home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

 

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: Labor's Historic No to Bush's War: Joann Wypijewski reports; Who is Barry Rubin? Inside the Israeli Pro-War Lobby; What's Next for the Peace Movement? Elected Greens in Oregon Push for Impeachment; Dirty Bombs: the Legacy of Depleted Uranium. Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring, with more than 60,000 visitors a day. This is inspiring news, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Recent Stories

April 3, 2003

Uri Avnery
A Crooked Mirror: Presstitution and the Theater of Operations

David Vest
Can You Hear the Silence?

Anthony Gancarski
Colin Powell Telemarketer

David Lindorff
Takoma: the Dolphin Who Refused to Fight

Michael Roberts
War, Debts and Deficits

Ramzy Baroud
Now That Iraqis Are Being Killed Is Israel Any More Secure?

Jo Wilding
From Baghdad with Tears

Anton Antonowicz
Cluster Bombs on Babylon

Alison Weir
Israel, We Won't Forget Rachel Corrie

Bruce Jackson
Hating Wolf Blitzer's Voice

Eliot Katz
War's First Week

Steve Perry
War Web Log 04/03

 

April 2, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
The Politics of Casualties

David Lindorff
Making America Safer...for Iraqi Fighters

William Blum
Some Observations on the Recent Behavior of the Empire

Gustavio Sierra
The Morning After the Slaughter at Nasser

Patrick Cockburn
Playing Into Saddam's Hands

Robert Jensen
Peter Arnett: Whipping Boy of the Pentagon

Jeremy Brecher
Uniting for Peace Update

N.D. Jayaprakash
The Siege of Basra

LaDawn Haglund
You Can Jail the Resisters, But You Can't Arrest the Resistance

Robert Fisk
Truth and Subterfuge

Jemima Khan
I'm Ashamed to be British

Steve Perry
War Web Log

Stew Albert
Total War

Website of the Day
Traitor List: Sign Up Now!

 

April 1, 2003

Jason Leopold
Rumsfeld: "Get Me Rewrite"

William S. Lind
The Pitfalls of War Planning

Jorge Mariscal
Latinos on the Frontlines, Again

Paul de Rooij
Arrogant Propaganda

Jo Wilding
From Baghdad: "I Am His Mother"

Tarif Abboushi
Operation Embedded Folly

Lee Sustar
Labor's War at Home

Akiva Eldar
Israeli Dreams of Iraqi Oil

Bernard Weiner
The Vietnam Connection

Robert Fisk
The Graveyard at Baghdad's North Gate

Steve Perry
War Web Log 04/01

Website of the Day
A Collectible War

 

March 31, 2003

David Lindorff
Liberating Iraqis from Their Homes

Neve Gordon
A Different Kind of Despair

John Chuckman
Absurdities and Contradictions

Ron Jacobs
Bernie Sanders Voting Maybe on War

Wayne Madsen
The Siege of Washington

Mark Franchetti
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death

Robert Fisk
Blood and Bandages of the Innocent

Robin Cook
Send Our Soldiers Home

Anthony Gancarski
Investigate Perle

Uri Avnery
The Devil's Dictionary

Steve Perry
War Web Log 03/31

 

March 29, 2003

Kathy and Bill Christison
"Like Being Autistic with Power": an Interview with Jeff Halper

Ben Tripp
"My Empire for a Map!": Geography American Style

Ann Harrison
The War on Protesters: San Francisco's Berserk Cops

Kurt Nimmo
Dead People: Don't Go There

Chris Floyd
Blood on the Tracks: Cheney the War Profiteer

Ann Pettifer
Israelis: Victims No Longer?

Jo Wilding
Dispatch from Baghdad: Nowhere is Safe

Ramzy Baroud
Horror Chamber: Inside the Al-Amiriya Shelter

David Krieger
Perle is Gone, But the Looting Continues

John Gershman
Dreams of Empire; Eulogies for International Law

Robert Fisk
Bombing the Phone System

Brice Abel
War, Bush and the Jesus Torilla

Tom Stephens
The Chickenhawk Circle of Hell

Alexander Cockburn
"War Not Going According to Plan"

 

March 28, 2003

Robert Fisk
Bitter Truths About Basra

Daniel Wolff
A Road Trip in Wartime

Chris Clarke
We Never Spit on Any Baby Killers

David Lindorff
Saddam, a Hero Made in Washington

Pierre Tristam
Icarus on Crack: American Hubris and Iraq

Jason Leopold
Richard Perle: the Enterprising Hawk

Saul Landau
Technological Massacre

Carol Norris
The Mother of All Bombs

Riad Abdelkarim, MD
Iraq War Lingo 101

Adam Engel
Schlock and Awe

Steve Perry
War Web Log

 

March 27, 2003

Anthony Gancarski
Somebody Blew Up Baghdad

Rahul Mahajan
The New Humanitarianism: Basra as Military Target

Simon Jones
A Letter from Uzbekistan

William S. Lind
No Exit

Diane Christian
A Day of Reckoning

The Black Commentator
Onward Embedded Soldiers: the Press and the War

Mickey Z.
Remembering the Real Moynihan: Genocide in East Timor

Richard Thieme
The Problem of Empathy

Jason Leopold
Energy Scams: Bilking California Out of Billions

Tariq Ali
A Naked Display of Imperial Power

Alexander Cockburn
Up the Creek

 

March 26, 2003

Bruce Jackson
A Battlefield from Hell

Pablo Mukherjee
Watch Their Lips

David Krieger
Shock But Not Awe

Linda Heard
Winning Hearts and Minds Bush-Style

Imad Jadaa
The Beautiful Face of America

Adam Engel
Buckets of Blood

Patrick Cockburn
Kurds Unimpressed

David Lindorff
POWs, Torture and Hypocrisy

Robert Fisk
The Coup That Didn't Happen

April Hurley, MD
A Doctor's Outrage in Baghdad

Gloria Bergen
Chretien's Shame

Reema Abu Hamdieh
The Smell of Death Surrounds Me

 

March 25, 2003

Jeffrey St. Clair
Life During Wartime

Gary Leupp
What Democracy Looks Like: the Streets of Cairo

Bill and Kathleen Christison
An Interview with Hanan Ashrawi

Bruce Jackson
Why Protest? Why Write?

Uri Avnery
Bitter Rice: Thoughts and Warnings on the War

Jason Leopold
Blood Indicator: Casualties and the Stock Market

Ralph Nader
A Pre-emptive War on a Defenseless Country

 

March 24, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
Ominous Signs

David Lindorff
Peacekeepers at Ground Zero

Diane Christian
Blood Sacrifice

Kathy Kelly
The Morning After Shock and Awe

John Stanton
US Bombs Iran

Wayne Madsen
How to Live with a Rogue Superpower

Anthony Gancarski
Iraq and the Death of the West

David Vest
Earth vs. Bush

Ahmad Faruqui
The Liberation of Iraq in Perspective

Robert Fisk
We Bomb, They Suffer

 

 

March 22 / 23, 2003

Edward Said
The Other America

Saul Landau
The Threats of Empire

Kathleen and Bill Christison
On the Road in the West Bank

Joanne Mariner
Suing Seymour Hersh

Ann Harrison
The Battle of San Francisco

Robert Fisk
A Cauldron of Fire

Hani Shukrallah
The Gates of Hell

Chris Floyd
Memory Lane

Kathy Kelly
Imagine Chicago Under This Kind of Attack

Ramzi Kysia
Bombing Away a Chance for Joy

Linda Heard
Baghdad Burns While Bush Does Lunch

Bradley Burston
Could the US be at War for Years?

Salvador Peralta
Mass Murder as Liberation?

Tom Gorman
Now That's a Coalition!

Jorge Mariscal
Johnny Mack, When Are You Coming Back?

Cindy Milstein
The Grassroots Go Global

Josh Frank
Blocking Portland's Bridges

Elaine Cassel
The Case of Elizabeth Smart: Kidnapping and Insanity

Gordon Solberg
Drowning in Niceness: the Lessons of Elizabeth Smart

Tom Crumpacker
Getting to Know the Real Havana

Poets' Basement
Dobie, Guthrie, Alam, Wechsler

 

March 21, 2003

Ben Tripp
Blood for Oil: the Exchange Rate

Cathy Breens
Report from Baghdad: Mothers, Kids and Crash Kits

Scott Handleman
Fourth Generation Protesting: Shutting Down San Francisco

Vanessa Jones
Paint Them Red

Brian J. Foley
Patriotic Protest for Professors

Zoltan Grossman
After Saddam, a War on Iraqi Rebels?

Philip S. Golub
Inventing Demons

Richard Lichtman
On the Current Experience of Terror

Milan Rai
Blitz-Coup

Pepe Escobar
A Cheap Family Farce

Floyd Rudmin
The Nightmare at the Back Door: Nuclear Plant's as Terror Targets

Chris Floyd
See Rome (poem)

Website of the War
Iraq Body Count

 

March 20, 2003

Jo Wilding
From Waiting to War: a Day and a Night in Baghdad

Stephen Banko
I Was a Soldier Once

Kevin Alexander Gray
How Did We Become an Outlaw Nation?

Shane Claiborne
Nomadic Solidarity: Glimpses of Life in Baghdad on the Eve of War

Kathy Kelly
Waiting on the Baghdad Skies to Crack

Anthony Gancarski
Michelle Makin's "Liberty Shields"

Rahul Mahajan and Robert Jensen
Myths and Facts About the War on Iraq

Jason Leopold
Cheney's Lies About Halliburton and Iraq

Ron Jacobs
If War is Business as Usual, There Should be No Business as Usual

Chuck O'Connell
Predictions About the Iraq War

Douglas Herman
US Air Force Veteran on the Coming Air Campaign

Ralph Nader
Come On Democrats, Stand Up for Peace

William Hughes
War is Theft

Sima Saeedi
Dispatch from Iran

Hammond Guthrie
John Philip Sousa

Website of the Day
Iraq Body Count

 

Hot Stories

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.


Burn Your Sweatshop Clothes!
Buy Union Made Apparel!

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

April 5, 2003

War Means (Almost) Never Having to Say You're Sorry

Civilian Deaths and Official Apologies

By JOANNE MARINER

It may reflect a purely humanitarian concern for civilian life, or perhaps a more calculated apprehension of what commentators have dubbed the "al-Jazeera effect" - the fact that images of civilian death and suffering in Iraq will further inflame an already angry Muslim world. Whether for altruistic or strategic reasons, or a combination of both, President George W. Bush has repeatedly promised that U.S. military forces will take all necessary steps to minimize the number of civilian casualties in the Iraq war.

"I want Americans and all the world to know," Bush declared in a radio address on Saturday, that U.S. and allied forces "will make every effort to spare innocent civilians from harm."

But President Bush and his top military brass have also acknowledged that civilian deaths are inevitable. Baghdad, currently under heavy bombardment, is a city of some five million people. Even with careful reliance on precision-guided weapons, any mistakes made during the on-going "shock and awe" bombing campaign could be horrifyingly lethal.

Questioned about possible civilian deaths not long before the start of hostilities in Iraq, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer explained that they are an inevitable consequence of war. But, he affirmed, "The President will regret any action that is taken that does lead to loss of innocent life."

Fleischer's note of sympathetic regret is worth examining, for it is a telling and accurate indicator of the U.S. government's approach to civilian deaths during armed conflict. Unquestionably, the government would prefer to minimize the number of civilians killed during wartime. It has even instituted certain preventive measures to help achieve this end. But when civilian casualties do occur, the government rarely accepts responsibility for them in any meaningful way.

Judging by past practice, the families of civilians killed in Iraq should not expect official apologies, or compensation, or justice. Nor should they imagine that the U.S. government will expend significant effort investigating why and how their relatives died, or conducting a systematic assessment of how to prevent such deaths in the future.

The U.S. Record on Official Apologies

Official apologies can be understood as the first step on a more extended scale of assuming responsibility for American errors or wrongs. Beyond apologies lies the possibility of compensation for the damage caused and, in some instances, sanctioning of the perpetrator.

But the U.S. government is rarely willing to take even this first step. Indeed, in past incidents involving civilian deaths, even extremely high numbers of deaths, the government has been notably unapologetic.

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is the most glaring example. More than 50 years later, peace activists persist in their so far unheeded calls for an official apology and compensation. Nor has the government ever apologized for any of the atrocities committed by U.S. forces in Vietnam, including the My Lai massacre, in which hundreds of innocent civilians were killed.

Just before he left office, President William J. Clinton did express regret about a massacre committed during the Korean War at the village of No Gun Ri, in which U.S. troops fired on civilians who were hiding under a railroad bridge, killing a large but unknown number. "I deeply regret that Korean civilians lost their lives at No Gun Ri," Clinton said.

But the wording of Clinton's statement was telling. Expressions of regret, in international currency, are not entirely equivalent to apologies. While they indicate sorrow that an incident occurred, they lack the acceptance of responsibility implicit in a full apology. Unsurprisingly, South Korean groups have continued to press the U.S. government to assume responsibility and provide compensation for No Gun Ri and other wartime incidents.

Besides the precise wording of an apology, the form in which it is made is also viewed as meaningful. Formal written apologies, preferably hand-delivered by a personal envoy of the head of state, carry much more weight than informal, verbal expressions of repentance. Squabbles over such differences, in addition to intense attention to wording, have been much in evidence during the acrimonious debate over Japanese apologies for crimes committed against Koreans and Chinese during the Second World War.

Some Civilians Count More Than Others

Were one to judge by recent experience, one might conclude that, besides American deaths, the U.S. government only registers Chinese deaths as truly significant. By a clear margin, the government's most openly apologetic response to civilian casualties was with the accidental bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, which occurred in May 1999 during the <U.S.-led> war on Yugoslavia.

The embassy bombing, in which three Chinese civilians were killed, drew greater official attention than other far more deadly incidents. Although a total of about 500 civilians were killed during the conflict in Yugoslavia--indeed, 73 Kosovar Albanians died in a single incident in April 1999--none of these deaths merited a reaction remotely comparable to that of the embassy bombing.

President Clinton personally apologized for the embassy bombing just days after it happened, and this time, for once, his wording was unequivocal: "I want to say to the Chinese people and to the leaders of China, I apologize." Members of Congress, too, immediately introduced a concurrent resolution expressing Congress's "regret and apologies" for the bombing, and extending its "deepest sympathies and condolences to the Chinese Government, citizens, and families of the bombing's victims."

A U.S. spy plane's collision with a Chinese plane, although it did not happen during a military hostilities, provides a more recent example of U.S. willingness to apologize when good relations with China are at risk. In April 2001, after a U.S. aircraft collided with a Chinese fighter plane, resulting in the pilot's death, the U.S. Ambassador to China delivered a personal letter of apology to the Chinese authorities.

"Both President Bush and Secretary of State Powell have expressed their sincere regret over your missing pilot and aircraft," the letter said. "Please convey to the Chinese people and to the family of pilot Wang Wei that we are very sorry for their loss .... We are very sorry the entering of China's airspace and the landing did not have verbal clearance."

No Chinese were killed during the <U.S.-led> war in Afghanistan, but plenty of Afghans were. According to a survey carried out by Global Exchange, an international human rights group, at least 824 Afghan civilians were killed during the <U.S.-led> bombing campaign between October 7, 2001, and the end of January 2002. (The researchers emphasized that their survey is far from comprehensive - it covered only ten of Afghanistan's thirty-two provinces - and that the actual number of deaths is higher.)

One of the bloodiest single incidents of the war, in fact, may have occurred in mid-2002, after the study ended, and as U.S. military operations in the country were winding down. On July 1, approximately 48 civilians, including a number of children, were killed an air assault on a wedding party in the southern province of Kakarak. Nor have civilian deaths in Afghanistan come to an end. Most recently, in February 2003, Afghan authorities reported that at least seventeen civilians were killed in American bombing raids in the Baghran valley, a remote area of southern Afghanistan.

None of these incidents resulted in a full presidential apology, although President Bush did say that he called Afghan President Hamid Karzai on the telephone after the mistaken attack in July. His statement of remorse, if you can call it that, was studiously bland. "Any time innocent life is lost," Bush told Karzai, "we're sad."

Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz's stab at apologizing was equally feeble. While stating that he regretted the loss of civilian life, he added that "bad things happen in combat zones," and the United States had "no regrets about going after bad guys."

Compensation and Prosecution

With apologies for the killing of civilians being scarce, it is unsurprising that compensation for such killings is even scarcer, and the criminal prosecution of the perpetrators is scarce still.

The 1999 Chinese embassy bombing, always the exception, resulted in substantial U.S. compensation both for the damage to the building and the loss of life. But other than this incident, compensation has been extremely rare.

While it is believed that the CIA gave $1,000 cash to family members of Afghans killed in a mistaken attack that took place in January 2002, the war's other mistaken killings went uncompensated. Global Exchange, the organization that conducted the study of Afghan civilian deaths, has been pressing the U.S. government to compensate Afghans in the amount of $10,000 per family, but so far its appeal has been unsuccessful.

Even the most negligent killings almost never lead to the successful criminal prosecution of responsible members of the military. A review of incidents that resulted in large numbers of civilian deaths shows that charges rarely reach the court-martial stage. When they do, moreover, the defendants are nearly always acquitted.

Lessons Not Learned

While civilian casualties may be an inescapable fact of war, it is apparently not one that the Pentagon has any real interest in examining. As former deputy assistant secretary of defense Sarah Sewall pointed out in an Op Ed recently published in The New York Times, the Department of Defense has never undertaken a systemic evaluation of its record in preventing civilian casualties. Indeed, the military does not even officially tabulate the numbers of civilians killed in each war.

This studied official ignorance belies official expressions of concern. And the government's failure to take responsibility for the damage it wreaks on civilian lives is equally disappointing.

Consider the words of an Afghan man who lost much of his family to American bombs. As he told The Los Angeles Times last year: "We thought the Americans were good people. But they just drop their bombs and leave. They don't explain. They don't apologize. They don't even offer to pay for what they did."

Joanne Mariner is a human rights lawyer based in New York. An earlier version of this article appeared in FindLaw's Writ. She can be reached at: mariner@counterpunch.org.

Today's Features

Uri Avnery
A Crooked Mirror: Presstitution and the Theater of Operations

David Vest
Can You Hear the Silence?

Anthony Gancarski
Colin Powell Telemarketer

David Lindorff
Takoma: the Dolphin Who Refused to Fight

Michael Roberts
War, Debts and Deficits

Ramzy Baroud
Now That Iraqis Are Being Killed Is Israel Any More Secure?

Jo Wilding
From Baghdad with Tears

Anton Antonowicz
Cluster Bombs on Babylon

Alison Weir
Israel, We Won't Forget Rachel Corrie

Bruce Jackson
Hating Wolf Blitzer's Voice

Eliot Katz
War's First Week

Steve Perry
War Web Log 04/03

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /