FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Wiretapping Reporters

Last week the Danish public was informed that police had been listening in on private telephone conversations made by a journalist from the newspaper “Jyllands-Posten”. It is the second largest news paper in the country and ironically quite close to the present rightist government.

The tapping happened after reporter Stig Mathiessen and his paper weeks ago told the police that rumour had it that a “death list” on Danish Jews is circulating in fundamentalist Muslim circles. Kill a Jew and get a 30 000 dollars reward. The reporter could not inform the police on the name of his source, but was able to mention a number of Jews on the list. Some of these are now under police protection.

Unable to make the reporter divulge the name the police started wiretapping the private phone of Mathiessen in order to get the wanted information. Tapes from this operation were played in a secret court session and on this background the D.A. demanded that the reporter handed over the name. He refused and appealed the case, which will be central to journalists right to protect their sources.

Protest is widespread. The International Federation of Journalists, IFJ, calls it an abuse of power and says, “it reflects the contempt that some senior officers have for the rights of journalists and media”. IFJ General Secretary, Aiden White, said last week: “Once again the authorities are using the media for ‘fishing’ expeditions for evidence and are violating fundamental rights in the process”.

In a joint letter Friday the largest newspapers and TV-stations in Denmark demanded an explanation from Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who is also Minister of the Press. They argued that mere suspicion of wiretapping would make some sources dry out – and thus damage the freedom of expression and the free press.

Rasmussen’s answer doesn’t satisfy the Danish media. He just mentions the “serious character of the case” and that he can’t be part of an ongoing police investigation. Off course the Government is all for freedom of the press but the possibility of solving serious crimes has to be considered too, soHe also refused to open an investigation of the affair.

Oluf Jorgensen, press law specialist at The Danish School of Journalism, fears that the court ruling will lead to an increased use of wiretapping of journalists by the police. In the wake of 9/11 the Danish Government introduced a so-called Terror Package that increased the power of the police to investigate information the media may possess. Oluf Jorgensen tells the newspaper “Politiken” that he fears the new court ruling will weaken journalists right to protect their sources.

‘The War on Terror’ already had lots of casualties. Freedom of the press may soon be added to the list.

Steen Sohn is a free lance writer living in Aarhus, Denmark. He can be reached at stsohn@mail.djh.dk

 

More articles by:
bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
December 09, 2019
Jefferson Morley
Trump’s Hand-Picked Prosecutor John Durham Cleared the CIA Once, Will He Again?
Kirkpatrick Sale
Political Collapse: The Center Cannot Hold
Ishmael Reed
Bloomberg Condoned Sexual Assault by NYPD 
W. T. Whitney
Hitting at Cuban Doctors and at Human Solidarity
Louisa Willcox
The Grizzly Cost of Coexistence
Thomas Knapp
Meet Virgil Griffith: America’s Newest Political Prisoner
John Feffer
How the New Right Went Global — and How to Stop It
Ralph Nader
Why Not Also Go With “The Kitchen Table” Impeachable Offenses for Removal?
M. K. Bhadrakumar
Sri Lanka Continues Its Delicate Dance With India
Robert Fisk
Meet the Controversial Actor and Businessman Standing Up Against Egypt’s el-Sisi
Dahr Jamail
Savoring What Remains: Dealing With Climate PTSD
George Wuerthner
Bison Slaughter in Yellowstone…Again
Scott Tucker
Premature Democratic Socialists: Reasons for Hope and Change
Julian Rose
Polish Minister of Health Proposes Carcinogenic 5G Emission Levels as National Norm
Dean Baker
Coal and the Regions Left Behind
Robert Koehler
Envisioning a United World
Weekend Edition
December 06, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
Eat an Impeachment
Matthew Hoh
Authorizations for Madness; The Effects and Consequences of Congress’ Endless Permissions for War
Jefferson Morley
Why the Douma Chemical Attack Wasn’t a ‘Managed Massacre’
Andrew Levine
Whatever Happened to the Obama Coalition?
Paul Street
The Dismal Dollar Dems and the Subversion of Democracy
Dave Lindorff
Conviction and Removal Aren’t the Issue; It’s Impeachment of Trump That is Essential
Ron Jacobs
Law Seminar in the Hearing Room: Impeachment Day Six
Linda Pentz Gunter
Why Do We Punish the Peacemakers?
Louis Proyect
Michael Bloomberg and Me
Robert Hunziker
Permafrost Hits a Grim Threshold
Joseph Natoli
What We Must Do
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Global Poison Spring
Robert Fantina
Is Kashmir India’s Palestine?
Charles McKelvey
A Theory of Truth From the South
Walden Bello
How the Battle of Seattle Made the Truth About Globalization True
Evan Jones
BNP Before a French Court
Norman Solomon
Kerry’s Endorsement of Biden Fits: Two Deceptive Supporters of the Iraq War
Torsten Bewernitz – Gabriel Kuhn
Syndicalism for the Twenty-First Century: From Unionism to Class-Struggle Militancy
Matthew Stevenson
Across the Balkans: From Banja Luka to Sarajevo
Thomas Knapp
NATO is a Brain Dead, Obsolete, Rabid Dog. Euthanize It.
Forrest Hylton
Bolivia’s Coup Government: a Far-Right Horror Show
M. G. Piety
A Lesson From the Danes on Immigration
Ellen Isaacs
The Audacity of Hypocrisy
Monika Zgustova
Chernobyl, Lies and Messianism in Russia
Manuel García, Jr.
From Caesar’s Last Breath to Ours
Binoy Kampmark
Going to the ICJ: Myanmar, Genocide and Aung San Suu Kyi’s Gamble
Jill Richardson
Marijuana and the Myth of the “Gateway Drug”
Muzamil Bhat
Srinagar’s Shikaras: Still Waters Run Deep Losses
Gaither Stewart
War and Betrayal: Change and Transformation
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail