FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Senator Would Zap Iraqis (or WTO Protesters) with Futuristic Pain Beams

Senator John Kerry’s vision of “winning the peace” in Iraq and elsewhere involves the use of futuristic microwave beam weapons designed to inflict agonizing pain on unruly civilians, a recent campaign document reveals.

The document, a fact sheet released in support of Kerry’s June 3 speech on military issues, endorses the development and use of “new, non-lethal technologies” including “directed energy weapons that can produce lethal and non-lethal effects.”

Described by Time Magazine as a “cross between a microwave oven and a Star Trek phaser,” a directed energy weapon fires an invisible beam of energy that flash-heats human targets from a distance. The beams do not burn flesh, but they create an unbearably painful burning sensation by instantaneously heating moisture under the skin.

A working directed energy weapon, Raytheon Corp.’s Active Denial System, will be delivered to the military for testing this fall. Raytheon volunteers who experienced the weapon’s effect have described it as unbearably painful, saying they felt as though their bodies were on fire.

Although the weapon may have battlefield uses, it appears to be designed primarily for incapacitating civilian rioters or protesters. Air Force documents cited by the Sacramento Bee praise the beam weapon’s “capability in military operations other than war,” including peacekeeping, humanitarian operations and crowd control.

Significantly, Sen. Kerry envisions use of these weapons in “stability operations” aimed at “winning the peace.” Army Field Manuals define stability operations as “applications of military power intended to influence the political environment, facilitate diplomacy, and interrupt specific illegal activities” in foreign countries.

In plain language, stability operations are quasi-military endeavors aimed at installing or supporting regimes favorable to US interests, typically in so-called “failed states.” With the passage of a UN resolution endorsing Iraq’s new handpicked government, the 160,000 foreign troops in Iraq are now said to be conducting stability operations.

US military officials have implied that directed energy weapons would be welcome in Iraq. Interviewed by the Bee, Marine Capt. Dan McSweeney, a spokesman for the Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, justified the weapons by pointing to “instances in Iraq where crowd situations have unfortunately ended in violence and death.”

All this raises the disturbing possibility that Senator Kerry envisions using the high-tech weapons as a means of dispersing public protests in Iraq and other countries subject to US occupations or “peacekeeping missions.”

In his June 3 speech, Kerry claimed directed energy weapons could “incapacitate the enemy, without risking the lives of innocent bystanders.” But research cited by Bradford University’s Non-Lethal Weapons Project indicates that the microwaves might cause cataracts and cancer; used at close range the weapon could “cook a person’s eyeballs.” Needless to say, the microwave beam is incapable of distinguishing between enemies and innocent bystanders.

Kerry has not discussed using microwave weapons against domestic dissenters, but a sales presentation available on Raytheon’s web site specifically touts the Active Denial System as one of its Homeland Security products designed to “protect our citizens, property, infrastructure and cyberspace.”

Because directed energy weapons inflict intense pain without leaving marks or other physical evidence, human rights activists are also concerned about their potential use as a torture devices, particularly in the wake of the Abu Ghraib prison scandals. Kerry, like President Bush, has said he opposes torture.

Note: As of this writing, the Kerry campaign fact sheet is available online at www.johnkerry.com/; the Raytheon presentation can be found at www.raytheon.com/ .

JACOB LEVICH is a writer and editor living in New York City. He can be reached at: jlevich@earthlink.net

 

 

More articles by:

Jacob Levich is a university administrator and independent researcher who tweets as @cordeliers.

February 21, 2019
Nick Pemberton
Israel, Venezuela and Nationalism In The Neoliberal Era
Chris Orlet
The Bill and Melinda Gates’ Fair Taxation Scaremongering Tour
Bruce E. Levine
“Heavy Drinking” and the NYT’s Offensive Obit on Herbert Fingarette
Lisi Krall
This Historical Moment Demands Transformation of Our Institutions. The Green New Deal Won’t Do That
Stephanie Savell
Mapping the American War on Terror: Now in 80 Countries
Daniel Warner
New York, New York: a Resounding Victory for New York Over Amazon
Russell Mokhiber
With Monsanto and Glyphosate on the Run AAAS Revokes Award to Scientists Whose Studies Led to Ban on Weedkiller in Sri Lanka and Other Countries
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Fake National Emergency Moves America Closer to an Autocracy
Alex Campbell
Tracing the Threads in Venezuela: Humanitarian Aid
Jonah Raskin
Mitchel Cohen Takes on Global and Local Goliaths: Profile of a Lifelong Multi-Movement Organizer
Binoy Kampmark
Size Matters: the Demise of the Airbus A380
Elliot Sperber
For Your Children (or: Dead Ahead)
February 20, 2019
Anthony DiMaggio
Withdrawal Pains and Syrian Civil War: An Analysis of U.S. Media Discourse
Charles Pierson
When Saudi Arabia Gets the Bomb
Doug Johnson Hatlem
“Electability” is Real (Unless Married with the Junk Science of Ideological Spectrum Analysis)
Kenneth Surin
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline: Another Boondoggle in Virginia
John Feffer
The Psychology of the Wall
Dean Baker
Modern Monetary Theory and Taxing the Rich
Russell Mokhiber
Citizens Arrested Calling Out Manchin on Rockwool
George Ochenski
Unconstitutional Power Grabs
Michael T. Klare
War With China? It’s Already Under Way
Thomas Knapp
The Real Emergency Isn’t About the Wall, It’s About the Separation of Powers
Manuel García, Jr.
Two Worlds
Daniel Warner
The Martin Ennals and Victorian Prize Winners Contrast with Australia’s Policies against Human Dignity
Norman Solomon
What the Bernie Sanders 2020 Campaign Means for Progressives
Dan Corjescu
2020 Vision: A Strategy of Courage
Matthew Johnson
Why Protest Trump When We Can Impeach Him?
William A. Cohn
Something New and Something Old: a Story Still Being Told
Bill Martin
The Fourth Hypothesis: the Present Juncture of the Trump Clarification and the Watershed Moment on the Washington Mall
February 19, 2019
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Troublesome Possibilities: The Left and Tulsi Gabbard
Patrick Cockburn
She Didn’t Start the Fire: Why Attack the ISIS Bride?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Literature and Theater During War: Why Euripides Still Matters
Maximilian Werner
The Night of Terror: Wyoming Game and Fish’s Latest Attempt to Close the Book on the Mark Uptain Tragedy
Conn Hallinan
Erdogan is Destined for Another Rebuke in Turkey
Nyla Ali Khan
Politics of Jammu and Kashmir: The Only Viable Way is Forward
Mark Ashwill
On the Outside Looking In: an American in Vietnam
Joyce Nelson
Sir Richard Branson’s Venezuelan-Border PR Stunt
Ron Jacobs
Day of Remembrance and the Music of Anthony Brown        
Cesar Chelala
Women’s Critical Role in Saving the Environment
February 18, 2019
Paul Street
31 Actual National Emergencies
Robert Fisk
What Happened to the Remains of Khashoggi’s Predecessor?
David Mattson
When Grizzly Bears Go Bad: Constructions of Victimhood and Blame
Julian Vigo
USMCA’s Outsourcing of Free Speech to Big Tech
George Wuerthner
How the BLM Serves the West’s Welfare Ranchers
Christopher Fons
The Crimes of Elliot Abrams
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail