|
CounterPunch
September
5, 2002
Bush's Boss
is a Jewish Carpenter
Of Jesus and George
by Ben Tripp
Let's talk about the Man from Nazareth, whom George
Bush II nominated as the philosopher who most influenced him
during the 'presidential campaign' of 2000. I submit to you
that this famous Nazarene has not caused so much trouble since
the day he got brought up on charges in 32 A.D., and that includes
the Crusades, which at least got people traveling again. If
Jesus Christ were alive today, He would be appalled. His message--and
the powerful men who claim to have been moved by it--has been
perverted out of recognition in the name of wealth and power.
If Bush admires anything about Christ, it is probably the excellent
cover he provides to do Whatever You Damn Well Please in His
Name. But mark my words: you won't find a guy who is more the
inverse of Jesus than George W. Bush.
In the interest of full disclosure, let
it be noted that I am not a Christian, although I have learned
many powerful lessons from the Bible. Nor am I an atheist: I
worship a type of lichen that grows on oak trees. It seems safe
enough--you start worshipping somebody's description of God,
crazy things happen. Stick with something like moss, you'll
never get messages from the creator to go liberate Palestine
by the sword or burn all the Lutherans in the next village.
With some kinds of lichen, you might get messages, but only if
you ingest them in quantity; the kind I worship has no psychoactive
properties and can be sprinkled on salads. If I were a Christian,
though, I would be very embarrassed right now, and I would feel
a compulsion to explain to everybody I run into that Bush meant
some other man from Nazareth, possibly Mitch Fosselman over on
D street who raised prize-winning cattle until he broke his hip
and had to move into Jerusalem.
No chance: Bush indisputably means Jesus
Christ is his role model, and this should be cause for concern.
A guy who has presided over scores of state executions and laughed
about it to the press should probably align himself with Pontius
Pilate, not Jesus. At least Pontius wasn't cracking wise all
the time. Bush just couldn't care less: if you're guilty of
malfe'ance, off to the chair with you. I wonder if he'd be so
casual about slaying the naughty if we still favored crucifixion,
not lethal injections. But he doesn't have much of a sense of
irony.
Executions aren't the only disconnect.
You can drive around with a "My Boss Is A Jewish Carpenter"
sticker on your pickup, and that doesn't mean you get Jesus'
message. Bush clearly has no problem with being a borrower or
a lender, for example--he borrowed the White House and is lending
it to everybody he owes a favor. He doesn't turn the other cheek,
unless it's the cheek of his ass to the United Nations. He is
currently dismantling the obstacles to throwing the first stone,
and the stone in this case is a nuclear missile lobbed at one
of those swarthy countries that are still pissed off about the
Crusades. Don't think Bush isn't on a crusade, by the way--he
may choose his words poorly, and he may have retracted that one,
but he is on a crusade, all right.
Several members of his cabinet, such
as John "God Said It, I Believe It, That Settles It"
Ashcroft, are genuine zealots, and they love the idea of a crusade.
But we're not talking about a metaphorical crusade; we're talking
about the real thing, with Percheron horses and banners flapping
and big old two-handed swords, riding into Jerusalem over the
bodies of the Palestinians (and the Jews if they don't step aside
when the time comes). Ashcroft is a standout: he really believes
that the end time is near and the Book of Revelations is about
to come true. For ignorant heathens, the Book of Revelations
is the part of the Bible written by the apostle John after a
mescaline jag, and among other prognostications explains how
the world is going to end--as experts have determined, sometime
in the fall of 1987. We're talking plagues of locusts with human
heads. If Bush is serious about Jesus, which is debatable, he
certainly believes Revelations, too--and in light of that whole
bit about the world nearing its end no matter what we
do, Bush's failure to invest in long-term strategies suddenly
makes a chilling kind of sense. After all, why worry about the
environment when it's going to be consumed in unquenchable fire
anyway? Put it like that, I'm no longer worried about how many
miles per gallon I'm getting, either. Jesus didn't talk about
the environment, after all. And maybe that's the problem: advice
on righteous living from twenty centuries ago just doesn't address
the issues of today.
Jesus (and we're not getting into whether
He even existed, or whether His biographers might have exaggerated
His deeds or misquoted His words in order to keep themselves
interesting) did not have to worry about the environment. Back
in His day pollution was what an unmarried guy did to the girls.
Jesus did not have to worry about weapons of mass destruction--there
were none, unless you count the incident wherein Samson "found
a new jawbone of an ass, and put forth his hand, and took it,
and slew a thousand men therewith" (Judges 15:15,16), which
I think we can discount as hyperbole.
If anybody is going to slay 10,000 with
the jawbone of an ass, it's George Bush II.
The insidious thing people like Bush
do is to take the Bible literally and fudge around the edges,
where things hadn't been invented at the time of the writing,
rather than acknowledge that the entire work is full of metaphors
from which lessons can be drawn (which, if you believe in the
lessons, is the whole beauty of the thing). If there had been
industrial pollution in Jesus' time, you damn betcha He would
have had something to say about it--and not "Now we can
all walk on water, because it's coagulated in the rivers!"
If there were Tomahawk missiles, 'smart bombs', and 'bunker
busters', Jesus would not have recommended their use--not on
anybody, not even the Romans. If you don't like where the spirit
of His message leads, the trick is to take Him literally--Jesus
never said anything about arsenic in drinking water, after all.
(I will now stop capitalizing He and
His and Him and just get on with it.) Jesus wouldn't know what
to make of the world today. In his time, there were a couple
million Jews, and the world population wasn't even close to cracking
a billion. His was a theocratic society based on herding, agriculture,
and the usual trades, until certain natural resources were found
there, at which time the Roman Empire arrived, needing to export
these resources to fuel its endeavors. . . Does any of this sound
familiar? But the Romans weren't after petroleum. They wanted
produce.
Things had gotten out of hand by the
time Jesus was old enough to vote, and there was a certain amount
of cosying up between the Pharisees, or local priests, and the
Romans. The priests played a governing role similar to that
of the Vichy government in France during World War Two--and with
similar ill effects on the Jewish population. Jesus was a fundamentalist
in some ways--he believed the Temples should be used for nothing
but worship, at a time when they were centers of commerce that
dealt in property, goods, and currency exchange, much like the
Catholic Church of today. I have to lie down, the irony is suffocating
me. . . No. Must go on. Must. . . make point.
Jesus despised all this truckle and like
a good fundamentalist he rampaged around and tore down the system
as much as he could. He would have been one of the people breaking
Starbucks windows in Seattle during the WTO meeting. That's
where he stood, relative to the authorities--who regarded him
as an anarchist, while he regarded himself as an old-time reformer.
In this way, Jesus and Bush could not be more different: Bush
would patently like to see the Church running the show again,
and as Bush sees politics as an arm of commerce, we can therefore
postulate that he would like to see the Church running the commercial
realm as well as the state, which places him firmly in the camp
of the Pharisees---who eventually handed Christ over to the Romans
for torture and execution.
At the same time, when he wasn't railing
against the system, Jesus' message was one of peace and love
and forgiveness. Bush is a man of war and hate and brutal judgement--it's
hard to cast him in any other light. So even in the contradictions
between Christ's deeds and message, Bush manages to reveal the
reverse tendency in every case--a fancy piece of footwork. Where
Christ is stomping around deploring money changers' booths in
the temple, Bush is accepting donations from the Reverend Moon
and abetting corporate usury; when Christ calms down and suggests
that he among us who is without sin should cast the first stone,
Bush says, "Git back, Jack!" and lobs a brick at the
nearest teenager on death row.
There are many more diametric opposites
between Bush and Jesus. The field is almost too rich; it's hard
to choose examples. The head spins and the ears ring. Jesus
probably wouldn't be thrilled to learn Bush's family fortune
was seeded with Nazi money, for one thing; for another, Bush
doesn't eat kosher. Christ accepted responsibility for the sins
of all mankind and died to redeem us; Bush won't even accept
responsibility for missing an SEC filing deadline. But I think
we can agree that Bush may have emulated Jesus Christ on at least
one occasion, and I will graciously observe it here, lest anyone
think I am incapable of seeing virtue in the man selected to
be our President.
A while back, America got involved in
a war in Vietnam. Certain persons who ran against Bush during
the campaign season of 2000 had fought in that war--Al Gore and
John McCain, to name a couple. They went over to Southeast Asia
to kill Gooks. George W. Bush II was also eligible to fight
in that war. But, perhaps heeding the message of the philosopher
Jesus Christ, he realized war is bad and peace is good. So he
joined the National Guard, in which service he would never have
to kill anything larger than a jackrabbit on the runway. But
even this warlike organization would displease Christ---or so
Bush must have reasoned. Because he went AWOL for the last year
of his tour of duty--and if that doesn't make him a man of peace,
I don't know what does.
Ben Tripp is a screenwriter. He can be reached at: credel@earthlink.net
Today's Features
Gary Leupp
Who's Afraid
of Iraq?
New
Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively
to Subscribers:
- War Talk As White Noise:
Anything to Get Harken and Halliburton
Out of the Headlines;
- First Hilliard, Then
McKinney: Jewish
Groups Target Blacks Brave Enough to Talk About Justice in the
Middle East; Intimidation
is the Name of the Game; Smearing
"Insane" McKinney As Muslims' Pawn;
- The Missing Terrorist?
Calling Scotland
Yard: "Where's Atif?"
- They Never Booed Dylan!:
Tape Transcript Shows
Famed Newport Folkfest Dissing of Electric Dylan Not True. The Catcalls were for Peter
Yarrow!
- New Shame from the Liffey
Shrike
Remember, the CounterPunch website is
supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe
Now! Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840-3683
home / subscribe
/ about us
/ books
/ archives
/ search
/ links
/
|
September
3, 2002
Nabil Amro
Leadership
& Legitimacy:
An Open Letter to Arafat
Robert Fisk
A Forgotten
Holocaust:
The British in Palestine
Uri Avnery
The Return
of the Dinosaurs
September
2, 2002
Francis Boyle
Flashback:
US War Crimes During the Gulf War
Lou Cohan
Confessions
of a Downloader
Philip Farruggio
Labor
Day Antidote to Apathy
William Blum
Cuban Political
Prisoners
in the US
September
1, 2002
Dave Marsh
No Surrender:
Springsteen's The Rising
August 31,
2002
Gavin Keeney
Return to the
Charterhouse of Parma
David Vest
Porkland:
Confronting Republicans & Police in Portland
Ralph Nader
The Highway
Lobby
M. Shahid
Alam
CNN Reporting
(poem)
Neve Gordon
Sharon's
Subjugation Strategy
Dr. Susan
Block
The Gangbang
Asthete
The Sexual Life
of Catherine M.
Kurt Nimmo
Clueless
at the State Dept.
August 30,
2002
Alexander
Cockburn
American
Journal:
Hitchens, Kissinger, Springsteen, Haggard & Elvis
August 29,
2002
Chris Floyd
The Secret
Sharers:
The CIA and the Murder of Frank Olson
August 28,
2002
William Ring
War on Iraq:
The Brightest Scenario
August 27,
2002
Sam Bahour
The Violence
of Curfew
Wenonah Hauter
From Johannesburg:
Pacts with the Devil: Public-Private Partnerships and the Global
Environment
Jerre Skog
Wanted:
"Our Kind of Guy"
in Iraq!
Uri Avnery
Letter
to a Pilot
August 26,
2002
Sami Al-Arian
Fighting
for the Right of
Dissent and Due Process
Ruebner /
Turaani
What
is Israel Hiding?
Norman Madarasz
Brazil
and the IMF:
Democracy and Emerging Market Liberalism
Robert Fisk
War Crimes:
Reporters Aren't Prosecutors
Douglas Valentine
Phoenix,
CIA and Maj. Gen. Bruce Lawlor: From Vietnam
to Homeland Security
August 24
/ 25, 2002
Susan Davis
Proverbial
Wisdom:
Of Clogs and Enron
Falk / Krieger
No War
Against Iraq
Ceylon Mooney
Fasting
for Iraq
Jonathon
Wright
Police
Brutality in Atlanta
Ralph Nader
Congress's
Pay Raise Scam
Jeffrey St.
Clair
Chainsaw
George
Alexander
Cockburn
Alterman
Cheapens Holocaust
August 23,
2002
Dave Marsh
Selling
Out?
Anthony Gancarski
Super-Duper:
Oil, al-Qaeda and a West African Adventure
William Hughes
Lieberman's
Conflict
of Interest?
Kurt Nimmo
The Lapdog
Conversion of CNN:
They Didn't Want to "Criticize" a Popular War
Sean Donahue
Hardline
in Colombia
Resources:
100s of Links
About 9/11
CounterPunch:
Complete
Coverage of 9/11 and Its Aftermath
Five
Days That
Shook The World:
Seattle and Beyond
By
Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
Photos by Allan Sekula
(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch
Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)
Read
Whiteout and Find Out
How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most
Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban
and Osama bin Laden
Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the
Press
by Alexander
Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
|