and Michigan are also working to get Nader on the ballot this November.” The disgusting NaderFactor website founded by many former Dean staffers then took this up in a national ad, “Right-wing extremists are even trying to help Nader’s campaign in Oregon, Wisconsin and, yes, Florida again!”.

There must be some concrete proof backing these reports from such reputable news sources. If so, the purported conservative groups were violating Wisconsin state law that says petitioning for an independent candidate cannot begin until August 1. Perhaps Newsweek and New York Times could have done some research to find out when the signature-gathering period actually began in Wisconsin. But then again, we all remember the Times’ excellent fact-checking from the lead-up to the war in Iraq. All these slanders on the Nader campaign are based on one so far unsubstantiated announcement by the conservative group Citizens for a Sound Economy in early July, acting independently of the Nader campaign, promising to collect signatures in Wisconsin.

As the field coordinator of the Nader campaign in Wisconsin, I know a little bit about the drive to get Nader on the ballot. We are not working with the GOP or Citizens for a Sound Economy, nor will we take their signatures. We don’t trust these right-wing hacks with collecting signatures that are going to be challenged by the Democratic party machine. A terrible Wisconsin state law doesn’t allow us to turn in more than 4,000 signatures and 2,000 are required, and our goal is accuracy in the face of a Democratic challenge. The petitioners are taking a principled stand in the face of hostile opposition. They are veterans of third-party politics, antiwar activists, socialists, labor activists, students and those simply fed up with the choice between Bush and (as veep Peter Camejo says) not Bush “lite”, but Bush “smart”.

My point is not that there are no conservative groups that are cynically organizing to put Nader on the ballot, although there is no evidence of this in Wisconsin and we are not seeking or accepting their support. The point is that the Democrats and the mainstream press have successfully made this the issue of the Nader campaign, despite the non-issue that it really is. And that gets magnified ten-fold in a swing state like Wisconsin. So when we talk to well-minded people on the street about signing a petition to get Nader on the ballot, we are first asked if we are Republicans, if we are getting funded by the Republican Party. (The not so well-minded people just tell us to go to hell.) The hypocrisy of these charges from the Democratic Party goes without saying. Just to cite one example, the Democratic Party has taken more than three times as much money from Halliburton this year ($129,449) as Nader has taken from registered Republicans. The Democratic Party happily takes money from criminal corporations who actually expect the Democrats, if elected, to cooperate. Nader isn’t even aware of the support of groups like Citizens for a Sound Economy, much less beholden to their interests.

This slander campaign is meant to censor Nader and avoid a debate on the issues and the necessity of Ralph’s campaign against both parties, because if there were such an honest and open debate, the Democrats would lose. The Democrats’ only resort against Nader is slander and their deep pockets. We already saw this in the debate between Howard Dean and Nader on NPR, where Dean spent most of his time attacking Nader about conservative groups supporting him of their own volition and pretending that the Democrats and Nader were just different shades of gray, downplaying the vast divide that separates Nader from Kerry and Dean himself. The more the Dems can trumpet the idea that Nader’s campaign is being run by conservatives, the more they can marginalize and silence the campaign and the increasingly thick-skinned volunteers working on it. All progressives who want to see a real debate in this country outside the narrow confines of the Democratic and Republican parties need to defend Nader against these attacks. If we don’t do so and we allow this slander to continue because this is not a “convenient” election to actually defend someone we believe in, the next time around we will find it that much tougher to win the argument for independent politics and even more “inconvenient” to defend a progressive third party candidate.

BILL LINVILLE is the Wisconsin Field Coordinator for Nader/Camejo 2004 and a member of the International Socialist Organization in Madison, Wisconsin. He can be reached at bill_linville@yahoo.com.

 

 

More articles by:

February 21, 2019
Alex Campbell
Tracing the Threads in Venezuela: Humanitarian Aid
Jonah Raskin
Mitchel Cohen Takes on Global and Local Goliaths: Profile of a Lifelong Multi-Movement Organizer
Binoy Kampmark
Size Matters: the Demise of the Airbus A380
February 20, 2019
Anthony DiMaggio
Withdrawal Pains and Syrian Civil War: An Analysis of U.S. Media Discourse
Charles Pierson
When Saudi Arabia Gets the Bomb
Doug Johnson Hatlem
“Electability” is Real (Unless Married with the Junk Science of Ideological Spectrum Analysis)
Kenneth Surin
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline: Another Boondoggle in Virginia
John Feffer
The Psychology of the Wall
Dean Baker
Modern Monetary Theory and Taxing the Rich
Russell Mokhiber
Citizens Arrested Calling Out Manchin on Rockwool
George Ochenski
Unconstitutional Power Grabs
Michael T. Klare
War With China? It’s Already Under Way
Thomas Knapp
The Real Emergency Isn’t About the Wall, It’s About the Separation of Powers
Manuel García, Jr.
Two Worlds
Daniel Warner
The Martin Ennals and Victorian Prize Winners Contrast with Australia’s Policies against Human Dignity
Norman Solomon
What the Bernie Sanders 2020 Campaign Means for Progressives
Dan Corjescu
2020 Vision: A Strategy of Courage
Matthew Johnson
Why Protest Trump When We Can Impeach Him?
William A. Cohn
Something New and Something Old: a Story Still Being Told
Bill Martin
The Fourth Hypothesis: the Present Juncture of the Trump Clarification and the Watershed Moment on the Washington Mall
February 19, 2019
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Troublesome Possibilities: The Left and Tulsi Gabbard
Patrick Cockburn
She Didn’t Start the Fire: Why Attack the ISIS Bride?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Literature and Theater During War: Why Euripides Still Matters
Maximilian Werner
The Night of Terror: Wyoming Game and Fish’s Latest Attempt to Close the Book on the Mark Uptain Tragedy
Conn Hallinan
Erdogan is Destined for Another Rebuke in Turkey
Nyla Ali Khan
Politics of Jammu and Kashmir: The Only Viable Way is Forward
Mark Ashwill
On the Outside Looking In: an American in Vietnam
Joyce Nelson
Sir Richard Branson’s Venezuelan-Border PR Stunt
Ron Jacobs
Day of Remembrance and the Music of Anthony Brown        
Cesar Chelala
Women’s Critical Role in Saving the Environment
February 18, 2019
Paul Street
31 Actual National Emergencies
Robert Fisk
What Happened to the Remains of Khashoggi’s Predecessor?
David Mattson
When Grizzly Bears Go Bad: Constructions of Victimhood and Blame
Julian Vigo
USMCA’s Outsourcing of Free Speech to Big Tech
George Wuerthner
How the BLM Serves the West’s Welfare Ranchers
Christopher Fons
The Crimes of Elliot Abrams
Thomas Knapp
The First Rule of AIPAC Is: You Do Not Talk about AIPAC
Mitchel Cohen
A Tale of Two Citations: Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” and Michael Harrington’s “The Other America”
Jake Johnston
Haiti and the Collapse of a Political and Economic System
Dave Lindorff
It’s Not Just Trump and the Republicans
Laura Flanders
An End to Amazon’s Two-Bit Romance. No Low-Rent Rendezvous.
Patrick Walker
Venezuelan Coup Democrats Vomit on Green New Deal
Natalie Dowzicky
The Millennial Generation Will Tear Down Trump’s Wall
Nick Licata
Of Stress and Inequality
Joseph G. Ramsey
Waking Up on President’s Day During the Reign of Donald Trump
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail