home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

 

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: Cockburn on the Roadmap: It's a Big Hoax in a Long Line of Hoaxes; St. Clair on The Rat in the Grain: Daniel Amstutz and the Looting of the Farms of Iraq; All About David Horowitz: the Dazed and Confused Dirigible of the Right; Handicapping the Democrats: Will It be Graham vs. Dean?; Kucinich Wows Madison: But Seems to Have Forgotten the Horrors of Clintontime; Blumenthal v. Hitchens: Inside the Conspiracy; Merle Haggard Stays the Course: Country Legend Defends Dixie Chicks, Bashes Bush. Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring, with more than 60,000 visitors a day. This is inspiring news, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Coming Soon!
From Common Courage Press

Recent Stories

June 6, 2003

David Krieger
The Big Lie

Ramzy Baroud
Sharon and the Myth of the Peacemakers

Anthony Gancarski
Sharansky: "Crucifixion is a Privilege"

Sam Hamod
His Own Little Country

Sean Carter
Why Indict Martha Stewart and Not Ken Lay?

David Lindorff
Cracks in the Consensus

Stew Albert
Ari's Great Set

Elaine Cassel
Ashcroft the Insatiable

 

June 5, 2003

Jeffrey St. Clair
Pools of Fire: The Looming Nuclear Nightmare in the Woods of North Carolina

Imraan Siddiqi
Ann Coulter's Foul Mouth

Michael Leon
Clinton, Reno & Waco: Remember What They've Done

Robert Jensen
Texas Pledge Law Undermines Democracy

Ann Harrison
Rosenthal is Free, But the Fight isn't Over

Paul Dean
How You Can Be Deliriously Happy in the Age of Bush

Gary Leupp
When Spooks Speak Out

Website of the Day
Evidence in Black and White?

 

June 4, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
Federal Judge Blinks; Rosenthal Walks

Lisa Walsh Thomas
The Isaiah Crowd: The Threat of Neo-Christianity

Jason Leopold
Manufacturing the Iraq War

John Chuckman
Blackmail as Policy

Mazin Qumsiyeh
Summit: Peace or Pretense?

Issam Nashashibi
Sharon's Sword of Damocles

Steve Perry
Wolfowitz of Arabia: the VF interview transcript

 

June 3, 2003

Chris Floyd
Copycat Killers: Bush, Jakarta and the Slaughter in Aceh

Jason Leopold
Wolfowitz Tells All

Elaine Cassel
We Interrupt Your Normal Show to Bring You an Important Message from Michael Powell: "Go to Hell, Americans!"

Tom Crumpacker
The Politics of US Cuba Policy

William S. Lind
Fourth Generation Warfare in Iraq

Sam Hamod
The Final Brick in the Wall

Uri Avnery
The Altalena Affair

Hammond Guthrie
Stepping into Some Deep DARPA

Steve Perry
The WashTimes' al-Qaeda nuke "exclusive"

June 2, 2003

Arundhati Roy
Day of the Jackals

Norman Madarasz
Behind the Neo-Con Curtain: Plato, Leo Strauss and Allan Bloom

Alain Frachon and Daniel Vernet
The Strategist and the Philosopher: Strauss and Wohlstetter

Anthony Gancarski
Anti-Imperialism, Then & Now

Standard Schaefer
Wasted at the Pentagon

Jason Leopold
Rocky's Advice to the Dems

Guthrie & Albert
HUAC 58 Years Letter

Steve Perry
The Politics of Terror Alerts

 

May 31, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
A Whiner Called Horowitz

Gary Leupp
The Frauds of War

Dave Lindorff
Clinton, Bush, Lies and Impeachment

Tom Stephens
Does It Matter that the Bush Administration Lied?

Sasan Fayazmanesh
Who Is Next?

Joanne Mariner
Trivializing Terrorism

Wayne Madsen
Ayatollah Ashcroft's Busy Week

Larry Magnuson
Is a Television a Radio or a Billboard?

Elaine Cassel
Wake Up, America!

Gila Svirsky
Waiting for the Lament to End

Susan Davis
Kitchen Dreams

Chris Clarke
Barbra Streisand: Environmental Hypocrite

Chris Floyd
Bush Locates Source of World Evil: God

Adam Engel
Gravity's End Zone

Poets' Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Orloski, Albert

 

May 30, 2003

Ben Tripp
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Agenda

Neve Gordon
The Bad Fence

Todd Steiner
Endangered Ocean

Robert Freeman
Bush's Tax Cuts: a Form of National Insanity

Sean Carter
Utah Gets Fired Up for Executions

Daniel Bacher
How Bush's War Violated International Laws

Tariq Ali
Re-Colonizing Iraq

Steve Perry
Bush Wars Web Log

 

May 29, 2003

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Jason Leopold
Despite Thin Intelligence Reports, US Plans Overthrow of Iran Regime

Ron Jacobs
Popular Uprising, Inc.

Michelle Ciaccorra
Bush's Nuclear Policy: Do As I Say, Not As I Do

Yves Engler
The Economics of Health Care in America: Pay More to Die Sooner

Kimberly Blaker
Vouchers for Jesus

Harry Browne
Stakeknife: Britain's Army Spy at the Top of the IRA

Stew Albert
Cops of the World

Steve Perry
Greens 04: In or Out?

 

 

 

Hot Stories

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Elaine Cassel
Civil Liberties Watch

Michel Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I Saw Marines Kill Civilians"

Uzma Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War: What America Says Does Not Go

Paul de Rooij
Arrogant Propaganda

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

June 6, 2003

Trapped by Their Own Lies

Cracks in the Consensus?

By DAVID LINDORFF

It's too early to predict how far things will go, but it does appear that the Bush political juggernaut, much like the army's tanks and armored personnel carriers in Iraq, has begun to show signs of breaking down from overuse.

The big issue at the moment is the administration's blatant lies about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction--the justification for the American/British war of aggression against Iraq.

The obvious fact that, after all, Iraq did not have such weapons any more by the time of the invasion is leading for mounting calls, both in the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament, for an investigation of the run-up to war, and into how intelligence information was manipulated or manufactured. Perhaps even more important, the American media, which for over half a year played lapdog to Bush and his warhawks, is starting to report more critically about the issue for the first time.

On May 26, media critic Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post published an article airing a set of vitriolic emails between New York Times Iraq bureau chief John Burns and one of the paper's in-house cheerleader for pre-emptive war, reporter Judith Miller, whose thinly sourced stories repeatedly and breathlessly touted discoveries of WMD sites only to have each discovery subsequently debunked. Those emails make it clear, Kurtz writes, that Miller's only real source for these stories was Ahmad Chalabi, the convicted swindler being promoted as a potential Iraqi leader by Bush's warhawks in the Pentagon.

Citing New Yorker writer Seymour Hersh, Kurtz suggests that Chalabi was a key source of WMD "evidence" for the infamously biased "intelligence unit" known as the Cabal set up in the Pentagon by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld last fall, when he found he couldn't get what he wanted from the CIA. Kurtz goes on to say, "Chalabi may have been feeding the (New York) Times and other news organizations the same disputed information."

Even the Philadelphia Inquirer, which in the run-up to the war was taking a moderately pro-war stance in both its reporting and its editorials, has become more openly critical. On June 1, the paper published a news story by Inquirer Washington bureau reporter John Walcott headlined, "Doubt on war felt at top levels." In it, Walcott says that the war, which Bush's top advisers have hoped would be "the centerpiece of Bush's reelection campaign," was becoming "a political, diplomatic and military mess."

He goes on to report that, "A growing number of critics in Congress and some within the administration" are now saying that "much of the administration's public rationale for the war, and much of its planning for the war and its aftermath, appears to have been based on fabricated or exaggerated intelligence that was fed to civilian officials in the Pentagon by Iraqi exiles."

Walcott reports that although officials in the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the State Department were all warning that their information was "unreliable at best," Chalabi and other Iraqi exiles, "got a hearing in two important places. One of these was Rumsfeld's made-to-order in-house Pentagon "intelligence" team, and the other was "the New York Times."

Media critic Ed Herman, an emeritus professor at the University of Pennsylvania who has long monitored the Philadelphia Inquirer, says the Walcott story suggests that a shift has taken place in that newspaper's political and editorial stance on the Iraq war and the Bush administration's handling of the issue. The same repositioning seems to be taking place in other media outlets, too.

Coming at a time when the Bush administration is starting to face mounting criticism on a number of fronts--Iraq, economic policy, the Federal Communications Commission's railroading through of a massive media deregulation plan, and the Justice Department's abuse of immigrants and its undercutting of civil liberties--it looks like the monolithic consensus within the power structure which has characterized the post 9-11 political environment has begun to fracture.

It remains to be seen whether these fracture lines will grow, whether elements within the mainstream media will become more critical of administration policy, and whether the largely spineless Democratic opposition will begin to take the offensive.

At a minimum, the cracks in the pro-Bush concensus within the media on Iraq policy provides an opening for progressive politicians like Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to get their arguments heard. Kucinich, one of nine candidates seeking the Democratic Party's nomination for president and one of the most consistent and outspoken Congressional critics of the Iraq war, has, along with candidates Al Sharpson and Carol Moseley-Braun, heretofore been largely ignored by the mainstream media (though he has been getting favorable responses from the public on the stump).

On Tuesday, Kucinich announced that he will introduce a Resolution of Inquiry in the House to demand the release of the intelligence that led to the war in Iraq, and to Administration claims that Iraq had tons of biological and chemical weapons, delivery systems, and a 'reconstituted' nuclear program. A rarely used House procedure, Kucinich invoked the resolution tactic successfully in March to get the Bush administration to release the controversial 12,000-page weapons report which Iraq had submitted to U.N. weapons inspectors--a report that contained embarrassing evidence that U.S. firms had for years been primary suppliers of WMD-making supplies to Iraq.

"This Administration led this nation into war based on lies," said Kucinich, in announcing his plan for the new resolution. "I think that this Congress, and the American people, have a right to know what information this Administration had, and how they justify their public comments. Now is the time for truth-telling."

Dave Lindorff is the author of Killing Time: an Investigation into the Death Row Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal. A collection of Lindorff's stories can be found here: http://www.nwuphilly.org/dave.html

Today's Features

David Krieger
The Big Lie

Ramzy Baroud
Sharon and the Myth of the Peacemakers

Anthony Gancarski
Sharansky: "Crucifixion is a Privilege"

Sam Hamod
His Own Little Country

Sean Carter
Why Indict Martha Stewart and Not Ken Lay?

David Lindorff
Cracks in the Consensus

Stew Albert
Ari's Great Set

Elaine Cassel
Ashcroft the Insatiable

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /