FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Fatal Vision

Hard as it is for all of us to confront, the loss of life in Iraq must be looked at in current and historical ways.

Comparing our current human loss with past losses is our only measuring stick. During the two-year period of 1963 and 1964 in Vietnam the United States military loss was 324. The first incursion into Iraq in 1991 saw the loss of 147 servicemen. Since March 20, 2003, the loss of military service men and women as of October 17, 2003, was 336.

Our military losses in the past seven months have surpassed the death toll of two years in Vietnam. It was reported that there were 43 attacks on our military troops on Sunday, October 19, 2003. If May 1, 2003, signified the end of “major battles” in Iraq, why are the losses not stopping? Why are the deaths not declining? Why are we still fighting throughout Iraq?

The following graph illustrates the losses:

 

 

One thing that is truly apparent from this graph is that these numbers will only become larger and never diminish.

On Saturday, October 18, Lt. Gen. Thomas F. Metz told reporters that it is likely that our troops will be in Iraq
until 2006.

Was the stage managed appearance of “Mission Accomplished” on the decks of the USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1 just a miscalculation or was it a deception?

George Bush has begun a new public relations campaign to sell our continued military occupation of Iraq to the public. He has stated that he believes that the “media” has focused too much upon the deaths of our men and women. He feels that we are not hearing enough of the positive things that are happening in Iraq. He also stated that he would be the one to “hug” the mothers and wives of the soldiers lost in this conflict yet he has not attended even one funeral of these men and women.

At the onset of this military adventure, George Bush requested $79 Billion and told our congressional representatives that sum would cover the cost of our involvement for one year. An additional $87 Billion was approved by our congress last week, making the financial cost for the first year $166 Billion.

The US Treasury released its financial statement for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, showing a deficit for that period to be $374 Billion. This deficit does not take into account the sums that were used from our Social Security Trust Fund in the amount of $160 Billion, nor the sums that were removed from the other pension funds that the government administers. Without these amounts, our deficit would have exceeded $500 Billion for the one year period.

In 1965, we lost 1,863 and in 1966, we lost 11,153. The total losses for Vietnam numbered greater than 58,000 with a financial burden that caused our nation to fall from surplus to deficit.

Repeating history because we fail to learn its lessons may be human nature, but our country and its citizens have demonstrated a tremendous resiliency and the ability to grow in a positive nature. I can only hope that we, collectively, can convince our governmental employees to cease their imperial designs.

BRIDGET GIBSON can be reached at: rbsclay@grm.net

 

More articles by:
September 26, 2018
Jonathan Cook
Time to Wake Up: the Neoliberal Order is Dying 
David J. Detmer
History Distorted: Sam Wineberg’s Critique of Howard Zinn
Robert Hunziker
An Unforeseen Climate Beast Awakens!
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Many More Women Are There?
Jörg Wiegratz
The Age of Fraud: the Link Between Capitalism and Profiteering by Deception
John Kendall Hawkins
Now There’s a Wall Between Us, Something There’s Been Lost…
William Kaufman
Brett Kavanaugh’s Wayward Penis: A New Twist
Michael Welton
A Wake-Up Call to the Canadian Left
Patrick Irelan
Brett Goes to School 
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
All Wars Are Illegal, Let’s Act!
Dean Baker
Robots, China and the Failure of Economics Reporters
Matthew Johnson
Cancel Kavanaugh
Rohullah Naderi – Rustam Ali Seerat
The Option of Self-Defense for Hazaras
September 25, 2018
Kenneth Surin
Fact-Finding Labour’s “Anti-Semitism” Crisis
Charles Pierson
Destroying Yemen as Humanely as Possible
James Rothenberg
Why Not Socialism?
Patrick Cockburn
How Putin Came Out on Top in Syria
John Grant
“Awesome Uncontrollable Male Passion” Meets Its Match
Guy Horton
Burma: Complicity With Evil?
Steve Stallone
Jujitsu Comms
William Blum
Bombing Libya: the Origins of Europe’s Immigration Crisis
John Feffer
There’s a New Crash Coming
Martha Pskowski
“The Emergency Isn’t Over”: the Homeless Commemorate a Year Since the Mexico City Earthquake
Fred Baumgarten
Ten Ways of Looking at Civility
Dean Baker
The Great Financial Crisis: Bernanke and the Bubble
Binoy Kampmark
Parasitic and Irrelevant: The University Vice Chancellor
September 24, 2018
Jonathan Cook
Hiding in Plain Sight: Why We Cannot See the System Destroying Us
Gary Leupp
All the Good News (Ignored by the Trump-Obsessed Media)
Robert Fisk
I Don’t See How a Palestinian State Can Ever Happen
Barry Brown
Pot as Political Speech
Lara Merling
Puerto Rico’s Colonial Legacy and Its Continuing Economic Troubles
Patrick Cockburn
Iraq’s Prime Ministers Come and Go, But the Stalemate Remains
William Blum
The New Iraq WMD: Russian Interference in US Elections
Julian Vigo
The UK’s Snoopers’ Charter Has Been Dealt a Serious Blow
Joseph Matten
Why Did Global Economic Performance Deteriorate in the 1970s?
Zhivko Illeieff
The Millennial Label: Distinguishing Facts from Fiction
Thomas Hon Wing Polin – Gerry Brown
Xinjiang : The New Great Game
Binoy Kampmark
Casting Kavanaugh: The Trump Supreme Court Drama
Max Wilbert
Blue Angels: the Naked Face of Empire
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail