Fatal Vision

Hard as it is for all of us to confront, the loss of life in Iraq must be looked at in current and historical ways.

Comparing our current human loss with past losses is our only measuring stick. During the two-year period of 1963 and 1964 in Vietnam the United States military loss was 324. The first incursion into Iraq in 1991 saw the loss of 147 servicemen. Since March 20, 2003, the loss of military service men and women as of October 17, 2003, was 336.

Our military losses in the past seven months have surpassed the death toll of two years in Vietnam. It was reported that there were 43 attacks on our military troops on Sunday, October 19, 2003. If May 1, 2003, signified the end of “major battles” in Iraq, why are the losses not stopping? Why are the deaths not declining? Why are we still fighting throughout Iraq?

The following graph illustrates the losses:



One thing that is truly apparent from this graph is that these numbers will only become larger and never diminish.

On Saturday, October 18, Lt. Gen. Thomas F. Metz told reporters that it is likely that our troops will be in Iraq
until 2006.

Was the stage managed appearance of “Mission Accomplished” on the decks of the USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1 just a miscalculation or was it a deception?

George Bush has begun a new public relations campaign to sell our continued military occupation of Iraq to the public. He has stated that he believes that the “media” has focused too much upon the deaths of our men and women. He feels that we are not hearing enough of the positive things that are happening in Iraq. He also stated that he would be the one to “hug” the mothers and wives of the soldiers lost in this conflict yet he has not attended even one funeral of these men and women.

At the onset of this military adventure, George Bush requested $79 Billion and told our congressional representatives that sum would cover the cost of our involvement for one year. An additional $87 Billion was approved by our congress last week, making the financial cost for the first year $166 Billion.

The US Treasury released its financial statement for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, showing a deficit for that period to be $374 Billion. This deficit does not take into account the sums that were used from our Social Security Trust Fund in the amount of $160 Billion, nor the sums that were removed from the other pension funds that the government administers. Without these amounts, our deficit would have exceeded $500 Billion for the one year period.

In 1965, we lost 1,863 and in 1966, we lost 11,153. The total losses for Vietnam numbered greater than 58,000 with a financial burden that caused our nation to fall from surplus to deficit.

Repeating history because we fail to learn its lessons may be human nature, but our country and its citizens have demonstrated a tremendous resiliency and the ability to grow in a positive nature. I can only hope that we, collectively, can convince our governmental employees to cease their imperial designs.

BRIDGET GIBSON can be reached at: rbsclay@grm.net


More articles by:
Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
LEJ Rachell
The Baddest Black Power Artist You Never Heard Of
Lawrence Ware
All Hell Broke Out in Oklahoma
Franklin Lamb
Tehran’s Syria: Lebanon Colonization Project is Collapsing
Donny Swanson
Janus v. AFSCME: What’s It All About?
Will Podmore
Brexit and the Windrush Britons
Brian Saady
Boehner’s Marijuana Lobbying is Symptomatic of Special-Interest Problem
Julian Vigo
Google’s Delisting and Censorship of Information
Patrick Walker
Political Dynamite: Poor People’s Campaign and the Movement for a People’s Party
Fred Gardner
Medical Board to MDs: Emphasize Dangers of Marijuana
Rob Seimetz
We Must Stand In Solidarity With Eric Reid
Missy Comley Beattie
Remembering Barbara Bush
Wim Laven
Teaching Peace in a Time of Hate
Thomas Knapp
Freedom is Winning in the Encryption Arms Race
Mir Alikhan
There Won’t be Peace in Afghanistan Until There’s Peace in Kashmir
Robert Koehler
Playing War in Syria
Tamara Pearson
US Shootings: Gun Industry Killing More People Overseas
John Feffer
Trump’s Trade War is About Trump Not China
Morris Pearl
Why the Census Shouldn’t Ask About Citizenship
Ralph Nader
Bill Curry on the Move against Public Corruption
Josh Hoxie
Five Tax Myths Debunked
Leslie Mullin
Democratic Space in Adverse Times: Milestone at Haiti’s University of the Aristide Foundation
Louis Proyect
Syria and Neo-McCarthyism
Dean Baker
Finance 202 Meets Economics 101
Abel Cohen
Forget Gun Control, Try Bullet Control
Robert Fantina
“Damascus Time:” An Iranian Movie
David Yearsley
Bach and Taxes