home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

Read Cockburn and St. Clair's Whiteout: the CIA, Drugs and the Press and discover how the CIA gave a helping hand to the opium lords who took over Afghanistan, thus ushering the Taliban into power.


CounterPunch: Complete Coverage of 9/11 and the War on Afghanistan

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Published October 31: Another special 8-page edition with stories on: How Monica Lewinski Saved the Social Security System; CNN debates the pros and cons of torture; a history of the Palmer Raids; Smearing Rep. Cynthia McKinney; David Lloyd and Rick Berg profile Zalmay Khalilzad, Bush's Afghan playmaker; Blind Predator dupes the New Yorker's Seymour Hersh; Kipling's Jezail guns. Available only to Subscribers. Subscribe Now!

November 1, 2001

Sami Amanah
US Attempts to Recruit
Russian Vets of Afghan War

Molly Secours
Where Are the Voices of Reason? Let the Women
Be Heard

William Blum
Unleashing the CIA

October 31, 2001

Tom Turnipseed
Terrorize the Poor,
Subsidize the Rich

Chris Clarke
Thank God for Berkeley

Steve Perry
The Silent Genocide

October 30, 2001

Rep. Ron Paul
War on Terror
Bad as War on Drugs

Jeffrey St. Clair
Flying Blind:
The Predator's Problem

Ali Abunimah
Dear Colin Powell

St. Clair/Cockburn
Atomic Trains Grounded

Maud Hurd
We Need a Real
Stimulus Package

Dr. Susan Block
We're All Afghans Now

Tariq Ali
Busted in Munich

Francis Beer
Toward the Terrorist
Anti-World

October 29, 2001

Alexander Cockburn
The Left and the Just War

John Pilger
Hidden Agenda
of the War on Terror

David Krieger
Nukes on the Loose

Jack McCarthy
Neo-Nazis and 9/11

Marina Kalashnikova
The Brzezinski Interview

Richard Manning
Terrorism:
a definitive history

October 27, 2001

Edward Said
A Vision to Lift the Spririt

October 26, 2001

CounterPunch Wire
Genocide Scholar Gagged
Over Comments on the
Bombing of Afghanistan

Rahul Mahajan
Poisoning the Well

Sen. Russ Feingold
Why I Opposed the
Anti-Terrorism Bill

John Troyer
Put the War to a Vote

Norman Madarasz
What It Means to be
Against the War

Patrick Cockburn
Northern Alliance Attacks
US Bombing Strategy

Richard Lloyd Parry
Terrible Images
of a "Just" War

October 25, 2001

Ghassan Andoni
Raid on Bethlehem

N.D. Jayaprakash
From Hiroshima to NYC

Evan Schultz
Memo to Ashcroft:
Read Marbury

The Sunshine Project
Assault on the BioWeapons
Convention

Sarah Turner
Cashing In on Patriotism

Latin American Colloquium
on Systemology
The Meridia Manifesto

Noam Chomsky
The New War on Terror

Resources:
100s of Links About 9/11


CounterPunch:
Complete Coverage of 9/11 and Its Aftermath


Five Days That
Shook The World:
Seattle and Beyond

By Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
Photos by Allan Sekula

(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)

INSIDE

Subscribe Online!

EXCLUSIVE TO
COUNTERPUNCH
SUBSCRIBERS


Published Oct. 15, 2001

8-Page Special Issue

War Diary

CIA's Assassination Plan a History of Torture in US Prisons

bin Laden and Bush Business Connections

Aisha Ikramuddin on the Hidden Hype of US Food Bombs

Peter Linebaugh on Pakistan

Christopher Hitchens' Love for Mrs. Thatcher

Jiang Zemin Tells Bush: Nuke 'Em


Search CounterPunch

Read Whiteout and Find Out How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press

by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The New Intifada:
Resisting Israel's Apartheid

Edited by Roane Carey

Responses to 9/11:
Chomsky, Russell Banks,
Zinn, and Alice Walker
A Free ebook from
Seven Stories Press

 

A Pocket Guide to
Environmental Bad Guys
by James Ridgeway
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The Phoenix Program
by Douglas Valentine

Al Gore:
A User's Manual
by Cockburn
and St. Clair

Buy This Explosive
New Book at an
Amazing Discount!
 

Reviews of Gore:
a User's Manual


Private Warriors
by Ken Silverstein

CounterPunch's Booktalk

November 1, 2001

FBI Eyes Torture

By Alexander Cockburn

"FBI and Justice Department investigators are increasingly frustrated by the silence of jailed suspected associates of Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network, and some are beginning to that say that traditional civil liberties may have to be cast aside if they are to extract information about the Sept. 11 attacks and terrorist plans."

Thus began a piece by Walter Pincus on page 6 of The Washington Post on Sunday, and if you suspect that this is the overture to an argument for torture, you are right. The FBI interrogators have been getting nowhere with the four key suspects, held in New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center. None of these men have talked, and Pincus quotes an FBI man involved in the interrogation as saying that "it could get to that spot where we could go to pressure...where we won't have a choice, and we are probably getting there."

Pincus reports that "among the alternative strategies under discussion are using drugs or pressure tactics, such as those employed occasionally by Israeli interrogators, to extract information. Another idea is extraditing the suspects to allied countries where security services sometimes employ threats to family members or resort to torture."

Some FBI interrogators are thinking longingly of drugs like the so-called "truth serum," sodium pentothal; others the "pressure tactics," i.e., straightforward tortures, used by Shin Bet in Israel, banned after savage public debate a few years ago, which included sensory deprivation (an old favorite of British interrogators in Northern Ireland), plus many agonizing physical torments. Another idea is to send the suspects to other countries for torture by seasoned experts. Israel is not mentioned; nor are the British. Extradition of Moussaoui to France or Morocco is apparently a possibility.

CounterPunch was astounded to find David Cole, noted liberal professor at Georgetown University Law Center, being quoted by Pincus as saying that "the use of force to extract information could happen" in cases where investigators believe suspects have information on an upcoming attack. "If there is a ticking bomb, it is not an easy issue, it's tough," he said. Of course it's tough. As Cole surely knows, the "ticking bomb" rationale has been used by Israel's torture lobby for years, long after it had become clear that it had simply become a routine way of dealing with suspects. Right now the disposition of the FBI, intent on interrogating every Arab American male (some 200,000) in this country, is doubtless to assume that they might have knowledge of a ticking bomb.

The FBI claims it is hampered by its present codes of gentility. If so, there's no need to eye Morocco or France as subcontracting torturers. As a practical matter torture is far from unknown in the interrogation rooms of U.S. law enforcement, with Abner Louima the best-known recent example.

The most infamous disclosure of consistent torture by a police department in recent years concerned cops in Chicago in the mid-70s through early 80s who used electroshock, oxygen deprivation, hanging on hooks, the bastinado and beatings of the testicles. The torturers were white and their victims black or brown. A prisoner in California's Pelican Bay State Prison was thrown into boiling water. Others get 50,000-volt shocks from stun guns. Many states have so-called "secure housing units" where prisoners are kept in solitary in tiny concrete cells for years on end, many of them going mad in the process. Amnesty International has denounced U.S. police forces for "a pattern of unchecked excessive force amounting to torture."

Last year the UN delivered a severe public rebuke to the United States for its record on preventing torture and degrading punishment. A 10-strong panel of experts highlighted what it said were Washington's breaches of the agreement ratified by the United States in 1994. The UN Committee Against Torture, which monitors international compliance with the UN Convention Against Torture, has called for the abolition of electric-shock stun belts (1000 in use in the U.S.) and restraint chairs on prisoners, as well as an end to holding children in adult jails. It also said female detainees are "very often held in humiliating and degrading circumstances" and expressed concern over alleged cases of sexual assault by police and prison officers. The panel criticized the excessively harsh regime in maximum security prisons, the use of chain gangs in which prisoners perform manual labor while shackled together, and the number of cases of police brutality against racial minorities.

So far as rape is concerned, because of the rape factories more conventionally known as the U.S. prison system, there are estimates that twice as many men as women are raped in the U.S. each year. A Human Rights Watch report in April of this year cited a December 2000 Prison Journal study based on a survey of inmates in seven men's prison facilities in four states. The results showed that 21 percent of the inmates had experienced at least one episode of pressured or forced sexual contact since being incarcerated, and at least 7 percent had been raped in their facilities. A 1996 study of the Nebraska prison system produced similar findings, with 22 percent of male inmates reporting that they had been pressured or forced to have sexual contact against their will while incarcerated. Of these, more than 50 percent had submitted to forced anal sex at least once. Extrapolating these findings to the national level gives a total of at least 140,000 inmates who have been raped.

Since its inception the CIA has taken a keen interest in torture, avidly studying Nazi techniques and protecting their exponents such as Klaus Barbie. The FBI could ship the four key suspects to plenty of countries taught torture by CIA technicians, including El Salvador. Robert Fisk reported in the London Independent in 1998 that after the 1979 revolution Iranians found a CIA film made for the SAVAK, the Shah's political police, on how to torture women. William Blum, whose Rogue State (Common Courage, 2000) gives a useful overview of the United States' relationship to torture, cites a 1970 story in Brazil's extremely respectable Jornal do Brasil, quoting the former Urugayan chief of police intelligence, Alejandro Otero, as saying that U.S. advisers, particularly Dan Mitrione, had instituted torture in Uruguay on a routine basis, with scientific refinement in technique (such as the precise upper limits of electric voltage before death intervened) and psychological pressure, such as a tape in the next room of women and children screaming, telling the prisoner that his family was being tortured.

The CIA's official line is that torture is wrong and is ineffective. It is indeed wrong. On countless occasions it has been appallingly effective. CP