home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

Read Cockburn and St. Clair's Whiteout: the CIA, Drugs and the Press and discover how the CIA gave a helping hand to the opium lords who took over Afghanistan, thus ushering the Taliban into power.

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: SAGA'S OF BETRAYAL: The Full, Clear Story, Told by a Former CIA Analyst, of How the US Ditched Solemn Pledges; Dishonored Guarantees Stretching Back to LBJ; Lectured the Palestinian on Swapping Land-for-Peace and Then, in Clinton Time, Sold Them Down the River; The Equally Disgusting Saga of How Clinton and Holbrooke Sanctioned Indonesian Butchery of the East Timorese, Then This May Travelled to Dili to Preen at the Independence Celebration of Those Whose Slavery and Near Extermination They Had Calmly Okayed. Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now! Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840-3683

June 14, 2002

Tom Turnipseed
The Fear Factor to Promote
War and Trample Truth

Steve Perry
How the Bush Adminstration Buried Coleen Rowley

June 13, 2002

Amira Hass
Indefinite Siege

Mokhiber / Weissman
Time to Put Lives Over Patents

Robert Fisk
Bush's Weird War

Stanton / Madsen
Democracy in Crisis:
What is to be Done?

Roldan Tomasz Suárez
Venezuela: Five Facts
About the Coup

June 12, 2002

Fran Shor
Dirty Bombs, Blowback
and Imperial Projections

Dave Marsh
Shelley Stewart, Radio and the Birmingham Civil Rights Movement

Chris Floyd
Murder, Inc.

June 11, 2002

Omar Barghouti
On Dance, Identity and War

Robert Fisk
The Bush Afghan Gang:
Murderers, Gangsters, Stooges

Minerva Wright
The Donkeys of the Holy Land

David Krieger
Stopping a Nuclear War
in South Asia

June 10, 2002

Jeffrey St. Clair
Executioner's Last Songs

June 8/9, 2002

Gavin Keeney
Mademoiselle M.
Or Getting Screwed in Paris

Susan Davis
Sleepless in the Suburbs
Curing Insomnia: a new use for The Nation?

George Sunderland
"Send in the Weekly
Standard": The Screaming Pundits Assault Corps

June 7, 2002

Michael Colby
Bush to the Nation:
You're All Cops Now

Tanweer Akram
Howard Zinn's "Terrorism
and War": a review

David Krieger
New Security Challenges

Sam Bahour
The Palestinian Intifada:
A Very American Struggle

Tom Turnipseed
A Crisis of Confidence
in US Leadership

June 6, 2002

Michael Colby
White House vs. EPA:
Political Hot Air and
Global Warming

Ron Jacobs
The Indo-Pakistan Conflict:
It's Just a Shot Away

Francis Boyle
Take Sharon to The Hague:
Prosecute Israeli War Crimes
at Jenin

CounterPunch Bulletin
60 Minutes and President Chavez's Censored F-Word

Mark Weisbrot
Spying and Lying:
The FBI's Shameful Past

June 5, 2002

Robert Fisk
Berlusconi the Censor

Danielle Brian
Nuclear Plants and Terrorism

Ardeshir Cowasjee
For What Do We Fight?

George Monbiot
Kashmir on the Brink

Michael Neumann
What is Antisemitism?

June 4, 2002

Dave Marsh
Bono the Useful Idiot

William Evan / Francis Boyle
Kashmir: Invoking Intl. Law to Avoid Nuclear War

Cockburn / St. Clair
The Future Wellstone Deserves

June 3, 2002

Ramdas / Makhijani
India, Pakistan and Nukes:
A Road Map to Peace

Fran Shor
Meanwhile, Back in Afghanistan

Neve Gordon
The Caterpillar Effect

Resources:
100s of Links About 9/11


CounterPunch:
Complete Coverage of 9/11 and Its Aftermath


Five Days That
Shook The World:
Seattle and Beyond

By Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
Photos by Allan Sekula

(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)

INSIDE

Subscribe Online!

EXCLUSIVE TO
COUNTERPUNCH
SUBSCRIBERS


Published March 15, 2002

  • Facing Down Rehnquist and Scalia:
  • Jennifer Harbury at the Supreme Court;
  • ADL Throws in Towel, Pays Up:
  • How They Worked for Apartheid Regime and Spied on NAACP:
  • Cockburn on America the Bully:
  • From Teddy Roosevelt to George W.
  • St. Clair on Musicians Against the Death Penalty & The Legacy of the Mekons.


    Search CounterPunch

Read Whiteout and Find Out How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press

by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The Memphis Blues Again:
Six Decades of Memphis Music Photographs
Photos by Ernest Withers
Text by Daniel Wolff

The New Intifada:
Resisting Israel's Apartheid

Edited by Roane Carey

 

A Pocket Guide to
Environmental Bad Guys
by James Ridgeway
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The Phoenix Program
by Douglas Valentine

Al Gore:
A User's Manual
by Cockburn
and St. Clair

Buy This Explosive
New Book at an
Amazing Discount!
 

Reviews of Gore:
a User's Manual


Private Warriors
by Ken Silverstein

CounterPunch's Booktalk

June 14, 2002

US Trade Policy
"Do as We Say, Not as We Did"

by Mark Weisbrot

"Do as we say, not as we do," is the advice from the United States to the low- and middle-income countries of the world when it comes to trade. Lately the press has taken aim at this aspect of modern colonialism. They have pointed out the hypocrisy of the US and other rich countries subsidizing their agriculture or protecting their steel or textile industries, while demanding that countries as poor as Ghana open their markets to goods and services from the North.

This allows the punditry to fancy itself the champion of the world's poor, joining hands in righteous indignation with the leaders of the world's most powerful economic institutions: the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and the World Trade Organization. The same rules should apply equally to all, they proclaim.

Or as Anatole France once said, "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."

But how much will the world's poor really benefit from increased access to the markets of the rich countries? And is this really the best way to level the playing field -- "free trade" for everyone?

As often happens with debates about economic policy, few of the people writing and chattering about the subject bother to look at the numbers. For example: imagine that the rich countries of the world open all of their markets for merchandise trade-- agriculture, textiles, steel, everything. This would be phased in by 2015. How much more annual income would the low- and middle-income countries have in 2015 as a result of this increased access to the markets of rich countries?

According to the World Bank, the answer is about 0.6 percent. The poorer countries would not get their fair share, but imagine that they did: a country in Sub-Saharan Africa whose income per person would otherwise be $500 a year would, as a result of this trade liberalization, have $503. Not much to write home about.

In fact, according to other widely-used economic models, many developing countries will actually wind up with a net loss from the liberalization of agriculture and textile trade that was agreed upon at the WTO's creation in 1994.

But it gets worse. The WTO doesn't just make and enforce trade rules. It has a seamier underside -- the highly protectionist agreement known as "TRIPS" (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights). The goal of these rules is to get the low and middle-income countries to obey patent and copyright laws that are made in the USA and Europe.

Economists haven't spent too much time looking at what this will cost developing countries. But preliminary estimates (again from the World Bank) indicate that this one form of protectionism could easily exceed the gains from trade liberalization.

And there are other serious concerns that people in developing countries have about implementing the rules of "free trade," as it is commonly and inaccurately labeled. In many countries a large part of the labor force, sometimes the majority, is still employed in agriculture. In the United States we went from 53 percent of our labor force in agriculture in 1870 to 4.6 percent in 1970, and yet the displacement of people from the countryside still generated much pain and serious social unrest. Imagine what would happen if this century-long process were collapsed into a couple of decades, as advocated by the WTO (along with the IMF and World Bank) for much of the world. This is a recipe for social explosion.

The truth is that equalizing the enforcement of bad rules will not make the world better off, any more than spreading street crime from poor to middle-class neighborhoods would. If we look at the few countries that have made it out of poverty in the last half-century -- for example South Korea or Taiwan -- they didn't get there by adhering to the "Washington Consensus" of free trade and unrestricted foreign investment flows. Quite the contrary: their governments protected, subsidized, and even created key industries, and intervened heavily to move their economies into higher technology, higher value-added production.

Of course we did similar things when the United States was a developing country, with an average tariff of 44 percent on manufactured goods as late as 1913. Not to mention "borrowing" technology from wherever it existed in more advanced form, ignoring foreign intellectual property rights. "Do as we say, not as we did."

Mark Weisbrot is co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is co-author (with Dean Baker) of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press).

Today's Features

Tom Turnipseed
The Fear Factor to Promote
War and Trample Truth

Steve Perry
How the Bush Adminstration Buried Coleen Rowley

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /