FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

George Will and Anti-Semitism

 

In his most recent Washington Post article, political pundit, George Will levels the charge of anti-Semitism against left-leaning intellectuals. This accusation, which is entirely without merit, comes from a journalist, who, during his dubious career has eagerly attacked blacks, aliens, Muslims and, his favorite “whipping boy”, liberals. His animus towards these groups is only partially disguised by the lofty rhetoric he employs to hide his own deep-seated prejudices.

Nevertheless, voices like Will’s are becoming increasingly commonplace as the marketplace of ideas has been reduced to the shrill invective issuing from America’s right wing think tanks.

Will defines these leftist intellectuals in a circuitous, Rumsfeld-like language, “people who think about ideas-about thinking-but also people who think they do.” If the intention is sarcasm, it’s lost in its oblique delivery.

Mr. Will continues, speaking in the voice of an alleged “leftist” anti-Semite, “We do not dislike Jews, we only dislike Zionists-although to live in Israel is to endorse the Zionist enterprise, and all Jews are implicated, as sympathizers, in the crime that is Israel.”

This is a sweeping statement and one that lies at the heart of attacks on liberals as anti-Semites. Will deftly conflates anti-Semitism with resistance to the illegal occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. What is striking about Will’s comment is that by his own logic both Colin Powell and George Bush anti-Semites, since they have both publicly advocated a two-state solution.

This is how pundits like Mr. Will back themselves into an intellectual cul-de-sac. They begin with assumptions that are entirely untenable and then they invoke linguistic trickery to hide their feeble argument. In reality, no defense is possible. The issue was decided decades ago when the world body agreed “unanimously” that Israel should accept the 1967 borders as the legitimate boundaries of the Palestinian State.

That hasn’t changed.

That won’t change.

Regardless of the legions of op-ed writers like Will who are employed to defend the indefensible, and regardless of the benign-sounding language (“security barrier”) used to mask the brutal reality on the ground; the facts remain the same. Israel is in violation of UN resolutions, continues to ignore the clear intentions of the world community, and shows no willingness to change. In fact, the violence and land theft has only increased under Sharon.

There’s nothing “leftist” intellectuals can do about this, nor is their anything anti-Semitic about pointing it out. It simply demonstrates a commitment to basic principles of social justice. Only the Israeli leadership can affect a substantive change. And, much like the American leadership, Israel’s government is not reflective of the collective will of the people, 56% of who STILL WANT A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT. (Even after three years of unrelenting war and acrimony)

This proves that Will’s opinion is in the minority even in Israel.

As for the charge of anti-Semitism, it should be noted that Will’s “selective indignation” was never aroused when Muslims were being locked up wholesale in the US after 9-11. Nor has he been outspoken about the disgraceful and lawless two year detention of Muslims in Guantanamo Bay. He hasn’t wasted one word on their account.

With George Will civil rights and personal liberties are only defended if you have the right pedigree; Muslims and liberals need not apply.

And, Will’s distain for Muslims couldn’t be more obvious. He opines on the “Arab world’s addiction to political lunacy”; a dismissive and racist comment that would never be directed at Jews, but can safely be levied at Muslims without fear of reprisal.

It’s just another illustration of the intolerance and bias that dominate Will’s writings. It’s clear that if it wasn’t for double standards, he’d have no standards at all.

Taking a broader view of the nagging problems of discrimination and bigotry, Mr. Will can be consoled in knowing that both are safely accounted for in their natural quarters, the right wing of the Republican Party.

MIKE WHITNEY can be reached at: fergiewhitney@msn.com

 

More articles by:

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.

February 21, 2019
Daniel Warner
New York, New York: a Resounding Victory for New York Over Amazon
Russell Mokhiber
With Monsanto and Glyphosate on the Run AAAS Revokes Award to Scientists Whose Studies Led to Ban on Weedkiller in Sri Lanka and Other Countries
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Fake National Emergency Moves America Closer to an Autocracy
Alex Campbell
Tracing the Threads in Venezuela: Humanitarian Aid
Jonah Raskin
Mitchel Cohen Takes on Global and Local Goliaths: Profile of a Lifelong Multi-Movement Organizer
Binoy Kampmark
Size Matters: the Demise of the Airbus A380
February 20, 2019
Anthony DiMaggio
Withdrawal Pains and Syrian Civil War: An Analysis of U.S. Media Discourse
Charles Pierson
When Saudi Arabia Gets the Bomb
Doug Johnson Hatlem
“Electability” is Real (Unless Married with the Junk Science of Ideological Spectrum Analysis)
Kenneth Surin
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline: Another Boondoggle in Virginia
John Feffer
The Psychology of the Wall
Dean Baker
Modern Monetary Theory and Taxing the Rich
Russell Mokhiber
Citizens Arrested Calling Out Manchin on Rockwool
George Ochenski
Unconstitutional Power Grabs
Michael T. Klare
War With China? It’s Already Under Way
Thomas Knapp
The Real Emergency Isn’t About the Wall, It’s About the Separation of Powers
Manuel García, Jr.
Two Worlds
Daniel Warner
The Martin Ennals and Victorian Prize Winners Contrast with Australia’s Policies against Human Dignity
Norman Solomon
What the Bernie Sanders 2020 Campaign Means for Progressives
Dan Corjescu
2020 Vision: A Strategy of Courage
Matthew Johnson
Why Protest Trump When We Can Impeach Him?
William A. Cohn
Something New and Something Old: a Story Still Being Told
Bill Martin
The Fourth Hypothesis: the Present Juncture of the Trump Clarification and the Watershed Moment on the Washington Mall
February 19, 2019
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Troublesome Possibilities: The Left and Tulsi Gabbard
Patrick Cockburn
She Didn’t Start the Fire: Why Attack the ISIS Bride?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Literature and Theater During War: Why Euripides Still Matters
Maximilian Werner
The Night of Terror: Wyoming Game and Fish’s Latest Attempt to Close the Book on the Mark Uptain Tragedy
Conn Hallinan
Erdogan is Destined for Another Rebuke in Turkey
Nyla Ali Khan
Politics of Jammu and Kashmir: The Only Viable Way is Forward
Mark Ashwill
On the Outside Looking In: an American in Vietnam
Joyce Nelson
Sir Richard Branson’s Venezuelan-Border PR Stunt
Ron Jacobs
Day of Remembrance and the Music of Anthony Brown        
Cesar Chelala
Women’s Critical Role in Saving the Environment
February 18, 2019
Paul Street
31 Actual National Emergencies
Robert Fisk
What Happened to the Remains of Khashoggi’s Predecessor?
David Mattson
When Grizzly Bears Go Bad: Constructions of Victimhood and Blame
Julian Vigo
USMCA’s Outsourcing of Free Speech to Big Tech
George Wuerthner
How the BLM Serves the West’s Welfare Ranchers
Christopher Fons
The Crimes of Elliot Abrams
Thomas Knapp
The First Rule of AIPAC Is: You Do Not Talk about AIPAC
Mitchel Cohen
A Tale of Two Citations: Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” and Michael Harrington’s “The Other America”
Jake Johnston
Haiti and the Collapse of a Political and Economic System
Dave Lindorff
It’s Not Just Trump and the Republicans
Laura Flanders
An End to Amazon’s Two-Bit Romance. No Low-Rent Rendezvous.
Patrick Walker
Venezuelan Coup Democrats Vomit on Green New Deal
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail