Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Spring Fund Drive: Keep CounterPunch Afloat
CounterPunch is a lifeboat of sanity in today’s turbulent political seas. Please make a tax-deductible donation and help us continue to fight Trump and his enablers on both sides of the aisle. Every dollar counts!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Mysteries of 9/11

The Washington Post’s Style section is their arts
and entertainment section. They have stories on personalities;
movie, music, TV and theater reviews, comics and the regular
puff piece on some powerful figure. I am partial to Zippy the
Pinhead myself.

On May 18, the Washington Post ran a
story in their Style section called “A Cloak but No Dagger
(The Washington Post, 5/18/2002). It concerned Rep. Porter Goss
(R-Fla), the Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
At the time the article was written Goss was said to be helping
to “steer” a House-Senate investigation into the 9/11/01
attacks. The puff piece proceeds normally until deep inside,
when it reads:

“On the morning of Sept. 11, Goss
and [Bob Graham (D-Fla)] were having breakfast with a Pakistani
general named Mahmud Ahmed [sic] ­ the soon-to-be sacked
head of Pakistan’s intelligence service. Ahmed ran a spy agency
notoriously close to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban…the discussion
that morning touched on Taliban links to terrorism, but Goss
says his greatest worry was the dispute in Kashmir”

One thing that is curious about these
three sentences is apparently the Pakistani man’s name is misspelled.
He’s known on the internet as Mahmoud Ahmad.

Even more interesting about this breakfast
meeting is that the Times of India has reported that Gen. Ahmad
is alleged to have been the individual who had $100,000 wired
to alleged hijacker Mohammed Atta. (The Times of India, Delhi,
9 October 2001). Canadian professor Michel Chossudovsky is affiliated
with a website that mentions this unusual connection. (Visit:
http://www.GlobalResearch.ca).

Chossudovsky, writing for the Philadelphia
City Paper, quotes the Agence France-Presse as confirming that
the evidence the government of India has supplied to the U.S.
[regarding Gen. Ahmad’s connection to hijacker Atta] is “of
a much wider range and depth than just one piece of paper linking
a rogue general to some misplaced act of terrorism.” (the
Philadelphia
City Paper
, December 20-27, 2001).

So, if Ahmad did send money to Mohammed
Atta, and Atta was indeed, the mastermind of the WTC attacks,
what was Ahmad doing talking to leaders of Congress in the weeks
before 9/11/01? And, why is the Washington Post using their Style
section to mention that this unusual breakfast meeting took place
on 9/11/01? If they were representing the interests of the general
public (who want to know as much as possible what happened on
9/11) they’d be reporting these matters more conspicuously.

Another thought-provoking commentary
which you can find at the Centre for Research on Globalization
website is an article by Patrick Martin (World
Socialist Web Site
, 9/12/2002). Martin points out that a
year has passed since the 9/11/01 attacks and still the Bush
administration has not released:

  • The passenger lists maintained by the
    airlines;
  • The information from the two data recorders
    recovered from the doomed planes;
  • The transcripts of communications between
    the pilots and air traffic controllers on the ground;
  • Any evidence that there were 19 Arab
    hijackers on board, and what their real names and nationalities
    were.

So, while the media and Congressional
leaders continue to investigate the “intelligence failures”
surrounding 9/11/01, neither the general public (or any Congressional
representatives) have had the opportunity to examine these artifacts
of our nation’s worst day of terrorism.

Now, there has to be a reasonable explanation
as to why the Bush administration hasn’t released those items.
And, certainly there can be another reasonable explanation for
why the Congressmen were meeting the Pakistani intelligence officer
on 9/11/01.

However, it is not very comforting to
note that there is not a mainstream newspaper in our country
that is calling for the Bush administration to release the hijack
clues to the public. And, it is disturbing how the Washington
Post has used its Style section to hint very quietly at
the meetings that took place between powerful officials and the
Pakistani general alleged to have been the 9/11/01 money man.

There has never been a greater time for
people to read and disseminate what’s in the alternative media.
We must find ways to inform ourselves and organize a resistance
to what’s taking place in our country while we still can.

Scott Loughrey
is a media critic in Baltimore.

He can be reached at: scottl44@yahoo.com

More articles by:
May 24, 2018
Gary Leupp
Art of the Dealbreaker: Trump’s Cancellation of the Summit with Kim
Jeff Warner – Victor Rothman
Why the Emerging Apartheid State in Israel-Palestine is Not Sustainable
Kenn Orphan
Life, the Sea and Big Oil
James Luchte
Europe Stares Into the Abyss, Confronting the American Occupant in the Room
Richard Hardigan
Palestinians’ Great March of Return: What You Need to Know
Howard Lisnoff
So Far: Fascism Lite
Matthew Vernon Whalan
Norman Finkelstein on Bernie Sanders, Gaza, and the Mainstream Treatment
Daniel Warner
J’accuse All Baby Boomers
Alfred W. McCoy
Beyond Golden Shower Diplomacy
Jonah Raskin
Rachel Kushner, Foe of Prisons, and Her New Novel, “The Mars Room”
George Wuerthner
Myths About Wildfires, Logging and Forests
Binoy Kampmark
Tom Wolfe the Parajournalist
Dean Baker
The Marx Ratio: Not Clear Karl Would be Happy
May 23, 2018
Nick Pemberton
Maduro’s Win: A Bright Spot in Dark Times
Ben Debney
A Faustian Bargain with the Climate Crisis
Deepak Tripathi
A Bloody Hot Summer in Gaza: Parallels With Sharpeville, Soweto and Jallianwala Bagh
Josh White
Strange Recollections of Old Labour
Farhang Jahanpour
Pompeo’s Outrageous Speech on Iran
CJ Hopkins
The Simulation of Democracy
Lawrence Davidson
In Our Age of State Crimes
Dave Lindorff
The Trump White House is a Chaotic Clown Car Filled with Bozos Who Think They’re Brilliant
Russell Mokhiber
The Corporate Domination of West Virginia
Ty Salandy
The British Royal Wedding, Empire and Colonialism
Laura Flanders
Life or Death to the FCC?
Gary Leupp
Dawn of an Era of Mutual Indignation?
Katalina Khoury
The Notion of Patriarchal White Supremacy Vs. Womanhood
Nicole Rosmarino
The Grassroots Environmental Activist of the Year: Christine Canaly
Caoimhghin Ó Croidheáin
“Michael Inside:” The Prison System in Ireland 
May 22, 2018
Stanley L. Cohen
Broken Dreams and Lost Lives: Israel, Gaza and the Hamas Card
Kathy Kelly
Scourging Yemen
Andrew Levine
November’s “Revolution” Will Not Be Televised
Ted Rall
#MeToo is a Cultural Workaround to a Legal Failure
Gary Leupp
Question for Discussion: Is Russia an Adversary Nation?
Binoy Kampmark
Unsettling the Summits: John Bolton’s Libya Solution
Doug Johnson
As Andrea Horwath Surges, Undecided Voters Threaten to Upend Doug Ford’s Hopes in Canada’s Most Populated Province
Kenneth Surin
Malaysia’s Surprising Election Results
Dana Cook
Canada’s ‘Superwoman’: Margot Kidder
Dean Baker
The Trade Deficit With China: Up Sharply, for Those Who Care
John Feffer
Playing Trump for Peace How the Korean Peninsula Could Become a Bright Spot in a World Gone Mad
Peter Gelderloos
Decades in Prison for Protesting Trump?
Thomas Knapp
Yes, Virginia, There is a Deep State
Andrew Stewart
What the Providence Teachers’ Union Needs for a Win
Jimmy Centeno
Mexico’s First Presidential Debate: All against One
May 21, 2018
Ron Jacobs
Gina Haspell: She’s Certainly Qualified for the Job
Uri Avnery
The Day of Shame
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail