FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Fatal Vision

Hard as it is for all of us to confront, the loss of life in Iraq must be looked at in current and historical ways.

Comparing our current human loss with past losses is our only measuring stick. During the two-year period of 1963 and 1964 in Vietnam the United States military loss was 324. The first incursion into Iraq in 1991 saw the loss of 147 servicemen. Since March 20, 2003, the loss of military service men and women as of October 17, 2003, was 336.

Our military losses in the past seven months have surpassed the death toll of two years in Vietnam. It was reported that there were 43 attacks on our military troops on Sunday, October 19, 2003. If May 1, 2003, signified the end of “major battles” in Iraq, why are the losses not stopping? Why are the deaths not declining? Why are we still fighting throughout Iraq?

The following graph illustrates the losses:

 

 

One thing that is truly apparent from this graph is that these numbers will only become larger and never diminish.

On Saturday, October 18, Lt. Gen. Thomas F. Metz told reporters that it is likely that our troops will be in Iraq
until 2006.

Was the stage managed appearance of “Mission Accomplished” on the decks of the USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1 just a miscalculation or was it a deception?

George Bush has begun a new public relations campaign to sell our continued military occupation of Iraq to the public. He has stated that he believes that the “media” has focused too much upon the deaths of our men and women. He feels that we are not hearing enough of the positive things that are happening in Iraq. He also stated that he would be the one to “hug” the mothers and wives of the soldiers lost in this conflict yet he has not attended even one funeral of these men and women.

At the onset of this military adventure, George Bush requested $79 Billion and told our congressional representatives that sum would cover the cost of our involvement for one year. An additional $87 Billion was approved by our congress last week, making the financial cost for the first year $166 Billion.

The US Treasury released its financial statement for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, showing a deficit for that period to be $374 Billion. This deficit does not take into account the sums that were used from our Social Security Trust Fund in the amount of $160 Billion, nor the sums that were removed from the other pension funds that the government administers. Without these amounts, our deficit would have exceeded $500 Billion for the one year period.

In 1965, we lost 1,863 and in 1966, we lost 11,153. The total losses for Vietnam numbered greater than 58,000 with a financial burden that caused our nation to fall from surplus to deficit.

Repeating history because we fail to learn its lessons may be human nature, but our country and its citizens have demonstrated a tremendous resiliency and the ability to grow in a positive nature. I can only hope that we, collectively, can convince our governmental employees to cease their imperial designs.

BRIDGET GIBSON can be reached at: rbsclay@grm.net

 

More articles by:

December 19, 2018
Carl Boggs
Russophobia and the Specter of War
Jonathan Cook
American Public’s Backing for One-State Solution Falls on Deaf Ears
Daniel Warner
1968: The Year That Will Not Go Away
Arshad Khan
Developing Country Issues at COP24 … and a Bit of Good News for Solar Power and Carbon Capture
Kenneth Surin
Trump’s African Pivot: Another Swipe at China
Patrick Bond
South Africa Searches for a Financial Parachute, Now That a $170 Billion Foreign Debt Cliff Looms
Tom Clifford
Trade for Hostages? Trump’s New Approach to China
Binoy Kampmark
May Days in Britain
John Feffer
Globalists Really Are Ruining Your Life
John O'Kane
Drops and the Dropped: Diversity and the Midterm Elections
December 18, 2018
Charles Pierson
Where No Corn Has Grown Before: Better Living Through Climate Change?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Waters of American Democracy
Patrick Cockburn
Will Anger in Washington Over the Murder of Khashoggi End the War in Yemen?
George Ochenski
Trump is on the Ropes, But the Pillage of Natural Resources Continues
Farzana Versey
Tribals, Missionaries and Hindutva
Robert Hunziker
Is COP24 One More Big Bust?
David Macaray
The Truth About Nursing Homes
Nino Pagliccia
Have the Russian Military Aircrafts in Venezuela Breached the Door to “America’s Backyard”?
Paul Edwards
Make America Grate Again
David Rosnick
The Impact of OPEC on Climate Change
Binoy Kampmark
The Kosovo Blunder: Moving Towards a Standing Army
Andrew Stewart
Shine a Light for Immigration Rights in Providence
December 17, 2018
Susan Abulhawa
Marc Lamont Hill’s Detractors are the True Anti-Semites
Jake Palmer
Viktor Orban, Trump and the Populist Battle Over Public Space
Martha Rosenberg
Big Pharma Fights Proposal to Keep It From Looting Medicare
David Rosen
December 17th: International Day to End Violence against Sex Workers
Binoy Kampmark
The Case that Dare Not Speak Its Name: the Conviction of Cardinal Pell
Dave Lindorff
Making Trump and Other Climate Criminals Pay
Bill Martin
Seeing Yellow
Julian Vigo
The World Google Controls and Surveillance Capitalism
ANIS SHIVANI
What is Neoliberalism?
James Haught
Evangelicals Vote, “Nones” Falter
Vacy Vlanza
The Australian Prime Minister’s Rapture for Jerusalem
Martin Billheimer
Late Year’s Hits for the Hanging Sock
Weekend Edition
December 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
A Tale of Two Cities
Peter Linebaugh
The Significance of The Common Wind
Bruce E. Levine
The Ketamine Chorus: NYT Trumpets New Anti-Suicide Drug
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Fathers and Sons, Bushes and Bin Ladens
Kathy Deacon
Coffee, Social Stratification and the Retail Sector in a Small Maritime Village
Nick Pemberton
Praise For America’s Second Leading Intellectual
Robert Hunziker
The Yellow Vest Insurgency – What’s Next?
Nick Alexandrov
George H. W. Bush: Another Eulogy
Patrick Cockburn
The Yemeni Dead: Six Times Higher Than Previously Reported
Brian Cloughley
Principles and Morality Versus Cash and Profit? No Contest
Michael F. Duggan
Climate Change and the Limits of Reason
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail