What
You're Missing in Our Subscriber-only CounterPunch Newsletter
Special Investigation:
Have Journalists Been Deliberately Murdered in Iraq by the US
Military?
Our new
CounterPunch newsletter, just out, Christopher Reed examines
the growing body count of journalists in Iraq and documents numerous
incidents where US troops have deliberately targeted reporters.
Charles Glass offers a
stark comparison of the uprooting of Palestians in the Galilee
during the 1948 war to the lush compensation of Israelis living
on the same land who were displaced by the war on Lebanon. Remember, we are funded
solely by the subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this
website by buying a
subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you
won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation towards the
cost of this online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible.Click
here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please:Subscribe
Now
The lame-duck Republican-led Senate
Armed Services Committee seems determined to force through confirmation
of Robert Gates to replace Donald Rumsfeld as secretary of defense.
The hurry is synthetic -- and totally unnecessary.
I know, I know -- everyone
but Barney the dog wants Rumsfeld out of the Pentagon tout suite.
According to a Pentagon spokesman, however, Gates has commitments
that would preclude his taking the reins at the Pentagon until
January. So, senators, relax already. Let Rumsfeld spend December
at one of his houses in Taos, while you do your homework. There
is no exaggerating the importance of the Gates candidacy.
Even Democrats on the committee
are saying Gates is a shoo-in barring an unexpected disclosure.
But the likelihood of such a disclosure seems nil, with Gates
the sole witness at his hearing Tuesday. Still, Rep. Rush Holt,
D-N.J., who was an analyst in the State Department's intelligence
bureau and now sits on the House Intelligence Committee, has
called Gates' nomination ''deeply troubling'' and appealed for
hearings that are ``thorough and probing.''
Gates has primarily two things
going for him, which hardly suffice to justify confirmation:
o The Anyone-But-Rumsfeld syndrome,
which has understandable appeal. Just how much appeal was brought
home to me last week, when a former colleague who worked closely
with Gates during Iran-Contra said, ``Despite my misgivings,
I would support Satan himself in preference to Rumsfeld.''
o The Not-Enough-Evidence-To-Indict
bromide offered reluctantly by Lawrence Walsh, the independent
counsel who led the investigation of the Iran-Contra affair.
Walsh was frustrated by Gates' remarkable inability to recall
explosive information that his subordinates swore under oath
they had told him ''about Oliver North's illegal activities,''
for example. (Gates' supporters still brag about his ''eidetic
[institutional] memory.'') Walsh wrote:
``The statements of Gates often
seemed scripted and less than candid. Nevertheless . . . a jury
could find the evidence left a reasonable doubt that Gates either
obstructed official inquiries or that his two demonstrably incorrect
statements were deliberate lies.''
Not exactly a ringing endorsement.
The Armed Services Committee's
ranking member, Carl Levin, D-Mich., who voted against Gates'
nomination in 1991 to be director of the CIA, said he wanted
to give Gates a ''fresh look; a lot of time has passed.'' Well,
highly damaging evidence has come to light since 1991, implicating
Gates in some of the most serious national-security scandals
of the 1980s. Veteran investigative reporter Robert Parry, for
one, has been providing chapter and verse on Consortiumnews.com.
For example, in January 1995,
Howard Teicher, who served on President Reagan's National Security
Council staff, submitted a sworn affidavit detailing the activities
of Gates and his then-boss, CIA Director William Casey, in secretly
providing arms to Iraq. This violated the Arms Export Control
Act in two ways: ignoring the requirement to notify Congress;
and providing arms to a state designated as a sponsor of terrorism.
It gets worse. To grease the
skids for this dubious adventure, Gates ordered his more malleable
subordinates at the CIA to cook up intelligence reports to provide
some comfort to Reagan in acquiescing to these activities. A
National Intelligence Estimate of May 1985 predicted Soviet inroads
in Iran if the United States did not reach out to ''moderates''
within the Iranian leadership.
In addition, Gates' analysts
were pressed to publish several reports beginning in late 1985
-- as HAWK anti-aircraft missiles wended their way to Tehran
-- that Iranian-sponsored terrorism had ''dropped off substantially.''
There was no persuasive evidence to support that judgment.
As part of my official duties
at the time, I took steps to make Gates aware of this a month
before he wrote in articles in the Washington Post, Foreign Affairs
magazine and our professional journal Studies in Intelligence
that, ''No CIA publication asserted these things.'' I then tried
in vain to get him to correct the record.
Hold the nomination
Since this episode casts serious
doubt on Gates' veracity, I felt a responsibility to bring it
to the attention of the senators weighing Gates' nomination to
become CIA director in 1991. On Oct. 7, 1991, I swore in an affidavit
laying out the facts and gave it to the Senate Intelligence Committee.
I heard nothing.
It is difficult to believe
that senators have become so used to being diddled by administration
officials and nominees that they shy away from looking seriously
into such matters. After the brutal nomination hearings in 1991,
then-Sen. Tom Daschle addressed the $64,000 question -- ''Whether
Gates might continue to trim the truth'' -- and insisted: ``We
cannot afford to take that chance.''
Nor should we take that chance
now. As Iraq goes down the drain, and ''the crazies'' accelerate
their campaign to bomb Iran, what is more important than a defense
secretary from whom Congress can expect truthful testimony? Hold
the Gates nomination over to January.
Ray McGovern was a CIA analyst from 1963 to 1990
and Robert Gates' branch chief in the early 1970s. McGovern now
serves on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals
for Sanity (VIPS). He is a contributor to Imperial
Crusades, edited by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair.
He can be reached at: rrmcgovern@aol.com
CounterPunch
Speakers Bureau Sick of sit-on-the-Fence speakers, tongue-tied and timid?
CounterPunch Editors Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St Clair
are available to speak forcefully on ALL the burning issues,
as are other CounterPunchers seasoned in stump oratory. Call
CounterPunch Speakers Bureau, 1-800-840-3683. Or email beckyg@counterpunch.org.
