Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Spring Fund Drive: Keep CounterPunch Afloat
CounterPunch is a lifeboat of sanity in today’s turbulent political seas. Please make a tax-deductible donation and help us continue to fight Trump and his enablers on both sides of the aisle. Every dollar counts!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Iraq’s New Terrorist Prime Minister

 

“In Iraq we meant to render futile both the theory and the practice of terrorism; what we have done instead is to endow it with diplomatic credentials, making credible the policies of blind assassination.”

Lewis H. Lapham; Harper’s

In a long line of American puppets, the name Ayad Allawi figures to loom large. In just a matter of weeks the new Prime Minister of Iraq has accommodated his US paymasters with a zeal that must leave the dapper Hamid Karzai wondering if his job is safe.

In his first days after taking office, Allawi was called on to endorse the bombing of an alleged “safe house” in Falluja; an incident that took the lives of 26 Iraqis including women and children. None of the dead were identified as “foreign fighters”, although every major newspaper in America reiterated the Pentagon’s view that the occupants were colleagues of Abu Musab al Zarqawi.

The bombing of Falluja occurred just three days after the UN was cajoled into signing the Iraqi Sovereignty Resolution. During negotiations at the UN, the Bush Administration made it look as though they were taking a more “reasoned approach” to security issues.

That was not the case.

The military simply suspended its major operations to make it appear as though a fundamental shift in policy had taken place. This eschewed the very real possibility that the members of the Security Council would have rejected the resolution outright.

Instead, the Security Council approved the resolution, establishing the US as the “UN Multinational Force”, and the bombing of Falluja resumed three days later.

It was a deception that the “more seasoned” members of the Council should have anticipated.

The ex-CIA operative Allawi expressed his enthusiasm for the bombing, saying that he supported the action as a means of quashing the “terrorist” operatives in post-war Iraq.

We will “annihilate the terrorist groups,” boasted Allawi.

There have been six more bombings in Falluja producing equally dubious results. To date, no “foreign fighters” have been positively identified in Falluja.

The rule of thumb seems to be, that wherever an errant bomb drops on innocent Iraqis (be it a wedding party or a Mosque) it immediately becomes a “legitimate target” in the war on terror.

Just yesterday (Sunday, July 18) US forces bombed another “alleged” safe house in Falluja killing an estimated 14 Iraqis including women and children.

Only the present occupants of the White House and the American media can be expected to defend such slaughter as justifiable.

The increasing death toll of Iraqis attests to the fact that neither the US Military nor the Bush Administration is particularly bothered the prospect of more dead Muslims.

Nor does it seem to weigh on the conscience of Iraq’s “hand picked” P.M., Allawi. Perhaps Allawi’s tenure in Saddam’s Gestapo (the Mukabarat) hardened him to the pangs of remorse that we usually associate with the killing innocent people. Or maybe it was his involvement in a 1990s terrorist bombing campaign in Baghdad (trying to destabilize the Saddam regime) that deadened him to the loss life. (In one incident he was directly connected to the bombing of school bus.)

Whatever it was, he has quickly established his bone fides for ruthlessness with a passion that has impressed his employers in Washington.

Allawi has become the cat’s paw of US policy in Iraq; the continued aggression of the military is being fashioned to appear as though Allawi is “calling the shots”.

Iraqis are not taken in by this ruse. They are well aware of the regions’ colonial history and the subsequent establishing of an “Arab facade”; the puppet governments that provide a mask to disguise the workings of the imperial machine.

The Allawi experiment is no different.

For example, consider the recent detention of 500 criminal suspects who were arrested at Allawi’s behest. The action was taken for one of two reasons; either Allawi has taken a sudden interest in crime in Baghdad or Rumsfeld wants to continue rounding up insurgent suspects without drawing further attention to his real motives. (Following the Abu Ghraib scandal, the military must be as discreet as possible in their random dragnets. Never the less, they will persist in detaining large numbers of innocent Iraqis until the resistance is crushed.) The justification of “fighting crime” provides a useful screen for the real aims of the Defense Dept. chieftans.

Similarly, Allawi’s announcement of an “Order for Safeguarding National Security”, the equivalent of Martial law, is part of a broader US strategy to apply maximum force whenever it chooses.

Even the name of the new law (Safeguarding National Security) smacks of the euphemisms that are churned out of American neoliberal “think tanks” on a regular basis. It is just more of the same old Bush “doublespeak”, invoked to conceal the complete suspension of civil liberties.

(The law provides for “random searches, seizures, closures, eavesdropping, curfews–all tools of the modern police state–are now in the hands of the small and unelected Baghdad leadership; and in the fine print, the establishment of a half-dozen new security agencies, each with a name, acronym and marching orders reminiscent of the decidedly undemocratic Mideast norm.” Mitch Potter)

The law enshrines the principle that in “liberated” Iraq, citizens have been effectively stripped of their personal freedom.

George Orwell could not have imagined a more dismal state of affairs.

Incredibly, in the same week that Allawi announced his intention to enact Martial law, he also unveiled his plan to develop a “state security apparatus” to deal with the insurgency.

No one in Iraq has any misgivings about what this really means.

Allawi started his political career as a Ba’ath Party enforcer and gradually worked his way up to become a senior official in the Iraqi secret police (the Mukabarat.) Eventually, he was bound to try to reconstitute the feared secret police that kept the Iraqi people under Saddam’s iron grip for decades.

Not surprisingly, this was already being done by the CIA and Dept of Defense prior to Allawi’s rise to power. (Z Magazine has reported that US intelligence was reenlisting members of Saddam’s Mukabarat to respond to the growing insurgency.)

The Bush Administration has no qualms about resurrecting the “primary instrument of Iraqi state terror”, as long as it is employed in the greater interests of continued American domination.

Again, Allawi provides nothing more than a convenient Iraqi face to a scheme that was well developed before he was ever appointed as Prime Minister.

This is the real meaning of Iraqi sovereignty; a curtain that hides the machinations of the American Imperium.

So far, Allawi has followed each of Washington’s edicts with unmitigated enthusiasm. His passion for his new position hasn’t been dimmed by the carnage he has authorized or by the constant threats to his life.

Apart from his utter loyalty to the Bush clan, Allawi has demonstrated his aptitude for the job in ways that are intangible. In an article in the Sydney Morning Herald, Paul McGeough tells of Allawi’s involvement in the murder of six alleged insurgents’ just days before he was handed over control of the interim government.

“The prisoners–handcuffed and blindfolded–were lined up against a wall in a courtyard adjacent to the maximum-security cell block in which they were held at the Al-Amariyah security centre, in the city’s south-western suburbs.”

“Informants told the Herald that Dr Allawi shot each young man in the head as about a dozen Iraqi policemen and four Americans from the Prime Minister’s personal security team watched in stunned silence.”

Was this the final indication that Allawi was worthy of a place at the Bush table?

Is there a more appropriate “initiation” into the world of gangland terror and political bloodletting than that described in McGeough’s article?

The occupants of the Oval Office must have felt heartened to know that they had enlisted another reliable member to their circle of murders and torturers.

MIKE WHITNEY can be reached at: fergiewhitney@msn.com

More articles by:

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.

May 22, 2018
Stanley L. Cohen
Broken Dreams and Lost Lives: Israel, Gaza and the Hamas Card
Andrew Levine
November’s “Revolution” Will Not Be Televised
Ted Rall
#MeToo is a Cultural Workaround to a Legal Failure
Gary Leupp
Question for Discussion: Is Russia an Adversary Nation?
Binoy Kampmark
Unsettling the Summits: John Bolton’s Libya Solution
Doug Johnson
As Andrea Horwath Surges, Undecided Voters Threaten to Upend Doug Ford’s Hopes in Canada’s Most Populated Province
Kenneth Surin
Malaysia’s Surprising Election Results
Kathy Kelly
Scourging Yemen
Dana Cook
Canada’s ‘Superwoman’: Margot Kidder
Dean Baker
The Trade Deficit With China: Up Sharply, for Those Who Care
John Feffer
Playing Trump for Peace How the Korean Peninsula Could Become a Bright Spot in a World Gone Mad
Peter Gelderloos
Decades in Prison for Protesting Trump?
Thomas Knapp
Yes, Virginia, There is a Deep State
Andrew Stewart
What the Providence Teachers’ Union Needs for a Win
Jimmy Centeno
Mexico’s First Presidential Debate: All against One
May 21, 2018
Ron Jacobs
Gina Haspell: She’s Certainly Qualified for the Job
Uri Avnery
The Day of Shame
Amitai Ben-Abba
Israel’s New Ideology of Genocide
Patrick Cockburn
Israel is at the Height of Its Power, But the Palestinians are Still There
Frank Stricker
Can We Finally Stop Worrying About Unemployment?
Binoy Kampmark
Royal Wedding Madness
Roy Morrison
Middle East War Clouds Gather
Edward Curtin
Gina Haspel and Pinocchio From Rome
Juana Carrasco Martin
The United States is a Country Addicted to Violence
Dean Baker
Wealth Inequality: It’s Not Clear What It Means
Robert Dodge
At the Brink of Nuclear War, Who Will Lead?
Vern Loomis
If I’m Lying, I’m Dying
Valerie Reynoso
How LBJ initiated the Military Coup in the Dominican Republic
Weekend Edition
May 18, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
The Donald, Vlad, and Bibi
Robert Fisk
How Long Will We Pretend Palestinians Aren’t People?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Wild at Heart: Keeping Up With Margie Kidder
Roger Harris
Venezuela on the Eve of Presidential Elections: The US Empire Isn’t Sitting by Idly
Michael Slager
Criminalizing Victims: the Fate of Honduran Refugees 
John Laforge
Don’t Call It an Explosion: Gaseous Ignition Events with Radioactive Waste
Carlo Filice
The First “Fake News” Story (or, What the Serpent Would Have Said)
Dave Lindorff
Israel Crosses a Line as IDF Snipers Murder Unarmed Protesters in the Ghetto of Gaza
Gary Leupp
The McCain Cult
Robert Fantina
What’s Wrong With the United States?
Jill Richardson
The Lesson I Learned Growing Up Jewish
David Orenstein
A Call to Secular Humanist Resistance
W. T. Whitney
The U.S. Role in Removing a Revolutionary and in Restoring War to Colombia
Rev. William Alberts
The Danger of Praying Truth to Power
Alan Macleod
A Primer on the Venezuelan Elections
John W. Whitehead
The Age of Petty Tyrannies
Franklin Lamb
Have Recent Events Sounded the Death Knell for Iran’s Regional Project?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail