|
CounterPunch
January
2, 2003
We Won't Be Fighting for Freedom
in Iraq
by ROBERT JENSEN
The Defense Department's "Defend America"
Web site reads, "Dear member of the U.S. military: Thank
you for defending our freedom." Fill in your name and hometown
and click to join the more than 2 million who have sent the message.
The sentiment seems hard to argue with.
No matter what one thinks of the coming war against Iraq, can't
we all send such a message to those who serve?
Not if we want to be honest about U.S.
war plans, for those troops won't be defending our freedom but
defending America's control over the strategically crucial energy
resources of the Middle East. They will be in the service of
the empire, fighting a war for the power and profits of the few,
not freedom for the many.
To some, that statement may seem disrespectful.
But resistance to the coming war against Iraq doesn't signal
a lack of respect for those who do the fighting. I never have
served in the military, but my family and friends have, and I
have empathy for people on the front lines who face the risks.
If I truly am to respect them--as human
beings and as fellow citizens--I should be willing to state clearly
my objections to this war.
That requires distinguishing between
the rhetoric and the reality of U.S. foreign and military policy.
Every great power claims noble motives for its wars, but such
claims usually cover an uglier reality, and we are no different.
For most of the post-World War II era,
the United States' use of force against weaker nations was justified
as necessary to stop Soviet plans for world conquest. The Soviet
regime was authoritarian, brutal and interventionist in its own
sphere, and it eventually acquired the capacity to destroy us
with nuclear weapons.
But the claim that the Soviets were a
global military threat to our existence also was a political
weapon to frighten Americans into endorsing wars to suppress
independent development in the Third World and accepting a permanent
wartime economy.
With the Soviet Union gone, American
planners needed a new justification for the military machine.
International terrorism may prove more durable a rationale, for
organizations such as al-Qaeda are a real threat, and we have
a right to expect our government to take measures to protect
us.
But the question is: Which measures are
most effective?
U.S. intelligence officials have acknowledged
that the U.S. attack on Afghanistan did little to reduce the
threat and may have complicated counterterrorism efforts. But
the war was effective at justifying a continuing U.S. military
presence in Central Asia. A war against Iraq, being marketed
as part of the war on terrorism, is even more obviously about
U.S. control of the region's oil.
So, we have to separate what may motivate
people in the armed forces from the real role of the U.S. military.
I have no doubt that many of the people
who serve believe they are fighting for freedom, an honorable
goal we should respect. But they are doing that for a government
with a different objective--to shore up U.S. power and guarantee
the profits of an elite--that we shouldn't support.
There is no disrespect in urging fellow
citizens who have joined the military to ask, "What am I
really fighting for?" and, "Who really benefits from
the risks I take?"
If we civilians truly care about the
troops--as well as the innocent people of Iraq who will die in
a war--we should make it clear to Washington that we won't support
wars for power and instead demand a sane foreign policy that
seeks real freedom and justice, not dominance and control.
My message to the troops would be: "Thank
you for being willing to defend freedom, but please join the
resistance to this unjust war."
That is a message of support for the
troops and a plea for solidarity among ordinary people who want
to build a better world, not serve the empire.
It is a reminder that, as John McCutcheon
put it so eloquently in song: "The ones who call the shots
won't be among the dead and lame/And on each end of the rifle
we're the same."
Robert Jensen
is the author of Writing Dissent: Taking Radical Ideas From the
Margins to the Mainstream and a journalism professor at the University
of Texas at Austin.
Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make
a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!
CounterPunch Available Exclusively
to Subscribers:
- CounterPunch Special:
The Persecution of Gershon Legman by Susan Davis: Smut, the Post Office, Commies
and the FBI;
- Reeling Democrats: Is Pelosi the Answer?
- Gandhi v. Hitler: the Secret Race for the Nobel
Prize;
- Sullying Mario Savio's
Memory;
- Lynching Then and Now;
- Earn While You Learn: Chris Whittle and Child Labor;
The Case of the Pompous
Professor;
- The Class Struggle in
Boston: All that
Effort, But What Did They Get?
Remember, the CounterPunch website is
supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide
web audience is soaring , with about seven million hits a month
now. This is inspiring, but the work involved also compels us
to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make
a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe
Now!
Or Call Toll Free 1 800 840 3683
home / subscribe
/ about us
/ books
/ archives
/ search
/ links
/
|