• Monthly
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $other
  • use PayPal

SPRING FUNDRAISER

Is it time for our Spring fundraiser already? If you enjoy what we offer, and have the means, please consider donating. The sooner we reach our modest goal, the faster we can get back to business as (un)usual. Please, stay safe and we’ll see you down the road.
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Legitimacy in Iraq

By using the distraction of Rumsfeld’s testimony on Capital Hill to disguise continuing aggression, US Marines have stepped up their campaign to “capture or kill” Muqtada al-Sadr. Fighting has escalated in both Najaf and Kerbala with the goal of seizing control of the Holy cities and disbanding al Sadr’s Mahdi Army.

Al Sadr, who has been identified by the western press as “the radical cleric,” ( for disparaging the brutal and inexcusable conduct of the occupation) has drawn the ire of the coalition authority for not complying with the new order.

Given the Bush Administration’s penchant for fabrication, we should at least examine the claims levied against the cleric. By all accounts al Sadr was a marginal leader with a modest following of (roughly) 10,000. When his newspaper (which was operating within the parameters of widely accepted standards of free speech) was shut down by Proconsul Paul Bremer, al Sadr’s people took to the streets in peaceful (but vocal) protest. They were fired on by the Americans, and a number of them were killed. This was the beginning of al Sadr’s armed struggle against the occupation.

His call to arms only occurred after he had exhausted the conventional democratic methods of expression. This being the case, the appellation of “radical cleric” is just another of the “unproved assumptions” brandished by western journalists to promote the overall goals of the occupation. It is another illustration of the manipulation of language to mold public perceptions. It is tantamount to ideological warfare.

Since joining the insurgency al Sadr has been holed up in the Holy city of Najaf, appearing infrequently in public and limiting his criticism to laser sharp observations on the nature of the occupation. It was al Sadr who first realized that the Americans were in Iraq to stay and that the brutality would only increase. It was also al Sadr who grasped the unavoidable fact that America would have to be expelled by force from Iraq.

So far there is nothing to indicate that the cleric is wrong in his judgment. In fact, the criminal assault on Falluja which resulted in the slaughter of over 600 townspeople, and the disgraceful behavior of US servicemen in Rumsfeld’s Abu Ghraib “torture chamber,” are a strong indication that al Sadr is correct on all counts.

But the larger question about al Sadr is this; does al Sadr have a legitimate claim to the authority he now wields or is the Coalition Authority entitled to “kill or capture” him?

The question of legitimacy gets to the heart of the Iraq dilemma. Whereas, al Sadr, is a native Iraqi and a well respected cleric (among his followers) Paul Bremer and Co. can make no such claim. The occupation has no legal or moral right to be in Iraq at all. Its continued presence is justified in terms of overwhelming force alone.

This is the inescapable moral quandary we face when a country is illegally invaded without international authority and without an imminent national security threat. Whatever, actions are taken within this paradigm of “unprovoked aggression” have to considered in terms of one’s right to be there in the first place.

In the case of the occupation of Iraq, reasonable people agree that Iraq posed no threat to the US and that the war was not endorsed by the Security Council. Therefore, we must assume that it is the leadership and conduct of the US that lacks legitimacy not al Sadr.

This issue may seem inconsequential given the determination of the Marines to remove al Sadr, but it does allow those who care about such issues to see that the logic of the occupation is grounded in the implicit acceptance of criminal aggression.

For Iraq’s growing insurgency, claiming the moral high-ground is an important part of enlisting people to their cause. Under the rubric of “moral superiority” their efforts become a broader struggle for justice and, thus, more likely to succeed.

MIKE WHITNEY can be reached at: fergiewhitney@msn.com

More articles by:

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.

Weekend Edition
May 29, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Tim Wise
Protest, Uprisings, and Race War
Nick Pemberton
White Supremacy is the Virus; Police are the Vector
T.J. Coles
What’s NATO Up to These Days? Provoking Russia, Draining Healthcare Budgets and Protecting Its Own from COVID
Benjamin Dangl
Bibles at the Barricades: How the Right Seized Power in Bolivia
Kevin Alexander Gray - Jeffrey St. Clair - JoAnn Wypijewski
There is No Peace: an Incitement to Justice
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Few Good Sadists
Jeff Mackler
The Plague of Racist Cop Murders: Ahmaud Arbery, George Floyd and the COVID-19 Pandemic
Joshua Frank
In Search of a Lost Socialism
Charles Pierson
Who are the “Wrong Hands” in Yemen?
Andrew Levine
Trump Is Unbeatable in the Race to the Bottom and So Is the GOP
David Schultz
Trump isn’t the Pope and This Ain’t the Middle Ages
Ramzy Baroud
Political Ambiguity or a Doomsday Weapon: Why Abbas Abandoned Oslo
Pam Martens - Russ Martens
A Growing Wave of Bankruptcies Threatens U.S. Recovery
Joseph Natoli
Conditions Close at Hand
N.D. Jayaprakash
No Lessons Learned From Bhopal: the Toxic Chemical Leak at LG Polymers India 
Ron Jacobs
The Odyssey of Elias Demetracopoulos
J.P. Linstroth
Arundhati Roy on Indian Migrant-Worker Oppression and India’s Fateful COVID Crisis
Melvin Goodman
Goodness Gracious, David Ignatius!!
Roger Harris
Blaming the COVID-19 Pandemic on Too Many Humans:  a Critique of Overpopulation Ideology
Sonali Kolhatkar
For America’s Wealthiest, the Pandemic is a Time to Profit
Prabir Purkayastha
U.S. Declares a Vaccine War on the World
David Rosen
Coronavirus and the Telecom Crisis
Paul Buhle
Why Does W.E.B. Du Bois Matter Today?
Mike Bader
The Only Way to Save Grizzlies: Connect Their Habitats
Dave Lindorff
Pandemic Crisis and Recession Can Spark a Fight for Real Change in the US
Nyla Ali Khan
The Sociopolitical and Historical Context That Shaped Kashmiri Women Like My Grandmother in the 1940s
Louis Proyect
Does Neo-Feudalism Define Our Current Epoch?
Ralph Nader
S. David Freeman: Seven Decades of Participating in Power for All of Us
Norman Solomon
Amy Klobuchar, Minneapolis Police and Her VP Quest
Maria Paez Victor
Venezuela in the 2020 Pandemic
Ron Mitchell
Defending Our Public Lands: One Man’s Legacy
Nomi Prins 
The Great Depression, Coronavirus Style: Crashes, Then and Now
Richard C. Gross
About That City on A Hill
Kathleen Wallace
An Oath for Hypocrites
Eve Ottenberg
Common Preservation or Extinction?
Graham Peebles
Air Pollution Mental Illness and Covid-19
ADRIAN KUZMINSKI
Unearned Income for All
Evan Jones
The Machine Stops
Nicky Reid
Proudhon v. Facebook: A Mutualist Solution to Cyber Tyranny
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
What is a “Native” Plant in a Changing World?
Shailly Gupta Barnes
Why are Our Leaders Still Putting Their Faith in the Rich?
John Kendall Hawkins
In Search of the Chosŏn People of Lost Korea
Jill Richardson
Tens of Millions of Are Out of Work, Why on Earth is Trump Trying to Cut Food Aid?
Susan Block
Incel Terrorism
David Yearsley
Plague Music
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail