|
Today's
Stories
July 13, 2006
Saul Landau
Lies as Patriotism?
Youmans / Erakat
Divestment, Corporate Engagement
and Israel
Dave Lindorff
Cut and Run: a Winning Strategy
Ron Jacobs
Dogs of War Barking at the Moon
Col. Dan Smith
Iraq: Fool Me Twice
June 22, 2006
Marjorie Cohn
Friendly Fire Ambush
Winslow T. Wheeler
Lockheed, the Senator and the F-22
Tanya Reinhart
A Week of Israeli Restraint
Mike Marqusee
The Forest Gate Raid
William Blum
Why Bush's Iraq is Worse Than Saddam's
June 21, 2006
Ramzy Baroud
Zarqawi's Death: Myth vs. Reality
Patrick Cockburn
Embassy Work as Death Sentence
Gary Leupp
Making the Case for Impeachment
Greg Moses
Elite Logic at the Border
June 20, 2006
Fred Gardner
The Long War on Aspirin
Omar Waraich
Ode to Joy: Watching Blair Sink
Christopher Reed
Japan Nixes Payments to Its Wartime
Slaves
CP Newswire
Coca Cola Takes a Hit
Jonathan Cook
Israel Engineers Another Cover-Up
June 19, 2006
Bill Quigley
HUD's Bulldozers and the Poor of
New Orleans
John Walsh
Tears of a Clown: Al Franken's War
Mike Whitney
The Zoom Lens War: Bush's Baghdad
Photo Op
Alexander Cockburn
The Left and the Blathersphere
June 16 / 18, 2006
Weekend Edition
Kathy / Bill Christision
The
Power of the Israel Lobby
Joseph Nevins
On the Migrant Trail: No More Walls, No More Deaths
Farrah Hassen
An Interview with Syria's Ambassador to the US, Dr. Imad Moustapha
Greg Moses
The Real Mission of the Uniformed Ghost at the Border
Nicole Colson
"There's No Hope at Gitmo"
John Scagliotti
How MoveOn Wastes Its Donors' Money
Mokhiber / Weissmann
Corporate Democrats
June 15, 2006
Kathy Kelly
Look
Them in the Eye: Honest Abe and the Residents of Ramadi
Norman Solomon
Premature Triangulation: Hillary's Big Problem
Ron Jacobs
Publicity
Stunts as Public Policy
Sam Bahour
Cover Up on Gaza Beach
Ramzy Baroud
Palestine on the Brink
CounterPunch Wire
Death Squads at Colombia's Universities
Gabriel Kolko
Why
a Global Economic Deluge Looms
Website of the Day
Antje Duvekot: Music You've Been Waiting Years to Hear
June 14, 2006
Nicole Colson
"They
Want the Fear Level at a High Pitch": An Interview with Lawyer
Lynne Stewart
Jonathan Cook
Israeli
Law and Order
Joseph Schechla
Bulldozing Palestine: an Open Letter to Caterpillar, Inc.
Michael Carmichael
Bolton at Oxford: Jeered and Taunted
Evelyn Pringle
Karl and George, the Teflon Partnership
Ward Churchill
My Trial By Media: Turning Quibbles Over Footnotes into Felonies
Rev. William E. Alberts
Decoding the Coders of Christ: Jesus the Political Insurgent?
Website of the Day
Marines Iraq Snuff Film
June 13, 2006
Medea Benjamin
Take
Back America Suppresses Anti-War Dissenters at HRC Speech
Anthony Alessandrini
The
Evil of Banality: the General, the New York Times and the Gitmo
Suicides
Paul D'Amato
The
Meaning of Haditha
Dave Lindorff
The Strange Death of Zarqawi: Was He Killed So He Wouldn't Talk?
John Ross
Elections and the World Cup: If Team Mexico Advances, Will Anyone
Show Up to Vote for Lopez Obrador?
Gabriel Garcia
Venezuela and Drug Trafficking: Bush Bashes Chavez Despite Positive
Results
Hilton Obenzinger
DIvestment is a Stand for Equality in Israel
Yitzhak Laor
The Secret of Authority
Juan Antonio Ocasio
Rivera
Puerto Rico at the UN
Jennifer Van Bergen
The
Story Behind Zarqawi's Death: What's the Legality of the Assassination?
Website of the Day
Paul Wright: a Real American Freedom Fighter
June 12, 2006
Paul Craig Roberts
Bush's
Armageddon Wish: a Final End to History?
Patrick Cockburn
The
US Already Misses Zarqawi
Mike Marqusee
Rebranding
a Team: English Nationalism and the World Cup
Lee Sustar
"I
Never Had the American Dream:" Left with No Future by GM and
Delphi
Robert Fisk
Has
Racism Invaded Canada?
Michael J. Smith
Enter Sandman; Exit Kosland
Felice Pace
NPR's Warped Covereage of the MIddle East
Jennifer Loewenstein
Setting
the Record Straight on Hamas
Website of the Day
Our Way Home
June 10 / 11, 2006
Weekend Edition
Robert Fisk
Zarqawi's
End is not a Famous Victory
Diane Christian
Zarqawi's Face
Joe Allen
The American Way of Atrocities: Marine Corps' Killer Virtues
Ralph Nader
Let Us All Praise the Dixie Chicks
Fred Gardner
Tylenol Toxicity Terror
Dave Lindorff
Nothing New About Haditha
Dave Zirin / John
Cox
Will Racism Spoil the World Cup?
Dennis Perrin
Death is Patriotic: Necro-Porn, Live on CNN
Greg Moses
Militarizing the Border: Why Operation Jump Start Worries Me
John Chuckman
Terror in Toronto or Tempest in a Teapot?
Michael J. Smith
Babes in Kosland: Dem Blogfest, Day Two
Roger Burbach
Bachelet in DC: Chilean President Refuses to Back Down to Bush
Ira Moskowitz
Israeli Court Finds Mad-Dog US Prof Libeled CounterPuncher Neve
Gordon
Sam Bahour
The Gaza Air Strikes: Begging for a Response
Seth Sandronsky
Grocery Chains and Bush's Ownership Society: Profits Fall, Stores
Close
Michael Berg
A Father's Day Message: Both Parties Have Betrayed America
Kirsten Roberts
Desmond Dekker and the Music of the Shantytowns
Ron Jacobs
Who's Fooling Who?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Playlist: What I'm Listening to This Week
Poets' Basement
Jones, Davies, Engel and Louise
Website of the Weekend
Miles and Trane, So What?
| July 13, 2006
“I ask every American to find a way to thank those who defend our freedom.” George W. Bush
Lies As Patriotism?
By SAUL LANDAU
Anticipating the July 4 wave of patriotic fervor exemplified by kids lighting firecrackers, Senator Pat Roberts (R-KA), chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, attacked the New York Times for exposing a supposedly effective and classified program that tracked terrorist money transfers. Roberts asked Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte to assess “the damage” done by the Times and Washington Post’s publication of stories about how SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) used an account tracking program. Representative Peter King (R-NY) lobbed a cherry bomb by demanding that Justice bring charges against the Times. Bush limited his own fireworks oratory to calling the publication “disgraceful.”
Bush, however, played a major role in revealing “secrets.” On eight occasions, he warned “the terrorists” to watch their money transfers. A September 24, 2001 speech informed them: “Today we have launched a strike on the financial foundation of the global terror network.” On April 19, 2004, in case terrorists had forgotten, Bush explained: “See, part of the way to make sure we catch terrorists is to chase money trails.”
With the support of more than 100 nations, US officials froze world-wide assets and on June 6, 2003, Bush boasted that he’d busted the assets of over 150 known terrorists and terrorist groups. “We’re running down their money trails,” he smugly reported.
He stopped short of informing the terrorists that the tracking program -- allegedly revealed by the Times and Post -- had a web site where it made its anti-terrorist tracking information available on the Internet. Indeed, White House press flak Tony Snow swore that the terrorists knew nothing of SWIFT or its magazine, Dialogue, which also made tracking operations public.
Did Bush and the screamers in the Senate assume the wily terrorists -- or the US public? -- were too stupid to look there to find what actions the US government had taken to trace their money transfers? Solemn statements about fighting terrorism define Bush’s patriotism. He asks citizens to salute the flag -- not burn it -- and glue bumper stickers on their cars saying “I support our troops.”
His notion of patriotism demands nothing more -- not a penny in taxes to support those suffering troops. Does a flag and bumper sticker mean loyalty to a nation, or does it represent jingoism?
On July 4, Bush reiterated his optimism on events in Iraq. Newspapers headlined another bloody attack there. On that day, a relative of my wife forwarded an email from a “patriot.” In this saturated red, white and blue scenario, all these attacks are directed against the United States. World War III began in 1979, the patriot avers, when Iranian revolutionaries took US hostages in Teheran. President Jimmy Carter could do no more than mount a futile desert rescue mission. The unnamed script writer described as skirmishes from this third world war all attacks since then against US troops and installations in the Middle East and Africa.
The Bush Administration’s explanations of the world seem downright moderate when compared to the ethno centrist obsession of the ultra right. The Minute Men and other super nationalist groups imagine a world-wide Islamic conspiracy, whose members relentlessly pursue their target: American freedom. The email implores the citizens to force the President to wage full-scale world wide war against anti-Christian evil. The email writer omits US behavior in the post World War II period, when the United States sewed the seeds of rebellion in the Middle East. When the CIA overthrew the democratic government of Iran in 1953, it helped set in motion a radical movement that has now reached frightening proportions.
After the 1967 War, Washington identified its policy ever more closely with Israel and against the Palestinians. The Arab world became ever more critical of the United States. In addition, like the proverbial rolling stone gathering diseased Middle East moss, US policies favoring oily despots picked up parasites that live off the larger body. The 26 year tyranny of the US-picked Shah of Iran, for example, pushed dissenting politics into the mosques. In 1979, dissent emerged from those “holy places” as anti-American rage. Iranians of many stripes overthrew the Shah. Then, some of the militant Islamic rebels took US hostages.
By legitimizing the illegitimate -- the Shah -- in Iran, US policy created a non enduring “friend” and millions of long-term, fanatic enemies. Pro Israeli policies also rang a very sour note with tens of millions of Arabs as do the policies of pro-US oil dictatorships.
Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya remind Middle Easterners that the United States continues to spread myths that Palestinians in Israel live as equals and all violence there comes from Palestinian extremism – not from Israeli occupation of Palestinian land. Bush invented new lies about “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq, and “spreading democracy” to the corrupt kingdoms of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the oil-rich Emirates.
Old lies beget new ones as situations demand. Iraqi government officials, for example, supposedly run a legal and sovereign entity. Ironically, Iraqi leaders complain about US soldiers murdering and raping their people. They plead for a timetable for rapid US withdrawal. Yet, Washington reasserts that “elected Iraqi leaders” want military occupation for as long as necessary to wipe out the terrorists.
Bush insists killing the all powerful and charismatically evil Abu Musab al-Zarqawi on June 7 signified a major gain. The media slavishly reported this myth as if it represented a turning point in the insurgency. As if the Iraqi government could now proceed with normal business!
Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter sneers at Bush’s sovereignty myth. “Imagine the president of the United States flying to …supposedly sovereign territory, being driven under heavy U.S. military protection to the U.S. Embassy, and then with some five minutes notification, summoning the highest elected official of that nation to the U.S. Embassy for a meeting … Iraqi sovereignty continues to be hyped as a reality when in fact it is as fictitious as any fairy tale ever penned by the Brothers Grimm. For all of the talk of a free Iraq, the fact is Iraq remains very much an occupied nation where the United States (and its ever decreasing “coalition of the willing”) gets to call all the shots.” (AlterNet, June 26, 2006)
As Ritter and other astute observers have noted, the insurgency shows no sign of abating after Zarqawi’s death. The daily news bulletins detail more bombings and kidnappings of Iraqi government personnel, including Ministers. The US-trained Iraqi police appear powerless.
Worse, scandals erupt regularly, the latest involving US troops raping and burning an Iraqi woman and then murdering her family to cover it up. In Washington, everyone agrees that the United States must eventually withdraw from Iraq, but not because Iraqi government leaders demand it. Rather, 60 plus percent of the public oppose the war and occupation. This has forced Congress to debate the issue, albeit with heavy verbal doses of cowardice and opportunism.
One such Mountebank emerged over a lost item in a 2003 document, which said that US troops stumbled on a supposed pile of chemical weapons. Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) now claims the troops discovered 500 artillery shells with chemicals. Ritter said that Santorum “conveniently fails to report that there is nothing ‘secret’ about this data, it has all been reported before (by the Bush administration, nonetheless), and that the shells in question constitute old artillery munitions manufactured well prior to 1991 (the year of the first Gulf War, and a time after which the government of Saddam Hussein stated -- correctly, it turned out -- that no WMD were produced in Iraq). The degraded sarin nerve agent and mustard blister agent contained in the discovered munitions had long since lost their viability, and as such represented no threat whatsoever.”
Ritter, once a Republican -- and presumably “patriotic” in those days -- reported accurately before Bush invaded Iraq that Saddam could not have had the dangerous weapons alleged by the US government.
The self-anointed patriots in power lied about weapons, continue to foster the myth of Iraqi government legitimacy and the importance of Zarqawi’s death. Daily bombings and rising US dead and wounded counts indicate that the insurgency proceeds apace on its bloody path. Bush had no valid reason to invade Iraq and his puppet government cannot control anything.
Facts alone should refute Bush’s claim to patriotism. He lies, denies and tells jokes to show he’s one of the boys. That seems sufficient to garner more than 30% of the public’s approval. They apparently believe his assurances about tracking terrorist money and take comfort in his acceptance of their patriotism as saluting the flag and driving cars with “I support our troops” bumper stickers. Hopefully, medical science will invent a spinal transplant for Democrats so they can together shout: “Out of Iraq -- Now.”
Saul Landau is an Institute for Policy Studies Fellow. He can be reached at landau@counterpunch.org.
|