home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

 

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: Cockburn on the Roadmap: It's a Big Hoax in a Long Line of Hoaxes; St. Clair on The Rat in the Grain: Daniel Amstutz and the Looting of the Farms of Iraq; All About David Horowitz: the Dazed and Confused Dirigible of the Right; Handicapping the Democrats: Will It be Graham vs. Dean?; Kucinich Wows Madison: But Seems to Have Forgotten the Horrors of Clintontime; Blumenthal v. Hitchens: Inside the Conspiracy; Merle Haggard Stays the Course: Country Legend Defends Dixie Chicks, Bashes Bush. Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring, with more than 60,000 visitors a day. This is inspiring news, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Coming Soon!
From Common Courage Press

Recent Stories

June 19, 2003

Saul Landau
Lying, Flag Waving and Redefining Conservative Values

June 18, 2003

Wendell Berry
Small Destructions Add Up

Elaine Cassel
Dark Star Chambers: Secret Trials, Nameless Defendents, Veiled Threats to Defense Lawyers

Col. Daniel Smith
Iraq's WMDs: Integrity, Ethics and Intelligence

Chris Fagen
Ignoring the World's Bloodiest War

Rick Fantasia and Kim Voss
Bush's Low Intensity War on Labor

Sam Hamod
Theater of Deception: Bush, Sharon, Abbas

M. Shahid Alam
Illuminating Tom Friedman

Jon Brown
Greens & Dems: a Reply to Publius

Steve Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log, 6/18

 

June 17, 2003

Dr. Susan Block
Sex, Lies and WMDs

Elaine Cassel
Scalia, the Rumsfeld of the Supremes

Roger Burbach
Brazil Under Lula

Dan Bacher
The WTO's War on Salmon

Peter Phillips and Jason Spencer
Entertainment Media 2003

Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
The Challenge of Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century

Wayne Madsen
Outting Ashcroft's Latest Hypocrisy

Larry Kearney
Starlight

Steve Perry
The Bush Administration Lies Marathon, Day 3

June 16, 2003

Frida Berrigan
Death in Aceh: US Weapon Aid the Repression

Publius
Candidate Dem and Citizen Green

Tarif Abboushi
Roadmap or Roadkill?

Rep. John Conyers
Bush's Deceptions about Iraq Threaten Democracy at Home

Julian Samuel
A Review of Pilger's The New Rulers of the World

Uri Avnery
The Children of Death

Steve Perry
Bush's Lies, Part 2

 

June 14 / 15, 2003

Edward Said
A Roadmap to What and Where?

Jeffrey St. Clair
Pryor Unrestraint: Killer Bill Pryor's Mad Quest for the Federal Bench

David Lindorff
Rumsfeld v. Belgium

Jennifer Loewenstein
Suicide's Most Willing Accomplice

Lee Sustar
US Tax System: Rigged for the Rich

Ben Tripp
Of Dissidents and Dissonance

William S. Lind
Lies, Damned Lies and Military Intelligence

Joanne Mariner
Rebellious Judges

Gila Svirsky
A Macabre Alliance

Mickey Z.
Where We Are

Chris Floyd
Metaphysics as a Guide to Murder

Noah Leavitt
Peru as Our Crystal Ball?

Yves Engler and Bianca Mugyenyi
The G8 and Africa

Dr. Gerry Lower
Dear Rudy, Let's Get Those Damned Liberals

Ted Dace
A Review of Kovel's The Enemy of Nature

Adam Engel
Midnight at the Apocalyptic Pancake

Poets' Basement
Smith, Greeder, Albert, and O'Hayer

Website of the Weekend
AEI: Starts Wars; Creates Poverty

June 13, 2003

David Vest
Bush Roadmap to What?

Ron Jacobs
The Iranian Revolution, Reloaded?

John Chuckman
The Man Who Wasn't There

Jason Leopold
Six Months Before War White House Silenced Critics of WMD Intelligence

Michael Leon
Missing Weapons, Shrinking Bush and the Media

Negar Azimi
Ashcroft's Cruel Version of America

Saul Landau
Shiite Happens

Hammond Guthrie
Then and Now

Steve Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 6/13

 

June 12, 2003

Gary Leupp
The Intel-gate Row in Britain: a Chronology

Ahmad Faruqui
The Tragic Legacy of the Six Day War

Wayne Madsen
Unfit for Office: Time for Rumsfeld to Resign

Laura Carlsen
Hunger and Security

Tarif Abboushi
Warm and Fuzzy in Aqaba

Ray McGovern
Deceived into War: Reflections of a Former CIA Analyst

Steve Perry
Counting Bush's Lies, part 2

 

Hot Stories

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Elaine Cassel
Civil Liberties Watch

Michel Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I Saw Marines Kill Civilians"

Uzma Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War: What America Says Does Not Go

Paul de Rooij
Arrogant Propaganda

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

June 19, 2003

What's Next?

You Call This Security?

By DAVID LINDORFF

The last 21 months certainly have been wild and crazy. We've seen the vaporization of the World Trade Center, a successful attack on the Pentagon, the transformation of George Bush from a bumbling laughing stock to an awe-inspiring tyrant, the overnight creation of a mammoth global peace movement, a lightning war of aggression and conquest by the U.S., and the simultaneous shattering of a half-century-old alliance and of the United Nations.

Now it's time to look ahead at what may be coming, which could prove to be crazier and scarier still.

A lot, I suspect, will depend upon what America's enemies decide to do next, and where they decide to act.

If Osama Bin Laden and his supporters decide to target the U.S. and manage to pull off another high-casualty terrorist attack within the United States, on the scale of what they did in Manhattan, it could spell the end of democratic government and of our civil liberties tradition. The growing backlash against the government's post 9/11 assault on civil liberties, and the tentative questioning of the integrity and competence of the Bush administration that has begun more recently, would be swept away in a wave of new anti-terror fervor and Gestapo-like tactics that would be irresistible.

On the other hand, if the Iraqi resistance, with or without the help of outside organizations like al Qaeda, manages to move from isolated attacks on American soldiers in Iraq to a major massacre of American troops in that country, it could have a reverse effect back in the U.S., much like the Tet Offensive in the Indochina War--leading Americans to demand a pull-back from what will be widely viewed at that point as a hopeless quagmire. With the U.S. having kept its casualties so astonishingly low through the duration of the war, it might seem hard to imagine Iraq's rag-tag guerrillas pulling off such a feat. Recall, however, that occupation is a lot different from invasion. An attacking army has all the advantages of mobility and surprise--and in America's case, of massive aerial support. An army of occupation, in contrast, is a sitting duck, can make little use of air support, and moreover has to struggle against low morale, boredom and lack of attention. Moreover, the more aggressively the U.S. occupiers employ seek-and-destroy tactics against the Iraqi resistance, the more hostile they are likely to make the populace, thus creating an environment all the more favorable to the guerrillas.

It seems a safe bet that the Iraqi resistance and its allies throughout the Middle East are contemplating just such a major attack on American troops. They have to know that American public opinion has little patience for foreign adventures, that much of the occupying army is composed of reservists with families, jobs and lives that they want to get back to, and that heavy casualties are generally not politically tolerated. Thus, it seems only a matter of time before a Lebanon-style attack occurs.

What about a new major terror attack within the U.S.?

Sadly, it would seem such a terrible event is becoming increasingly likely, too. Even under the best of circumstances, the U.S. invasion of Iraq virtually assured that whatever experimental chemical or biological horrors Saddam Hussein might have been cooking up, plus the nuclear waste materials in Iraq, would find their way into the hands of terrorists. But beyond that, the incredible ineptness and disinterest demonstrated by the invading U.S. and British armed forces, which waited weeks to try to secure dangerous weapons and waste materials, handed such hostile groups a golden opportunity. Not only were the materials available--there was a broken enemy motivated to sell whatever it could, both to punish the U.S. and to raise cash to escape Iraq.

On top of that, beyond creating a ludicrous color-coded alarm system and arresting, terrorizing and deporting hundreds of hapless Islamic immigrant visa violators, it turns out that the Bush Administration has done almost nothing concrete to protect the U.S. against terrorism. The fraudulently promoted Iraq war was a huge diversion not just of attention, but of domestic security forces and financial resources. Whole state police and urban police departments, as well as fire departments, have been gutted, thanks to a legacy of programs which have encouraged people in those jobs to sign up as reservists or in the National Guard. Moreover, Rand Beers, the top Bush counter-terrorism advisor who resigned in disgust in March, says that the Bush administration has been "making us less secure, not more secure," because of a pattern of neglect and homeland security budget cutting, for example in the area of port security or border security.

A conspiracy theorist could have a heyday speculating on whether it's actually in the Bush administration's interest to have the U.S. suffer an occasional terror hit. Certainly the current resident of the White House--whose claim to the title "President" has always been rather tenuous--was not winning any popularity contests until he was able to start calling himself Commander-in-Chief instead of Chief Executive. His whole reelection campaign appears to be premised upon his running dressed in khaki.

Whatever the White House's real motives, we have the ironic situation of a military establishment resorting to all manner of aggressive actions in a desperate bid to avoid a calamitous attack on its troops in Iraq, and an administration at home offering , as Beers puts is, "only a rhetorical policy" for protection against a domestic terror attack.

The near certainty of large-scale bloody attacks on Americans both in Iraq and in the U.S. presents Democrats, liberals, progressives and the whole opposition movement with a dual challenge: to prepare now for both eventualities.

In the case of domestic terrorism, now is the time to forcefully remind Americans that terror attacks, however awful, do not in themselves threaten America's existence; that it is, rather, the unthinking, panicky and jingoistic response to acts of terror--for example sweeping arrests, detentions without trial, hasty passage of laws like the USA PATRIOT Act, and the like--which pose the real threat. If the newsmedia, political leaders and other opinion makers make that argument powerfully and often now, before terror strikes again, it will be far easier to challenge the inevitable push towards a police state that will follow any major act of terror.

At the same time the peace movement needs to lay the groundwork now for a major campaign to recall American troops from Iraq, in order to be able to capitalize on the inevitable loss of support for the occupation that will follow any large-scale attack on American troops in that country.

Dave Lindorff is the author of Killing Time: an Investigation into the Death Row Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal. A collection of Lindorff's stories can be found here: http://www.nwuphilly.org/dave.html


Yesterday's Features

Wendell Berry
Small Destructions Add Up

Elaine Cassel
Dark Star Chambers: Secret Trials, Nameless Defendents, Veiled Threats to Defense Lawyers

Col. Daniel Smith
Iraq's WMDs: Integrity, Ethics and Intelligence

Chris Fagen
Ignoring the World's Bloodiest War

Rick Fantasia and Kim Voss
Bush's Low Intensity War on Labor

Sam Hamod
Theater of Deception: Bush, Sharon, Abbas

M. Shahid Alam
Illuminating Tom Friedman

Jon Brown
Greens & Dems: a Reply to Publius

Steve Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log, 6/18

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /