FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Anybody Remember the Powell Doctrine?

by RICH PROCTER

Anybody remember the 90’s? Rember our “Long National Nightmare of Peace and Prosperity,” when pundits loved to bash Bill Clinton’s foreign policy by citing “the Powell Doctrine”? This was the Doctrine that was going to keep us from entangling ourselves in another Vietnam. Haven’t heard much about the “Powell Doctrine” recently, especially from its author, Colin Powell. I believe Mr. Powell is too busy wielding his awesome “street cred” to prop up the Bushies “War Right This Very Second!!!” program.

Just for the heck of it, why don’t we examine the Powell Doctrine, and see how it applies to the invasion…er, that is the “liberation” of Iraq. Powell said that six questions MUST be answered before US forces could be committed to combat abroad. Locked, loaded and cocked? Here we go…

1) Is A Vital US Interest At Stake? — Is Saddam massing troops on his borders, threatening one of our allies? No. Has he developed weapons of mass destruction that he might use on Israel or Kuwait? Not that the UN has discovered. Is he acting belligerent toward our friends? Ahhhhhh…no. So the Powell Doctrine votes “NO” on number one.

2) Will We Commit Sufficient Resources To Win? Yes, I know the plan is to rain terror from the sky on Iraq with hundreds of smart bombs in a Dresden-like campaign of horror and demoralization. The hope is that Saddam will realize we mean business, and he’ll give up, and Bush II will have a nice, short, low (US) casualty, telegenic war ending in high-fives all around and a swell coffee table book, available for a $500 donation to the RNC. But most (non-Bush) experts believe there’s an excellent chance the war will get bogged down in block-by-block fighting in Baghdad, where smart bombs are useless and it’s pretty much M-16 versus AK-47. This could lead to a long, nasty, bloody war — and this is NOT the war Bush is selling the American people. The answer to this is a conditonal “Yes, but…” as in yes, but when Bush’s popularity goes below 30%, look for a quick “declaration of victory” and let’s get the hell out of there no matter what the circumstance.

3) Are Our Objectives Clearly Defined? Well, kinda sorta. We want to find and destroy their weapons…if they have any. We want to destroy Saddam…unless he agrees to go into exile. We want Iraq to become a new bastion of Democracy in the Middle East…but Islamic extremists might capture free elections, so that won’t happen in our lifetime. We want to “safeguard” their oil fields (Bwaa Haa Haa!) The Defense Department clearly wants to kick Saddam’s ass and scram. The State Department wants us to stick around a few decades to re-make the Middle East as a vassal state of the Republican Party. So the answer to #3 is no.

4) Will We Sustain the Commitment? See #2. Bush begins running for re-election next summer. Most likely, the economy will still be in the dumper. If the evening news is a montage of stacked body bags, gleeful al-Jazeera bin Laden tapes and “concerned Defense Officials” looking everywhere for the “light at the end of the tunnel,” the answer is an emphatic NO.

5) Is There A Reasonable Expectation that the Public and Congress Will Support the Operation? Bush is clearly promising the American public “War Lite” — a hailstorm of smart bombs, a lightning troop sweep, and a Victory Parade featuring the Grateful Iraqui Public welcoming their Liberators. If the war lasts longer than a month and we seem to be bogging down, expect public support to plummet. And since every Congressman and 1/3 of our Senators are running for re-election next year, expect them to run for cover. An resounding NO on this one.

6) Have we exhausted our other options? The only folks who believe we’ve exhausted our options are the Bushies. The UN doesn’t believe it. The Pope doesn’t believe it. Our NATO allies don’t believe it. Most of the public doesn’t believe it. Bush says he believes it, but he can’t seem to muster the proof, beyond some fuzzy photographs and some ginned up “evidence” designed to keep the true believers in line. NO to this one.

So there you have it, sports fans. Five NOs and one “Yes, but…” Ouch! If Colin were taking this test at a State University, his grade would be “F — See Me.” Of course, Colin Powell will never be grilled on applying his own Doctrine, because the “liberal” press won’t bring it up. And the man who created a Doctrine designed to insure that America would never suffer another Vietnam will go along with Bush to plunge America into a war based on an elaborate web of deliberate lies (like Vietnam), with squishy public support (like Vietnam), creating what could turn into a catastrophic debacle with huge loss of life (like Vietnam).

Mr. Powell seems to have misplaced his own Doctrine. Would somebody please give him a copy before it’s too late?

RICH PROCTER can be reached at planetniner@yahoo.com

 

More articles by:
February 21, 2018
Cecil Bothwell
Billy Graham and the Gospel of Fear
Ajamu Baraka
Venezuela: Revenge of the Mad-Dog Empire
Edward Hunt
Treating North Korea Rough
Binoy Kampmark
Meddling for Empire: the CIA Comes Clean
Ron Jacobs
Stamping Out Hunger
Ammar Kourany – Martha Myers
So, You Think You Are My Partner? International NGOs and National NGOs, Costs of Asymmetrical Relationships
Michael Welton
1980s: From Star Wars to the End of the Cold War
Judith Deutsch
Finkelstein on Gaza: Who or What Has a Right to Exist? 
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
War Preparations on Venezuela as Election Nears
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Military Realities
Steve Early
Refinery Safety Campaign Frays Blue-Green Alliance
Ali Mohsin
Muslims Face Increasing Discrimination, State Surveillance Under Trump
Julian Vigo
UK Mass Digital Surveillance Regime Ruled Illegal
Peter Crowley
Revisiting ‘Make America Great Again’
Andrew Stewart
Black Panther: Afrofuturism Gets a Superb Film, Marvel Grows Up and I Don’t Know How to Review It
CounterPunch News Service
A Call to Celebrate 2018 as the Year of William Edward Burghardt Du Bois by the Saturday Free School
February 20, 2018
Nick Pemberton
The Gun Violence the Media Shows Us and the State Violence They Don’t
John Eskow
Sympathy for the Drivel: On the Vocabulary of President Nitwit
John Steppling
Trump, Putin, and Nikolas Cruz Walk Into a Bar…
John W. Whitehead
America’s Cult of Violence Turns Deadly
Ishmael Reed
Charles F. Harris: He Popularized Black History
Will Podmore
Paying the Price: the TUC and Brexit
George Burchett
Plumpes Denken: Crude thinking
Binoy Kampmark
The Caring Profession: Peacekeeping, Blue Helmets and Sexual Abuse
Lawrence Wittner
The Trump Administration’s War on Workers
David Swanson
The Question of Sanctions: South Africa and Palestine
Walter Clemens
Murderers in High Places
Dean Baker
How Does the Washington Post Know that Trump’s Plan Really “Aims” to Pump $1.5 Trillion Into Infrastructure Projects?
February 19, 2018
Rob Urie
Mueller, Russia and Oil Politics
Richard Moser
Mueller the Politician
Robert Hunziker
There Is No Time Left
Nino Pagliccia
Venezuela Decides to Hold Presidential Elections, the Opposition Chooses to Boycott Democracy
Daniel Warner
Parkland Florida: Revisiting Michael Fields
Sheldon Richman
‘Peace Through Strength’ is a Racket
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Taking on the Pentagon
Patrick Cockburn
People Care More About the OXFAM Scandal Than the Cholera Epidemic
Ted Rall
On Gun Violence and Control, a Political Gordian Knot
Binoy Kampmark
Making Mugs of Voters: Mueller’s Russia Indictments
Dave Lindorff
Mass Killers Abetted by Nutjobs
Myles Hoenig
A Response to David Axelrod
Colin Todhunter
The Royal Society and the GMO-Agrochemical Sector
Cesar Chelala
A Student’s Message to Politicians about the Florida Massacre
Weekend Edition
February 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
American Carnage
Paul Street
Michael Wolff, Class Rule, and the Madness of King Don
Andrew Levine
Had Hillary Won: What Now?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail