|
CounterPunch
January
16, 2003
Hawai'i, January
16, 1893
The Rosy Dawn
of US Imperialism
by GARY LEUPP
On this day 110 years ago, U.S. Marines, acting
at the invitation of wealthy haole (white) sugar planters,
invaded the Kingdom of Hawai'i and overthrew Queen Lili'uokalani,
eighth monarch in the line of King Kamehameha I. A day, to coin
a phrase, that lives in infamy. Five years later, Hawai'i was
formally annexed by the U.S.; it became a U.S. "territory"
in 1900, and the fiftieth state in 1959.
The inception of U.S. imperialism is
generally traced to 1898, and the acquisition of an overseas
empire (Puerto Rico, the Philippines) as spoils of the Spanish-American
War. From that point, there was a vigorous debate in the U.S.
about the pros and cons of imperialism (usually conceptualized
as a policy that the government might or might not pursue,
rather than as a system constituting, in Lenin's phrase,
the "highest stage of capitalism"). Globally, the "new
imperialism" is usually dated to the 1870s and 1880s. It's
distinguished from the empire-building in the Americas and parts
of Asia during the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries by the fact
that it was based on direct investment feeding capitalist-industrial
economies (rather than the quest for gold, silver, slaves, etc.)
From the 1870s, the "scramble for Africa" partitioned
nearly the whole of that continent among the European powers.
In Polynesia (a region generally neglected by historians, even
"world historians"), Fiji, Tahiti, Hawai'i, Samoa,
and Tonga were all colonized between 1870 and 1900. The last
major Maori uprising in Aotearoa (New Zealand, the southwest
limit of Polynesia) was suppressed by the British in 1870.
It seems to me, though, that one can
trace the rosy dawn of U.S. imperialism at the very least to
1893 and the Marines' criminal action in Hawai'i, or maybe to
the gunboat diplomacy of Commodore Perry's mission to Japan in
1853-4, or maybe even to the actions of American nationals in
Hawai'i from the arrival of Protestant missionaries from Massachusetts
in 1820. In both Hawai'i and Japan, the U.S. sought to impose
what today is lauded in mainstream political and journalistic
discourse as "globalization." Encouragement or creation
of "free" market economies welcoming exports and foreign
investment. Privatization, allowing for foreign acquisition of
local resources. "Free flow" of (Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman,
western) ideas. Hospitality to foreign military presence---to
insure "freedom" for the right sort of people. This
was the agenda of western imperialists throughout Polynesia.
The Hawaiian monarchs, one must grant,
abetted the process. In 1821 Kamehameha II, fearing he would
burn in hell otherwise, embraced the missionaries' fundamentalist
teachings and bowed to their advice. Thereafter missionary families
(usually holding both U.S. and Hawaiian citizenship, the latter
graciously and foolishly conferred) came to dominate both the
Hawaiian economy and its politics. (As they say in Hawai'i, in
the beginning the missionaries had the Bible, and the people
had the land; now the people have the Bible, and the missionaries,
the land.) Submitting to missionary and sugar planter pressure,
Kamehameha III agreed to discard the prior system of feudal land
tenure (which insured that the maka'aina or commoners
could engage in subsistence agriculture-very productive and healthy
agriculture at that) with a system of private property that in
short order dispossessed the great majority of Hawaiians, whose
ranks were being horrifically decimated by diseases introduced
from abroad. He allowed resident foreigners to vote in elections
for the newly formed legislature, on a par with native Hawaiians.
Fearing the mounting influence of Americans, he even began negotiating
with them about the annexation of his nation on terms that would
at least allow for Hawaiians' survival.
This king was succeeded by two rulers,
both his nephews, who terminated discussion of annexation, sought
to diminish Americans' influence over the polity, and strove
to build ties with Japan (recently "opened," and an
up-and-coming, soon to be imperialist power) as a counterweight
to that influence. King Kalakaua (r. 1874-91) traveled the world,
seeking to boost Hawai'i's prestige and insure its independence,
in part through a proposed alliance with Japan. He promoted a
renaissance of indigenous culture, most notably reviving the
hula tradition of dance, which the missionaries had banned. (They
were oh, so consternated that they couldn't crush this pagan,
vile, and lewd native boogie.) On the other hand, he traded a
reciprocity treaty maintaining Hawai'i's favored access to the
U.S. sugar market for U.S. use of Pearl Harbor as a naval base.
Worse, he bowed to the pressure of the sugar planters and agreed
to a new constitution (called "the Bayonet Constitution"
as it was dictated by the missionaries and planters and accompanied
by the threat of his overthrow), which disenfranchised three-fourths
of what had been the native Hawaiian voting population.
Kalakaua's sister Lili'uokalani succeeded
him after his death. Her efforts, in response to overwhelming
popular sentiment, to promulgate a new constitution restoring
native rights and limiting the foreigners' influence, met with
fierce resistance from members of the American business community.
The latter actively plotted to arrange U.S. annexation. Their
ally, U.S. Minister plenipotentiary John L. Stevens, wrote to
the U.S. Secretary of State in March 1892, seeking instructions
on how to proceed. "The golden hour," he declared,
"is near at hand." The following January, thirteen
top haole capitalists met to plan a coup, organizing a paramilitary
force to lay the groundwork. Its name? Why, The Committee
of Public Safety, of course. Stevens, well informed of the
conspiracy, assured them that the marines aboard USS Boston
in Honolulu Harbor were "ready to land at any moment"
to assist their worthy civilizing annexationist goals. On January
13, the Committee of Public Safety informed the queen
it planned to announce that the throne had been vacated. Shocked
(as you'd be if you were her), she appealed for support to Minister
Stevens, supposing that the U.S., which she had visited and much
admired, and with which her government had excellent relations,
would oppose the overthrow of her constitutional government.
Lili'uokalani was a brilliant, highly articulate lady, composer
of over a hundred songs, including the immortal Aloha Oe (and
even more moving ones written during her subsequent imprisonment).
But alas, so naïve.
On January 16, the Committee of Public
Safety sent a letter to Stevens claiming that the queen was attempting
"with armed force and threats of bloodshed" to impose
a new constitution. "We are unable to protect ourselves
without aid," whined the sugar barons, "and, therefore,
pray for the protection of the United States forces." (Shades
of Grenada, 1983, when Reagan invaded to protect the lives of
U.S. medical students. We should commemorate that anniversary
too.) Sure enough, boatloads of bluejackets, America's finest,
were soon storming down Nuuanu Street to Stevens' office as Sanford
B. Dole, son of missionaries, sugar magnate, and Supreme Court
Justice, proclaimed a provisional republic "until terms
of union with the United States have been negotiated." Dole
became the first president of the Hawaiian Republic. (Compare
Texas, 1836.)
Thus Lili'uokalani was shunted aside,
and in an effort to avoid bloodshed, she agreed to "yield
my authority until such time as the Government of the United
States shallundo the action of its representative" But sympathy
for her remained strong, and while authorities in Washington
debated the pros and cons of annexing Hawai'i, supporters of
the queen led by Robert Wilcox (formally an anti-monarchist but
now inclined to support the queen's cause against foreign aggression)
quite reasonably plotted an insurrection. (Meanwhile racism pervaded
the entire discourse about annexation in the U.S. The pro side
said, "Let's expand into the Pacific in accordance with
God's plan, make money and civilize those South Sea savages."
The con side said, "We don't want or need any more dangerous,
lascivious negro citizens in this country." Newly elected
President Grover Cleveland for his part strongly condemned Lili'uokalani's
overthrow and called for her restoration to the throne. In response,
thug Dole---who has streets named after him---criticized Washington's
"interference in the internal affairs" of Hawai'i!)
Wilcox's pro-Queen rebellion was aborted
in January 1894, and on January 16, a year after her overthrow,
the queen was arrested. Officials of the republic found a respectable
cache of arms at her residence, including 21 bombs (some made
with coconut shells), as well as 30 rifles.
[Digression about coconuts and their
usage. Many consider the production of pottery a hallmark of
cultural advance. Historically, the potter's wheel and ceramic
production tend to accompany the beginnings of agriculture; grains
and other foodstuffs are stored in and served on dishes. But
while Polynesian peoples on the Bismarck Peninsula pioneered
in ceramic production some 3500 years ago (the Lapita culture),
pottery did not become generally diffused throughout Polynesia.
Why? Because intelligent people decided it was easier to use
gourds, koa wood, coconuts etc. to serve the same purpose as
pottery. Now, the coconut (Cocos nucifera) includes a
thick hardy grenade of fibrous husk. It contains a fruit easy
to remove, and "milk" from which I recommend you prepare
haupia pudding (there are recipes on the net) before proceeding.
Then you can use the shell to serve or store macadamia nuts,
coffee beans, ohelo berries, pickled plums, dried squid,
explosive materials, and so on. Creative, practical minds around
Lili'uokalani contrived coconut bombs. I don't know what happened
to them; perhaps there is one on display in the Bishop Museum
in Honolulu.]
Potential terror-bomber Lili'uokalani
was charged with treason, of all things, and placed
under house arrest. After nine months, and the sentencing of
five of her supporters to death, she acceded to another "forced
abdication" in part to win clemency for her supporters.
Justice was served; she was sentenced to five years at hard labor
and fined five thousand dollars.
The sentence was not carried out, but
a fine United Press correspondent, one Reverend Sereno Bishop
of the prestigious Bishop missionary family (which founded the
aforementioned Bishop Museum, a big Honolulu tourist attraction),
a man who had earlier described the queen to the world as a pious
Christian lady (which she was, actually) now eagerly endeavored
to tarnish her reputation and thereby justify her removal. The
queen had been manipulated, he revealed, by sorcerers (kahunas
or native priests). She had made sacrifices to the native volcano
goddess Pele, and promoted the salacious hula. Worst of all,
she was really the bastard daughter of a "negro blackboot."
Pure disinformation, of course, of a type that people who watch
CNN and read the New York Times may be familiar with.
Queen Lili'uokalani died peacefully at age 79, in November 1917
(that most decisive and hopeful of months in modern history),
accorded the priceless gift of U.S. citizenship, and grieving
for her colonized people, who'd owned all the land in 1800, 10%
of the land in 1893, and almost none of it at her death.
So this is the edifying tale of the overthrow
of the Hawaiian kingdom. Greed, arrogance, bigotry, racism, lies,
terror, treachery, deceit. The U.S. Congress pretty much conceded
that ten years ago, offering a formal apology (Joint Resolution
19; see Congressional Record, vol. 139). "But wasn't it
all worth it in the end?" you might ask. "I mean, isn't
anybody better off being part of the U.S.A.?" Indeed, being
a citizen of an imperialist country has its advantages, unevenly
distributed though they may be. Having lived in Hawai'i during
eleven of my most formative years, I can attest that life can
be very, very pleasant even on islands dominated physically and
economically by the U.S. military, a tourist industry that degrades
and prostitutes the local people and culture, and a declining
tropical agriculture. (Sugar operations finally collapsed during
the last decade, just not competitive in the global economy anymore.
The sugar capital's gone to real estate, finance, tourism, macademia
nuts, Kona coffee, etc.) I fervently believe that Hawai'i
no ka oi (There's no better place than Hawai'i.) But
that's despite the fact that the system sucks. It's because the
land, sky, sea and most of all the multiethnic people are
so beautiful.
The seizure of the Hawaiian nation, in
any case, wasn't about improving the lot of a people systematically
dispossessed and disenfranchised by the annexationists, any more
than the de facto U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is about helping
Afghans, or the coming war with Iraq about liberating that nation's
people. It was about more fully empowering the already powerful,
and making the wealthy wealthier, squeezing profits out of coolie
labor like you squeeze sweet sap out of sugarcane stalks. It
was an early instance of U.S. imperialism, supported ideologically
by religious fundamentalism and racism, and justified by bald-faced
lies. Unfortunately, it's not even one of the ugliest examples,
and probably nowhere near the last.
But best to have faith that someday,
imperialism will be all over. The past holds lessons we can build
upon, striving towards that end. So here's to anti-imperialist
Queen Lili'uokalani, to rebel Wilcox, and to any well-considered
use of Cocos nucifera, or other tropical agricultural
products, to abet the cause of human liberation, in Polynesia
or elsewhere.
Gary Leupp
is an an associate professor, Department of History, Tufts University
and coordinator, Asian Studies Program.
He can be reached at: gleupp@tufts.edu
Yesterday's
Features
Jason Leopold
The
Return of Voo--Doo Economics
Elaine Cassel
Once
a Con, Always a Con:
When Doing Time Isn't Enough
Rich Procter
Economic
Chickenhawks
Ron Jacobs
A Blast from the Past:
Where the Home in the Valley Met the Damp Dirty Prison
Maria Tomchick
North Korea's Warlike Noises (And What They Mean)
Chris Floyd
Monsters
Inc.: the Pentagon's Plan to Creat Mutant "Super--warriors"
Russell Mokhiber and
Robert Weissman
Corporate Black Caucus?
Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make
a Tax--Deductible Donation Today Online!
CounterPunch Available Exclusively
to Subscribers:
- CounterPunch Special:
The Persecution of Gershon Legman by Susan Davis: Smut, the Post Office, Commies
and the FBI;
- Reeling Democrats: Is Pelosi the Answer?
- Gandhi v. Hitler: the Secret Race for the Nobel
Prize;
- Sullying Mario Savio's
Memory;
- Lynching Then and Now;
- Earn While You Learn: Chris Whittle and Child Labor;
The Case of the Pompous
Professor;
- The Class Struggle in
Boston: All that
Effort, But What Did They Get?
Remember, the CounterPunch website is
supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide
web audience is soaring , with about seven million hits a month
now. This is inspiring, but the work involved also compels us
to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make
a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe
Now!
Or Call Toll Free 1 800 840 3683
home / subscribe
/ about us
/ books
/ archives
/ search
/ links
/
|
January
4, 2003
Jeffrey St.
Clair
Something
About Butte
Saul Landau
The Bush Vision and the Culture of Power
Annie Higgins
Six Soldiers
Michael Ortiz
Hill
Bush's Armageddon Obsession
Francisco Armada and Carlos
Mutaner
Venezuela: Chomsky's Tropical Nightmare
James T. Phillips
Targeting Americans
Jack Bice
A Fresh World Vision
Robert Fisk
Double Standards in the War on Terror
Chris Clarke
Is a Blue Rose a Rose?
Frank Fugate
How the West (Bank) Was Won
Anis Shivani
Bleak Prospects for Dems
Ben Tripp
Does Bush Know Korean?
Adam Engel
Les Miserable and the Hackers from Hell
Read
Whiteout and Find Out
How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most
Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban
and Osama bin Laden
Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the
Press
by Alexander
Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
|