All Because of One Small Olive

Why has the Sharon-Ben-Eliezer-Peres government collapsed? Because of a small olive.

It started like a children’s tale: Once upon a time there was a small olive in a Palestinian village. It grew and ripened on a branch of an old tree in a grove on the top of a hill. “Pick me! I want to give my oil!” the little olive pleaded.

But it went on ripening, and the pickers did not come. They could not reach it, because the settlers had set up two mobile homes on the hill, and the whole area became a “security region” of this outpost. When the owners of the grove approached, the settlers cursed them, beat them up and started shooting. This happened at dozens of locations all over the West Bank.

The villagers called the IDF, which now controls all the Palestinian territories. But the army did not come to protect them. Many of the army officers are themselves settlers. The army considers that its job is to defend the settlers, and does not like the idea of confronting them. When the army did interfere, it was to drive the villagers out of their groves near the outposts.

In their plight, the villagers called on the Israeli peace organizations. They found them willing.

The Israeli “peace camp” consists of two parts. One, centered around “Peace Now,” is connected with the Labor party, which was a pillar of the government. The party chief served as Minister of Defense and was, therefore, responsible for all the iniquities committed in the Palestinian territories.

The other part of the peace camp consists of many radical groups, each active in its chosen sector. “Gush Shalom” is a political and ideological center. “Taayush,” an Arab-Jewish Israeli group, is aiding the besieged Palestinian population. “B’Tselem” collects and publishes data, as does the “Alternative Information Center.” “Physicians for Human Rights” does a wonderful job in the medical field, while the Women’s Coalition for Peace and Bat-Shalom combine human rights activities with a feminist agenda. “The Committee against House Demolition” initiates the rebuilding of homes destroyed by the army, and “Rabbis for Human Rights” is acting on behalf of the (unfortunately, tiny) religious community that does not follow the fanatical nationalist banner. “Machsom Watch” reports and tries to prevent abuses at the checkpoints. “Yesh Gvul” helps soldiers who refuse to serve in the occupied territories. “New Profile” is active in the same area. The list is long. Activists of different groups frequently cooperate, and many belong to more than one.

The activists of these organizations volunteered to help the villagers. They went out to pick olives and to defend the villagers as a “human shield.” They were joined by European peace activists, who come in shifts to help the occupied Palestinian population. On some days there were dozens of Israeli and international activists in the groves, on Saturdays there were hundreds. They were dispersed in different villages, went up the hills and were attacked by the settlers. In dozens of incidents, the settlers started shooting into the air and at the ground around the olive pickers.

During long weeks, the public did not hear anything about these events. There is a conspiracy of silence in the media concerning the very existence of a radical peace camp. “Peace Now” is considered somehow as belonging to the national consensus, and therefore its actions are (scantily) reported. The actions of the more principled and energetic forces (“The Deep Left” in the words of former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, who abhors them) were not reported at all, unless there was bloodshed.

But slowly, reports about the War of the Olives began to infiltrate the media: about the settlers driving the Palestinians away and robbing them of the olives they had picked; about settlers who picked the olives in the groves themselves after driving the owners away; about settlers setting fire to groves; about the former Chief Rabbi, who announced that Jews are justified in taking away the fruits for which the Arab villagers had toiled, because God has given the fruit of the Land to the Jews.

The conspiracy of silence was finally broken when a group of famous writers organized a token olive picking. The media, which had ignored the devoted work of the hundreds of anonymous activists, were happy to join celebrities like Amos Oz, A.B. Yehoshua, David Grossman and Me’ir Shalev. The olive picking became part of the consensus.

The settlers have never been popular with great parts of the public. The anger grew when it became known that the poor in Israel were deprived of large sums of money in order to fatten the settlements. The anger was mixed with anxiety for the soldiers, who were frequently beaten by the settlers, while risking their lives to protect remote, half-empty settlements. The stories about the cruel harassment of defenseless olive pickers were just too much. They evoked repulsion and loathing even in the Silent Majority.

This had an indirect impact on Binyamin Ben-Eliezer, too. He noticed the changing public mood and decided that it is now in his and the party’s interest to leave the government. He was feverishly looking for a pretext. Public opinion polls indicated that the settlers are now the most unpopular group in the country. He decided, therefore, to break up the government on the point. He suddenly demanded that the government take away money from the settlements and give it to the pensioners.

This was only a pretext, but it shows that a great part of the public is fed up with the settlements. At long last, the settlements have become the central object of controversy. While Ariel Sharon is trying to set up a government based on the settlers and their allies on the extreme right, the Labor Party, now in opposition, will be compelled to present an anti-settlements program. Thus, the slogan of a small, “marginal” minority is becoming the program of a large camp.

This is an example of the working of the “small wheel” doctrine formulated by us decades ago: A small wheel with a strong independent drive turns a bigger wheel, which turns an even bigger wheel, and so on, until the whole big machine starts operating. That’s how a small political group, with an independent and determined agenda, can drive decisive political processes when the timing is right.

We still have a long way to go. The danger of fascism is still hovering over this country. However, it has now been proven that things can be moved in the opposite direction.

Perhaps the small olive on the hill is mightier than a one-ton bomb.

URI AVNERY has closely followed the career of Sharon for four decades. Over the years, he has written three extensive biographical essays about him, two (1973, 1981) with his cooperation. Avnery is featured in the new book, The Other Israel: Voices of Refusal and Dissent.


More articles by:

URI AVNERY is an Israeli writer and peace activist with Gush Shalom. He is a contributor to CounterPunch’s book The Politics of Anti-Semitism.

Weekend Edition
March 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Michael Uhl
The Tip of the Iceberg: My Lai Fifty Years On
Bruce E. Levine
School Shootings: Who to Listen to Instead of Mainstream Shrinks
Mel Goodman
Caveat Emptor: MSNBC and CNN Use CIA Apologists for False Commentary
Paul Street
The Obama Presidency Gets Some Early High Historiography
Kathy Deacon
Me, My Parents and Red Scares Long Gone
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Rexless Abandon
Andrew Levine
Good Enemies Are Hard To Find: Therefore Worry
Jim Kavanagh
What to Expect From a Trump / Kim Summit
Ron Jacobs
Trump and His Tariffs
Joshua Frank
Drenched in Crude: It’s an Oil Free For All, But That’s Not a New Thing
Gary Leupp
What If There Was No Collusion?
Matthew Stevenson
Why Vietnam Still Matters: Bernard Fall Dies on the Street Without Joy
Robert Fantina
Bad to Worse: Tillerson, Pompeo and Haspel
Brian Cloughley
Be Prepared, Iran, Because They Want to Destroy You
Richard Moser
What is Organizing?
Scott McLarty
Working Americans Need Independent Politics
Rohullah Naderi
American Gun Violence From an Afghan Perspective
Sharmini Peries - Michael Hudson
Why Trump’s Tariff Travesty Will Not Re-Industrialize the US
Ted Rall
Democrats Should Run on Impeachment
Robert Fisk
Will We Ever See Al Jazeera’s Investigation Into the Israel Lobby?
Kristine Mattis
Superunknown: Scientific Integrity Within the Academic and Media Industrial Complexes
John W. Whitehead
Say No to “Hardening” the Schools with Zero Tolerance Policies and Gun-Toting Cops
Edward Hunt
UN: US Attack On Syrian Civilians Violated International Law
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Iraq Outside History
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: The Long Hard Road
Victor Grossman
Germany: New Faces, Old Policies
Medea Benjamin - Nicolas J. S. Davies
The Iraq Death Toll 15 Years After the US Invasion
Binoy Kampmark
Amazon’s Initiative: Digital Assistants, Home Surveillance and Data
Chuck Collins
Business Leaders Agree: Inequality Hurts The Bottom Line
Jill Richardson
What We Talk About When We Talk About “Free Trade”
Eric Lerner – Jay Arena
A Spark to a Wider Fire: Movement Against Immigrant Detention in New Jersey
Negin Owliaei
Teachers Deserve a Raise: Here’s How to Fund It
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
What to Do at the End of the World? Interview with Climate Crisis Activist, Kevin Hester
Kevin Proescholdt
Secretary of Interior Ryan Zinke Attacks America’s Wilderness
Franklin Lamb
Syrian War Crimes Tribunals Around the Corner
Beth Porter
Clean Energy is Calling. Will Your Phone Company Answer?
George Ochenski
Zinke on the Hot Seat Again and Again
Lance Olsen
Somebody’s Going to Extremes
Robert Koehler
Breaking the Ice
Pepe Escobar
The Myth of a Neo-Imperial China
Graham Peebles
Time for Political Change and Unity in Ethiopia
Terry Simons
10 American Myths “Refutiated”*
Thomas Knapp
Some Questions from the Edge of Immortality
Louis Proyect
The 2018 Socially Relevant Film Festival
David Yearsley
Keaton’s “The General” and the Pernicious Myths of the Heroic South