home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

Read Cockburn and St. Clair's Whiteout: the CIA, Drugs and the Press and discover how the CIA gave a helping hand to the opium lords who took over Afghanistan, thus ushering the Taliban into power.


CounterPunch: Complete Coverage of 9/11 and the War on Afghanistan

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Published October 31: Another special 8-page edition with stories on: How Monica Lewinski Saved the Social Security System; CNN debates the pros and cons of torture; a history of the Palmer Raids; Smearing Rep. Cynthia McKinney; David Lloyd and Rick Berg profile Zalmay Khalilzad, Bush's Afghan playmaker; Blind Predator dupes the New Yorker's Seymour Hersh; Kipling's Jezail guns. Available only to Subscribers. Subscribe Now!

November 1, 2001

Alexander Cockburn
FBI Eyes Torture

William Blum
Unleashing the CIA

October 31, 2001

Tom Turnipseed
Terrorize the Poor,
Subsidize the Rich

Chris Clarke
Thank God for Berkeley

Steve Perry
The Silent Genocide

October 30, 2001

Rep. Ron Paul
War on Terror
Bad as War on Drugs

Jeffrey St. Clair
Flying Blind:
The Predator's Problem

Ali Abunimah
Dear Colin Powell

St. Clair/Cockburn
Atomic Trains Grounded

Maud Hurd
We Need a Real
Stimulus Package

Dr. Susan Block
We're All Afghans Now

Tariq Ali
Busted in Munich

Francis Beer
Toward the Terrorist
Anti-World

October 29, 2001

Alexander Cockburn
The Left and the Just War

John Pilger
Hidden Agenda
of the War on Terror

David Krieger
Nukes on the Loose

Jack McCarthy
Neo-Nazis and 9/11

Marina Kalashnikova
The Brzezinski Interview

Richard Manning
Terrorism:
a definitive history

October 27, 2001

Edward Said
A Vision to Lift the Spririt

October 26, 2001

CounterPunch Wire
Genocide Scholar Gagged
Over Comments on the
Bombing of Afghanistan

Rahul Mahajan
Poisoning the Well

Sen. Russ Feingold
Why I Opposed the
Anti-Terrorism Bill

John Troyer
Put the War to a Vote

Norman Madarasz
What It Means to be
Against the War

Patrick Cockburn
Northern Alliance Attacks
US Bombing Strategy

Richard Lloyd Parry
Terrible Images
of a "Just" War

October 25, 2001

Ghassan Andoni
Raid on Bethlehem

N.D. Jayaprakash
From Hiroshima to NYC

Evan Schultz
Memo to Ashcroft:
Read Marbury

The Sunshine Project
Assault on the BioWeapons
Convention

Sarah Turner
Cashing In on Patriotism

Latin American Colloquium
on Systemology
The Meridia Manifesto

Noam Chomsky
The New War on Terror

Resources:
100s of Links About 9/11


CounterPunch:
Complete Coverage of 9/11 and Its Aftermath


Five Days That
Shook The World:
Seattle and Beyond

By Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
Photos by Allan Sekula

(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)

INSIDE

Subscribe Online!

EXCLUSIVE TO
COUNTERPUNCH
SUBSCRIBERS


Published Oct. 15, 2001

8-Page Special Issue

War Diary

CIA's Assassination Plan a History of Torture in US Prisons

bin Laden and Bush Business Connections

Aisha Ikramuddin on the Hidden Hype of US Food Bombs

Peter Linebaugh on Pakistan

Christopher Hitchens' Love for Mrs. Thatcher

Jiang Zemin Tells Bush: Nuke 'Em


Search CounterPunch

Read Whiteout and Find Out How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press

by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The New Intifada:
Resisting Israel's Apartheid

Edited by Roane Carey

Responses to 9/11:
Chomsky, Russell Banks,
Zinn, and Alice Walker
A Free ebook from
Seven Stories Press

 

A Pocket Guide to
Environmental Bad Guys
by James Ridgeway
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The Phoenix Program
by Douglas Valentine

Al Gore:
A User's Manual
by Cockburn
and St. Clair

Buy This Explosive
New Book at an
Amazing Discount!
 

Reviews of Gore:
a User's Manual


Private Warriors
by Ken Silverstein

CounterPunch's Booktalk

November 1, 2001

Let Women Be Heard

Where are the Voices of Reason?

By Molly Secours

"Where are the women, where are the women"? This was the chant reverberating throughout a stadium holding several thousand participants just two months ago. It was the NGO closing ceremonies at the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa and Fidel Castro was the honored speaker. As five dark suited dignitaries--all males--took their seats at a table behind him, a lone voice shouted the question from the vast crowd.

Within seconds the mantra rumbled through the masses with an intensity that crossed lines of race, gender and nationality. The entire stadium echoed the chorus "where are the women?"

Little could anyone have predicted that less than a month later the United States would stage a war in which few voices of reason or sanity are audible. Let's face it, the feminine perspective--which does not necessarily have to come from women--has been scarce throughout this entire crisis; if not altogether absent.

What is the feminine perspective? Generally it is the perspective that values life above all else and one that is most adept at negotiations and communication. A feminist perspective weighs humanitarian issues along side of the political--rather than in place of it. It is the feminine which experiences the excruciating pain and the rapturous joy of creating life. And historically, it is primarily the masculine who destroys human life through war, aggression and greed.

This explains why women (and those with feminine perspective) are generally excluded from the discussion in matters of politics and war. It's not because they are not intelligent enough or not qualified to offer insight and perhaps a solution. In the current situation it is because the United States--and most of the world--views women as a detriment to social and political self-interest. Hence, women are generally overlooked in such heady matters.

If you are skeptical about the lack of feminine perspective or influence, pick up a daily newspaper or tune into the news. How many images feature women negotiating with world leaders or signing bills that violate civil rights or target immigrants for the greater good?

This weekend's edition of the countries most widely read newspaper was jam-packed with authoritative voices espousing war-wisdom. Not one of them questioned the U. S. position on the bombing in Afghanistan or the devastation of innocent people. They were all written by men.

These days voices of dissent are roundly criticized, discredited and dismissed. It takes a lot of courage (and maybe a death wish) to stand up and confront U.S. leadership about the current crisis--especially if you are black and a woman.

In spite of all the intimidation, there is one woman who spoke out early on in this crisis. It was the Honorable Barbara Lee, the African American House representative from the Ninth District of California.

Way back in September (before the war) Ms. Lee opposed the resolution giving the President free reign to spend a $40 billion budget on the military to retaliate against the terrorist attacks. In a vote of 420-to-1 she was the lone dissenting voice that said no, we should not go to war.

Lee also proposed that a review of U.S. foreign policy is necessary in order to reverse the current war trend. As a result of speaking out Ms Lee was ostracized and rewarded with death threats that have required her to secure police protection.

Like many Americans, Ms. Lee has the audacity to believe that the annihilation of civilian men, women and children abroad isn't an appropriate response to the terrorist attacks in the U.S.

During an interview in September Ms. Lee said "We don't know the real nature of terrorism in the true sense of the word. We have not invested in combating terrorism the way we should have, which involves many issues. I am convinced that military action alone will not prevent further terrorist attacks."

This isn't "women's intuition". It is a perspective based on a broader and more honest viewpoint of American foreign policy.

It appears Ms. Lee was right. After weeks of bombing, the military strikes have produced few results while extinguishing numerous lives. And now our leaders inform us the war must expand rather than end.

Why are we so afraid to talk about the contributing factors of this ugly war? Is it really so traitorous to discuss the fact that Osama Bin Laden is a creation of the U.S. intelligence forces or ponder the ramifications of our actions? Is it a betrayal to speak of the U.S. recruitment and arming of right wing Islamic fundamentalists during the Cold War in order to defeat the Soviet-backed democratic regime in Afghanistan? Or to question whether or not decimating a war torn country will do anything to make us safer or feel better about the loved ones who died on September 11th?

Before the bombing even started, the Women's Alliance for Peace and Human Rights in Afghanistan (WAPHA) noted, "The tragedy that has hit the innocent American people is deeply felt by the suffering people of Afghanistan. The people of Afghanistan have been tortured, terrorized and massacred on a daily base by the international terrorists such as Osama Ben Laden, his followers, the Taliban, the Pakistani ISI, the Pakistani religious extremist groups and other foreign extremists." And now these very same people are being killed at the hands of Americans.

There are numerous voices of reason absent from the mainstream current debate. Voices of dissent who are advocating for a political and a peaceful resolution. The voices of women (and men) who offer a social and political viewpoint based on historical accounts of American foreign policy. These are the voices of Howard Zinn, Alice Walker, Noam Chomsky, Cynthia McKinney, and of course, Barbara Lee.

There are many voices of reason to shed light on this war. We just dont get to hear them.

Molly Secours is a writer, videographer and racial dialog facilitator in Nashville TN. She can be reached at mollmaud@earthlink.net