FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Let Me Ask You One Question: Is Your Money That Good?

 

In the first days after the events known as 9/11, I wrote a piece that appeared in a view different journals and websites that was titled “The Terrorism of War.” In that piece I mentioned that although there was no link between Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and the Islamic terrorists, the US “war on terror” would probably wind up creating one. Recent events in Iraq and Madrid seem to bear this prediction out. In short, the US war machine has created the situation it described, leaving the world with an invigorated collection of groups committing acts of terror against civilians in Iraq and elsewhere and an armed resistance movement opposed to the US and its diminishing allies occupying the countryside of Iraq.

While I remain skeptical that the attacks in Iraq that seem to be aimed at civilians are the work of Iraqi or foreign terrorist groups (I honestly think some of them are the work of Israeli and/or US intelligence agencies, either directly or through intermediary groups), this is the perception created by US media reports. The war on Iraq is now more than ever the “war on terror” in the minds of those Americans who use US television for their news. FOX News is the most obvious perpetrator of this lie, drawing conclusions as to the nature of the fighters based solely on their ethnocentric suppositions that are fueled by Pentagon half-truths and pro-Israeli neoconservative lies. These conclusions, when repeated over and over at a hysterical pitch-as is the nature of the twenty-four hour news networks-can convince most listeners that what they are hearing is the truth. As to those anti-occupation demonstrations and the attacks committed by locals: those are not what they appear to be. At least according to the FOX “news” team. Much like the police in the Rodney King beating insisted that the videotape was lying, the Pentagon and their propagandists insist that the resistance is not resistance and the Iraqis involved in it are not Iraqis. In other words, believe what they tell you, not what you see.

With the anniversary of the beginning of the war on Iraq here, it is instructive to take a look at the war and its opposition. The Democrats, who actually had a couple of candidates running on various versions of an antiwar platform in the early going, have now made it clear that they are going along with the Bush party line-the occupation and rebuilding of Iraq in Washington’s image is part of the war on terror. Furthermore, they are trying their best to convince those disgusted with Bush and Co. that the Kerry campaign is different than Bush. This may be the case as regards some domestic matters, but it is definitely not so when it comes to foreign policy. While FOX showed the March 17th blast in Baghdad, it was also showing a Kerry speech wherein he told his audience that the US troops needed to stay in Iraq to finish their job. On other occasions, Mr. Kerry has even called for an increase in troop strength. These statements beg the obvious question: what is the job of the troops? If it is to make the area safe for US investors and to project US military power in the region, then they do need to stay. If it’s to bring democracy and freedom to the Iraqi people, then they need to go. Immediately. Democracy can not be established as long as US troops are in Iraq. It doesn’t matter whether there is a US-installed government or a UN mandate that involves US troops. The US military and its civilian counterparts need to leave.

Of course they won’t. Why? Because democracy is not the end result of US intervention. Nor is it what Bush, Cheney and the rest hoped for back when they started this project. Certainly, US style democracy may be a goal of some of the war’s architects, but only as a by-product of the war’s fundamental purpose-the complete incorporation of Iraq into the global capitalist system under Washington’s terms. Obviously, this order is dominated by the United States and the incorporation of Iraq’s resources and labor force would insure that dominance for at least the immediate future. For those invested in this project, the events on the ground must be disheartening. The home-grown insurgency seems to be strengthening and various terror groups are leaving their murderous mark as well. After a year of war, the only guarantee US troops appear to represent is the guarantee that Iraq will suffer more misery and that more occupation soldiers will die. Oh yeah, and that the masters of war will continue to reap their bounty at everyone else’s expense.

RON JACOBS is author of The Way the Wind Blew: a history of the Weather Underground, which is being republished by Verso.

He can be reached at: rjacobs@zoo.uvm.edu

 

 

More articles by:

Ron Jacobs is the author of Daydream Sunset: Sixties Counterculture in the Seventies published by CounterPunch Books. His latest offering is a pamphlet titled Capitalism: Is the Problem.  He lives in Vermont. He can be reached at: ronj1955@gmail.com.

September 25, 2018
Kenneth Surin
Fact-Finding Labour’s “Anti-Semitism” Crisis
Charles Pierson
Destroying Yemen as Humanely as Possible
James Rothenberg
Why Not Socialism?
Patrick Cockburn
How Putin Came Out on Top in Syria
John Grant
“Awesome Uncontrollable Male Passion” Meets Its Match
Guy Horton
Burma: Complicity With Evil?
Steve Stallone
Jujitsu Comms
William Blum
Bombing Libya: the Origins of Europe’s Immigration Crisis
John Feffer
There’s a New Crash Coming
Martha Pskowski
“The Emergency Isn’t Over”: the Homeless Commemorate a Year Since the Mexico City Earthquake
Fred Baumgarten
Ten Ways of Looking at Civility
Dean Baker
The Great Financial Crisis: Bernanke and the Bubble
Binoy Kampmark
Parasitic and Irrelevant: The University Vice Chancellor
September 24, 2018
Jonathan Cook
Hiding in Plain Sight: Why We Cannot See the System Destroying Us
Gary Leupp
All the Good News (Ignored by the Trump-Obsessed Media)
Robert Fisk
I Don’t See How a Palestinian State Can Ever Happen
Barry Brown
Pot as Political Speech
Lara Merling
Puerto Rico’s Colonial Legacy and Its Continuing Economic Troubles
Patrick Cockburn
Iraq’s Prime Ministers Come and Go, But the Stalemate Remains
William Blum
The New Iraq WMD: Russian Interference in US Elections
Julian Vigo
The UK’s Snoopers’ Charter Has Been Dealt a Serious Blow
Joseph Matten
Why Did Global Economic Performance Deteriorate in the 1970s?
Zhivko Illeieff
The Millennial Label: Distinguishing Facts from Fiction
Thomas Hon Wing Polin – Gerry Brown
Xinjiang : The New Great Game
Binoy Kampmark
Casting Kavanaugh: The Trump Supreme Court Drama
Max Wilbert
Blue Angels: the Naked Face of Empire
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will There Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail