FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

California’s Half-baked Prison Rules

This isn’t just about being ‘tough on crime’. It’s not about winning a ‘drug war’. It’s not even about prison reform or human rights or social justice.

It’s about the lack of common sense displayed by an overwhelmingly broken system that puts everyone in the country in more danger.

Some of the proposed rule changes for California prisons have already been implimented in prisons around the country. Soon they’ll be in all the prisons. The way these warehouses are being run today include a lot of dangerous foolishness: Dangerous to the prisoners, the guards, their families, and all of society – yes, even you. If you are ever unfortunate enough to run up against an angry, shell-shocked, psychotic hungry ex-prisoner, let me know how it turns out.

The proposed rule changes in California that concern me most are:

Timed 5-second hellos and goodbyes for visitors. I visualize a room overflowing with guards with stopwatches. There is a proposed rule that would forbid the children of prisoners from sitting on dad or mom’s lap. Explain that to a child who wants to be held by their parent. No contact visits for death row prisoners. Florida has already instigated this dangerous rule, even though there were no security breaches to make the rule necessary. So why would I say this rule is dangerous? Because if a prisoner has nothing to lose, life IS more dangerous for the guards around him. And one that bothers me a great deal with it’s senselessness is the proposed rule that would forbid DRUG OFFENDERS from having family visits for one year after incarceration. Every study ever done says prisoners do better with family contact. Why oh why do drug offenders always get the worst of the deal?

It seems to me that prison rules are now made, not because an incident caused security problems, but to make the guards’ jobs easier. You know why? Because they can’t keep the help if the help actually have to get up and work for their money!

For instance, in Florida if you needed toilet paper, you called out your need and a guard brought you a roll of two ply toilet paper (if he was in the mood). Now, you get one roll of one ply toilet paper per week for each two man cell. So the guards can do less work.

These kinds of rules may seem to make the guards’ jobs easier on the surface, but believe me, with all incentives gone, with no rewards in place for good behavior, the guards are going to find their jobs more dangerous, the system will produce more angry, damaged people and society will eventually pay the price.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More articles by:
September 20, 2018
Michael Hudson
Wasting the Lehman Crisis: What Was Not Saved Was the Economy
John Pilger
Hold the Front Page, the Reporters are Missing
Kenn Orphan
The Power of Language in the Anthropocene
Paul Cox – Stan Cox
Puerto Rico’s Unnatural Disaster Rolls on Into Year Two
Rajan Menon
Yemen’s Descent Into Hell: a Saudi-American War of Terror
Russell Mokhiber
Nick Brana Says Dems Will Again Deny Sanders Presidential Nomination
Nicholas Levis
Three Lessons of Occupy Wall Street, With a Fair Dose of Memory
Steve Martinot
The Constitutionality of Homeless Encampments
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
The Aftershocks of the Economic Collapse Are Still Being Felt
Jesse Jackson
By Enforcing Climate Change Denial, Trump Puts Us All in Peril
George Wuerthner
Coyote Killing is Counter Productive
Mel Gurtov
On Dealing with China
Dean Baker
How to Reduce Corruption in Medicine: Remove the Money
September 19, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
When Bernie Sold Out His Hero, Anti-Authoritarians Paid
Lawrence Davidson
Political Fragmentation on the Homefront
George Ochenski
How’s That “Chinese Hoax” Treating You, Mr. President?
Cesar Chelala
The Afghan Morass
Chris Wright
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
Howard Lisnoff
The Beat Goes On Against Protest in Saudi Arabia
Nomi Prins 
The Donald in Wonderland: Down the Financial Rabbit Hole With Trump
Jack Rasmus
On the 10th Anniversary of Lehman Brothers 2008: Can ‘IT’ Happen Again?
Richard Schuberth
Make Them Suffer Too
Geoff Beckman
Kavanaugh in Extremis
Jonathan Engel
Rather Than Mining in Irreplaceable Wilderness, Why Can’t We Mine Landfills?
Binoy Kampmark
Needled Strawberries: Food Terrorism Down Under
Michael McCaffrey
A Curious Case of Mysterious Attacks, Microwave Weapons and Media Manipulation
Elliot Sperber
Eating the Constitution
September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savior
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail