Bush’s Napoleonic Complex


A veteran journalist friend of mine recently remarked that, in many ways, George W. Bush’s lust for war reminded him of Napoleon Bonaparte. The French emperor dreamt of a world under his domination. Although many of Bush’s domestic policies closely resemble those of Adolf Hitler, the comparison of Bush to Napoleon has merit. Napoleon wanted to restore the Holy Roman Empire of Charlemagne. In his first military incursions into the Middle East, Napoleon believed he was another Alexander the Great.

Bush obviously wants to create some sort of neo-Crusader American empire in the Middle East and beyond. Bush’s constant linking of his war policies to God indicates that he possesses the same sort of megalomania as Napoleon.

Napoleon wrecked the peace brought about by the Treaty of Amiens of 1802 and plunged the world back into war. Bush has trashed international treaties by the truckload and has returned the world to a nascent Cold War–and like the Soviet Union during the prior Cold War the United States is now considered the primary threat to world peace by governments and peoples alike.

The telltale signs of empire creation begins with perception management. Napoleon accomplished this by convincing the French masses that he was re-creating the glory of France after years of revolution and civil war. No amount of French blood was too much to pay and the French were happy to support Napoleon’s numerous wars.

The American public is now convinced that Bush achieved a tremendous victory over Saddam Hussein. They are willing to disregard all the reasons Bush used to invade Iraq. No weapons of mass destruction have been discovered in Iraq and a number of people in America and abroad now believe if such weapons are found, they would have been planted in Iraq by the United States.

Americans are also being told by the Bush-controlled corporate media that the residents of Baghdad and Basra were jubilant that the Americans had arrived. Never mind the fact that both cities had been under constant bombardment for weeks and that water and electricity had been cut off. After that kind of ordeal, anyone would welcome a lull in bombing and restoration of basic services. It does not mean Iraqis necessarily welcome an invading force. Independent journalists, not embedded by Pentagon handlers, report that a number of Iraqis have expressed fears that their country will come under the control of the Israelis. In addition, a CIA report states that most Iraqis abhor Ahmed Chalabi, America’s designated leader for post-Saddam Iraq.

Iraqis know Chalabi as a crook. He defrauded depositors out of $300 million when his Petra Bank in Jordan collapsed in the late 1980s. In 1992, after Chalabi escaped Jordan, reportedly with the help of then-Crown Prince Hassan, the brother of King Hussein, a Jordanian court found Chalabi guilty of fraud and sentenced him to 22 years at hard labor. Jordan has an Interpol red notice out for Chalabi’s arrest. But Chalabi will not face a Jordanian jail cell. Instead, his patrons, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Jay Garner, Scooter Libby, Michael Ledeen, and James Woolsey are pushing him as the new prime minister of Iraq. And for good measure, Chalabi’s old friend, Hassan of Jordan, is being mentioned as the person to head up a restored Hashemite monarchy in Baghdad.

But none of this is being mentioned by the American media, which is under the tight control of Bush political operatives and right-wing policy launderers like the American Enterprise Institute (home of Lynne Cheney who reportedly sits on a fellowship grant provided to the think tank from Israeli sources) and the Heritage Foundation.

With Fox News and Clear Communications and their sordid commentators spouting forth the most jingoistic propaganda billed as news, the American people are not being told the truth about Iraq. The fact that the U.S. military purposefully targeted Al Jazeera offices near the Mansour Hotel and Abu Dhabi TV and Reuters offices at the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad that were previously declared by the US Central Command as no-fire zones is being widely reported around the world but not in the United States. CNN’s veteran journalist Christiane Amanpour rejected the observation by her colleague, Wolf Blitzer, that war is a dangerous business (he was parroting Pentagon press spokeswoman Torie Clarke). Amanpour, who insisted that all the journalists knew more about the Baghdad war zone than government press officers, should have reminded CNN’s audience that Blitzer is far from a seasoned unbiased war correspondent he claims to be. The fact that Blitzer was once the Washington correspondent for The Jerusalem Post, a leading advocate of the war on Iraq, should be known by every CNN viewer. However, CNN viewers can probably be excused for not knowing Blitzer’s background — a number of journalists are not even aware of his ingrained bias on the Middle East.

The whole world is talking about the virtual news blackout imposed by the Bush administration on the United States. The BBC, France 2, CBC, Deutsche Welle, and TV Espana are all reporting that what Americans are being fed by their media is pure propaganda. European TV is carrying images of hundreds of dead Iraqi civilians while U.S. television concentrates on American military doctors tending to “sick” (not wounded) Iraqi children and Iraqis pulling down statues of Saddam and defacing his portraits.

American cable news trollops continue to lament the non-combat deaths of NBC’s David Bloom and The Atlantic Monthly’s Michael Kelly but ignore the killing of Al Jazeera’s Tariq Ayoub from a hail of American tank fire directed at the satellite news channel’s Baghdad offices. Ayoub was as familiar to millions of Arab viewers as David Bloom was to Americans. But hardly a peep about Ayoub’s death came from the 24 x 7 purveyors of Bush regime pabulum. No mention is made of ITN’s British correspondent Terry Lloyd who was reportedly killed by U.S. Marine gunfire outside of Basra late last month.

Instead, the cable propagandists began interviewing U.S. military law experts about the need for war crimes trials for Iraqi political and military leaders. No mention is made of courts martial for U.S. troops who deliberately targeted journalists or civilians. It is the disinformation policy that the Bush regime has adopted that is most amazing and worrisome to people the world over. The Bush regime does not want bad news, only good news. The Soviet Union was known for a similar policy — there was no bad news in the old Soviet Empire. Airplane crashes, earthquakes, epidemics, and severe storms were never covered by the Soviet media. The U.S. media, under the thumb of government media manipulators, is gradually adopting the same policy — only one U.S. fixed wing aircraft was shot down by the Iraqis, the rest of aircraft losses were all “accidents,” the killing of civilians and journalists were “accidents,” the bombing of a refugee bus heading to Syria was an “accident.” In other words, the U.S. war on Iraq has been a prefect “10.” Just look at the Iraqis celebrating that their cities are no longer being bombed. They see the Americans and British as liberators, not conquerors. The Orwellian disinformation campaign marches on. George W. Bush has stuck it to the anti-war movement and his political detractors. He is assured of re-election. Doubters like Tom Daschle will pay with their Senate seats next year. There is no economic recession. There is no high unemployment. Tax cuts can pay for the war. Washington, DC kids from poor families are barred from this year’s White House Easter egg hunt — only military dependents are invited. Barbara Bush says she doesn’t watch TV because seeing those coffins coming back to Dover Air Force Base upsets her and her husband. A message for “Babs” — I understand your angst, perhaps you should rent a good movie, like “Nicholas and Alexandra” or “Marie Antoinette.”

Meanwhile, the neo-conservative hawks use the TV and radio airwaves, editorial and op-ed columns, and the floors of the Senate and House to demand a final accounting for all those who demean the motives of the Bush administration (which has become synonymous with the United States in a replay of Louis XIV’s “L’etat c’est moi” concept).

Meanwhile, Americans and legal residents of the United States continue to be rounded up by the thugs of John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge. Muslim residents of the United States, fearful that their “papers are not in order” continue to put a strain on churches and social welfare agencies in small towns in upstate New York and Vermont. Canadian immigration authorities cannot keep up with the flow of refugees out of the United States.

Bush allies on Congress want to drop the sunset provisions of the Patriot Act and make the government’s new powers permanent. The leading proponent of such legislation, Senator Orrin Hatch, recently said on a radio show that Paris is a “nice city . . . if it weren’t for the French who live there.” Get ready for more of such xenophobia and hate speech for the Republicans and their Democratic barnacles. By the way Mr. Hatch, I’ve noticed Utah is a pretty nice state– if it weren’t for all the Mormons who live there.

A victorious George Bush is as dangerous as was a victorious Napoleon. The whiff of an American world empire is in the air. Already the Bush administration is threatening small nations like Barbados, Jamaica, and Chile if they support a Uniting for Peace Resolution to move the international debate about America’s occupation of Iraq from the Security Council to the General Assembly where the U.S. has no veto. Knowing the mindset of the Bush administration, there are probably already plans in effect to “shock and awe” Bridgetown, Kingston, and Santiago. After all, if you already have experience blowing up hotels like the Al Rashid and Palestine Hotels in Baghdad, the thoughts of taking a swipe at the seaside hotels of Barbados and Jamaica must really stir the libido of the chickenhawks.

Ron Jacobs is author of The Way the Wind Blew: a history of the Weather Underground.

He can be reached at: rjacobs@zoo.uvm.edu


More articles by:

Ron Jacobs is the author of Daydream Sunset: Sixties Counterculture in the Seventies published by CounterPunch Books. His latest offering is a pamphlet titled Capitalism: Is the Problem.  He lives in Vermont. He can be reached at: ronj1955@gmail.com.

February 21, 2019
Nick Pemberton
Israel, Venezuela and Nationalism In The Neoliberal Era
Chris Orlet
The Bill and Melinda Gates’ Fair Taxation Scaremongering Tour
Bruce E. Levine
“Heavy Drinking” and the NYT’s Offensive Obit on Herbert Fingarette
Lisi Krall
This Historical Moment Demands Transformation of Our Institutions. The Green New Deal Won’t Do That
Stephanie Savell
Mapping the American War on Terror: Now in 80 Countries
Daniel Warner
New York, New York: a Resounding Victory for New York Over Amazon
Russell Mokhiber
With Monsanto and Glyphosate on the Run AAAS Revokes Award to Scientists Whose Studies Led to Ban on Weedkiller in Sri Lanka and Other Countries
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Fake National Emergency Moves America Closer to an Autocracy
Alex Campbell
Tracing the Threads in Venezuela: Humanitarian Aid
Jonah Raskin
Mitchel Cohen Takes on Global and Local Goliaths: Profile of a Lifelong Multi-Movement Organizer
Binoy Kampmark
Size Matters: the Demise of the Airbus A380
Elliot Sperber
For Your Children (or: Dead Ahead)
February 20, 2019
Anthony DiMaggio
Withdrawal Pains and Syrian Civil War: An Analysis of U.S. Media Discourse
Charles Pierson
When Saudi Arabia Gets the Bomb
Doug Johnson Hatlem
“Electability” is Real (Unless Married with the Junk Science of Ideological Spectrum Analysis)
Kenneth Surin
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline: Another Boondoggle in Virginia
John Feffer
The Psychology of the Wall
Dean Baker
Modern Monetary Theory and Taxing the Rich
Russell Mokhiber
Citizens Arrested Calling Out Manchin on Rockwool
George Ochenski
Unconstitutional Power Grabs
Michael T. Klare
War With China? It’s Already Under Way
Thomas Knapp
The Real Emergency Isn’t About the Wall, It’s About the Separation of Powers
Manuel García, Jr.
Two Worlds
Daniel Warner
The Martin Ennals and Victorian Prize Winners Contrast with Australia’s Policies against Human Dignity
Norman Solomon
What the Bernie Sanders 2020 Campaign Means for Progressives
Dan Corjescu
2020 Vision: A Strategy of Courage
Matthew Johnson
Why Protest Trump When We Can Impeach Him?
William A. Cohn
Something New and Something Old: a Story Still Being Told
Bill Martin
The Fourth Hypothesis: the Present Juncture of the Trump Clarification and the Watershed Moment on the Washington Mall
February 19, 2019
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Troublesome Possibilities: The Left and Tulsi Gabbard
Patrick Cockburn
She Didn’t Start the Fire: Why Attack the ISIS Bride?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Literature and Theater During War: Why Euripides Still Matters
Maximilian Werner
The Night of Terror: Wyoming Game and Fish’s Latest Attempt to Close the Book on the Mark Uptain Tragedy
Conn Hallinan
Erdogan is Destined for Another Rebuke in Turkey
Nyla Ali Khan
Politics of Jammu and Kashmir: The Only Viable Way is Forward
Mark Ashwill
On the Outside Looking In: an American in Vietnam
Joyce Nelson
Sir Richard Branson’s Venezuelan-Border PR Stunt
Ron Jacobs
Day of Remembrance and the Music of Anthony Brown        
Cesar Chelala
Women’s Critical Role in Saving the Environment
February 18, 2019
Paul Street
31 Actual National Emergencies
Robert Fisk
What Happened to the Remains of Khashoggi’s Predecessor?
David Mattson
When Grizzly Bears Go Bad: Constructions of Victimhood and Blame
Julian Vigo
USMCA’s Outsourcing of Free Speech to Big Tech
George Wuerthner
How the BLM Serves the West’s Welfare Ranchers
Christopher Fons
The Crimes of Elliot Abrams