Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Spring Fund Drive: Keep CounterPunch Afloat
CounterPunch is a lifeboat of sanity in today’s turbulent political seas. Please make a tax-deductible donation and help us continue to fight Trump and his enablers on both sides of the aisle. Every dollar counts!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Meaning of September 11

 

Politics as practiced in America has long been a cynical business, but the Bush administration has established a new standard for cynicism and manipulation.

In his speech yesterday in Quantico, VA to the FBI and a bunch of Marines bused in for patriotic color and canned applause, our active duty-dodging, “bring ’em on” threat-making president used the anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks to call for a further gutting of civil liberties and expansion of the lawless behavior and draconian powers of the Ashcroft Justice Department.

The USA PATRIOT Act (widely and unthinkingly referred to erroneously in the mainstream media as the Patriot Act), in effect since November 2001, has already been used by the Justice Department for everything from conducting warrantless searches and surveillance to arresting and detaining suspected “terrorists” without charge or even access to a lawyer–including U.S. citizens like Jose Padilla. The expanded powers now being sought by Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft would include the power to strip even native-born Americans of their citizenship, their very birthright, expanded power for warrantless searches and arrests and other further assaults on the national’s constitutional liberties. Plans are even afoot to use military brigs to confine those whose citizenship has been removed, creating a set of Guantanamo-like Gulags within the domestic U.S.

The irony, of course, is that the Justice Department, with all the new powers in already granted itself since September, 2002, has done little to make the country safer against terrorism threats.

The Bush administration knows that opposition to its ongoing rights assault has been growing, not just among traditional liberals and leftists, but on the right too, where there remain powerful constituencies that support a literal and uncompromising interpretation of the Bill of Rights. Over 160 communities and three states, including many dominated by Republicans, have over the past year or so approved laws and resolutions defending the Bill or Rights and attacking the PATRIOT Act’s provisions, such as its giving to federal agents the power to examine the library records of patrons without a warrant and without notice to the subject of the investigation. Administration sources and congressional supporters have been quoted as saying that the intent of having the president make a personal appeal for expansion of the PATRIOT Act provisions on Sept. 10 was to have it reach the public on the second anniversary of the 9/11 terror attack, in hopes that this would mute opposition to the proposed new measures.

This cynical abuse of the pain and suffering of the relatives of the World Trade Center and Pentagon dead, as appalling as it is, is matched by the president’s attempt in his Sunday address to the nation and his Wednesday address to FBI and Marine personnel to also use the same 9/11 tragedy to confuse the public and win support for his continued war policy in Iraq. Conflating the terror attacks with the U.S. military’s growing problems in Iraq, Bush has tried to say that what “began in America” is being ended in Iraq, as if by attacking Iraqi guerrilla fighters, the U.S. military is hitting back at the terror network that was responsible for the 2002 terror attacks on New York and Washington, D.C. Of course nothing could be further from the truth. The war against Iraq, which no intelligence has linked to Al Qaida, diverted military attention and power away from the search for 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. (In fact, bin Laden, taking a page from the president’s cynical playbook, chose yesterday to thumb his nose at the president and the Pentagon with release of a video tape hailing the 9/11 attack and calling for more attacks on America and Americans.) By destroying the government in Iraq, Bush and his Pentagon war-mongers also turned that nation into a lawless breeding ground for anti-American terrorists–one that is awash in weapons and explosives, and with people who know how to use them.

No honest observer of the ongoing war in Iraq would claim that even a thorough U.S. victory there, and establishment of a successful Iraqi government–a highly unlikely prospect over the next few years–would end, or even reduce terrorist threats against the U.S. Few terrorists over the past decade have been Iraqi, and the terrorist world could get along fine without Iraqis in the future.

Meanwhile, there is a 9/11 anniversary worth recalling, without any cynicism but with a great deal of irony. That’s the anniversary of the 1973 coup that overthrew the elected government of Salvadore Allende Gossens in Chile. America suffered a terrible terror attack on 9/11, but it hardly compares with the many more thousands who were brutally killed in that earlier coup, a coup which, as Peter Kornbluh, in his new book, replete with original documents and CIA and State Department cables, proves was instigated and supported by the U.S. government and specifically by President Richard M. Nixon and his Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. This was state-sponsored terrorism at its worst, and as yet, no one in American government has been brought to justice for it.

As we ponder the meaning of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2002, and of President George Bush’s call for yet more unchecked police-state powers, we Americans would do well to also ponder the meaning of September 11,1973. The more recent 9/11 terrorist attack clearly demonstrated what can happen when committed terrorists decide to attack even the world’s most powerful nation. Sept. 11, 1973 shows something worse: what happens when the very government of the world’s most powerful nation is headed by terrorists–whether a Richard Nixon and a Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, or a George W. Bush and a Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld–that is, by people who have no respect for law or for constitutionally protected civil rights and liberties, or for human life itself, and who view democracy as a game to be cynically played and manipulated.

September 11, 1973 showed us in blood just what such enemies of democracy and basic human decency are capable of.

DAVE LINDORFF is the author of Killing Time: an Investigation into the Death Row Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal. A collection of Lindorff’s stories can be found here: http://www.nwuphilly.org/dave.html

 

More articles by:

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of ThisCantBeHappening!, an online newspaper collective, and is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).

May 23, 2018
Nick Pemberton
Maduro’s Win: A Bright Spot in Dark Times
Ben Debney
A Faustian Bargain with the Climate Crisis
Deepak Tripathi
A Bloody Hot Summer in Gaza: Parallels With Sharpeville, Soweto and Jallianwala Bagh
Farhang Jahanpour
Pompeo’s Outrageous Speech on Iran
Josh White
Strange Recollections of Old Labour
CJ Hopkins
The Simulation of Democracy
Lawrence Davidson
In Our Age of State Crimes
Dave Lindorff
The Trump White House is a Chaotic Clown Car Filled with Bozos Who Think They’re Brilliant
Russell Mokhiber
The Corporate Domination of West Virginia
Ty Salandy
The British Royal Wedding, Empire and Colonialism
Laura Flanders
Life or Death to the FCC?
Gary Leupp
Dawn of an Era of Mutual Indignation?
Katalina Khoury
The Notion of Patriarchal White Supremacy Vs. Womanhood
Nicole Rosmarino
The Grassroots Environmental Activist of the Year: Christine Canaly
Caoimhghin Ó Croidheáin
“Michael Inside:” The Prison System in Ireland 
May 22, 2018
Stanley L. Cohen
Broken Dreams and Lost Lives: Israel, Gaza and the Hamas Card
Kathy Kelly
Scourging Yemen
Andrew Levine
November’s “Revolution” Will Not Be Televised
Ted Rall
#MeToo is a Cultural Workaround to a Legal Failure
Gary Leupp
Question for Discussion: Is Russia an Adversary Nation?
Binoy Kampmark
Unsettling the Summits: John Bolton’s Libya Solution
Doug Johnson
As Andrea Horwath Surges, Undecided Voters Threaten to Upend Doug Ford’s Hopes in Canada’s Most Populated Province
Kenneth Surin
Malaysia’s Surprising Election Results
Dana Cook
Canada’s ‘Superwoman’: Margot Kidder
Dean Baker
The Trade Deficit With China: Up Sharply, for Those Who Care
John Feffer
Playing Trump for Peace How the Korean Peninsula Could Become a Bright Spot in a World Gone Mad
Peter Gelderloos
Decades in Prison for Protesting Trump?
Thomas Knapp
Yes, Virginia, There is a Deep State
Andrew Stewart
What the Providence Teachers’ Union Needs for a Win
Jimmy Centeno
Mexico’s First Presidential Debate: All against One
May 21, 2018
Ron Jacobs
Gina Haspell: She’s Certainly Qualified for the Job
Uri Avnery
The Day of Shame
Amitai Ben-Abba
Israel’s New Ideology of Genocide
Patrick Cockburn
Israel is at the Height of Its Power, But the Palestinians are Still There
Frank Stricker
Can We Finally Stop Worrying About Unemployment?
Binoy Kampmark
Royal Wedding Madness
Roy Morrison
Middle East War Clouds Gather
Edward Curtin
Gina Haspel and Pinocchio From Rome
Juana Carrasco Martin
The United States is a Country Addicted to Violence
Dean Baker
Wealth Inequality: It’s Not Clear What It Means
Robert Dodge
At the Brink of Nuclear War, Who Will Lead?
Vern Loomis
If I’m Lying, I’m Dying
Valerie Reynoso
How LBJ initiated the Military Coup in the Dominican Republic
Weekend Edition
May 18, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
The Donald, Vlad, and Bibi
Robert Fisk
How Long Will We Pretend Palestinians Aren’t People?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail