May 3, 2001
Shocked
Over Kerrey?
It's How We Fought the War
Here's one of the many unsettling things
about Bob Kerrey, and it doesn't even address the issue of what
exactly he did in the Vietnamese village of Thanh Phong. Supposedly
riddled with indecision whether to accept the Medal of Honor
for a military action subsequent to the one now under dispute,
he finally did so on May 14, 1970, just 10 days after after the
Ohio National Guard killed four anti-war student protesters at
Kent State.
In other words, at a moment
of maximal national revulsion against the Vietnam War, former
Sen. Kerrey went along with the Pentagon's urgent desire for
heroes and presented his chest to President Richard M. Nixon,
who pinned the medal to it. So much for "ambiguity,"
one of the words used now to salvage his reputation. And now,
and only now, is he considering whether to give back the Bronze
Star awarded him for the 1969 mission in which (if you believe,
as we do, his fellow SEAL Gerhard Klann) he assisted in the throat-slitting
of an elderly Vietnamese peasant and ordered the killing of 13
women and babies, or (if you believe him) less wittingly supervised
the slaughter of an old man and 13 or more women and children.
It's pretty clear that Kerrey's
raid was part of the CIA's Phoenix program (as was My Lai, where
"Task Force Barker" killed 504 men, women and children
the preceding year). The intent of Phoenix was terror, precisely
the killing of not only suspected Viet Cong, but also their families.
The late William Colby, the CIA man who ran the program, told
Congress that between 1967-1971, 20,587 Vietnamese "activists"
were killed under the Phoenix program. The South Vietnamese declared
that 41,000 had been killed. Other estimates go as high as 70,000.
Barton Osborn, an intelligence
officer in the Phoenix program, spelled out in a congressional
hearing the prevailing bureaucratic attitude of the agents toward
their campaign of terror: "Quite often it was a matter of
expediency just to eliminate a person in the field rather than
deal with the paperwork."
And who was classified as a "VC
sympathizer" and, therefore, fair game to be slaughtered
by units like Kerrey's? The CIA's Robert Ramsdell, one of the
two men who developed the My Lai operation, said, "Anyone
in that area was considered a VC sympathizer because they couldn't
survive in that area unless they were sympathizers." Thanh
Phong was in "that area," which lends credence to Klann's
account of what Kerrey's raiders did.
The death squads run by the
CIA men supervising Phoenix were a particular favorite of the
man who pinned the medal on Kerrey: Nixon. After My Lai there
was a move to reduce funding for these killing programs. According
to journalist Seymour Hersh, Nixon passionately objected: "No.
We've got to have more of this. Assassinations. Killings."
The funding was swiftly restored.
When he was at Newsweek in
1998, reporter Gregory Vistica had Kerrey cold, but the newsmagazine's
editors decided that since Kerrey was no longer a presidential
candidate it wasn't worth exposing him. It was apparently OK
for a U.S. senator to be an alleged war criminal. Then the New
York Times finally decided to run Vistica's story because Kerrey
had left the Senate. Given the lack of disquiet among faculty
and students, it's also apparently OK for an alleged war criminal
like Kerrey to be head of the New School University in New York,
which in earlier days hosted refugees from Nazi Germany.
So will the Kerrey brouhaha nudge the
nation or Congress into confronting the past and what the Vietnam
War really involved? Of course not. Right before the last election,
CounterPunch ran a story by Doug Valentine, who wrote "The
Phoenix Program," one of the best histories of what really
happened in Vietnam. Valentine's CounterPunch story concerned
Robert Simmons,
in the midst of an ultimately successful campaign to represent
Connecticut in Congress. The specific charge against Simmons,
originally leveled in the Connecticut paper New London Day in
1994 was that he routinely violated the Geneva Convention while
interrogating civilian prisoners during his 20 months of service
with the CIA in Vietnam. Simmons claimed he'd always steered
clear of the dirty stuff. Same way Kerrey claims that when his
unit cut the throats of the old folk in a Thanh Phong peasant
hut, he was outside.
When Simmons was battling to
become a congressman (after a long career in state government
in Connecticut), no national paper cared a whit about the fact
that a possible torturer and war criminal was on the hustings.
Small wonder Congress is being protective of Kerrey, admonishing
the Pentagon not to probe what happened at Thanh Phong. How many
executive agents of the Phoenix program are strolling up and
down the aisles of government? CP
|