Coming
Soon!
From Common Courage Press
Recent
Stories
July
17, 2003
Ron
Jacobs
Sometimes Even the President of the
United States Has to Stand Naked
Lisa
Walsh Thomas
Bush Country: the Venom and Adulation of Ignorance
Martin
Schwarz
Bush Pre-emptive Strike Doctrine is the Bane of Non-Proliferation
Watchdogs
Heidi
Lypps
Better Justice Through Chemistry? Forced
Drugging and the Supreme Court
Norman
Madarasz
Third Ways and Third Worlds: Lula at the Progressive Governance
Conference
Pankaj
Mehta
Criminalizing the Palestinian Solidarity Movement
Marjorie
Cohn
Bush, War Lies & Impeachment: the
Boy Who Cried Wolf
Hammond
Guthrie
(Dis) Intelligence Revisited
Website
of the Day
No Force, No Fraud: the Soul of Libertarianism
July
16, 2003
Jason
Leopold
Wolfowitz Told White House to Hype
Dubious Uranium Claims
William
Cook
Defining Terrorism from the Top Down
Elaine
Cassel
Judge Brinkema v. Ashcroft: She Whom
Must Not Be Obeyed
Jason
Leopold
How Can They Justify the War If WMDs Are Never Found?
Linda Heard
Bondage or Freedom?
Raymond
Barrett
From Detroit to Basra
Jeffrey
St. Clair
Back to the Future in Guatemala:
The Return of Gen. Ríos Montt
July
15, 2003
Kathleen
and Bill Christison
Why We Resigned from VIPS
Elaine
Cassel
Ashcroft's War on Legal Whistleblowers:
the Ordeal of Jesselyn Radack
Chris
Floyd
Barge Poles: Oil Wars and New Europe's Mercenaries
Jason
Leopold
CIA Warned White House Last October that Niger Docs were Forgeries
Gaius Publius
Considering the Obvious: Fool Us Once, Fool Us Twise...Please
John
Troyer
The Niger Syndrome
Becky Gillette
No Conspiracy at Coffeen Nature Preserve: a Response to David
Orrr
Uri
Avnery
The Bi-National State: The Wolf Shall
Dwell with the Lamb
Website
of the Day
Cost of Iraq War
July
14, 2003
Lisa
Taraki
Hot Days in Ramallah
Walter
Brasch
Bush: the Pretend Captain
SOA
Watch
Training Colombia's Killers in the US
Dan Bacher
Yurok Tribe Denounces Klamath River Salmon Killers
Veteran
Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
Intelligence Unglued
Website
of the Day
Coalition for Democratic Rights and Civil Liberties
July 12 / 13, 2003
Arthur
Mitzman
The Double Wall Before the Future
Standard
Schaefer
The Coming Financial Reality: an
Interview with Michael Hudson
John Feffer
A Fearful Symmetry: Washington and Pyongyang
Ron
Jacobs
Shades of Gray in Iran
Elaine
Cassel
Judicial Terrorism Against the Bill of Rights
Tom
Stephens
Civil Liberties After 9/11
David Lindorff
New White House Slogan: "Case Closed. Just Move On"
Jason
Leopold
The Mini-War Against Iraq Prior to 9/11
Lee Sustar
What's Behind the Crisis in Liberia?
Mickey
Z.
AIDS Dissent and Africa
Sam Hamod
Semitic is a Language Group, Not a Race or Ethnic Group
Ramzy
Baroud
Awaiting Justice on an Old Blanket
Jeffrey
St. Clair
Savage Incongruities: the Photographic Life of Lee Miller
Adam
Engel
Parable of the Lobbyist
Robert
Sanders
A Review of Ralph Lopez's American Dream
Poets'
Basement
Albert, Witherup, Guthrie
July
11, 2003
Conn
Hallinan
The Coin of Empire
Tim
Wise
God Responds to Bush
Mokhiber
/ Weissman
The Two Faces of Bush in Africa
Edward
S. Herman
Whitewashing Sandra Day O'Connor
David Orr
Coffeen-gate: What's Going on at the Sierra Club Foundation?
David
Lindorff
An Iraq War & Occupation Glossary
Website
of the Day
Dead Malls
July
10, 2003
Ron
Jacobs
Dealing with the Devil: the Bloody
Profits of General Dynamics
Sean
Donahue
Bush and the Paramillitaries: Coddling Terrorists in Colombia
Yemi
Toure
Who Outted Bush in Afrika?
Robert
Jensen
Politics and Sustainability: an Interview
with Wes Jackson
Ali
Abunimah
US Leaves Injured Iraqis Untreated
Joanne
Mariner
Federal Courts, Not Military Commissions
Website
of the Day
Electronic Iraq
July
9, 2003
David
Lindorff
Is the Media Finally Turning on
Bush?
David
Krieger and Angela McCracken
10 Myths About Nuclear Weapons
Mickey
Z.
Why Speak Out?
Lee Sustar
The Great Medicare Fraud
John
Chuckman
The Worst Kind of Lie
Gary Leupp
"Pacifist" Japan and the Occupation of Iraq
Website
of the Day
Hail to the Thief:
Songs for the Bush Years
July
8, 2003
Elaine
Cassel
Bully on the Bench: the Pathological
Dissents of Scalia
Alan
Maass
Nights of Fire and Rage in Benton Harbor
Chris
Floyd
Troubled Sleep: Getting Used to the American Gulag
Linda
S. Heard
America's Kangaroo Justice
Brian
Cloughley
They Tell Lies to Nodders
Charles
Sullivan
Bush the Christian?
Saul
Landau
The Intelligence Culture in the National Security Age
Website
of the Day
Occupation Watch
July
7, 2003
William
Blum
The Anti-Empire Report
Harvey
Wasserman
The Nuke with a Hole in Its Head
Ramzy
Baroud
Peace for All the Wrong Reasons
Simon
Jones
What Progressives Should Think About
Iran
Lesley
McCulloch
Fear, Pain and Shame in Aceh
Uri
Avnery
The Draw
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 7/3
July
4 / 6, 2003
Patrick
Cockburn
Dead on the Fourth of July
Frederick
Douglass
What is Freedom to a Slave?
Martha
Honey
Bush and Africa: Racism, Exploitation
and Neglect
Jeffrey
St. Clair
The Rat in the Grain: Amstutz and
the Looting of Iraqi Agriculture
Standard
Schaefer
Rule by Fed: Anyone But Greenspan in 2004
Lenni Brenner
Jefferson is for Today
Elaine
Cassel
Fucking Furious on the Fourth
Ben Tripp
How Free Are We?
Wayne
Madsen
A Sad Independence Day
John Stanton
Happy Birthday, America! 227 Years of War
Jim
Lobe
Bush's Surreal AIDS Appointment
John Blair
Return to Marble Hill: Indiana's Rusting Nuke
Lisa
Walsh Thomas
Heavy Reckoning at Qaim
David Vest
Wake Up and Smell the Dynamite
Adam
Engel
Queer as Grass
Poets'
Basement
Christian, Witherup, Albert & St. Clair
Website
of the Weekend
The Lipstick Librarian
July
3, 2003
Patrick
W. Gavin
The Meaning of Gettysburg
Thomas
W. Croft
There Was a Reason They Called It the Casino Economy
David
Lindorff
Outlawing Subversives: Hong Kong
and the US
John
Chuckman
Lessons from the American Revolution
Jackson
Thoreau
New Far-Right Scheme: Impeach Supreme Court Justices
Stan
Goff
"Bring 'Em On?": a Former
Special Forces Soldier Responds to Bush's Invitation for Iraqis
to Attack US Troops
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 7/3
July 2, 2003
Diane
Christian
Good Killing and Bad Killing
Richard
Falk
After Iraq, Does UN War Prevention Have a Future?
Mokhiber
/ Weissman
Bush Administration: Causing Repetitive Stress
Justin
Podur
Uribe's Onslaught Across Colombia
Reuven
Kaviner
Prosecuting Ben-Artzi, the Refusenik
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 7/2
July
1, 2003
Sasan
Fayamanesh
Weapon of Choice: Nukes, Israel and
Iran
Elaine
Cassel
Sex and the Supreme Moralizer: Scalia
and the Sodomy Cops
Susan
Block
A Love Supreme: Our Assholes Belong
to Ourselves
Bill
Glahn
RIAA Watch: No, No Bono
David Lindorff
Weapons in Search of a Name
Gary
Leupp
Occupation, Resistance and the Plight of the GIs
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 7/1
June
30, 2003
Karyn
Strickler
The Do-Nothings: an Exposé
of Progressive Politics in America
Col. Dan
Smith
The Occupation of Iraq: Descending into the Quagmire
Tim
Wise
Race and Destruction in Black and White
Neve Gordon
The Roadmap and the Wall
Chris
Floyd
The Revelation of St. George: "God Told Me to Strike Saddam"
Elaine
Cassel
Kentucky Woman
Uri
Avnery
Hope in Dark Times
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 6/30
Website
of the Day
Bush El Hombre
June
28 / 29, 2003
M.
Shahid Alam
Bernard Lewis: Scholarship or Sophistry?
Jeffrey
St. Clair
Meet Steven Griles: Big Oil's Inside
Man
Laura
Carlsen
Democracy's Future: From the Polls or the Populace?
Alan Maass
You Call These Democrats an Alternative?
C.Y.
Gopinath
Bush and Kindergarten
Noah Leavitt
Bush, the Death Penalty and International Law
Joanne
Mariner
Rehnquist Family Values
Ignacio
Chapela
Tenure, Censorship and Biotech at Berkeley
Bob
Scowcroft
Bush's Squeeze on Organic Farmers
Jon Brown
Tom Delay: "I am the Government"
Kam
Zarrabi
Keep Your Hands Off Iran, Please!
Ron Jacobs
Big Bill Broonzy's Conversation with the Blues
Julie
Hilden
Fear Factor: Art, Terror and the First Amendment
Adrien
Rain Burke
The Anarchists' Wedding Guide
Adam
Engel
US Troops Outta Times Square
Poets'
Basement
Witherup, Guthrie, Albert, Hamod
June
27, 2003
Jason
Leopold
CIA: Seven Months Prior to 9/11 Iraq
Posed No Threat to US
David
Vest
Supreme Silence: Bush's Bunker-Hunker
David
Lindorff
The Catch and Release of "Comical
Ali"
Ray McGovern
Cheney, Forgery and the CIA
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 6/26
Website
of the Day
John Kerry, Teresa Heinz & Ken Lay: The Politics of Hypocrisy
June
26, 2003
Sen.
Robert Byrd
The Road of Cover-Up is a Road to Ruin
Jason
Leopold
Wolfowitz Instructed the CIA to Investigate
Hans Blix
Paul
de Rooij
Ambient Death in Palestine
Chris Floyd
Mass Graves and Burned Meat in Bush's New Iraq
Elaine
Cassel
Wolfowitz as Lord High Executioner
CounterPunch
Wire
Musicians Unite Against Sweatshops
Sheldon
Hull
Squatting in Mansions
Ben Tripp
A Guide to Hating Almost Anyone
Uri
Avnery
The Best Show in Town
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 6/25
Website
of the Day
Ordinary Vistas:
The Photographs of Kurt Nimmo
June
25, 2003
Bruce
Jackson
Buffalo Cops Wage War on Pedal Pushers
Mickey
Z.
The New Dark Ages
David Lindorff
Indonesia's War on Journalists
Dan
Bacher
Butterflies and Farmworkers Confront USDA and Riot Cops
Adam Federman
"Success is Not the Issue Here"
Elaine
Cassel
"Ain't No Justice": Fed Judge Quits, Assails Sentencing
Guidelines
Bill Kauffman
My America vs. the Empire
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 6/25
Website
of the Day
You Are Being Watched:
Elevator Moods
June
24, 2003
Elaine
Cassel
Supreme Indemnity
Holocaust Denial at the High Court
Roya
Monajem
A Message from Tehran: Is It Worth
It to Risk One's Life?
John
Chuckman
The Real Clash of Civilizations
David Lindorff
WMD Damage Control at the Times
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 6/24
June
23, 2003
Marc
Pritzke
Washington Lied: an Interview with
Ray McGovern
Conn
Hallinan
The Consistency of Sharon
Wayne Madsen
Commercials, Disney & Amistad
Edward
Said
The Meaning of Rachel Corrie
Steve Perry
Bush's Wars Web Log 6/23
June
21 / 22, 2003
Alexander
Cockburn
My Life as a Rabbi
William
A. Cook
The Scourge of Hopelessness
Standard
Schaefer
The Wages of Terror: an Interview with R.T. Naylor
Ron Jacobs
US Prisons as Strategic Hamlets
Harry
Browne
The Pitstop Ploughshares
Lawrence
Magnuson
WMD: The Most Dangerous Game
Harold
Gould
Saddam and the WMD Mystery
David Krieger
10 Reasons to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
Avia
Pasternak
The Unholy Alliance in the Occupied Territories
CounterPunch
Summer Reading:
Our Favorite Novels
Todd Chretien
Return to Sender: Todd Gitlin, the Duke of Condescension
Maria
Tomchick
Danny Goldberg's Imaginary Kids
Adam Engel
The Fat Man in Little Boy
Poets'
Basement
Guthrie, Albert & Hamod
June 20, 2003
Walter
Brasch
Down on Our Knees
Robert
Meeropol
The Son of the Rosenbergs on His Parents Death and Bush's America
Russell
Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
Grannies and Baby Bells
Norman
Madarasz
Pierre Bourgault: the Life of a
Quebec Radical
Gary
Leupp
Bush on "Revisionist Historians"
Steve
Perry
Bush's Lies
Marathon: the Finale

Hot Stories
Wendell
Berry
Small Destructions Add Up
CounterPunch
Wire
WMD: Who Said What When
Cindy
Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter
I Can't Hear From
Elaine
Cassel
Civil Liberties
Watch
Michel
Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I
Saw Marines Kill Civilians"
Uzma
Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War:
What America Says Does Not Go
Paul de Rooij
Arrogant
Propaganda
Gore Vidal
The
Erosion of the American Dream
Francis Boyle
Impeach
Bush: A Draft Resolution
Click Here
for More Stories.

|
July
19, 2003
What is to be Done
with the CIA?
A
History of Flawed Intelligence
By MEL GOODMAN
[Editors' Note: This essay is an excerpt from the excellent
new book PowerTrip:
U.S. Unilateralism and Global Strategy After September 11,
part of the Open Media series published by Seven
Stories Press. The book is edited by John Feffer and
includes essays by writers and scholars from Foreign
Policy in Focus, including William Hartung, Martha Honey
and Ahmed Rashid.]
One week after the attack on the Pentagon and
the World Trade Center, National Security Adviser Condoleezza
Rice told the press corps, "This isn't Pearl Harbor."
No, it was worse. Sixty years ago, the United States did not
have a director of central intelligence or thirteen intelligence
agencies or a combined intelligence budget of more than $30 billion
to provide early warning of enemy attack.
There is another significant and telling
difference between Pearl Harbor and September 11. Less than two
weeks after the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin
D. Roosevelt appointed a high-level military and civilian commission
to determine the causes of the intelligence failure. Following
the September attacks, however, President Bush, CIA director
George Tenet, and the chairmen of the Senate and House intelligence
committees were adamantly opposed to any investigation or postmortem.
The president's failure to appoint a statutory inspector general
at the CIA from January 2001 to April 2002 deprived the
agency of the one individual who could have started an investigation
regardless of the director's opposition. Overall, the unwillingness
to begin a congressional inquiry for nearly eight months increased
the suspicion that indicators of an attack had gone unheeded.
The eventual Senate and House intelligence
committee investigation of the September 11 failure, which began
in June 2002, was mishandled from the beginning. The original
staff director for the investigation, former CIA inspector general
Britt Snider, had the stature and experience for the job, but
he was soon pushed out by former Senate intelligence committee
chairman Richard Shelby (R-GA),
a staunch critic of CIA Director Tenet but never an advocate
for reform of the intelligence community. The staff itself is
too small and inexperienced to do the job seriously. The August
2002 decision of the chairmen of the Senate and House intelligence
committees to order an aggressive FBI investigation of the joint
committee, ostensibly to uncover leaks of classified information,
marked a blatant violation of the separation of powers between
the executive and legislative branches. The move was designed
to placate the Bush administration, which has consistently established
roadblocks to an independent investigation of the intelligence
community.
Nevertheless, the preliminary report
of the joint intelligence committee has done an excellent job
of ferreting out evidence documenting the failures at the CIA
and the FBI. The report describes a director of central intelligence
who declared a war on terrorism in 1998 but allocated no additional
funding or personnel to the task force on terrorism; an intelligence
community that never catalogued information on the use of airplanes
as weapons; and a CIA that refused to acknowledge the possibility
of weaponizing commercial aircraft for terrorism until two months
after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Two days after the report was published, the Bush administration
reversed itself and endorsed the creation of a separate, independent
investigation to study the intelligence failure.
FAILURES OF INTELLIGENCE
The failure to anticipate the September
11 attack-and the reluctance to thoroughly investigate this failure-is
merely the latest in a long series of CIA blunders. Over the
past half century, U.S. presidents have accepted the poor performance
of the CIA, presumably because the agency represents a clandestine
and relatively inexpensive instrument of American foreign policy.
President Dwight Eisenhower employed the CIA in a series of covert
actions in Guatemala, Iran, and Cuba that contributed to instability
in these countries and complicated U.S. bilateral relations in
the Caribbean and Southwest Asia. Subsequent covert operations
in Indonesia, Congo, Angola, and Chile followed a similar pattern.
In the 1980s, CIA Director William Casey politicized the intelligence
analysis of the CIA and orchestrated the Iran-contra scheme that
eventually embarrassed the Reagan administration. Deputy Director
Robert Gates failed to receive confirmation as CIA director in
1987 because the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence did
not believe his denials of knowledge of the Iran-contra affair.
Casey and Gates were directly responsible for the CIA's poor
analytical record in dealing with Soviet issues throughout the
1980s, from the failure to foresee the Soviet collapse to the
revelation that CIA clandestine officer Aldrich Ames had been
a Soviet spy for nearly a decade-the greatest intelligence failure
in the history of the agency until the terrorist attacks in 2001.
The performance of the intelligence community
did not improve in the 1990s. When the CIA missed India's underground
nuclear testing in 1998, Tenet stated, "We didn't have a
clue." This failure to monitor Indian testing and Tenet's
inexplicable testimony that the CIA could not guarantee verification
of the treaty led to the Senate's unwillingness to ratify the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. The CIA also failed to anticipate
the third-stage capability of North Korea's Taepodong missile,
which was tested in August 1998, leading to bipartisan calls
in the United States for more funding for national missile defense
and Japanese suspension of talks to establish diplomatic relations
with North Korea.139 Since 1998, CIA analysis of Third World
missile programs has taken on a worst-case flavor, exaggerating
the national security threat to the United States and politicizing
the intelligence data in the process.
The CIA has been particularly weak on
the terrorism issue. In 1986, Casey and Gates created the conceptually
flawed Counter-Terrorism Center (CTC). They believed that the
Soviet Union was responsible for every act of international terrorism
(it wasn't), that intelligence analysts and secret agents should
work together in one office (they shouldn't), and that the CIA
and other intelligence agencies would share sensitive information
(they didn't). The CIA and FBI provided no warning of terrorist
attacks on the World Trade Center in 1993, U.S. military barracks
in Saudi Arabia in 1996, U.S. embassies in East Africa in 1998,
and the USS Cole in 2000. Presumably there were intelligence
successes during this period that may have prevented other acts
of terrorism. Nevertheless, the CTC never understood the connection
between Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, the coordinator of the 1993 World
Trade Center attack, and the al-Qaeda organization until it was
too late. And the CTC expected an attack abroad, not at home.
The September 11 attack exposed the inability
of analysts and agents to perform strategic analysis, challenge
flawed assumptions, and share sensitive secrets. No agency in
the intelligence community could imagine a terrorist operation
conducted inside the United States, using commercial airplanes
as weapons, although al-Qaeda had planned such operations in
the mid-1990s in Europe and Asia. The CIA was tracking al-Qaeda
operatives but never placed them on the immigration service watch
list; the FBI failed to track Arab men attending flight schools
who were behaving in a suspicious fashion. Nevertheless, the
Congressional Research Service and University of Pennsylvania
professor of political science Stephen Gale did anticipate hijacking
of commercial aircraft and warned both the CIA and the Department
of Transportation.
Since September 11, the Bush administration's
global policy of unilateralism has involved the CIA in controversial
covert operations, including political assassinations, despite
the ban since 1975 on such actions by presidential executive
order. U.S. unilateralism and fear of the CIA are major components
of the anti-Americanism that is intensifying in Europe, the Middle
East, and Southwest Asia. The current CIA director, George Tenet,
is serving the policy interests of the Bush administration in
other ways as well, resorting to worst-case analysis to describe
the threats that confront the United States in order to justify
the deployment of a national missile defense and the U.S. withdrawal
from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, a cornerstone of U.S.
arms control policy since 1972. Without new data, CIA analysts
have begun asserting that Iran, Iraq, and North Korea are moving
closer to a nuclear capability that would threaten the United
States. The administration's pressure on the CIA to produce intelligence
data to justify a war against Iraq will lead to greater politicization
of intelligence, and the emphasis on preemptive attack will lead
to dubious demands on the CIA to produce intelligence justification
for warfare. Tenet's unprecedented diplomatic role in the Middle
East peace process revives the suspicion that a CIA director
has put the nation's strategic intelligence at the service of
a political agenda. His intense involvement with both Palestinian
and Israeli security forces places him at the center of the policy
process in the Middle East and compromises the collection of
unbiased intelligence.
STRUCTURAL FLAWS
One reason for the consistent failures
of the intelligence community is the organizational overload
at both the CIA and FBI. The CIA has an operational mission to
collect human intelligence and analyze and publish national intelligence
estimates. It is also responsible for covert action. The agency
cannot perform both missions well. The FBI also suffers from
a bipolar mission. Its traditional law enforcement mission involves
reacting to crimes that have already occurred. Its counterterrorism
mission, by contrast, requires a proactive role-ferreting out
threats to national security before they occur. Walter Lippmann
reminded us seventy years ago that it is essential to "separate
as absolutely as it is possible to do so the staff which executes
from the staff which investigates."
Turf issues abound. The protection of
"sources and methods" has been an obstacle to information
sharing, with the CIA and the FBI having a long history of poor
communication. As critical, intelligence agencies and the Pentagon
often lock horns. The director of central intelligence (DCI)
is responsible for foreign intelligence but lacks control and
authority over 90 percent of the intelligence community, including
the National Security Agency (NSA), the National Imagery and
Mapping Agency (NIMA), and the National Reconnaissance Office
(NRO), which are staffed and funded by the Department of Defense.
The priorities of the DCI and those of the Pentagon are quite
different. Previous DCIs, particularly Gates and John Deutch,
harmed the CIA by de-emphasizing strategic intelligence for policy
makers and catering instead to the tactical demands of the Pentagon.
The CIA produced fewer intelligence assessments that dealt with
strategic matters and emphasized instead intelligence support
for the war fighter. Gates ended CIA analysis on key order-of-battle
issues in order to avoid tendentious analytical struggles with
the Pentagon; Deutch's creation of NIMA at the Department of
Defense enabled the Pentagon to be the sole interpreter of satellite
photography. The Pentagon uses imagery analysis to justify the
defense budget, to gauge the likelihood of military conflict
around the world, and to verify arms control agreements. In creating
NIMA, Deutch abolished the CIA's Office of Imagery Analysis and
the joint Department of DefenseCIA National Photographic
Interpretation Center, which often challenged the analytical
views of the Pentagon. Worst of all, the Bush administration
has referred to a "marriage" between the Pentagon and
the CIA, which suggests that intelligence continues to be subordinated
to Pentagon priorities. The CIA's worst-case analysis is being
used to justify the highest peacetime increases in defense spending
since the record-level hikes during the Reagan administration.
The CIA's second major mission, covert
action, remains a dangerously unregulated activity. There are
no political and ethical guidelines delineating when to engage
in covert action, and previous covert actions have harmed U.S.
strategic interests, placing on the CIA payroll such criminals
as Panama's General Manuel Noriega, Guatemala's Colonel Julio
Alpirez, Peru's intelligence chief Vladimiro Montesinos, and
Chile's General Manuel Contreras. Although President Bush, like
every other president since Gerald Ford, has signed an executive
order banning political assassination, exceptions have been made
in the covert pursuit of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and former
Afghanistan Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar-both of whom also,
ironically, received CIA assistance in the 1980s. In November
2002, the CIA killed six al-Qaeda operatives in Yemen, an action
immediately condemned by Amnesty International as a violation
of international law prohibiting summary executions.
In 1998, the United States and the CIA
used the cover of the UN and the UN Special Commission (UNSCOM)
to conduct a secret operation to spy on Iraqi military communications
as part of a covert action to topple Saddam Hussein. Neither
the UN nor UNSCOM had authorized the U.S. surveillance, which
Saddam Hussein cited as justification for expelling the UN monitors.
As a result, the United States and the UN lost its most successful
program to monitor and verify Iraq's nuclear, chemical, and biological
programs, compromising the credibility of multilateral inspection
of weapons of mass destruction. In that same year, the CIA produced
spurious intelligence data to justify the U.S. bombing of a pharmaceutical
plant in the Sudan, one of the few countries willing to help
the Clinton administration arrest Osama bin Laden.
Finally, a comparison of the CIA and
the State Department reveals skewed U.S. priorities. Today, the
CIA has approximately sixteen thousand employees, more than four
times the number at the State Department, and the intelligence
community budget is ten times that of the State Department. As
a result of cutbacks, the State Department has had to close important
posts in South America, the Balkans, Southwest Asia, and Africa,
and has had to post political amateurs with deep pockets to key
ambassadorships. It is no wonder that the role of the State Department
has significantly diminished in such key functional areas as
arms control and disarmament and such key regional areas as the
Middle East and South Asia. The CIA, meanwhile, doesn't need
so many resources. One of the CIA's first directors, Allen Dulles,
emphasized that "the bulk of intelligence can be obtained
through overt channels" and that if the agency got to be
a "great big octopus it would not function well."
WHAT IS TO BE DONE?
What the CIA and the intelligence community
should be, what it should do, and what it should prepare to do
is less clear now than at any time since the beginning of the
Cold War. Throughout the Cold War, the need to count and characterize
Soviet weapons systems and the search for indications of surprise
attack focused the efforts of the CIA. These goals disappeared
with the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the dissolution
of the Soviet Union in 1991. Major steps must be taken to design
an intelligence infrastructure to deal with terrorism, the major
security threat in the twenty-first century. The ongoing contentious
debate over the proposed new Department of Homeland Security
masks the far greater need to reform the intelligence community.
Such reforms include demilitarizing the intelligence community,
resolution of key turf issues, and reform of covert operations.
Retired general Brent Scowcroft has conducted
a comprehensive review of the intelligence community for President
Bush and favors transferring budgetary and collection authority
from the Pentagon to a new office that reports directly to the
DCI.144 These agencies include NSA, which conducts worldwide
electronic eavesdropping; NRO, which designs spy satellites;
and NIMA, which analyzes satellite pictures and data and produces
maps.145 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld opposes this transfer
and has created a new position of undersecretary of defense for
intelligence to preempt such reform. Congressional approval of
this new position would preserve the status quo and close the
narrow window of opportunity for more extensive reform proposals
under consideration by the joint intelligence committees of the
House and Senate.
It is crucial that the CIA strengthen
links across the intelligence community in order to share intelligence.
Unfortunately, the agency places too much emphasis on the compartmentalization
of intelligence and the "need to know," which are obstacles
to intelligence sharing. The failures at Pearl Harbor in 1941
and the terrorist attacks in 2001 could have been prevented with
genuine sharing of sensitive intelligence information. But this
information tends to move vertically within each of the thirteen
intelligence agencies instead of horizontally across them. The
FBI and the CIA have never been effective in sharing information
with each other or with such key agencies as the Immigration
and Naturalization Service, the Federal Aviation Agency, the
Border Guards, and the Coast Guard, which will be on the front
lines in the war against terrorism. There is no guarantee that
the CIA and FBI will share raw reporting on terrorism with the
new Office of Homeland Security.
To minimize the politicization of intelligence
work, covert operations and intelligence gathering should be
separated. The CIA's directorate of operations is responsible
for clandestine activities. Relying on secrecy, hierarchy, and
the strict enforcement of information on a need-to-know basis,
it is involved in the policy-making process. The directorate
of intelligence, on the other hand, helps set the context for
people who formulate policy, but it should not be involved in
the making of policy. The FBI should likewise be split into two
agencies, with a domestic counterterrorism service reporting
directly to the director of central intelligence.
The Bush administration and Congress
have responded in classic bureaucratic fashion to the September
11 failure, throwing lots of money at the problem to find a solution.
The defense budget for 2003 will be close to $400 billion, an
increase of nearly 30 percent since 2000. The intelligence budget
will increase by 20 percent in 2003, climbing to more than $35
billion. The defense budget protects the current force structure
and ongoing weapons modernization programs, and assigns top priority
to deploying a national missile defense. Most of the intelligence
budget pays for collection resources-including a profusion of
electronic data and images from planes, ships, ground stations,
and satellites, along with clandestine human intelligence collection.
These increases have little to do with countering terrorism and
are reminiscent of President Dwight Eisenhower's warning against
the military-industrial complex in 1961.
The intelligence community, particularly
the CIA, faces a situation comparable to that of fifty-five years
ago, when President Harry S. Truman created the CIA and the National
Security Council. As in 194748, the international environment
has now been recast, the threats have been altered, and as a
result the institutions created to fight the Cold War must be
redesigned. If steps are not taken to improve the intelligence
community, we can certainly expect more terrorist operations
against the United States.
Mel Goodman
has taught national security issues at the National War College,
Johns Hopkins and the American University. He is an analyst at
the Center for International Policty. He can be reached at: goodmanm@ndu.edu
Weekend Edition Features for July 12/13, 2003
Arthur
Mitzman
The Double Wall Before the Future
Standard
Schaefer
The Coming Financial Reality: an
Interview with Michael Hudson
John Feffer
A Fearful Symmetry: Washington and Pyongyang
Ron
Jacobs
Shades of Gray in Iran
Elaine
Cassel
Judicial Terrorism Against the Bill of Rights
Tom
Stephens
Civil Liberties After 9/11
David Lindorff
New White House Slogan: "Case Closed. Just Move On"
Jason
Leopold
The Mini-War Against Iraq Prior to 9/11
Lee Sustar
What's Behind the Crisis in Liberia?
Mickey
Z.
AIDS Dissent and Africa
Sam Hamod
Semitic is a Language Group, Not a Race or Ethnic Group
Ramzy
Baroud
Awaiting Justice on an Old Blanket
Jeffrey
St. Clair
Savage Incongruities: the Photographic Life of Lee Miller
Adam
Engel
Parable of the Lobbyist
Robert
Sanders
A Review of Ralph Lopez's American Dream
Poets'
Basement
Albert, Witherup, Guthrie
Keep CounterPunch
Alive:
Make
a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!
home / subscribe
/ about us / books
/ archives / search
/ links /
|