home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

Read Cockburn and St. Clair's Whiteout: the CIA, Drugs and the Press and discover how the CIA gave a helping hand to the opium lords who took over Afghanistan, thus ushering the Taliban into power.


CounterPunch: Complete Coverage of 9/11 and the War on Afghanistan

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Published October 31: Another special 8-page edition with stories on: How Monica Lewinsky Saved the Social Security System; CNN debates the pros and cons of torture; a history of the Palmer Raids; Smearing Rep. Cynthia McKinney; David Lloyd and Rick Berg profile Zalmay Khalilzad, Bush's Afghan playmaker; Blind Predator dupes the New Yorker's Seymour Hersh; Kipling's Jezail guns. Available exclusively to subscribers. Subscribe Now!


A Photographic Journal of Life in an Afghan Refugee Camp
By Judith Mann

November 14, 2001

Steve Perry
Afghanistan,
the Puzzle Palace

David Vest
The Great Unificator

Harry Browne
Preventing Future Terrorism

November 13, 2001

Peter Mahoney
Veteran's Day, 2001

Rep. Ron Paul
Expanding NATO
Is a Bad Idea

November 12, 2001

Robert Jensen
Goodbye to All That...
Patriotism

Nancy Oden
My Day at the Airport

CounterPunch Wire
East Timor 10 Years
After the Massacre

C.G. Estabrook
Instead of Terror

Alexander Cockburn
Wide World of Torture

November 11, 2001

Douglas Valentine
Homeland Insecurity: The Politics of Terror in America

November 10, 2001

Grover Furr
Seeking an Opposition
to the Afghan War

Bruce Kyle
Anatomy of a Green Smear:
Backstabbing Nancy Oden

November 9, 2001

Karen Snell
Torture By Proxy

John Troyer
A New Kind of Activism

Tariq Ali
Q & A About the War

Michael Colby
Schoolgirl Gets Booted
for Anti-war Views

November 8, 2001

Mokhiber/Weissman
The Cipro Rip-Off

Mitchel Cohen
The Smear Campaign
Against Nancy Oden

Steve Perry
American Roulette

November 7, 2001

Bahour/Dahan
Placebo Peace Plan

Tom Turnipseed
Bush Gives Billions
to His Oil Buddies

Cockburn/St. Clair
Greens, Airports and
National ID Cards

Dr. Susan Block
Ayatollah Asscroft

Brian J. Foley
Bombing Campaign Not "Self-Defense" Under International Law

November 6, 2001

Mark Scaramella
Where's That Red Cross Money Going

C.G. Estabrook
Our Torturers

Sheperd Bliss
Scott Nearing on War

Rep. Ron Paul
Underwriting the Taliban

Tariq Ali
The General Who
Came to Dinner

Evan Ravitz
Stop the War Through
Direct Democracy

Steve Perry
Hunger in Afghanistan

November 5, 2001

Patrick Cockburn
Living in the Minefields


David Price
Terror and Indigenous People

November 3, 2001

Declan McCullagh
Nancy Oden Interview

Daniel Wolff
The Memphis Blues Again

Mark Weisbrot
War on Civilians

Dave Marsh
How the RIAA (and the FBI) Cheat Musicians

Robert Jensen
Speaking Out Against
War on Campus

November 2, 2001

CounterPunch Wire
Green Party Leader Detained at Maine Airport; Prevented from Boarding Any Plane

Alexander Cockburn
FBI Eyes Torture

November 1, 2001

Dean Baker
Dying for Patents

Sami Amarah
US Attempts to Recruit
Russian Vets of Afghan War

Molly Secours
Where Are the Voices of Reason? Let the Women
Be Heard

William Blum
Unleashing the CIA

October 31, 2001

Tom Turnipseed
Terrorize the Poor,
Subsidize the Rich

Chris Clarke
Thank God for Berkeley

Steve Perry
The Silent Genocide

Resources:
100s of Links About 9/11


CounterPunch:
Complete Coverage of 9/11 and Its Aftermath


Five Days That
Shook The World:
Seattle and Beyond

By Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
Photos by Allan Sekula

(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)

INSIDE

Subscribe Online!

EXCLUSIVE TO
COUNTERPUNCH
SUBSCRIBERS


Published Oct. 15, 2001

8-Page Special Issue

War Diary

CIA's Assassination Plan a History of Torture in US Prisons

bin Laden and Bush Business Connections

Aisha Ikramuddin on the Hidden Hype of US Food Bombs

Peter Linebaugh on Pakistan

Christopher Hitchens' Love for Mrs. Thatcher

Jiang Zemin Tells Bush: Nuke 'Em


Search CounterPunch

Read Whiteout and Find Out How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press

by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The Memphis Blues Again:
Six Decades of Memphis Music Photographs
Photos by Ernest Withers
Text by Daniel Wolff

The New Intifada:
Resisting Israel's Apartheid

Edited by Roane Carey

A Pocket Guide to
Environmental Bad Guys
by James Ridgeway
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The Phoenix Program
by Douglas Valentine

Al Gore:
A User's Manual
by Cockburn
and St. Clair

Buy This Explosive
New Book at an
Amazing Discount!
 

Reviews of Gore:
a User's Manual


Private Warriors
by Ken Silverstein

CounterPunch's Booktalk

November 13, 2001

Reporters Have to Press Harder About Afghanistan

By Robert Jensen and Rahul Mahajan

At at time when U.S. journalists could hardly have fallen in line more quickly and completely with government officials, it's ironic that the most common criticism of the news media has been that they have "gone negative" and been too critical in their reporting on the Afghanistan war.

The problem isn't that journalists have been asking too many critical questions but that they have not asked enough of the right critical questions. The Northern Alliance entrance into Kabul doesn't change the importance of those questions.

We all have a stake in this. A more independent press would better serve the most hawkish Americans as much as the doves. As citizens in a democracy, we all need the most complete information possible if we are to participate meaningfully.

For more than a month after Sept. 11, reporters rarely challenged administration claims about the need for war and the initial war effort. In television interviews, it was often hard to tell government spokespersons and journalists apart. In recent weeks, as the administration's conduct of the war in Afghanistan and handling of the anthrax crisis at home made some critical questions unavoidable, reporters have started asking officials - in extremely polite fashion - for explanations.

At the moment, however, most of the questions have been about the wisdom of particular tactics: Has the United States been bombing too much or too little? Should the United States launch a ground offensive? Going unasked and unanswered are more basic questions.

For example, international relief workers have made it clear that the U.S. bombing, which temporarily halted food distribution and continues to disrupt that work, risks precipitating an enormous humanitarian disaster as winter approaches. The retreat of the Taliban to their southern stronghold reduces, but does not eliminate, the problem.

However the conflict plays out in weeks to come, the question remains: Why has the United States taken such risks with the lives of the 7.5 million Afghans estimated to be in danger of starving?

It's not that the U.S. news media have made no mention of this issue, but that journalists have downplayed its importance and refused to press when officials brush off the questions with nonresponsive replies.

What if journalists were really committed to reporting all the news, instead of the news filtered through U.S. government spokespeople? Then perhaps the call for a bombing halt last month by Mary Robinson, the United Nations high commissioner for human rights, which was echoed by numerous other UN officials and private aid agencies, would have been a big story. It was - in the foreign press. In the United States, it was either ignored or buried.

That lack of attention has real effects. In Great Britain, more than half the people support a bombing halt, perhaps in part because they have heard much more in their news media about the impending humanitarian catastrophe.

This is not an argument for advocacy journalism, but simply for independent journalism. An independent press must be a reliable source for all relevant information. To be that, an independent press must be skeptical and critical. No matter what one's position on the war - pro, anti or confused - we all should want, and demand, such independence.

Journalists say that is indeed what they do, but the evidence so far suggests that skepticism has yet to be applied to basic ethical questions about this war.

The argument for a journalism that presses harder is rooted in the idea that in a democracy, we the people actually have a role in determining policy and don't simply follow the leaders. That means people need an independent source of information from a press that does not accept the statements of government officials as gospel.

Most people would agree with that during peacetime, but many argue that such journalism is a luxury we can't afford during wartime. Just the opposite is the case. If anything, a critical press is even more important during war because so much is at stake.

So let's stop sniping at journalists when they do ask critical questions, and press them to go even deeper. It may be that not only the vitality of our democracy but the lives of many innocent Afghans depend on it.

Rahul Mahajan serves on the National Board of Peace Action, and is author of the forthcoming "The New Crusade: America's War on Terrorism" (Monthly Review Press). Robert Jensen is a professor of journalism at the University of Texas and author of Writing Dissent (Peter Lang). Both are members of the Nowar Collective. They can be reached at rahul@tao.ca.