home / subscribe / donate / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback / events

 

New Special Double Issue of Print Edition of CounterPunch

The Trial of Milosevic: What Does It Portend for Saddam? by Tiphaine Dickson; Dr. Dean Wraps It Up...or Does He? by Alexander Cockburn; Bush Oil Grab in Alaska: How Clinton Opened the Door by Jeffrey St. Clair; The Magnificient 9: CounterPunch's Annual List of Groups That Make a Difference; The Sabotage of Matt Gonzalez by Ben Terrall; Arnold and Parole: Already Better than Gray Davis! by Scott Handleman. CounterPunch Online is read by 70,000 visitors each day, but we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation for the online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible. Click here to make a (tax deductible) donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Now Available from
CounterPunch for Only $11.50 (S/H Included)

Today's Stories

January 3 / 4, 2004

Glen Martin
Jesus vs. the Beast of the Apocalypse

January 2, 2004

Stan Cox
Red Alert 2016

Dave Lindorff
Beef, the Meat of Republicans

Jackie Corr
Rule and Ruin: Wall Street and Montana

Norman Solomon
George Will's Ethics: None of Our Business?

David Vest
As the Top Wobbleth


January 1, 2004

Randall Robinson
Honor Haiti, Honor Ourselves

David Krieger
Looking Back on 2003

Robert Fisk
War Takes an Inhuman Twist: Roadkill Bombs

Stan Goff
War, Race and Elections

Hammond Guthrie
2003 Almaniac

Website of the Day
Embody Bags


December 31, 2003

Ray McGovern
Don't Be Fooled Again: This Isn't an Independent Investigation

Kurt Nimmo
Manufacturing Hysteria

Robert Fisk
The Occupation is Damned

Mike Whitney
Mad Cows and Downer George

Alexander Cockburn
A Great Year Ebbed, Another Ahead

 

 

December 30, 2003

Michael Neumann
Criticism of Israel is Not Anti-Semitism

Annie Higgins
When They Bombed the Hometown of the Virgin Mary

Alan Farago
Bush Bros. Wrecking Co.: Time Runs Out for the Everglades

Dan Bacher
Creatures from the Blacklight Lagoon: From Glofish to Frankenfish

Jeffrey St. Clair
Hard Time on the Killing Floor: Inside Big Meat

Willie Nelson
Whatever Happened to Peace on Earth?

 

December 29, 2003

Mark Hand
The Washington Post in the Dock?

David Lindorff
The Bush Election Strategy

Phillip Cryan
Interested Blindness: Media Omissions in Colombia's War

Richard Trainor
Catellus Development: the Next Octopus?

Uri Avnery
Israel's Conscientious Objectors

 

December 27 / 28, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
A Journey Into Rupert Murdoch's Soul

Kathy Kelly
Christmas Day in Baghdad: A Better World

Saul Landau
Iraq at the End of the Year

Dave Zirin
A Linebacker for Peace & Justice: an Interview with David Meggysey

Robert Fisk
Iraq Through the American Looking Glass

Scott Burchill
The Bad Guys We Once Thought Good: Where Are They Now?

Chris Floyd
Bush's Iraq Plan is Right on Course: Saddam 2.0

Brian J. Foley
Don't Tread on Me: Act Now to Save the Constitution

Seth Sandronsky
Feedlot Sweatshops: Mad Cows and the Market

Susan Davis
Lord of the (Cash Register) Rings

Ron Jacobs
Cratched Does California

Adam Engel
Crumblecake and Fish

Norman Solomon
The Unpardonable Lenny Bruce

Poets' Basement
Cullen and Albert

Website of the Weekend
Activism Through Music

 

 

December 26, 2003

Gary Leupp
Bush Doings: Doing the Language

 

December 25, 2003

Diane Christian
The Christmas Story

Elaine Cassel
This Christmas, the World is Too Much With Us

Susan Davis
Jinglebells, Hold the Schlock

Kristen Ess
Bethlehem Celebrates Christmas, While Rafah Counts the Dead

Francis Boyle
Oh Little Town of Bethlehem

Alexander Cockburn
The Magnificient 9

Guthrie / Albert
Another Colorful Season

 

 

December 24, 2003

M. Shahid Alam
The Semantics of Empire

William S. Lind
Marley's List for Santa in Wartime

Josh Frank
Iraqi Oil: First Come, First Serve

Cpt. Paul Watson
The Mad Cowboy Was Right

Robert Lopez
Nuance and Innuendo in the War on Iraq

 

 


December 23, 2003

Brian J. Foley
Duck and Cover-up

Will Youmans
Sharon's Ultimatum

Michael Donnelly
Here They Come Again: Another Big Green Fiasco

Uri Avnery
Sharon's Speech: the Decoded Version

December 22, 2003

Jeffrey St. Clair
Pray to Play: Bush's Faith-Based National Parks

Patrick Gavin
What Would Lincoln Do?

Marjorie Cohn
How to Try Saddam: Searching for a Just Venue

Kathy Kelly
The Two Troublemakers: "Guilty of Being Palestinians in Iraq"

 

December 20 / 21, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
How to Kill Saddam

Saul Landau
Bush Tries Farce as Cuba Policy

Rafael Hernandez
Empire and Resistance: an Interview with Tariq Ali

David Vest
Our Ass and Saddam's Hole

Kurt Nimmo
Bush Gets Serious About Killing Iraqis

Greg Weiher
Lessons from the Israeli School on How to Win Friends in the Islamic World

Christopher Brauchli
Arrest, Smear, Slink Away: Dr. Lee and Cpt. Yee

Carol Norris
Cheers of a Clown: Saddam and the Gloating Bush

Bruce Jackson
The Nameless and the Detained: Bush's Disappeared

Juliana Fredman
A Sealed Laboratory of Repression

Mickey Z.
Holiday Spirit at the UN

Ron Jacobs
In the Wake of Rebellion: The Prisoner's Rights Movement and Latino Prisoners

Josh Frank
Sen. Max Baucus: the Slick Swindler

John L. Hess
Slow Train to the Plane

Adam Engel
Black is Indeed Beautiful

Ben Tripp
The Relevance of Art in Times of Crisis

Michael Neumann
Rhythm and Race

Poets' Basement
Cullen, Engel, Albert & Guthrie

 

 

 

 



Hot Stories

Alexander Cockburn
Behold, the Head of a Neo-Con!

Subcomandante Marcos
The Death Train of the WTO

Norman Finkelstein
Hitchens as Model Apostate

Steve Niva
Israel's Assassination Policy: the Trigger for Suicide Bombings?

Dardagan, Slobodo and Williams
CounterPunch Exclusive:
20,000 Wounded Iraqi Civilians

Steve J.B.
Prison Bitch

Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber
True Lies: the Use of Propaganda in the Iraq War

Wendell Berry
Small Destructions Add Up

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

Weekend Edition
January 3 / 4, 2004

The Wrong War at the Wrong Time

Military Might Does Not Insure Stability

By JACK SHANAHAN
Vice Admiral, US Navy (Ret.)

Recent polls show that an increasing majority of Americans are growing weary of absorbing the lion's share of responsibility for running the world. They sense that the current administration's use of military force as the primary instrument of statecraft goes against American tradition in conducting our relations with other nations.

While there was a "clear and present danger" from terrorists across the globe and a need to confront them, the Bush Administration's obsession with Saddam Hussein took us into the wrong war at the wrong time.

As a result, terrorists are free to act at will on a worldwide basis while the U.S. searches for a way out of the Iraqi morass and while most of the rest of the world watches from the sidelines.

If we haven't learned already, hopefully we will by the time we extract from Iraq, that military power does not automatically translate into political and economic stability. We need urgently to find new approaches which, if they cannot solve a crisis, at least will allow us to manage---with the help of others--- the problems that are surfacing as part of an entirely new set of circumstances.

The U.S. is today the world's sole superpower. If it is our goal to maintain this status quo, like it or not, the U.S. needs to use our considerable political, economic, moral, and military influence to develop and shape a permanent "stand alone" peacekeeping mechanism within the United Nations.

The United Nations has indicated that it is willing to take a more active role in the fight on terrorism, on conflict resolution and to carry out more peace operations. The outbreak of ethnic fighting in the former Yugoslavia brought extensive if not always successful U.N. involvement and mediation. Elsewhere, in the Far East, in Africa, and in Central America, U.N. supervised peace agreements have contributed to the return of stability and encouraged regional participation in finding solutions to regional problems.

While we and the UN should study past operations for "lessons learned", we must carefully avoid becoming mired by the past. The Cold War with its deep east-west antagonisms is history. The future promises closer cooperation among the five permanent members of the Security Council, a promise already realized for many UN operations. Terrorism threatens all five permanent members and so provides a pragmatic basis for cooperation. This cooperative spirit suggests that the Security Council, if provided adequate and experienced staff support, can increasingly assume responsibility for peace operations as alternatives to unilateral military action.

What the UN does not need, nor should it have, is a standing military force. What it does need is a series of initiatives from member nations that gives the UN, under the direction of the Security Council and implemented by the Secretary General, an effective peace keeping and peace enforcement planning capability-in effect a contingency force headquarters. Toward this end, member nations should undertake steps to:

· establish, within the Department of Peace Keeping Operations, a legitimate contingency planning staff to include standard staff support functions of intelligence, communications and logistics in lieu of current ad hoc procedures.

· establish Regional Peacekeeping Areas (RPKA). Nations within each RPKA, because they have vested interests and posses unique knowledge and understanding of the region's political, economic, military and cultural undercurrents and influences, would establish their own contingency planning staffs similar to that of the UN. Such staffs would be empowered to call on, deploy and serve as the headquarters for earmarked forces designated by regional states for peace operations.

To insure that one or two locally dominant states cannot use the RPKA for their own (as opposed to broader regional) benefit, RPKA interventions could be restricted to those approved by the UN Security Council.

In many parts of the world the forerunner's of RPKAs already exist: the OAS in the Americas, the EU in Europe, the OAU in Africa, ASEAN in Southeast Asia and the Gulf Cooperation Council in the Persian Gulf. Because most of these bodies were established without a military security element as part of their charters, some revisions to and expansion of regional "sovereignty" would have to be negotiated.

· earmark a variety of military units to be available for each region. Nations would indicate the numbers and types of armed forces each would be willing to commit to peacekeeping (under Chapter VI of the UN Charter) or peace enforcement (Chapter VII of the UN Charter) operations if called upon by the Security Council. Without at least this level of involvement, RPKA contingency plans would be a sham, the UN (and regional organization's) would be seen as "paper tigers", and support plans for communications, intelligence and logistics would be all but meaningless.

· identify a limited number of member nations which could be called upon to provide or augment a wide range of specialized support in the event a region cannot muster these types of units. Specialized support functions which come to mind are satellite communications and reconnaissance, special intelligence, air and sea lift units, airfield control detachments, fresh water (osmosis) units and training facilities.

If the U.S. really wants to protect its national interests without finding itself overcommitted or having to go it alone, we cannot avoid being a major leader in building a more effective UN. Such a role does require unstinting political, financial, and military support for UN peace operations. It also demands the determination to work closely with other nations in building flexible yet viable new structures for international security. If we were to throw our considerable efforts into this approach, within a few years the burden of meeting a broad range of threats would be more equitably shared. With lower threats would come lower military spending throughout the world and an increase in resources available to address acute and growing domestic challenges.

If the UN is to fulfill the promise it held out to the world 58 years ago, it is imperative that the U.S. take the lead in fostering UN organizational reform and regional responsibility. We have the political, administrative and military expertise to move the world; all we need is the will to do so.

Jack Shanahan, Vice Admiral, U.S. Navy (Ret.), is a member of Business Leaders for Sensible Priorities. He can be reached at: shanahan@counterpunch.org

Weekend Edition Features for Dec. 27 / 28, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
A Journey Into Rupert Murdoch's Soul

Kathy Kelly
Christmas Day in Baghdad: A Better World

Saul Landau
Iraq at the End of the Year

Dave Zirin
A Linebacker for Peace & Justice: an Interview with David Meggysey

Robert Fisk
Iraq Through the American Looking Glass

Scott Burchill
The Bad Guys We Once Thought Good: Where Are They Now?

Chris Floyd
Bush's Iraq Plan is Right on Course: Saddam 2.0

Brian J. Foley
Don't Tread on Me: Act Now to Save the Constitution

Seth Sandronsky
Feedlot Sweatshops: Mad Cows and the Market

Susan Davis
Lord of the (Cash Register) Rings

Ron Jacobs
Cratched Does California

Adam Engel
Crumblecake and Fish

Norman Solomon
The Unpardonable Lenny Bruce

Poets' Basement
Cullen and Albert

Website of the Weekend
Activism Through Music


Keep CounterPunch Alive:

Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /