• Monthly
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $other
  • use PayPal

SPRING FUNDRAISER

Is it time for our Spring fundraiser already? If you enjoy what we offer, and have the means, please consider donating. The sooner we reach our modest goal, the faster we can get back to business as (un)usual. Please, stay safe and we’ll see you down the road.
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Will the Times Clean House?

 

The dramatic indictment, by the New York Times’ own ombudsman, of the newspaper’s propagandistic and misleading coverage of the run-up to the Iraq war, and the fighting of that war, and particularly of its uncritical support for the Bush administration’s deceptive claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and was supporting Al Qaeda, offers the hope of a sea change in the American media’s supine approach to journalism.

But only the hope of change.

Much will depend first of all on whether the Times’ own management takes the steps called for by ombudsman Daniel Okrent. He has called on the paper to “launch a new round of examination and investigation,” saying what is needed is not more contrition, but rather “a series of aggressively reported stories detailing the misinformation, disinformation and suspect analysis that led virtually the entire world to believe Hussein had W.M.D. at his disposal.”

Okrent, unlike the Times editors, who in their own semi-mea culpa essay published only four days earlier, had studiously avoided naming names, singles out two Times reporters-Judith Miller and Patrick Tyler-as being purveyors of what he called “credulous” and “flawed” articles, though he adds that their editors too, deserve blame for censoring out or downplaying reports that contradicted or undermined Miller’s and other propagandistic writers’ reports. Hinting that there were even more unsavory things going on at the Times, Okrent discloses that some reporters at the paper, thus far unnamed, actively protected their pro-administration sources from “unfriendly reporting by colleagues.” He also charges that editors at the paper created a “dysfunctional” system that permitted some reporters in Washington and Baghdad, again unnamed, “to work outside the lines of customary bureau management,” while preventing other reporters “with substantial knowledge of the subject at hand” from getting a chance to “express their reservations” about the stories the paper was running. He even discloses that the Times, in a major breach of ethics, from January through May 2003 actually had the niece of key Iraq war hawker (and Miller source) Ahmad Chalabi working for the paper at its Kuwait bureau.

Given the extremes to which the Times went to expose the failings of its cub reporter Jason Blair, when it was learned that he had been making up stories-a scandal that hurt nobody but Blair himself and the reputation of the paper–it would seem that the paper would have no alternative but to do at least as exhaustive a housecleaning now, when the deceptions and breaches of journalistic standards by its staff have had so much more serious an impact-contributing as they did to the nation’s going to war, and to the death of hundreds of Americans and thousands of innocent Iraqis.

But the impact of Okrent’s critique of the Times goes far beyond the Gray Lady. If the Times was guilty of shamelessly promoting a war on behalf of the Bush administration, so was most of the rest of the American media-especially the major television networks, including cable networks CNN and MSNBC, and the Times’ main competitors, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal.

Okrent says that at times the nation’s self-styled newspaper of record “pushed Pentagon assertions” about W.M.D.s and about Iraq’s alleged links to Al Qaeda “so aggressively you could almost sense epaulets sprouting on the shoulders of editors.”

Indeed, but the same could as easily be said of the anchors and reporters at the major networks, who might as well have been wearing uniforms. The breathless repeating of administration claims about W.M.D.s, about Al Qaeda threats, about other nations’ alleged terrorism links, and, after it began, about the magnificent American invasion, all framed with patriotic bunting and backed by rousing musical soundtracks, could have been designed by veterans of the propaganda offices of the former USSR or the People’s Republic of China.

So far, no one at any of these other media institutions has uttered a word of remorse or apology for the shoddy and sordid way they all danced to the Bush administration’s tune in first stampeding the nation in to war and then misinforming the public about the tragic and misguided course of that conflict.

Nor is there likely to be a word said about any of this scandal-which if honestly exposed would lead to the wholesale firing of a regiment of tainted journalists.

Unless, perhaps, the Times follows Okrent’s advice and really does expose its own failings and its willful complicity in the Bush administration’s warmongering. If the Times were to disclose how the administration and its paid Iraqi hirelings conducted their campaign of propaganda and deception, the tale would spread far beyond the paper itself, making it clear that the whole media establishment was dancing along.

Dramatic and surprising as it is for its forthrightness, perhaps the most striking thing about Okrent’s critique of his own employer is how it vindicates the alternative media (a point acknowledged only obliquely by Okrent)-and much of the foreign press–which have been reporting accurately on the W.M.D., issue, the non-existent Iraq-Al Qaeda link, and the conduct of the war, all along.

DAVE LINDORFF is completing a book of Counterpunch columns titled “This Can’t be Happening!” to be published this fall by Common Courage Press.

 

More articles by:

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of ThisCantBeHappening!, an online newspaper collective, and is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).

May 26, 2020
Melvin Goodman
Trump Administration and the Washington Post: Picking Fights Together
John Kendall Hawkins
The Gods of Small Things
Patrick Cockburn
Governments are Using COVID-19 Crisis to Crush Free Speech
George Wuerthner
Greatest Good is to Preserve Forest Carbon
Thomas Klikauer – Nadine Campbell
The Covid-19 Conspiracies of German Neo-Nazis
John G. Russell
TRUMP-20: The Other Pandemic
John Feffer
Trump’s “Uncreative Destruction” of the US/China Relationship
John Laforge
First US Citizen Convicted for Protests at Nuclear Weapons Base in Germany
Ralph Nader
Donald Trump, Resign Now for America’s Sake: This is No Time for a Dangerous, Law-breaking, Bungling, Ignorant Ship Captain
James Fortin – Jeff Mackler
Killer Capitalism’s COVID-19 Back-to-Work Imperative
Henry Giroux
Criminogenic Politics as a Form of Psychosis in the Age of Trump
Binoy Kampmark
Patterns of Compromise: The EasyJet Data Breach
Howard Lisnoff
If a Covid-19 Vaccine is Discovered, It Will be a Boon to Military Recruiters
David Mattson
Grizzly Bears are Dying and That’s a Fact
Thomas Knapp
The Banality of Evil, COVID-19 Edition
May 25, 2020
Marshall Auerback
If the Federal Government Won’t Fund the States’ Emergency Needs, There is Another Solution
Michael Uhl
A Memory Fragment of the Vietnam War
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
Make a Resilient, Localized Food System Part of the Next Stimulus
Barrie Gilbert
The Mismanagement of Wildlife in Utah Continues to be Irrational and a National Embarrassment.
Dean Baker
The Sure Way to End Concerns About China’s “Theft” of a Vaccine: Make it Open
Thom Hartmann
The Next Death Wave from Coronavirus Will Be the Poor, Rural and White
Phil Knight
Killer Impact
Paul Cantor
Memorial Day 2020 and the Coronavirus
Laura Flanders
A Memorial Day For Lies?
Gary Macfarlane – Mike Garrity
Grizzlies, Lynx, Bull Trout and Elk on the Chopping Block for Trump’s Idaho Clearcuts
Cesar Chelala
Challenges of the Evolving Coronavirus Pandemic
Luciana Tellez-Chavez
This Year’s Forest Fire Season Could Be Even Deadlier
Thomas Hon Wing Polin
Beijing Acts on Hong Kong
George Wuerthner
Saving the Lionhead Wilderness
Elliot Sperber
Holy Beaver
Weekend Edition
May 22, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Hugh Iglarsh
Aiming Missiles at Viruses: a Plea for Sanity in a Time of Plague
Paul Street
How Obama Could Find Some Redemption
Marc Levy
On Meeting Bao Ninh: “These Good Men Meant as Much to Me as Yours Did to You”
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Shallò: 120 Days of COVID
Joan Roelofs
Greening the Old New Deal
Rob Urie
Why Russiagate Still Matters
Charles Pierson
Is the US-Saudi Alliance Headed Off a Cliff?
Robert Hunziker
10C Above Baseline
Pam Martens - Russ Martens
The Fed’s Chair and Vice Chair Got Rich at Carlyle Group, a Private Equity Fund With a String of Bankruptcies and Job Losses
Eve Ottenberg
Factory Farming on Hold
Andrew Levine
If Nancy Pelosi Is So Great, How Come Donald Trump Still Isn’t Dead in the Water?
Ishmael Reed
Alex Azar Knows About Diabetes
Joseph Natoli
Will Things Fall Apart Now or in November?
Richard D. Wolff
An Old Story Again: Capitalism vs. Health and Safety
Louis Proyect
What Stanford University and Fox News Have in Common
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail