FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

What Makes a Nader Voter Tick?

by GREG BATES

 

I am writing a book that looks at Ralph Nader’s bid for the Presidency and I need 5 minutes of your time–if you intend to or are likely to vote for him. I have talked to a lot of people about this, and while many stand against him, some favor his run while saying they won’t vote for him. Others say they are pretty sure or very interested in voting for him. I want to find out, among those already likely to vote for him, why they think this is a good idea or could be a good idea.

Below is a list of 6 standard arguments against his run. I don’t write them to persuade you but I want to know what makes a Ralph voter tick–what are your answers to the ways Democrats and many progressives see this issue.

This is not a scientific survey. This has not been previously reviewed by anyone at the Nader campaign.

Please respond to gbates@commoncouragepress.com

I am counting on those who don’t qualify (those who intend at this point to vote for someone else) not to gum up my inbox with answers. Thanks. To fill out the survey you don’t have to have your mind made up, just be clearly leaning in that direction. You have to be eligible to vote in the U.S.

Some personal data can help clarify who the Nader voters are (we will keep this confidential and you don’t have to give name or address). All questions are optional–answer any you wish leaving others blank. But more is better.

1. What state do you live in?

2. As of this date, do you consider yourself to be in a swing state?

3. What is your gender?

4. What ethnic background do you identify as?

5. How old are you?

6. Did you vote for Nader in 2000?

7. Are you leaning toward voting for Ralph?

Six reasons not to vote Nader–what are your responses? (I ask loaded questions in hopes of inciting your best answers.)

1. Only one of two people will become president, Kerry or Bush. Why waste time voting (or working) for someone else?

2. One person said “I will vote for Kerry if he is just 1 degree to the left of Bush. Given what is at stake, why won’t you?”

3. If you agree that Getting Bush out is the top priority, why focus on any other candidate besides Kerry?

4. Nader could be doing something more useful, and touring the country, but not as a candidate. Do you agree>

5. Since getting Bush out is priority 1, why can’t you think strategically?

6. Don’t you realize how awful and dangerous 4 more years of Bush would be?

And a positive question:

7. What is the most important reason you are likely to vote for Nader?

By answering these 7 questions you get the chance to help the world understand what it is having trouble understanding. And maybe convince some readers.

Thanks. I won’t be able to respond to the questionnaires but I value your answers. Please respond before April 1, the cut off date. Please don’t respond later than April 1.

Feel free to forward to other like-minded Nader backers. I’m looking for as many responses from Nader supporters as possible.

Thanks for your time.

GREG BATES

respond to gbates@commoncouragepress.com

 

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
February 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
American Carnage
Paul Street
Michael Wolff, Class Rule, and the Madness of King Don
Andrew Levine
Had Hillary Won: What Now?
David Rosen
Donald Trump’s Pathetic Sex Life
Susan Roberts
Are Modern Cities Sustainable?
Joyce Nelson
Canada vs. Venezuela: Have the Koch Brothers Captured Canada’s Left?
Geoff Dutton
America Loves Islamic Terrorists (Abroad): ISIS as Proxy US Mercenaries
Mike Whitney
The Obnoxious Pence Shows Why Korea Must End US Occupation
Joseph Natoli
In the Post-Truth Classroom
John Eskow
One More Slaughter, One More Piece of Evidence: Racism is a Terminal Mental Disease
John W. Whitehead
War Spending Will Bankrupt America
Dave Lindorff
Trump’s Latest Insulting Proposal: Converting SNAP into a Canned Goods Distribution Program
Robert Fantina
Guns, Violence and the United States
Robert Hunziker
Global Warming Zaps Oxygen
John Laforge
$1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and “Fake” Cleanups
CJ Hopkins
The War on Dissent: the Specter of Divisiveness
Peter A. Coclanis
Chipotle Bell
Anders Sandström – Joona-Hermanni Mäkinen
Ways Forward for the Left
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Winning Hearts and Minds
Tommy Raskin
Syrian Quicksand
Martha Rosenberg
Big Pharma Still Tries to Push Dangerous Drug Class
Jill Richardson
The Attorney General Thinks Aspirin Helps Severe Pain – He’s Wrong
Mike Miller
Herb March: a Legend Deserved
Ann Garrison
If the Democrats Were Decent
Renee Parsons
The Times, They are a-Changing
Howard Gregory
The Democrats Must Campaign to End Trickle-Down Economics
Sean Keller
Agriculture and Autonomy in the Middle East
Ron Jacobs
Re-Visiting Gonzo
Eileen Appelbaum
Rapid Job Growth, More Education Fail to Translate into Higher Wages for Health Care Workers
Ralph Nader
Shernoff, Bidart, and Echeverria—Wide-Ranging Lawyers for the People
Chris Zinda
The Meaning of Virginia Park
Robert Koehler
War and Poverty: A Compromise with Hell
Mike Bader – Mike Garrity
Senator Tester Must Stop Playing Politics With Public Lands
Kenneth Culton
No Time for Olympic Inspired Nationalism
Graham Peebles
Ethiopia: Final Days of the Regime
Irene Tung – Teófilo Reyes
Tips are for Servers Not CEOs
Randy Shields
Yahoomans in Paradise – This is L.A. to Me
Thomas Knapp
No Huawei! US Spy Chiefs Reverse Course on Phone Spying
Mel Gurtov
Was There Really a Breakthrough in US-North Korea Relations?
David Swanson
Witness Out of Palestine
Binoy Kampmark
George Brandis, the Rule of Law and Populism
Dean Baker
The Washington Post’s Long-Running Attack on Unions
Andrew Stewart
Providence Public School Teachers Fight Back at City Hall
Stephen Cooper
Majestic Meditations with Jesse Royal: the Interview
David Yearsley
Olympic Music
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail