Coming
Soon!
From Common Courage Press
Recent
Stories
June
2, 2003
Arundhati
Roy
Day of the Jackals
Norman
Madarasz
Behind the Neo-Con Curtain: Plato,
Leo Strauss and Allan Bloom
Alain
Frachon and Daniel Vernet
The Strategist and the Philosopher: Strauss and Wohlstetter
Anthony
Gancarski
Anti-Imperialism, Then & Now
Standard
Schaefer
Wasted at the Pentagon
Jason
Leopold
Rocky's Advice to the Dems
Guthrie
& Albert
HUAC 58 Years Letter
Steve
Perry
The Politics of Terror Alerts
May
31, 2003
Alexander
Cockburn
A Whiner Called Horowitz
Gary Leupp
The Frauds of War
Dave
Lindorff
Clinton, Bush, Lies and Impeachment
Tom Stephens
Does It Matter that the Bush Administration Lied?
Sasan
Fayazmanesh
Who Is Next?
Joanne
Mariner
Trivializing Terrorism
Wayne
Madsen
Ayatollah Rumseld's Busy Week
Larry Magnuson
Is a Television a Radio or a Billboard?
Elaine
Cassel
Wake Up, America!
Gila Svirsky
Waiting for the Lament to End
Susan
Davis
Kitchen Dreams
Chris Clarke
Barbra Streisand: Environmental Hypocrite
Chris
Floyd
Bush Locates Source of World Evil: God
Adam Engel
Gravity's End Zone
Poets'
Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Orloski, Albert
May
30, 2003
Ben
Tripp
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Agenda
Neve
Gordon
The Bad Fence
Todd
Steiner
Endangered Ocean
Robert
Freeman
Bush's Tax Cuts: a Form of National Insanity
Sean
Carter
Utah Gets Fired Up for Executions
Daniel
Bacher
How Bush's War Violated International Laws
Tariq
Ali
Re-Colonizing Iraq
Steve
Perry
Bush Wars
Web Log
May
29, 2003
CounterPunch
Wire
WMD: Who Said What When
Jason
Leopold
Despite Thin Intelligence Reports,
US Plans Overthrow of Iran Regime
Ron
Jacobs
Popular Uprising, Inc.
Michelle
Ciaccorra
Bush's Nuclear Policy: Do As I Say, Not As I Do
Yves Engler
The Economics of Health Care in
America: Pay More to Die Sooner
Kimberly
Blaker
Vouchers for Jesus
Harry
Browne
Stakeknife: Britain's Army Spy at
the Top of the IRA
Stew
Albert
Cops of the World
Steve Perry
Greens 04: In or Out?
May
28, 2003
David
Vest
DubyaCo.: It's Not So Funny Any More
Dave
Lindorff
My Grandfather's Medal
John
Stanton
America's Dying: Arts and Philosophy Hold the Key
Bernard
Weiner
A PNAC Primer
Robert
Jensen
Texas Dems Set a Standard for the Rest of the Party
Ahmad Faruqui
The Oil Business of Regime Change:
the CIA and Iran
Hammond
Guthrie
Disarming Conundrums
Steve Perry
What If There's No Such Thing as Al-Qaeda?
May
27, 2003
Kurt
Nimmo
Condoleezza Rice: Huckstress for Israeli
Myths
Anthony
Gancarski
Hillary: a Dem the NeoCons Could Love?
Patrick
Cockburn
Terror, Bush and Joseph Conrad
John Chuckman
an Interpretation of Bush's Character
Kathleen
Christison
What Sharon Wants, Sharon Gets
Jeffrey
Blankfort
AIPAC Hijacks the Roadmap
Steve
Perry
Trouble in the Hinterlands
May
26, 2003
Franklin
C. Spinney
Test Anxiety: Star Wars, Punctuated
Epistimology and the Triumph of Medievalism
Elaine
Cassel
Supreme Sacrifice
Sam
Hamod
When Trained Killers Return Home
Stew Albert
The Final Conflict
May
24 / 25, 2003
Gary
Leupp
The Philosopher Kings: Leo Strauss
and the Neo-Cons
Uri Avnery
The Hannibal Procedure
Diane
Christian
Who's the Real Enemy?
"Just Cause" or "Kill the Bastards"
Alexander
Cockburn
Derrida's Double Life
William
S. Lind
Is Saddam Really Out of the Game?
William
Cook
Road to Nowhere
David Krieger
Bush's War on the Poor: Economic Justice
Ilan
Pappe
Academic Freedom Under Assault in Israel
Wayne Madsen
American Idle
Noah
Leavitt
Slowing Sowing Justice in the Killing Fields
Walt Brasch
Americans are Liars
Lenni
Brenner
John Brown and Dutch Bill
Mickey
Z.
Hope, Crosby & Al Qaeda
Michael
Ortiz Hill
Grievous Harm Here and Abroad
Adam Engel
Towers of Babel
Poets'
Basement
Albert, Guthrie, Alam, Orloski
May
23, 2003
Standard
Schaefer
Lifting the Sanctions: Who Benefits?
Ron
Jacobs
Long Live People's Park!
Michael
Greger, MD
Return of Mad Cow: US Beef Supply
at Risk
Elaine
Cassel
Tigar to Ashcroft: "Secrecy is the Enemy of Democratic Govt."
Sam
Hamod
The Shi'a of Iraq
Christopher
Greeder
After the Layoffs (poem)
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Weblog 5/23

Hot Stories
CounterPunch
Wire
WMD: Who Said What When
Cindy
Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter
I Can't Hear From
Elaine
Cassel
Civil Liberties
Watch
Michel
Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I
Saw Marines Kill Civilians"
Uzma
Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War:
What America Says Does Not Go
Paul de Rooij
Arrogant
Propaganda
Gore Vidal
The
Erosion of the American Dream
Francis Boyle
Impeach
Bush: A Draft Resolution
Click Here
for More Stories.
|
June
5, 2003
The Problem of Patriotism
Texas
Pledge Law Undermines Democracy
By ROBERT JENSEN
Among its many dubious achievements this session,
the Texas Legislature -- in the name of promoting appreciation
for democratic political values in the public schools -- struck
a blow against the critical thinking skills crucial for meaningful
democracy.
The Legislature passed, and Gov. Rick
Perry last week signed into law, a bill ordering all school districts
to require students to pledge allegiance to the U.S. and Texas
flags once during each school day, starting in the fall.
The message is pretty simple: To be good
citizens-in-training, children must stand up, face a flag, and
recite by rote a questionable set of political assertions. That's
democracy in action? That's education?
No, that's instruction in subordination,
the unquestioned acceptance of authority.
In his defense of the bill, sponsor Sen.
Jeff Wentworth pointed out that the habits we form as children
are crucial to moral and political development. "If you
want children to know what work is, have them work," the
San Antonio Republican said. I couldn't agree more.
He continued, "If you want children
to love country and state, teach them to honor their flags."
That one begs some obvious questions:
Why should we want children to love country and state? What do
such declarations really mean? If our country or state is engaged
in illegal or immoral activities, should we love it? If what
we claim to love are not the actions of our government at any
given moment -- which can be, and often are, stupid or wrong,
or both -- is it really principles about freedom and justice
we are claiming to love? If so, why claim those principles for
country or state? Aren't those principles universal?
And, more importantly, if the lives of
all people all over the world are of equal moral value -- as
every major religious and philosophical system contends -- shouldn't
we be pledging allegiance to our common humanity? Perhaps we
should be pledging to work toward a future in which state and
national boundaries no longer separate people. Maybe we should
be pledging to work toward a set of universal principles that
are articulated and defended in a world council made of up of
representatives from different watershed regions based on principles
of voluntary association.
Or maybe not -- which is my point. Different
people have different viewpoints on these questions. In a meaningful
democracy, the conventional answers to those questions shouldn't
be drilled into children through rituals. In an educational system
that takes seriously the goal of encouraging critical thinking
(see the Texas Education Code, section 28.001), the answers to
all those questions should not be dictated but should be the
subject of discussion from the earliest possible age.
Yes, we want children to form good intellectual
and political habits -- one of which is subjecting to rigorous
critique the political assertions handed down from above.
This is the problem of patriotism. If
we want to live in a real democracy, the concept of patriotism
itself has to be up for grabs. We must encourage serious debate
-- not just about what constitutes patriotic behavior, as the
question is usually framed, but about whether patriotism itself
is politically and morally desirable. That debate isn't fostered
by required recitation of pledges to flags.
The new law also mandates a one-minute
period each day for students to "reflect, pray, meditate,
or engage in any other silent activity." That provision
and the "one nation under God" phrase in the national
pledge of allegiance raise questions of church/state separation.
But my concerns here are about pedagogy, not theology.
Because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled
60 years ago that a school could not force a child to recite
the pledge, the new Texas law allows schools to excuse a student,
at a parent's request, from reciting the pledges. Even with that
provision, in some classrooms students who opt out may face ridicule
from fellow students, and we should be concerned about them.
Much more dangerous, however, is the
effect on those students who stand up every day and participate
in the pledge drill. Our democracy is in serious trouble if we
think we can teach citizenship and critical thinking like the
multiplication tables.
Robert Jensen
is an associate professor of journalism at the University of
Texas at Austin, a member of the Nowar Collective, and author
of the book Writing
Dissent: Taking Radical Ideas from the Margins to the Mainstream
and the pamphlet "Citizens of the Empire." He can be
reached at rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu.
Today's
Features
Arundhati
Roy
Day of the Jackals
Norman
Madarasz
Behind the Neo-Con Curtain: Plato,
Leo Strauss and Allan Bloom
Alain
Frachon and Daniel Vernet
The Strategist and the Philosopher: Strauss and Wohlstetter
Anthony
Gancarski
Anti-Imperialism, Then & Now
Standard
Schaefer
Wasted at the Pentagon
Jason
Leopold
Rocky's Advice to the Dems
Guthrie
& Albert
HUAC 58 Years Letter
Steve
Perry
The Politics of Terror Alerts
Keep CounterPunch
Alive:
Make
a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!
home / subscribe
/ about us / books
/ archives / search
/ links /
|