home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

CounterPunch

March 14, 2003

Flashback to 1989

When Rumsfeld and Bush Sr. Refused to Back a UN Resolution to Investigate Saddam for Human Rights Abuses

by JASON LEOPOLD

In 1989, the State Department released a report that described in gruesome detail Iraq's violation of human rights, specifically how Iraq's President Saddam Hussein tortured his own people for allegedly being disloyal.

But despite the atrocities outlined in the report, which President Bush now refers to when speaking about his desire to remove Hussein from power, the United States, under the first Bush Administration, refused to vote in favor of a United Nations resolution calling for an inquiry into Iraq's treatment of its population and possibly indicting Hussein for war crimes and human rights abuses.

The two people most vocal about refusing to go along with the U.N. investigation are now lobbying for a U.N. resolution authorizing an invasion of Iraq and are highly critical of the countries that refuse to back a U.S. led coalition to use military force to remove Hussein from power. Those men are Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.

But in 1989, the first Bush administration refused to join the U.N. in publicly protesting the forced relocation of at least half a million ethnic Kurds and Syrians in the late 1980s, even though the act violated principles of the 1948 Genocide Convention, according to Middle East Watch, a human rights organization.

The Bush and Reagan administrations also declined to punish Iraq when it used poison gas against Iranian soldiers in 1984 and Kurdish citizens in 1988. Moreover, the U.S. did not oppose the fact that Hussein bought 45 American helicopters, worth about $200 million, with assurances they were for civilian use, then transferred them to his military.

Armitage said in 1990 that that "in retrospect, it would have been much better at the time of their use of gas if we'd put our foot down," according to an August 1990 story in the Los Angeles Daily News.

Despite U.S. intelligence reports that showed Iraq's capability of building weapons of mass destruction and its inhumane treatment of its own civilians, the Bush Administration turned a blind eye and instead focused on improving U.S. relations with Hussein. The U.S. removed Iraq from its list of countries supporting terrorism in 1983, which reopened the door to federal subsidies and loans to Iraq.

Saddam Hussein "made it clear that Iraq was not interested in making mischief in the world," Rumsfeld said, who, as a Middle East envoy for the Regan Administration, reopened discussions with Saddam in 1983, according to the Daily News story. "It struck us as useful to have a relationship with him."

The current Bush Administration, many of whom served in the Reagan and the first Bush administrations, refuse to acknowledge that their policies toward Iraq at the time backfired and we may be paying a price for it now. But at this point, Iraq does not pose a threat to the U.S. and threats against the nation appear to be purely personal.

Under former Rumsfeld's watch during his years in the Reagan and Bush administrations, he and the former presidents allowed Hussein to build his army and a cache of chemical and nuclear weapons. In fact, many of the hawks that serve in the current Bush Administration assisted Hussein's regime in reaching these goals during the late 1980s and early 1990s.

For example, Judicial Watch said, according to the Daily News story, "that the U.S. extended $270 million in government-guaranteed credit from the Export-Import Bank to buy other American goods, despite repeated failures to make loan repayments on time. Since 1982, Baghdad has become one of the biggest buyers of U.S. rice and wheat, purchasing $5.5 billion in crops and livestock with federally guaranteed loans and agricultural subsidies and its own hard cash."

"Iraq benefited from a thriving grain trade with American farmers, cooperation with U.S. intelligence agencies, oil sales to American refiners that helped finance its military, and muted White House criticism of its human rights and war atrocities," the Daily News story said.

Armitage admitted in 1990 that the Reagan and Bush administrations were well aware of Hussein's brutality, but still, the U.S. was more interested in maintaining a healthy relationship with Iraq because the country's vast oil reserves was beneficial to U.S. interests.

"We knew this wasn't the League of Women Voters," Armitage said, referring to Hussein's regime, according to the Daily News story.

Jason Leopold is a regular columnist for CounterPunch. He can be reached at: jasonleopold@hotmail.com

Yesterday's Features

Robert Creeley
Help!

William Cook
Rage Against the Regime!

Issam Nahashibi and Abdelatif Rayan
Bush's Iraq Deja Vu: the Reincarnation of Failed 19"0s British Policies

Anthony Gancarski
Ledeen's Big Score

Wendy Brinker
Guns, Oil and Drugs

Robert Jensen
Petróleo, Petróleo, Petróleo

Karyn Strickler
The Big Lie About Partial Birth Abortions

Mickey Z.
Of Patience, Forebearance and War

Linda S. Heard
America, Don't Let Us Down

Col. Dan Smith
Crunch Time for the Security Council

Paul de Rooij
A Glossary to Warmongering

Website of the Day
Give War a Chance: the Anti-Peace Anthem

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /

 

CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers:

  • Turkish Delights: a Pre-War Diary by Tariq Ali;
  • The Plot to Frame the Zapatistas: Talkers and Cowards;
  • Drugging Kids: The Plague of Neuroleptics;

  • The Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal: a New Investigation.

Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring , with about seven million hits a month now. This is inspiring, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /


Take a Bite Out of Phil Knight's Bottom Line: Buy No Sweat Apparel!

March 8 / 9, 2003

Edward Said
Who's In Charge?

Bruce Jackson
Elegy for Two Giraffes and a Zebra

Perry Anderson
The Casuistries of Peace and War

Joanne Mariner
Patriot Act II's Attack on Punishment

William Lind
A Warning from Clausewitz on 4th Generation Warfare

Sam Husseini
Why So Long for Iraq to Comply? Follow the Policy

Forrest Hylton
Business as Usual in Bolivia?

David Lindorff
Race and the Death Penalty in Pennsylvania

Ben Tripp
Is There a Eurologist in the House?

Anthony Gancarski
W's Personal Jesus

Jon Elmer
An Interview with William Blum

Douglas Valentine
The Clash of the Icons

Norman Madarasz
Radical Politics and the Writer: Maurice Blanchot

Gordon Solberg
There's Got to be a Better Way

Poets' Basement
Guthrie, Engel, Bernard

Weekend Website
The White House

 

February 28, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
Meet the New Yorker's Chief Hack: Jeffrey Goldberg

Saul Landau
Now It's Personal

Michael Neumann
A Plea for Hysteria

Karima Bennoume
The UN: Tool for Peace or War?

The Black Commentator
The Rev. Sharpton and the Soul of the Democrats

Jennifer Loewenstein
Don't Turn Off the War

Richard Levins
Cuba's Biological Weapons: Why the World Needs More of Them

M. Shahid Alam
Is This a Clash of Civilizations?

Clay Conrad
Juries and Judges: What's Relevant?

Ben Tripp
Speaking in Tongues: a Guide to Gibberish in the Age of Bush

Eliot Katz
To Declare Preemptive War is to Declare a Bankrupt Imagination

Kurt Nimmo
Paying Through the Nose to Kill Iraqi Kids

Matt Vidal
George W. Bonaparte

Mark Zepezauer
Why the Right Hates America

Mickey Z.
The Anti----War Talk I Never Gave

Jerry Kroth
Jung and the Space Shuttle Revisited

Shyam Oberoi
Chronicle of a War Foretold

Ron Jacobs
What If the Firebombing of Baghdad Were a Nightclub Fire?

Poets' Basement
Eliot Katz and Jim Cohn

Website of the Weekend
Defense Tech

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

Read Whiteout and Find Out How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press

by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair