FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Beware the Iraq Election Blowback

 

With Iowa just having dramatically demonstrated to us the unpredictability of the democratic process, you start to understand what’s motivating all those Shiite demonstrators in Iraq.

They see how Bush and his viceroy, L. Paul Bremer, and their handpicked quisling officials in the provisional authority, are trying to rig the summer “sovereignty” exercise by running elections through open ballot caucuses, and are demanding instead an election by universal suffrage.

Of course, if there were a real open one-person, one-vote election in Iraq, odds are that the outcome would be a government that would promptly demand that the U.S. pull out, immediately, lock, stock and barrel.

That’s why Bremer is running back and forth between his Baghdad palace and Washington, and inviting in the U.N., trying to come up with some kind of a scheme in which the government could be somehow elected, but would have to agree in advance not to order the U.S. to leave.
Some kinda “sovereignty!”

I checked my dictionary, and the definition of the term sovereignty was “supreme and unrestricted power.” That’s pretty unambiguous wording.

Clearly if you have a government, but it can’t tell an occupying army to scram, you don’t have a sovereign government.

Although the corporate media is still content to repeat uncritically the White House’s use of the term sovereignty, the dictionary definition of the word is rather hard to get around, and it makes a joke of the so called “handover of sovereignty” being planned by Washington for Iraq for this June or July. In fact, contemplating Iraq’s future administration, the term “puppet government” comes most readily to mind. My dictionary defines that as “a state that appears independent but is controlled by another.”

At least in Hong Kong, when they talked about the handover of sovereignty in 1997, the British and the Chinese didn’t play games. Everyone knew were talking about handing the sovereignty over Hong Kong from the British to the Chinese, not a handover of sovereignty to the people of Hong Kong.

In the current instance, what we’re talking about is the handover of sovereignty in Iraq from the U.S. to…the U.S.

No wonder tens of thousands of angry people are marching in the streets of Baghdad and other Iraqi cities demanding a real election.

What they need to remember, though, is that we have a president here in the Land of the Free and the Brave who has every reason to fear such a process, not just in Iraq, but at home in America.

Bush knows he himself would not be president today if the U.S. presidential election in 2000 had been conducted by universal suffrage rules. He lost the popular election by over half a million votes.

No wonder he favors a rigged system in Iraq.

Meanwhile, beware the blowback of American imperialist election fraud overseas.

The same folks who are busy trying to limit, restrict and manipulate the operation of democracy in Iraq, such as it is, are also busy here at home trying to do the same thing.

While the Democrats busily play the preliminary game of democracy in the primaries, the Bush election juggernaut is hard at work rigging the real game that will be played next November.

Hence the gerrymandering of congressional districts in key states like Pennsylvania and Texas, which will virtually ensure that the next congress will be Republican, whoever is president. Hence the effort to pack as many conservatives onto federal and state benches as possible before then. And hence the push to get all states to buy into electronic voting, which will mean using computers made by companies owned and run by Republican campaign backers, which are demonstrably easy to hack and cheat with, and which leave no paper trial.

Americans, and the Democratic presidential candidate, whomever he may be come next July, should watch Iraq carefully this spring and early summer. It may indeed turn out to be a dry run for the November election here in the U.S. Watch for massive fraud, courtesy of the likes of Diebold Corp’s voting machines, and the mysterious disenfranchisement of a majority of the Shiite electorate.

What, by the way, do you call a democracy where the people no longer have sovereignty?

My dictionary suggests the term dictatorship: “a system of government where the ruler is not bound by a constitution or laws.”

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax–Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / DAVE LINDORFF

More articles by:

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of ThisCantBeHappening!, an online newspaper collective, and is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
February 25, 2020
Michael Hudson
The Democrats’ Quandary: In a Struggle Between Oligarchy and Democracy, Something Must Give
Paul Street
The “Liberal” Media’s Propaganda War on Bernie Sanders
Sheldon Richman
The Non-Intervention Principle
Nicholas Levis
The Real Meaning of Red Scare 3.0
John Feffer
Cleaning Up Trump’s Global Mess
David Swanson
How Are We Going to Pay for Saving Trillions of Dollars?
Ralph Nader
Three Major News Stories That Need To Be Exposed
John Eskow
What Will You Do If the Democrats Steal It from Sanders?
Dean Baker
What If Buttigieg Said That He Doesn’t Accept the “Fashionable” View That Climate Change is a Problem?
Jack Rasmus
The Nevada Caucus and the Desperation of Democrat Elites
Howard Lisnoff
The Powerful Are Going After Jane Fonda Again
Binoy Kampmark
Viral Losses: Australian Universities, Coronavirus and Greed
John W. Whitehead
Gun-Toting Cops Endanger Students and Turn Schools into Prisons
Marshall Sahlins
David Brooks, Public Intellectual
February 24, 2020
Stephen Corry
New Deal for Nature: Paying the Emperor to Fence the Wind
M. K. Bhadrakumar
How India’s Modi is Playing on Trump’s Ego to His Advantage
Jennifer Matsui
Tycoon Battle-Bots Battle Bernie
Robert Fisk
There’s Little Chance for Change in Lebanon, Except for More Suffering
Rob Wallace
Connecting the Coronavirus to Agriculture
Bill Spence
Burning the Future: the Growing Anger of Young Australians
Eleanor Eagan
As the Primary Race Heats Up, Candidates Forget Principled Campaign Finance Stands
Binoy Kampmark
The Priorities of General Motors: Ditching Holden
George Wuerthner
Trojan Horse Timber Sales on the Bitterroot
Rick Meis
Public Lands “Collaboration” is Lousy Management
David Swanson
Bloomberg Has Spent Enough to Give a Nickel to Every Person Whose Life He’s Ever Damaged
Peter Cohen
What Tomorrow May Bring: Politics of the People
Peter Harrison
Is It as Impossible to Build Jerusalem as It is to Escape Babylon?
Weekend Edition
February 21, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Anthony DiMaggio
Election Con 2020: Exposing Trump’s Deception on the Opioid Epidemic
Joshua Frank
Bloomberg is a Climate Change Con Man
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Billion Dollar Babies
Paul Street
More Real-Time Reflections from Your Friendly South Loop Marxist
Jonathan Latham
Extensive Chemical Safety Fraud Uncovered at German Testing Laboratory
Ramzy Baroud
‘The Donald Trump I know’: Abbas’ UN Speech and the Breakdown of Palestinian Politics
Martha Rosenberg
A Trump Sentence Commutation Attorneys Generals Liked
Ted Rall
Bernie Should Own the Socialist Label
Louis Proyect
Encountering Malcolm X
Kathleen Wallace
The Debate Question That Really Mattered
Jonathan Cook
UN List of Firms Aiding Israel’s Settlements was Dead on Arrival
George Wuerthner
‘Extremists,’ Not Collaborators, Have Kept Wilderness Whole
Colin Todhunter
Apocalypse Now! Insects, Pesticide and a Public Health Crisis  
Stephen Reyna
A Paradoxical Colonel: He Doesn’t Know What He is Talking About, Because He Knows What He is Talking About.
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A New Solar Power Deal From California
Richard Moser
One Winning Way to Build the Peace Movement and One Losing Way
Laiken Jordahl
Trump’s Wall is Destroying the Environment We Worked to Protect
Walden Bello
Duterte Does the Right Thing for a Change
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail