• Monthly
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $other
  • use PayPal

CounterPunch needs you. piggybank-icon You need us. The cost of keeping the site alive and running is growing fast, as more and more readers visit. We want you to stick around, but it eats up bandwidth and costs us a bundle. Help us reach our modest goal (we are half way there!) so we can keep CounterPunch going. Donate today!
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

The Shoney’s Incident

When I arrived in San Francisco last Friday morning, I was whisked off to the local studios of a network news channel for a scheduled debate on Iraq. That debate never took place since I found myself transfixed by and commenting on a dramatic roadside search of suspected terrorists on a Florida highway.

That incident, as it turns out, has profound implications for the new systems and norms of public security based on citizen vigilance that have arisen in the post Sept. 11 environment. But just what lessons can be learned from the event remains troublingly opaque.

For almost an hour I was on the air with Eunice Stone of Cartersville, the woman who had alerted authorities to the three Muslim men who were stopped and detained on the roadside for 17 hours during the exhaustive search and interrogation. She provided a gripping account of the conversation she claimed to have overheard the men having in a Georgia restaurant, which was in turns obnoxious, disturbing and downright frightening. She seemed credible and consistent, and, like millions of Americans, my inclination at the time was to be deeply grateful for her intervention.

However, police later released and completely exonerated the men from all suspicions of terrorism. In interviews with the press, they indignantly denied every aspect of Stone’s story and suggested that her concerns were in fact prompted not by their conversation, but by their Middle Eastern appearance and Islamic dress. They also appeared credible and reasonable.

Simply put, one of these two parties is lying through their teeth, and much depends on who it is. Given the distance between their stories, there is almost no possibility of a mixup. Either the men were laughing about the Sept. 11 attacks or they were not. Either they were discussing “bringing it down” and “if they mourned Sept. 11th, how will they react to Sept. 13th” or something along those lines, or they weren’t.

It comes down to this: If Stone heard the conversation she reported, her actions were commendable, and this case would tend to suggest that citizen vigilance can be a useful aid to law enforcement without degenerating into unwarranted abuse. Although the men were cleared of any suspicions of terrorism, some have speculated that they were “joking” or performing a “hoax” on Stone. Young men have been known to engage in such reckless mischief, and testimonials from their relatives that they would not be capable of such irresponsible conduct frankly cuts little ice.

On the other hand, if the conversation did not take place as Stone described it and her concerns were based on perceived identity and not conduct, this incident would serve as an important confirmation of the worst fears regarding “citizen vigilance” systems. It would mean that the authorities and the public had been grotesquely misled by raw prejudice.

The result would be the serious abuse of three innocent medical students, who continue to suffer negative consequences as the hospital they were to intern at has now turned them away. American history clearly shows that apparently nice, respectable ladies are capable of racism as ugly as that practiced by white-hooded hoodlums.

So was this racism run amok, or did three foolish young men bring a world of trouble onto their own heads? As it stands, there is no way for the public to tell, especially as both parties seem so sympathetic and believable.

Federal and Georgia state authorities can and must conduct a thorough investigation to determine the truth of the matter, and make those facts public. That millions of taxpayer dollars were wasted on a wild goose chase is a secondary issue — what is important is what this false alarm indicates we can expect from citizen vigilance programs in coming months and years.

This case will not be the final word on them, no matter what the facts turn out to be. But they will be an important early indication of the extent to which public perceptions of what is and is not suspicious are useful aids to law enforcement, or are new vehicles for the worst forms of bigotry.

Hussein Ibish is communications director for the American-Arab Anti- Discrimination Committee.

 

More articles by:

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

Weekend Edition
May 24, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Rob Urie
Iran, Venezuela and the Throes of Empire
Melvin Goodman
The Dangerous Demise of Disarmament
Jeffrey St. Clair
“The Army Ain’t No Place for a Black Man:” How the Wolf Got Caged
Richard Moser
War is War on Mother Earth
Andrew Levine
The (Small-d) Democrat’s Dilemma
Russell Mokhiber
The Boeing Way: Blaming Dead Pilots
Rev. William Alberts
Gaslighters of God
Phyllis Bennis
The Amputation Crisis in Gaza: a US-Funded Atrocity
David Rosen
21st Century Conglomerate Trusts 
Jonathan Latham
As a GMO Stunt, Professor Tasted a Pesticide and Gave It to Students
Binoy Kampmark
The Espionage Act and Julian Assange
Kathy Deacon
Liberals Fall Into Line: a Recurring Phenomenon
Jill Richardson
The Disparity Behind Anti-Abortion Laws
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Chelsea Manning is Showing Us What Real Resistance Looks Like
Zhivko Illeieff
Russiagate and the Dry Rot in American Journalism
Norman Solomon
Will Biden’s Dog Whistles for Racism Catch Up with Him?
Yanis Varoufakis
The Left Refuses to Get Its Act Together in the Face of Neofascism
Lawrence Davidson
Senator Schumer’s Divine Mission
Thomas Knapp
War Crimes Pardons: A Terrible Memorial Day Idea
Renee Parsons
Dump Bolton before He Starts the Next War
Yves Engler
Canada’s Meddling in Venezuela
Katie Singer
Controlling 5G: A Course in Obstacles
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Beauty of Trees
Jesse Jackson
Extremist Laws, Like Alabama’s, Will Hit Poor Women the Hardest
Andrew Bacevich
The “Forever Wars” Enshrined
Ron Jacobs
Another One Moves On: Roz Payne, Presente!
Christopher Brauchli
The Offal Office
Daniel Falcone
Where the ‘Democratic Left’ Goes to Die: Staten Island NYC and the Forgotten Primaries   
Julia Paley
Life After Deportation
Sarah Anderson
America Needs a Long-Term Care Program for Seniors
Seiji Yamada – John Witeck
Stop U.S. Funding for Human Rights Abuses in the Philippines
Shane Doyle, A.J. Not Afraid and Adrian Bird, Jr.
The Crazy Mountains Deserve Preservation
Charlie Nash
Will Generation Z Introduce a Wizard Renaissance?
Ron Ridenour
Denmark Peace-Justice Conference Based on Activism in Many Countries
Douglas Bevington
Why California’s Costly (and Destructive) Logging Plan for Wildfires Will Fail
Gary Leupp
“Escalating Tensions” with Iran
Jonathan Power
Making the World More Equal
Cesar Chelala
The Social Burden of Depression in Japan
Stephen Cooper
Imbibe Culture and Consciousness with Cocoa Tea (The Interview)
Stacy Bannerman
End This Hidden Threat to Military Families
Kevin Basl
Time to Rethink That POW/MIA Flag
Nicky Reid
Pledging Allegiance to the Divided States of America
Louis Proyect
A Second Look at Neflix
Martin Billheimer
Closed Shave: T. O. Bobe, the Girl and Curl
David Yearsley
Hard Bop and Bezos’ Balls
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail