Read
How the Press & the CIA Killed Gary Webb's Career
Today's
Stories
December
16, 2004
Christopher
Brauchli
Interest Rates, Credit Cards &
the Lethal Fine Print

December
15, 2004
Robert
Fisk
Who Killed Baha Mousa?
Jennifer
Van Bergen
The Monster Under the Bed
Heather
Gray
Will the Real Christians Please Stand?: a Personal Testimony
Dave
Lindorff
The DNC, Albright and the Iraq Elections
Luis
Hernandez Navarro
To Die a Little: Migration and Coffee
in Mexico and Central America
Joshua
Frank
The Ohio Recount: an Exercise in "Dumbocracy"
Greg
Moses
Eighty-Sixing Civil Rights in Ohio?
George
Caffentzis
The Petroleum Commons

December
14, 2004
Dave
Lindorff
DNC Meddling in the Ukraine Elections
Larry
Birns / Seth DeLong
Haiti is Unraveling and No One is Saying
Anything
Richard
Thieme
My Last Talk with Gary Webb: "I Knew It Was the Truth and
That's What Kept Me Going"
Patrick
Cockburn
A Year After Saddam's Capture, Iraq
is Getting Worse
Chris
Floyd
Client State: Moral Values and Voluntary Servitude in Bush's
America
Akiva
Eldar
A One-time Hanukkah Miracle
Burbach
/ Cantor
The Legacy of Pinochet: Kissinger
and the Teflon Tyrant

December
13, 2004
Cockburn
/ St. Clair
Gary Webb: a Great Reporter, Trashed
by the CIA's Claque
David
Phinney
"Contract Meal Disaster" for Iraqi Prisoners: Rancid
Food Sparked Abu Ghraib Riots
Paul
Craig Roberts
A Dose of Non-Delusional Reality
for Douglas Feith
M.
Junaid Alam
The War is the War Crime
Robert
Jensen
The US Has Lost the Iraq War...and That's a Good Thing
Richard
Oxman
Kafkaesque Lessons for the Left
Greg
Moses
Send No Messengers of Defeat
Douglas
Lummis
The Pentagon's Neurosis: Fallujah
Gulag

December
11 / 12, 2004
Alexander
Cockburn
Running an Empire on the Cheap
Ron
Jacobs
The Drugs of War: Getting High in the Green Zone?
Saul
Landau
Listening and Talking to God About
Invading Other Countries
Gary
Leupp
Bush's Capital
Sharon
Smith
The Horrible Toll on US Troops
Dave
Lindorff
Deja Vu All Over Again: 5,000 Desertions and Counting
Uri
Avnery
The Boss Has Gone Crazy
Jude
Wanniski
The Neo-Con Smear on Kofi Annan: What Food-for-Oil Scandal?
Heather
Gray
How the South Became Republican: an Interview with John Egerton
Patrick
Cockburn / Ken Sengupta
Fallujah: the Homecoming and the Homeless
John
Pilger
Return to Kosovo: Calling the Humanitarian Bombers to Account
Joshua
Frank
All the Rage: Mr. Solomon, Say You're Sorry
Ben
Tripp
O Canada!: the Truth About the Election of 2004
John
Stanton
God Speaks!
Laura
Nathan
Porn Stars are People, Too: a Talk with Christi Lake
Poets'
Basement
Capaccio, Davies, Louise, Ford and Albert
Website
of the Day
Fallujah Photos: Killed in Their Beds

December
10, 2004
Ralph
Nader
President Bush, Stop Destroying the
Mosques of Iraq
Greg
Moses
Whitewashing Voter Fraud
Nicole
Colson
Rebellion in the Ranks: Grunts Are Resisting Stop-Loss Orders
Frederick
B. Hudson
"They Still Got Those Dogs": A New Book Probes Old
Civil Rights Lessons
Patrick
Cockburn
Iraq's Insurgents Oppose the Occupation, Not the Elections
Kathy
Kelly
From Haiti to Iraq: Burying Water

December
9, 2004
Greg
Moses
Ask Not Who Bankrolled Fallujah
Joshua
Frank
Cobb and the Ohio Recount: Vote Fraud as Fundraiser!
Ralph
Nader
An Open Letter to Bush: It's Time to
Disclose the Real Casualty Figures
Lee
Sustar
Bhopal: the Making of a Disaster
Tom
Barry
Restrictionist Resurgence
Mickey
Z.
Sander Hicks and the 9/11 Truth Movement
Christopher
Brauchli
Bush in the Bubble
Mark
Donham
Why are House Democrats Trying to
Deny Cynthia McKinney Seniority?
Gary
Corseri
On the Anniversary of John Lennon's Death, 2012
Paul
de Rooij
The Voices of Sharon's Little Helpers

December
8, 2004
Ralph
Nader
Will the Real Michael Moore Ever Re-Emerge?
Ann
Harrison
The Ohio Recount: Reluctant Officials
and Few Rules
Paul
Craig Roberts
War Crime
Dave
Lindorff
They've Got a Secret: Inside the $40 Billion Black Budget for
Spying
Patrick
Cockburn / Andrew Buncombe
CIA Warning on Iraq: Fallujah Did Not Break the Back of the Insurgency
Col.
Dan Smith
Rules of Engagement in Iraq
Emily
Alves / Michael Johnson
Paradise Lost: Corruption and Clientelism in Costa Rica
Richard
Oxman
The Dylan Bob Wouldn't Mention: Up With Dylan Thomas
Ron
Jacobs
In Fallujah, Freedom Isn't Free

December
7, 2004
Patrick
Cockburn
Running Battles in Baghdad
Behrooz
Ghamari
Lost Muslim Voices of Dissent
Dave
Lindorff
American Fantasies: Psst! Hey Buddy,
Did You Hear How Well the War's Going?
Joshua
Frank
Dean at the DNC?
Richard
Oxman
Down with Dylan: the Insufferable Interview
Ray
McGovern
All Mosquitoes, No Swamp
John
Chuckman
The Invasion of Hallifax: The Imperial Wizard Visits Canada
James
Petras
Latin America: the Empire Changes Gears
Website
of the Day
ToxMap: Who's Poisoning You

December
6, 2004
Paul
Craig Roberts
Paranoia and Pre-emption: Is the
Bush Administration Certifiable?
December
4 / 6, 2004
Alexander
Cockburn
Politicize the CIA? You've Got to
be Kidding
Joe
Bageant
Dining with the Rhinos
Alan
Maass
Reporting from the Ground in Iraq: an Interview with Patrick
Cockburn
Brian
Cloughley
Democracy, Bush-style, in the Gulf
Laura
Carlsen
Latin America Shifts Left
Lenni
Brenner
Jefferson, Madison, Bush and Religion
Anna
Ioakimedes
Brazil's Haitian Mission: Doing God's Work or Washington's?
Uri
Avnery
Widow of Opportunity?
Fred
Gardner
Supreme Court Hears Medical Pot Case
Dave
Zirin
Steroids to Heaven
Jackie
Corr
Mining Camp Blues: the Red State Variation
Don
Fitz
Will Greens Abandon IRV?
Lucy
Herschel
"Art can be a Weapon of the Oppressed": an Interview
with Artist Anthony Papa
Richard
Oxman
No Angels in America: Bashing the Gay Play
Ron
Jacobs
Holiday Greeting Card
Poets'
Basement
Collins, Albert, LaMorticella

December
3, 2004
Dave
Lindorff
Lie Then Escalate
Ben
Tripp
Fun With Boycotts: How to Shop in a
Time of Crisis
Joe
Allen
Murder in El Salvador: the Assassination of Teamster Organizer
Gilberto Soto
Matthew
B. Riley
Human Rights Court Fails Lori Berenson
Meir
Shalev
In the End, It is the Violin that Wins
Bob
Wing
The White Elephant in the Room: Race and Election 2004
Christopher
Brauchli
When McCain Bit His Tongue
Sasan
Fayazmanesh
The EU, the US, Israel and Iran
December
2, 2004
Tito
Tricot
No Justice in Chile: I'm a Torture
Survivor in a Country Where Torturers Still Run Free
Behzad
Yaghmaian
The Murder of Theo Van Gogh and Muslim Migration
Dr.
Susan Block
Lana and Me: Meetings with Remarkable Apes
Frank
/ Chowkwanyun
Liberalism and Its Bounds
Lee
Sustar
Standoff in Ukraine: the Bad v. the Corrupt
Patrick
Cockburn
Another Grim Record in Iraq
Mark
Engler
Seattle at Five
Michael
Donnelly
Something Stinks in South Bend: the Firing of Tyrone Willingham
Nate
Collins
The Bay Area Mall on an Ohlone Burial Grounds
Saul
Landau
The Assassination of Danilo Anderson
December
1, 2004
Phillip
Cryan
Associated with Whom? Rightist Bias
in Wire Coverage of Colombia
Dave
Zirin
What's the Matter with "Leon"?:
Budweiser's Racist Commercial
Ghali
Hassan
Iraq's Health Care Under the Occupation:
200 Children Die Every Day
Donna
J. Volatile
Beware Western Nations Threatening "Democracy"
Patrick
Cockburn
How Saddam Tried to Arm the Insurgency
Nick
Meo
Chemical War Over Afghanistan
Mike
Ferner
The Battle of Toledo
Mokhiber
/ Weissman
Shame and Determination on Global AIDS Day: 40 Million and Rising
Kathy
Kelly
Looking the Other Way: the Real Crimes
of the UN in Iraq
November
30, 2004
Jennifer
Van Bergen
The Veil of Secrecy
Toni
Nelson Herrera
Meeting Kurtz: When Art is a Crime
Paul
Craig Roberts
The Bush Delusions: Successful at Incompetence
Patrick
Cockburn
The Insurgency Strikes Back: There Are No Safe Havens in Iraq
Chuck
Munson
WTO Protests Five Years Later: Seattle Weekly Trashes Anti-Globalization
Movement
Adam
Williams
Citizenship Sold: Back to Business in Indiana
Gregory
Elich
A Dangerous Turn in the US Plans for
North Korea
Website
of the Day
Read Lynne Cheney's Lesbian Novel Online!
November
29, 2004
Dave
Lindorff
Blowback in Ukraine: The Hand of
the CIA?
Omar
Barghouti
"The Pianist" of Palestine:
Roadblock Concerto at Gunpoint
Mike
Whitney
The US Media and Fallujah: How to
Market a Siege
Uri
Avnery
The Abu Mazen Style: "Give Me
Some Credit!"
Matt
Vidal
Globalization and Economic Inequality: a Look at the Numbers
Patrick
Cockburn
An Interview with Iraq's Foreign
Minister
Alan
Farago
Sex Change and Salvation: God, Girly Men and Endocrine Disrupters
Justin
Huggler
Bhopal 20 Years Later
Antony
Loewenstein
How Australia Reported Arafat's Death and Legacy
Gary
Leupp
Ukraine: Poll Results Aren't the Real
Issue
Website
of the Day
Mosul: Images from a Kill Zone
November
27 / 28, 2004
Peter
Linebaugh
Torture & Neo-Liberalism with
Sycorax in Iraq
Alexander
Cockburn
What Happened to O'Reilly's Loofa?
Fred
Gardner
Ashcroft v. Raich: Medical Marijuana and the Supreme Court
Kathy
Kelly
What We Can Control
Diane
Christian
The Other Cheek: "Empire Doesn't Analyze, It Acts"
Gary
Leupp
One More Neocon Target: South (Yes, South) Korea
Lenni
Brenner
Equality and Rights of Return: Jefferson Instructs the New York
Times
Ron
Jacobs
Death Squads and Iraq's Elections: the Mysterious Murders of
the AMS Clerics
Joshua
Frank
An Interview with Kevin Zeese on Nader, Kerry and the ABB Crowd
Toni
Solo
The Murder of Danilo Anderson
Saul
Landau
Fallujah, the 21st Century Guernica
JoAnn
Wypijewski
Matthew Shepard Case 6 Years Later: Why Hate Crimes Laws are
No Cure for Homophobia
Justin
Taylor
Empire's Lawless Opportunities
Amos
Harel
The Case of Captain R.
Walter
A. Davis
Tabloid Justice
Stephen
Hendricks
God's Kind of Men
Poets'
Basement
Albert, LaMorticella and Ford
November
26, 2004
Peter
Feng
Gavin Newsom: Man or Machine?
Greg
Moses
It's the White Vote, Stupid
Liaquat
Ali Khan
The Devil's Work: Bush's Minority Appointments
Michael
Mandel / Gail Davidson
Why Bush Should Be Banned from Canada: a Memo to the Ministry
of Immigration
Dave
Lindorff
Nation of Sheep, Turkey of an Election: Urkrainians Show the
Way
Gary
Corseri
When Black Friday Comes...
Paul
Craig Roberts
Whatever Happened to Conservatives?
Website
of the Day
Iraq Pipeline Watch
November
25, 2004
Willliam
Loren Katz
Giving Thanks to Whom?: "Thanks
to God We Sent 600 Heathen Souls to Hell Today"
Mitchel
Cohen
Why I Hate Thanksgiving
Mike
Ferner
An Uncommon Mom
November
24, 2004
Gila
Svirsky
License to Kill: the Example of Violence
is Set by the State
Winslow
T. Wheeler
The
Other Mess in Congress
Christopher
Brauchli
The Company He Keeps: the Syndicate of Tom Delay
Dave
Lindorff
Double Standards on Exit Polls: Hypocrisy Sans Irony
Ron
Jacobs
The Occupation of Iraq is the Root of t he Problem
Ken
Sengupta
Witnesses: War Crimes in Fallujah
Diana
Barahona
The Final Holocaust or Why I Voted for Ralph Nader
John
L. Hess
Safire the Shameless
Jason
Leopold
Did Harvard Hire (Another) War Criminal?
Jeffrey
St. Clair
The Mark of McCain: the Senator Most Likely to Start a Nuclear
War
Map
of the Day
Now and Then: 2004 v. 1860
November
23, 2004
Forrest
Hylton
Bush and Uribe at the Beach
November
22, 2004
Dave
Zirin
Fight Night in the NBA: Selective Outrage
in Detroit
Paul
Craig Roberts
On to Iran: We Won't Get Fooled Again?
Michael
Mandel / Gail Davidson
Why Bush Should be Banned from Canada
Kathie
Helmkamp
Our Son: a Marine Who Won't Kill
Ken
Sengupta
The Triangle of Death: "This is Now the Most Dangerous Place
in Iraq"
Mike
Whitney
Greenspan's Hammer
Roger
Burbach
Why They Hate Bush in Chile
Website
of the Day
Fed Up with Government Lies and Corporate Spin?
November
20 / 21, 2004
Alexander
Cockburn
The Poisoned Chalice
Todd
May
Religion, the Election and the Politics of Fear
Abbas
Ahmed Ibrahim
The Horrors of Fallujah: a First-Hand Account
Kevin
Zeese
Mishandling Nader
Landau
/ Hassen
After Arafat
Tom
Barry
The Vulcans Consolidate Power: The Rise of Stephen Hadley
Fred
Gardner
Pot Shots: Ask Dr. Todd
Justin
E.H. Smith
Triumph of the Will: the Sequel
Carl
Estabrook
Where We Are Now
Gary
Leupp
Imperial History-Making vs. Reality-Based Thought: a Dialogue
Dave
Lindorff
Apocalypse Soon
Jenna
Michelle Liut
Plans Colombia and Patriota: Wanton Wastes of Money, Manpower
and Lives
Mickey
Z.
The Granma Moses of Radical Writing: an Interview with William
Blum
Greg
Moses
The Same Old Struggle Against Imperial America
Sharon
Smith
Abortion Rights and the Election: What Now?
Ron
Jacobs
Sandwiches and Car Bombs
Ben
Tripp
Raising d'Etre: Finding Money in Hollywood These Days
Richard
Oxman
Basketbrawl Two Pointer: Iraq Rules!
Gilad
Atzmon
Politics and Jazz
Poets'
Basement
LaMorticella, Albert, Ford, & Anon.
Website
of the Day
Voice of the Forest




Hot Stories
Alexander Cockburn
Behold,
the Head of a Neo-Con!
Subcomandante
Marcos
The
Death Train of the WTO
Norman Finkelstein
Hitchens
as Model Apostate
Steve Niva
Israel's
Assassination Policy: the Trigger for Suicide Bombings?
Dardagan,
Slobodo and Williams
CounterPunch Exclusive:
20,000 Wounded Iraqi Civilians
Steve
J.B.
Prison Bitch
Sheldon
Rampton and John Stauber
True Lies: the Use of Propaganda
in the Iraq War
Wendell
Berry
Small Destructions Add Up
CounterPunch
Wire
WMD: Who Said What When
Cindy
Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter
I Can't Hear From
Gore Vidal
The
Erosion of the American Dream
Francis Boyle
Impeach
Bush: A Draft Resolution
Click
Here for More Stories.


|
December 16, 2004
The Prescient Candidate Reflects
An
Interview with Ralph Nader
By
MERLIN CHOWKWANYUN
Ralph Nader ran as an independent candidate
in 2004 for US President. Unlike both John Kerry and George
W. Bush, Nader unequivocally opposed the US invasion of Iraq.
During his candidacy, Nader embraced single-payer health care
and tackled numerous issues ignored by the two major parties'
candidates, including the proliferation of the racist prison-industrial
complex, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and increasing concentration
of corporate power. If the Democrats continued to adopt "Bush-lite"
policies, argued Nader, they might well lose the election by
alienating their traditional base.
Nader's run earned harsh scorn
from Democrats and many of his former supporters in 2000, such
as Medea Benjamin, Norman Solomon, and Jeff Cohen. Yet in light
of emerging post-election commentary partially attributing the
Democrats' loss to the party's tepid economic policies, many
of Nader's campaign arguments now seem utterly prophetic in hindsight.
In a recent article blasting John Kerry's hasty election concession,
Harper's Magazine publisher Rick MacArthur expressed regret
over not voting for Nader.
This is one of Nader's first
in-depth interviews since the election. In it, he offers his
insights on the election outcome and the future of American politics.
Merlin Chowkwanyun: Ralph, let's do a little dissection
of the pundit analysis of the election. One overriding narrative
that has developed is this idea that "moral values"
-- it's not really clear what exactly that encompasses -- were
so important to so many voters that no matter what Kerry could
have done, might have done, it wouldn't have mattered, so strong
was the mobilization that Karl Rove engineered for these so-called
"red-state voters." Do you buy this media narrative?
Ralph Nader: No, not at all. You know, if 75,000
votes switched in Ohio, people would be asking how Karl Rove
messed up the election. It wasn't that Kerry should have won
against Bush, it's that he should have landslided Bush. This
is a President with a terrible record, complete indifference,
lack of care for American workers, patients, consumers, environment,
a tax system that the biggest oligarch couldn't have dreamed
up better, the illegal war and quagmire in Iraq, and just on
and on. And Kerry never took advantage of it. In fact, it's
hard to remember in the last year whether Kerry laid a glove
on Bush.
Bush's trips were his own.
His falls were his own. His exposures adverse to him were his
own -- Richard Clarke leaving the White House and criticizing
him in a book, and Bob Woodward getting some damaging quotes
and other things, but it wasn't Kerry. Kerry did not put him
on the defensive. Instead, Bush taunted Kerry during the debates,
during the campaign. The Vietnam Swift Boat [Veterans for Truth]
knocked out a month of Kerry's campaign in August, put him on
the defense, so that he really blew the election.
MC: There are many critics who feel that had Kerry
embraced more Nader-type positions, he might have actually alienated
more voters. They claim that the country has gone more conservative.
Do you reject that?
RN: Yes, of course. This all comes from the vacuum
that the Democrats have created by taking key corporate-worker-economic
issues off the table like living wage, or universal health care,
or crackdown on corporate crime, fraud, and abuse, or the use
of middle-class tax dollars for corporate subsidies, handouts,
giveaways. Once you create that vacuum, then the so-called "social
issues," the issues that deal with religion, affirmative
action, abortion, and immigration -- all the hot-button issues
take central positions. And of course, the Republicans know
how to manipulate that, and cater to people's prejudices.
But you had 47 million workers
in this country who make between $5.15 minimum wage up to $10.
If they knew that the Democrats and John Kerry were really serious
about a living wage, I don't think they'd worry too much about
some of these other issues by comparison. But that has been
the historic failure of the Democrats for at least 25 years.
They've taken these issues that used to win elections for them
-- standing up for workers, standing up for Social Security in
an unequivocal manner, standing up for middle-class progressive
tax system, and so forth -- and they blew it. They've been losing
and losing, increasingly at the local, state, and national level,
to the worst Republicans in the last 100 years, and they still
do not analyze their failures. They do not look in the mirror.
They don't say that the central issue in politics is the contrast
between corporate power and the power of ordinary people and
who's going to prevail.
MC: I want to turn the discussion right now to
a very in-depth dissection of the Democratic Party, but first
I want to ask you, as someone who, since the 1960s, has interacted
with many congresspeople, legislators, Presidential administrations,
what do you think accounts for that turn you described within
the Democratic Party, that betrayal of many Great Society and
New Deal-type programs?
RN: Corporate money in campaigns. In 1979-80,
Congressman Tony Coelho, who headed the House of Representatives'
Campaign Finance Committee for the Democrats, said that they
could raise as much money as the Republicans in the business
community. It was all downhill after that. They did raise a
lot of money, and they sold their conscience. They sold their
agenda, and they basically destroyed their predominance in Congress
and in many state legislatures as a result. It's an amazing
case study of 25 years of how money can corrupt a political party
and lead to its losses -- and still the party will not do anything
different year after year.
One of the reasons I ran is
because I didn't trust the Democrats to even know how to get
the Bush people out of the White House. They've been losing
and losing. They lost to Gingrich in the Congress. They lost
major governorships and state legislatures. And then they turn
around and say to the liberals, the Democratic apparatchiks say:
"Just trust us. We're going to beat Bush this time, even
though we're not going to do anything different. We're not going
to have a different agenda. We're not going to make a deliberate
effort to register 9 million African-American voters, 90% of
whom would vote for the Democrats, especially in the swing states,
who would be decisive." It was a disaster for the Democrats.
MC: I want to ask you about the internal mechanics
of the Democratic Party. There seems to be a real divide between
the rank-and-file and Party leaders. Many news commentators noted
that at the Democratic National Convention, 80-90% of the delegates
were anti-war, yet there was a decidedly pro-war candidate up
on stage giving the nomination acceptance speech. As a lot of
people may not be familiar with them, can you talk about the
Democratic Leadership Council and what kind of power they wield?
RN: The Democratic Party at the national level
is very centrally controlled. Central to that core domination
is the Democratic Leadership Council, which has as many of its
founding figures people like Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Breaux,
Joe Lieberman. They have been very corporate-oriented. When
we talk about the corporate Democrats, we're talking about the
Democratic Leadership Council, which is basically saying, "Don't
upset business at all. Be very friendly to business. Turn your
back on the corporate crime wave that's looted tens of trillions
of dollars from pension holders, small investors, and workers
Enron-style. Keep raising money from them, and keep talking
about education, and generalities."
Well, one of the things it
led to, of course, was the marginalization of the progressive
wing of the Democratic Party, which got progressively weaker
because status inside the party was how much money you could
raise, and the corporate Democrats could always raise much more
money than the progressive Democrats. It was the rotting of
a political party, and someday, some scholar is going to chronicle
it in great detail. But it's a perfect case study of the need
for public funding of public campaigns.
MC: I wanted to talk also about the Democratic
Party's intimidation of yours and Peter Camejo's campaign. Can
you briefly recap that?
RN: Well, first of all they spent millions of dollars
and hired Republican, corporate law firms, including Ken Starr's
old law firm, Kirkland & Ellis, to unleash a huge assault
on our ballot access rights. And they filed 21 phony lawsuits,
and we had to defend them, and we won most of the state Supreme
Court decisions, but they harassed and intimidated our signature
gatherers. They did all the things that are described by the
phrase "dirty tricks," and succeeded in getting us
off some very important ballots. They even tried to get us off
Texas, of all states, Bush country. They didn't want us bogged
down in Texas going after Bush, I guess. They got us off Illinois
and Pennsylvania. They got us off Massachusetts, and Ohio, and
Oregon, and Arizona, and in other ways less visible, they sabotaged
our ballot access signature gathering in other states, so half
of the country could not vote for us. In other words, what the
Democrats were saying was: "We don't want to debate with
Nader-Camejo. We don't want to argue, debate, challenge in the
old traditional way. No, no. We want to make sure they're not
on the ballot so that millions of voters don't have a chance
to vote for them."
That's what we call political
bigotry, constitutional crimes, violation of our civil liberties.
We have it all documented. Congressman John Conyers has just
had an unofficial hearing in the House of Representatives with
a packed hearing room on the shenanigans that occurred in Ohio.
There were some expressions by members of the House, such as
Jerry Nadler from New York, that there needs to be a national
law for national elections. This idea of having 50 different
state laws widely varying with one another -- like 300 signatures
to get on the Presidential line in Tennessee, but 100,000 for
an independent Presidential candidate in nearby North Carolina
-- is crazy. In its totality, it amounts to a massive exclusionary
structure against third parties and independent candidates who
historically have been the source of regenerating American politics,
and who would give more voices and choices to the American people,
who in poll after poll, say they want more voices and choices,
even if they may vote Democrat or Republican. They want more
voices and choices on the ballot, and more voices and choices
on the Presidential debates, but the two parties have it locked
up. It's like a two-party electoral dictatorship.
MC: What happened to Dennis Kucinich during his
campaign, I think, is very illustrative of what happens to people
within the Democratic Party who choose to challenge that centralized
apparatus you discussed. Can you talk about intimidation of
people within the Democratic Party who attempt to reform it,
and the broader question of whether reform within the Democratic
Party is possible or desirable now?
RN: Well, it's desirable, but I don't think it's
very possible. There are no signs of any real insurgency here.
A very modest one in the form of Howard Dean was squelched when
the Washington Democrats pounced on him, and Dennis, of course,
didn't even get that far. He was told in no uncertain terms
that he'd have to support Kerry, and although he campaigned until
the Democratic National Convention, he did raise his arm with
Kerry. None of Kucinich's proposals, such as an assault on poverty,
found their way into the Democratic Party platform. Every one
he proposed was turned down, so he got nothing for his efforts
at being a loyal Democrat in the primary for almost two years,
and he had his head handed to him. That's how they treat their
progressive wing.
MC: Do you find some hope in the emergence of some
figures like Eliot Spitzer, for example, who has in the opinion
of many observers been implementing many effective crackdowns
on the corporate crime that you yourself have chronicled very
extensively in the past few years?
RN: Yes, he's outshone the other state Attorney
Generals and the Justice Department and the SEC. It just shows
you what a few lawyers can do. All that going after Wall Street,
and all the brokerage firms, and insurance brokers, he does with
about 70 lawyers in his white-collar crime section of the state
Attorney General's office. On the other hand, he hasn't been
able to try a case. He doesn't have the resources for a prolonged
case against these giant corporate law firms. The corporations
know they can settle out with him for a fraction of what they
stole, and get their wrists slapped, get an adverse public relations
experience, but he is doing more than anyone else.
Now the question is when he
runs for governor, broadens out, let's see what he does on other
issues of corporate power. He had a relatively easy number of
whistleblowers giving him the low-down on these corporate crooks,
so it was pretty easy black-and-white stuff to go after. Let's
see what he would do out of Albany in terms of gubernatorial
policies to shift the power from corporations more to consumers,
to people who are ill, to shield them from the HMO rapacities
and the giant health insurance companies, as well as dealing
with things like corporate prisons and reforming our criminal
injustice system in New York state at least, and of course, getting
workers a better deal.
MC: I want to ask you about the Democrats' behavior
in the immediate weeks following the election. What is your
reaction to their appointment of Harry Reid as Senate Minority
Leader and their stance towards the Attorney General nomination
by Bush of Alberto Gonzales?
RN: Well, I think Harry Reid, in some respects,
is going to be stronger than Tom Daschle. I think he's going
to be a straight-out defender of Social Security -- no if's,
and's, and but's, it's a solvent system until 2052, and with
very minor variations can be good for another century, as Paul
Krugman, Professor of Economics at Princeton, pointed out recently,
writing in the New York Times. He's still a work-in-progress.
He may surprise people in a good way. He has a hard core of
steel to him, and we'll see what happens. I think there's too
little known about them now to see how to react to Supreme Court
nominees or other nominees by the Bush Administration.
MC: Does the Gonzales nomination disturb you, given
his stances on torture and whether the United States was complying
with the Geneva Conventions and other international humanitarian
law?
RN: Of course. He was utterly too cavalier about
international law, about the Geneva Conventions, which he deprecated
as if they were quaint, and perhaps he's learned a lesson in
that respect because there have been too many reports now about
what's been going on in Guantanamo, even by the FBI and CIA,
which were reports worried about the way the prisoners there
were treated. They were never charged with anything. I think
it was only a few months ago that the first two prisoners were
even charged with anything out of the hundreds that are there,
and they've been there for almost three years. He should be
subjected to very tough questioning at the Senate confirmation
hearing.
MC: Can you talk about the recount in Ohio and
the Democratic Party's rather tepid support of it?
RN: I've always thought there were always a lot
of shenanigans before, during, and after Nov. 2 because you had
the perfect environment for it. You had a Republican governor.
You had a Republican Secretary of State, who was very partisan,
who's like Katherine Harris in 2000 in Tallahassee, Florida.
You had a Republican legislature, and they knew it was going
to be a swing state, if not the swing state. The stakes
were high. There's other evidence that before the election,
Kenneth Blackwell, the Secretary of State, was working overtime
to try to undermine the minority vote, dealing with voter registration,
etc. The ambience, the atmosphere was all there, and the Democrats
should have been much more alerted to it. But the ways these
laws are written, unless you're seen really with some crude stuff
on election day or post-election, you get away with what you
did before election day to depress the vote and to minimize the
number of voting machines in minority or heavily Democratic areas,
which is what was done in Ohio.
However, there is increasing
information coming to the forefront. There's litigation, very
good lawyers demanding a recount. There will be a recount.
But the results will not be in before the electors meet in mid-December
and elect a President. It will still be in the courts.
MC: I want to end our conversation with a discussion
of the future. We've talked about the Democratic Party and the
hurdles to change within it, some of which seem insurmountable
to many. I want to ask about your relationship to the Green
Party. I know your running mate, Peter Camejo, discussed forming
a new caucus within the Green Party. The Green Party did not
endorse the Nader-Camejo candidacy. What's your relationship
with the Green Party, and what do you see as their future role
for progressives?
RN: Well, I wish them luck. They have a very good
platform. They went from 2.8 million votes to about a 106,000
from 2000 to 2004, so they have their work cut out for them.
I think their biggest future is at the local level where they
can actually win races. In 2001, 2002, they won 25% of the local
races like City Council or Board of Education. But they don't
have anywhere near the number of candidates. They had about
500 this year. There are 2.5 million elective offices at the
local level, so they have a ways to go.
But my view of the future of
politics and the need to make the biggest issue excessive corporate
power that's destroying civic values, commercializing our elections,
our government, our educational systems, our childhood, our genetic
inheritance, our food, media, those are all described in terms
of their impact on the daily lives of people in my new book The
New Fight: Declare Your Independence and Fill the Democracy Gap.
If people are interested in where I think the country's heading
and the coming populist revolt against giant business that increasingly
has no allegiance to our country or our communities other than
to control or abandon them globally as they see fit, just pick
up the book, or get it in the library. You'll find that it gives
a whole new perspective about corporate power that will liberate
a lot of people's minds that have been overwhelmed for so many
years by very subtle and not-so-subtle corporate ads and corporate
propaganda like the attack on our civil justice system, persuading
people with all kinds of false statements that wrongfully injured
people are too litigious, which is ridiculous. Less than 10%
of wrongfully injured people even file a claim, much less go
to a lawyer. We have to open our eyes and stop growing up corporate
from our young days to the present day. No democracy can survive
the convergence and takeover of government power by economic
power. Franklin Delano Roosevelt put it very crisply in a message
to Congress in 1938, asking for an investigation of concentrated
corporate power, when he said: "When our government is taken
over by economic power, that's fascism." That's the exact
word he used: fascism.
MC: Does the locus of activity for an upcoming
insurgency against this consolidation of corporate power involve
the creation of a new political party, or will most of the activity
actually occur outside the electoral arena?
RN: I hope it occurs in both arenas. If you look
at our site, votenader.org, which is still up, you'll see a lot
of proposals, one called the "Agenda Inquiry for the Common
Good" that I sent to Kerry and Bush last October, 2003,
and many other similar proposals where we can strengthen our
democracy and put the people back in charge.
MC: What's next on your plate in the coming months?
I wanted to briefly ask you also what your relationship is like
with people such as Jeff Cohen or Medea Benjamin, who among some
other self-described "progressives," signed a letter
against your candidacy in the so-called swing states.
RN: I think they have an apology to make to the
Nader-Camejo campaign. It wasn't just their opposition. They
spread lies. They endorsed lies about our being bankrolled by
the Republicans. It was completely false. A hundred times more
Republican money from donors went into the Democratic coffers.
That's what I do not forgive them for. I think that involves
Michael Moore, and Norman Solomon, and Jeff Cohen, and Medea
Benjamin especially, as well as a number of others. If they
want to open communications, they need to preface it by apology.
It's one thing opposing us even though we had the agenda they
believed in -- that's ridiculous enough -- but what's unforgivable
was to lend their credibility to those lies that the Democratic
Party and the Democratic National Committee disseminated all
over the country to cover up their own dirty tricks against our
right to be on the ballot.
Right now, what we're doing
is winding down the campaign. The Democrats' assault cost us
a million dollars, so we're in debt, and we're trying to invite
people to help reduce the debt on votenader.org, so we can ramp
up on the anti-war issue and on the corporate crime enforcement
issue and much other work that needs to be done in a mobilized
way from the grassroots all the way to Washington.
MC: Ralph Nader, I want to thank you for this interview.
RN: Thank you again, and thank Counterpunch.
Merlin Chowkwanyun is a student at Columbia University.
He can be reached at mc2028@columbia.edu
Portions of this interview
aired earlier on WBAR 87.9 FM
NYC (www.wbar.org), and minor edits were made for clarity.
Weekend Edition
Features for November
27 / 28, 2004
Peter
Linebaugh
Torture & Neo-Liberalism with
Sycorax in Iraq
Alexander
Cockburn
What Happened to O'Reilly's Loofa?
Fred
Gardner
Ashcroft v. Raich: Medical Marijuana and the Supreme Court
Kathy
Kelly
What We Can Control
Diane
Christian
The Other Cheek: "Empire Doesn't Analyze, It Acts"
Gary
Leupp
One More Neocon Target: South (Yes, South) Korea
Lenni
Brenner
Equality and Rights of Return: Jefferson Instructs the New York
Times
Ron
Jacobs
Death Squads and Iraq's Elections: the Mysterious Murders of
the AMS Clerics
Joshua
Frank
An Interview with Kevin Zeese on Nader, Kerry and the ABB Crowd
Toni
Solo
The Murder of Danilo Anderson
Saul
Landau
Fallujah, the 21st Century Guernica
JoAnn
Wypijewski
Matthew Shepard Case 6 Years Later: Why Hate Crimes Laws are
No Cure for Homophobia
Justin
Taylor
Empire's Lawless Opportunities
Amos
Harel
The Case of Captain R.
Walter
A. Davis
Tabloid Justice
Stephen
Hendricks
God's Kind of Men
Poets'
Basement
Albert, LaMorticella and Ford
|