• Monthly
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $other
  • use PayPal

ONE WEEK TO DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!

A generous CounterPuncher has offered a $25,000 matching grant. So for this week only, whatever you can donate will be doubled up to $25,000! If you have the means, please donate! If you already have done so, thank you for your support. All contributions are tax-deductible.
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

The Shoney’s Incident

When I arrived in San Francisco last Friday morning, I was whisked off to the local studios of a network news channel for a scheduled debate on Iraq. That debate never took place since I found myself transfixed by and commenting on a dramatic roadside search of suspected terrorists on a Florida highway.

That incident, as it turns out, has profound implications for the new systems and norms of public security based on citizen vigilance that have arisen in the post Sept. 11 environment. But just what lessons can be learned from the event remains troublingly opaque.

For almost an hour I was on the air with Eunice Stone of Cartersville, the woman who had alerted authorities to the three Muslim men who were stopped and detained on the roadside for 17 hours during the exhaustive search and interrogation. She provided a gripping account of the conversation she claimed to have overheard the men having in a Georgia restaurant, which was in turns obnoxious, disturbing and downright frightening. She seemed credible and consistent, and, like millions of Americans, my inclination at the time was to be deeply grateful for her intervention.

However, police later released and completely exonerated the men from all suspicions of terrorism. In interviews with the press, they indignantly denied every aspect of Stone’s story and suggested that her concerns were in fact prompted not by their conversation, but by their Middle Eastern appearance and Islamic dress. They also appeared credible and reasonable.

Simply put, one of these two parties is lying through their teeth, and much depends on who it is. Given the distance between their stories, there is almost no possibility of a mixup. Either the men were laughing about the Sept. 11 attacks or they were not. Either they were discussing “bringing it down” and “if they mourned Sept. 11th, how will they react to Sept. 13th” or something along those lines, or they weren’t.

It comes down to this: If Stone heard the conversation she reported, her actions were commendable, and this case would tend to suggest that citizen vigilance can be a useful aid to law enforcement without degenerating into unwarranted abuse. Although the men were cleared of any suspicions of terrorism, some have speculated that they were “joking” or performing a “hoax” on Stone. Young men have been known to engage in such reckless mischief, and testimonials from their relatives that they would not be capable of such irresponsible conduct frankly cuts little ice.

On the other hand, if the conversation did not take place as Stone described it and her concerns were based on perceived identity and not conduct, this incident would serve as an important confirmation of the worst fears regarding “citizen vigilance” systems. It would mean that the authorities and the public had been grotesquely misled by raw prejudice.

The result would be the serious abuse of three innocent medical students, who continue to suffer negative consequences as the hospital they were to intern at has now turned them away. American history clearly shows that apparently nice, respectable ladies are capable of racism as ugly as that practiced by white-hooded hoodlums.

So was this racism run amok, or did three foolish young men bring a world of trouble onto their own heads? As it stands, there is no way for the public to tell, especially as both parties seem so sympathetic and believable.

Federal and Georgia state authorities can and must conduct a thorough investigation to determine the truth of the matter, and make those facts public. That millions of taxpayer dollars were wasted on a wild goose chase is a secondary issue — what is important is what this false alarm indicates we can expect from citizen vigilance programs in coming months and years.

This case will not be the final word on them, no matter what the facts turn out to be. But they will be an important early indication of the extent to which public perceptions of what is and is not suspicious are useful aids to law enforcement, or are new vehicles for the worst forms of bigotry.

Hussein Ibish is communications director for the American-Arab Anti- Discrimination Committee.

 

More articles by:
bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
October 16, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
How Turkey’s Invasion of Syria Backfired on Erdogan
Chitrangada Choudhury – Aniket Aga
How Cotton Became a Headache in the Age of Climate Chaos
Jack Rasmus
US-China Mini-Trade Deal: Trump Takes the Money and Runs
Michael Welton
Communist Dictatorship in Our Midst
Robert Hunziker
Extinction Rebellion Sweeps the World
Peter A. Coclanis
Donald Trump as Artist
Chris Floyd
Byzantium Now: Time-Warping From Justinian to Trump
Steve Klinger
In For a Dime, in For a Dollar
Gary Leupp
The Maria Ramirez Story
Kim C. Domenico
It Serves Us Right To Suffer: Breaking Down Neoliberal Complacency
Kiley Blackman
Wildlife Killing Contests are Unethical
Colin Todhunter
Bayer Shareholders: Put Health and Nature First and Stop Funding This Company!
Andrés Castro
Looking Normal in Kew Gardens
October 15, 2019
Victor Grossman
The Berlin Wall, Thirty Years Later
Raouf Halaby
Kurdish Massacres: One of Britain’s Many Original Sins
Robert Fisk
Trump and Erdogan have Much in Common – and the Kurds will be the Tragic Victims of Their Idiocy
Ron Jacobs
Betrayal in the Levant
Wilma Salgado
Ecuador: Lenin Moreno’s Government Sacrifices the Poor to Satisfy the IMF
Ralph Nader
The Congress Has to Draw the Line
William A. Cohn
The Don Fought the Law…
John W. Whitehead
One Man Against the Monster: John Lennon vs. the Deep State
Lara Merling – Leo Baunach
Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Not Falling Prey to Vultures
Norman Solomon
The More Joe Biden Stumbles, the More Corporate Democrats Freak Out
Jim Britell
The Problem With Partnerships and Roundtables
Howard Lisnoff
More Incitement to Violence by Trump’s Fellow Travelers
Binoy Kampmark
University Woes: the Managerial Class Gets Uppity
Joe Emersberger
Media Smears, Political Persecution Set the Stage for Austerity and the Backlash Against It in Ecuador
Thomas Mountain
Ethiopia’s Abiy Ahmed Wins Nobel Peace Prize, But It Takes Two to Make Peace
Wim Laven
Citizens Must Remove Trump From Office
October 14, 2019
Ann Robertson - Bill Leumer
Class Struggle is Still the Issue
Mike Miller
Global Climate Strike: From Protest To Power?
Patrick Cockburn
As Turkey Prepares to Slice Through Syria, the US has Cleared a New Breeding Ground for Isis
John Feffer
Trump’s Undeclared State of Emergency
Dean Baker
The Economics and Politics of Financial Transactions Taxes and Wealth Taxes
Jonah Raskin
What Evil Empire?
Nino Pagliccia
The Apotheosis of Emperors
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A Passion for Writing
Basav Sen
The Oil Despots
Brett Wilkins
‘No Friend But the Mountains’: A History of US Betrayal of the Kurds
John Kendall Hawkins
Assange: Enema of the State
Scott Owen
Truth, Justice and Life
Thomas Knapp
“The Grid” is the Problem, Not the Solution
Rob Kall
Republicans Are Going to Remove Trump Soon
Cesar Chelala
Lebanon, Dreamland
Weekend Edition
October 11, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Becky Grant
CounterPunch in Peril?
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail