home / subscribe / donate / tower / books / archives / search / links / feedback / events / faq
|
Here's the second in Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair's series as they describe Hillary Clinton's years in Little Rock and her narrow escape from federal charges that would have destroyed her political career for ever. PLUS KEVIN ALEXANDER GRAY on how Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards are failing Black America even as they hunt for votes in So uth Carolina's "Black Primary." Get your copy today by subscribing online or calling 1-800-840-3683 Remember contributions to CounterPunch are tax-deductible. Click here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now
|
|
Today's Stories August 18 / 19, 2007 Alexander
Cockburn Saul
Landau Ralph
Nader Robert
Fantina Robert
S. Eshelman Dave
Lindorff Anthony
DiMaggio Ben
Tripp Andrew
Wimmer Rick
Smith
Joanne
Mariner Paul
Craig Roberts Shepherd
Bliss Dave
Lindorff John
Muthyala Patrick
Cockburn Sherwood
Ross Phil
Doe David
Michael Green Website
of the Day
Jonathan
Cook Christopher
Brauchli Norman
Solomon Lee
Sustar / George
Bisharat Binoy
Kampmark Evelyn
Pringle Hugo
Blanco Website
of the Day
August 15, 2007 Paul
Craig Roberts Michael
Neumann Jordan
Flaherty Sonja
Karkar Felice
Pace Joshua
Frank Dave
Lindorff Carla
Blank David
Vest Harvey
Wasserman Peter
Rost, M.D. Russell
Mokhiber Website
of the Day
August 14, 2007 Paul
de Rooij Winslow
T. Wheeler David
Rosen Gary
Leupp Clifton
Ross Muhammad
Idress Ahmad Jacquelyn
Godin Uri
Avnery Ramzy
Baroud James
McEnteer Website
of the Day
August 13, 2007 Jeremy
Scahill F.
William Engdahl Alexander
Cockburn Kathy
Kelly Chris
Floyd Paul
Craig Roberts William
Blum Kenneth
Couesbouc Rannie
Amiri Brenda
Norrell Fran
Shor Ron
Jacobs Website
of the Day
August 11 / 12, 2007 Alexander
Cockburn Stan
Goff Ralph
Nader Vijay
Prashad Greg
Moses Alan
Farago Patrick
Cockburn Ben
Tripp Robert
Fantina John
Ross Seth
Sandronsky Paul
Krassner Website
of the Weekend
August 10, 2007 Paul
Craig Roberts Stan
Goff Marjorie
Cohn Saul
Landau Chris
Floyd Daniel
Ellsberg Anthony
Papa Farzana
Versey Sgt.
Kevin Benderman Nuri
Nuri Website
of the Day
August 9, 2007 Stan
Goff Paul
Craig Roberts Alan
Farago William
S. Lind Doug
Giebel Harvey
Wasserman Jacob
Hill Raul
Zibechi Dave
Zirin Website
of the Day
August 8, 2007 Andy
Worthington Jeff
Halper Greg
Moses Nurit
Peled-Elhanan Sukant
Chandan Robert
Fisk George
H. Strauss D.K.
Wilson Bill
Day Tim
Campbell Website
of the Day
August 7, 2007 Patrick
Cockburn Andy
Worthington Kathy
Kelly Stan
Cox Sonja
Karkar Sen.
Russ Feingold Alan
Farago Norman
Solomon Binoy
Kampmark Dave
Lindorff John
Stauber Website
of the Day August 6, 2007 Bill
Quigley Kathy
Rentenbach Uri
Avnery Col.
Dan Smith Ralph
Nader James
Neshewat D.K.
Wilson Greg
Moses Fidel
Castro Mike
Whitney
August 4 / 5, 2007 Alexander
Cockburn Peter
Linebaugh Saul
Landau Alan
Farago Dave
Zirin Barucha
Calamity Peller Anthony
DiMaggio Dave
Lindorff Fred
Gardner Nicola
Nasser Benjamin
Dangl Rannie
Amiri Daniel
Gross Sherwood
Ross Manuel
Garcia, Jr Missy
Beattie Ron
Jacobs Website
of the Weekend
August 3, 2007 Gabriel
Matthew Schivone Jonathan
Cook Patrick
Cockburn Little
Steven Van Zandt Christopher
Brauchli D.
K. Wilson Linda
Ford and Ira Glunts Kelly
Overton Monica
Benderman Manuel
Garcia, Jr. Website
of the Day
August 2, 2007 Paul
Craig Roberts Stanley Heller Eric
Ruder Robert
Fantina Alan
Farago Chris
Floyd Franklin
Lamb Sen.
Russ Feingold Anthony
Papa Norman
Solomon Website
of the Day
August 1, 2007 Debbie Nathan Fred
Gardner Gary
Leupp David
Rosen Winston
Warfield Daniel
McBride Glen
Ford Thomas
P. Healy John
V. Whitbeck David
Krieger Website
of the Day
July 31, 2007 Kathy
Kelly Clancy Sigal Paul Krassner Joe
DeRaymond Diane
Christian Chris
Floyd Ramzy
Baroud Alan
Farago Fidel
Castro Dan
Bacher
July 30, 2007 Marjorie Cohn: Independent Counsel Time Patrick Cockburn Peter Quinn Uri Avnery John Ross Ron
Jacobs David
Vest Jeffrey
St. Clair Website
of the Day
July 28 / 29, 2007 Alexander
Cockburn Ralph
Nader Robert
Fantina Fred
Gardner
July 27, 2007 John
Ross Arthur
Neslen Dave
Lindorff Julene
Blair Christopher
Brauchli Jesse
Hagopian Charles
Modiano Bill
Day Walter
Brasch M.D.
Mitchell Website
of the Day
July 26, 2007 Kathleen
Christison Andy
Worthington Clancy
Chassay Marjorie
Cohn Susie
Day David
Price Marie
Trigona Norman
Solomon William
S. Lind Natsu
Saito John
Stauber Website
of the Day
July 25, 2007 Andy
Worthington Gary
Leupp Ray
McGovern Dr.
Susan Block Joshua
Frank Tina
Richards Ben
Terrall Farzana
Versey Mohammad
Ali Salih Laura
Carlsen Ron
Jacobs Sunsara
Taylor Website
of the Day
Saul
Landau Kathy
Kelly Russell
Mokhiber M.
Shahid Alam Patrick
Cockburn and Anne Penketh Dave
Lindorff Binoy
Kampmark Richard
Neville Cindy
Sheehan Evelyn
Pringle Norman
Solomon CP
Newswire Website
of the Day
July 23, 2007 Andy
Worthington Uri
Avnery Patrick
Cockburn Sousan
Hammad John
Walsh Harvey
Wasserman Martha
Rosenberg Collin Baber
Reza
Fiyouzat Stephen
Lendman Website
of the Day
July 21 / 22, 2007 Alexander
Cockburn Werther Ralph
Nader David
Keen Fred
Gardner Gary
Leupp Robert
Fantina Saker Rannie
Amiri Mike
Whitney Dr.
Susan Rosenthal, MD Monica
Benderman Dan
Bacher Michael
Baney Missy
Beattie Ron
Jacobs Adam
Engel Thomas
Naylor Poets'
Basement Website
of the Weekend
July 20, 2007 Eliza
Szabo Pam
Martens Alan
Farago Harvey
Wasserman Marjorie
Cohn Dave
Zirin Anthony
DiMaggio Scott
Liebertz Linn
Washington, Jr. Bill
Piper / Anthony Papa Ramzy
Baroud Website
of the Day
July 19, 2007 Patrick
Cockburn Remi
Kanazi Winslow
T. Wheeler Sharon
Smith Dave
Lindorff Conn
Hallinan D.
K. Wilson Joshua
Frank Norman
Solomon Russell
Hoffman Ray
McGovern Website
of the Day July 18, 2007 Brenda
Norrell Col.
Dan Smith Martha
Rosenberg Conn
Hallinan Binoy
Kampmark Patrick
Bond / Tom
Johnson Paul
Craig Roberts Bob
Quellos Felice
Pace Robert
Weissman CP
Newswire Website
of the Day
July 17, 2007 Patrick
Cockburn Marjorie
Cohn Evelyn
Pringle David
Rosen Susan
Miller Franklin
Lamb Don
Monkerud Harvey
Wasserman Russell
Hoffman Dave
Lindorff Dave
Zirin Website
of the Day
July 16, 2007 Gary
Leupp Ellen
Cantarow Paul
Craig Roberts Allan
J. Lichtman Dan
Bacher Patrick
Cockburn Manuel
Garcia, Jr. James
Brooks Liaquat
Ali Khan Julie
Flint Website
of the Day
July 14 / 15. 2007 Alexander
Cockburn Andy
Worthington Ralph
Nader Robert
Fantina Ron
Jacobs Joshua
Frank Conn
Hallinan Dr.
Susan Rosenthal, MD John
Ross Fred
Gardner Rannie
Amiri Charles
Modiano Anthony
DiMaggio China
Hand Missy
Comley Beattie Dr.
James J. Murtagh, Jr. Kenneth
Rexroth Poets'
Basement Website
of the Weekend
July 13, 2007 Patrick
Cockburn Winslow
T. Wheeler Imran
Khan Todd
Chretien Sam
Husseini Dr.
Herman Mindshaftgap Anthony
Papa D.
K. Wilson David
Michael Green Website
of the Day
July 12, 2007 Paul
Craig Roberts Robert Jensen Dr. Susan Block Joshua Frank John Chuckman Corporate Crime
Reporter Mike Whitney Nicola Nasser Richard Rhames William S.
Lind Website of the Day
July 11, 2007 Patrick
Cockburn Richard
Neville Debra
McNutt John
V. Walsh Scott
Liebertz George
C. Wilson James
McEnteer Philip
Rizk Johnny
Hazard Dave
Lindorff Website
of the Day
July 10, 2007 James
Ridgeway Tariq
Ali Javed
Hussein William
Blum Ralph
Nader Jay
Arena Anthony
DiMaggio Eva
Liddell Jerry
Kroth Alice
Woodward Nikolas
Kozloff Paul
Shannon Website
of the Day
July 9, 2007 Fidel
Castro Diana
Johnstone John
Walsh Uri
Avnery Ramzy
Baroud John
Ripton Stephen
Lendman Bruce
Jackson Michael
Donnelly Doug
Giebel Website
of the Day
Saul
Landau Ismael
Hossein-zadeh Fawzia
Afzal-Khan John
Ross Pat
Williams Rannie
Amiri Farzana
Versey Bart
Gruzalski Paul
Rockwell Reza
Fiyouzat Monica
Benderman Kenneth
Couesbouc Dave
Lindorff Charles
Modiano Missy
Beattie Dal
LaMagna Jean
Gerard Anne
Dachel Ron
Jacobs Poets'
Basement Website
of the Day
Daniel
Ellsberg Gary
Leupp Harvey
Wasserman Omer
Subhani Marjorie
Cohn Christopher
Brauchli David
Michael Green China
Hand Renee
Saucedo Corporate
Crime Reporter Website
of the Day
July 5, 2007 Andy
Worthington Mike
Stark Norman
Solomon Michael
Schwartz Susie
Day Jacob
Hornberger Bill
Hatch Don
Fitz John
Wright Website
of the Day
July 4, 2007 St.
Clair / Frank Vijay
Prashad Carl
G. Estabrook Ron
Jacobs David
R. Dow Claudia
Johnson William
S. Lind Gregory
Afghani Paul
Edwards D.
K. Wilson Niranjan
Ramakrishnan Thomas
Jefferson Cindy
Sheehan Website
of the Day
Bill
Quigley Gary
Leupp Lynda
Brayer Richard
Thieme Helen
Redmond David
Swanson Jacob
Hornberger Ayesha
Ijaz Khan Franklin
Lamb Ray
McGovern Kevin
Zeese Dave
Lindorff Website
of the Day
![]()
![]()
Subscribe Online
|
Weekend
Edition The Indo-US Nuclear DealIndia Backtracks on DisarmamentBy N. D. JAYAPRAKASH The text of the Indo-US nuclear deal, which is titled "Agreement for Co-operation Between the Government of India and the Government of the United States of America Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy" (also known as the 123 Agreement) and which was released on 03 August 2007, is totally silent on the issue of nuclear disarmament. This is wholly contradictory to the explicit assurance made by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in his statement before the Indian Parliament in response to the discussion on the proposed Indo-US Nuclear Deal. In para 13 (viii) of his statement on 17 August 2006, Dr.Manmohan Singh had categorically assured members of the Rajya Sabha (Upper House) as follows:
It may be recalled that Dr.Manmohan Singh was referring to the "Action Plan for Ushering in a Nuclear Weapon Free and Non-Violent World", which the Late Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had submitted before the UN General Assembly on 09 June 1988 during the Third UN Special Session on Disarmament. The issue of nuclear disarmament is crucial to any deal on peaceful uses of nuclear energy precisely because of the inherent suspicion that transfer of nuclear material and nuclear technology may be misused for production of nuclear weapons. Therefore, what is intriguing is that, despite Dr.Manmohan Singh's categorical assurance that "There is no dilution on this count", even the word "disarmament" is completely missing from the entire text of the 123 Agreement. Instead, there is overt emphasis is on what is called non-proliferation in the preamble to the 123 Agreement. On 13 August 2007, Dr.Manmohan Singh reiterated that he had stood by all the commitments he had made before Parliament on 17 August 2007. However, it is again evident that, a notable omission from the said commitments was regarding the question of nuclear disarmament. Instead, Dr.Manmohan Singh has categorically asserted in para 22 of his statement dated 13 August 2007 that:
FROM FOE TO FRIEND OF NPT Upholding the concept of non-proliferation marks a clear departure from India's long-held principle position on the issue. For the first time since the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was signed in 1968, the Government of India has de facto extended support to the NPT, which the Government of India had consistently opposed during the last 39 years due to the inherently discriminatory nature of the NPT. In a quid-pro-quo move, the United States has de facto recognised India as a nuclear weapon state and has ensured India's back door entry into the club of "recognised" nuclear weapon powers, a move which is in consonance with its strategic tie-up with India. Since the United States has de facto recognised India as a nuclear weapon state, India's opposition to the NPT has vanished without a trace and it has readily teamed up with the United States to propagate the virtues of non-proliferation! Neither side had tried to conceal this convergence of views since the same is stated explicitly in the preamble to the 123 Agreement. In fact there are three specific references regarding commitment to non-proliferation in the preamble:
A mutual commitment by India and the United States to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction may have been a very welcome step if it was evident what was meant by the word "proliferation". Unfortunately, no attempt has been made to define the word "proliferation" under Article I of the 123 Agreement, which is 'Definitions'. (Incidentally, the word "proliferation" is not defined even in the text of the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which was extended indefinitely in 1995.) The fact that there can be two types of proliferation is sought to be hidden: "vertical" proliferation (increase in numbers and destructive capacity of nuclear weapons within a nuclear weapon state); and "horizontal" proliferation (increase in the number of nuclear weapon possessing countries). It is historically evident that, under the NPT regime, the word "proliferation" was used exclusively in the sense of "horizontal" proliferation; limiting "vertical" proliferation was practically never on the agenda of the NPT. (Article VI of the NPT, which was supposed to address the issue of "vertical" proliferation, was to be "pursued in good faith". The total indifference of the nuclear weapon states (NWSs) in implementing the said Article VI even 37 years after the NPT remaining in force, thoroughly exposes the bankruptcy of the NPT.) Therefore, there is no basis to presume that the word "proliferation" has been used in any other sense than as "horizontal" proliferation in the 123 Agreement. Having hitchhiked on to the
bandwagon of "recognised" nuclear weapon states (courtesy:
the United States), India has now virtually become the most vociferous
supporter of the NPT. The entire exercise of giving covert "recognition"
to India as a nuclear weapon state thoroughly exposes the wholly
deceptive nature of the NPT, which is that the NPT is merely
the handmaiden of the United States for serving its interests.
On its part, India has had no compunctions in jettisoning its
long-held principled stand of championing the cause of
global nuclear disarmament in lieu of the dubious honour
of being covertly conferred "recognition" as a nuclear
weapon state by the United States. Ultimately, India's subjective
craving for "recognition" as a nuclear weapon state
has triumphed over its objective stand as a champion of global
nuclear disarmament. RENEGING ON DISARMAMENT Just a month after Dr. Mammohan Singh gave his assurance to the Indian Parliament regarding India's commitment to global nuclear disarmament, the India Prime Minister had made a similar commitment before the XIV Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Summit at Havana on 15 September 2006. Dr.Manmohan Singh had stated that:
Earlier, the India-EU [European Union] Strategic Partnership Joint Action plan, which was adopted in New Delhi on 07 September 2005, too had emphasised that:
The Joint Action Plan went on to state that:
While the European Union has had no hesitation in seeking to achieve the goal of "universal disarmament" along with India, it is evident from the recent Indo-US joint statements that the United States is extremely allergic to the very word "disarmament". The United States apparently despises the word "disarmament" to such an extent that the word "disarmament" is not mentioned even once in any of the joint statements that the United States has issued with India especially in relation to the Indo-US Nuclear Deal. (In fact, by 1997 itself the U.S. Administration actually went to the extent of merging the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), which was set up by President Kennedy as an independent agency in 1961, with the U.S. Department of State. The downgraded functions of the ACDA have been handed over to an Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, a post that has been lying vacant for a long time! The sordid treatment meted out to the ACDA exemplifies the attitude of the U.S. Administration towards disarmament.) India's decision to backtrack on its commitment to disarmament is all the more inexplicable since India has always recognised the direct link between disarmament and development and Dr.Manmohan Singh himself had prioritised the fight against poverty as one of his primary concerns. In his reply 03 August 2005 to the Lok Sabha (Lower House) debate on his visit to the U.S. in July 2005, Dr. Manmohan Singh had stated:
Furthermore, in his suo-motu statement on 07 March 2006 before Parliament on 'Discussions on Civil Nuclear Energy Cooperation with the US: Implementation of India's Separation Plan', Dr. Manmohan Singh had reiterated that:
In his reply on 11 March 2006 in the Lok Sabha to the debate on Civil Nuclear Energy Cooperation with the United States, Dr.Manmohan Singh had also stated that:
Therefore, the question is whether the issue of universal disarmament is in India's supreme national interest or not? If "India's principal concern is to get rid of chronic poverty, ignorance and diseases" and if "the needs of the people of India must become the central agenda for our international cooperation", as the PM has argued, is it possible to do so without arresting the mindless expenditure towards arms build-up? Is it possible to do so without ensuring the diversion of the same for developmental purposes? The fact that India is now willing to sacrifice the goal of universal disarmament for a strategic tie-up with the United States does not augur well for India's own future and for the future of the rest of the world. Such a stance on the part of India constitutes nothing but a betrayal of the principles and purposes of the Non-Aligned Movement. It would also nullify the call of Dr.Manmohan Singh at the XIV NAM Summit at Havana on 15 September 2006 to "fellow members of NAM to join us in our efforts to achieve universal nuclear disarmament and a world free of all nuclear weapons."
HONOURABLE WAY OUT In a rearguard action, but in a manner that is totally outside the context of the 123 Agreement, the Prime Minister has in para 19 of his statement dated 13 August 2007, has reiterated India's commitment to "Non-discriminatory Global Nuclear Disarmament" The PM has repeated that:
Furthermore, in para 21 of his statement, the PM has added that:
Indeed, if the PM is so committed to goal of universal disarmament, the only honourable way for India to demonstrate such commitment is to take the initiative in convening an international conference on global nuclear disarmament forthwith with the explicit objective of declaring the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons as a crime against humanity. Such a conference can also workout a timetable for the elimination of nuclear weapons and for proceeding towards the ultimate goal of general and complete disarmament on the lines of the McCloy-Zorin accord, which was unanimously adopted by the UN General Assembly on 20 December 1961, and on the lines of the Rajiv Gandhi Action Plan of 1988. If the Government of India fails to take steps to advance the cause of universal disarmament, the PM will expose himself as a person indulging in double-speak. If he does initiate such steps, concrete progress towards nuclear disarmament will have the power of making any unjust nuclear deal fruitless. N.D. Jayaprakash works with the Delhi Science Forum/Coalition
for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace. He can be reached: jaypdsf@gmail.com
![]()
|
CounterPunch Books of the Crossroads: HOW THE IRISH INVENTED SLANG By Daniel Cassidy ![]() Click Here to Buy! How the Press Failed The Gang's All Here: Judy Miller, Bob Woodward, Rupert Murdoch, Bill O'Reilly...End Times Leaves No Reputation Unstained! ![]() Buy End Times Now! CounterPunch Books! Saul Landau's Bush and Botox World with a Foreword by Gore Vidal ![]() Click Here to Order! ![]() Michael Neumann's Devastating Rebuttal of Alan Dershowitz Grand Theft Pentagon: Tales of Greed and Profiteering in the War on Terror by Jeffrey St. Clair ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The Occupation by Patrick Cockburn ![]() ![]() Humanitarian Imperialism By Jean Bricmont ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() CITY BEAUTIFUL By Tennessee Reed ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Bruce Springsteen On Tour By Dave Marsh ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |