|
CounterPunch
January
7, 2003
Why is Capitalism in Crisis?
By AHMAD FARUQUI
Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, much ink has
been spilled on the virtues of capitalism. Last year, Andrew
Bernstein of Pace University capitalized on this momentum by
issuing a declaration "On the Principles and Possibilities
of Capitalism." Written to rebut the Marx-Engels Communist
Manifesto, the Bernstein Declaration asserts, "Capitalism
is the only social system in which individuals are free to pursue
their rational self-interest, to own property and to profit from
their actions."
In the Bernstein construct, capitalism
is synonymous with free markets where a large number of sellers
and buyers interact, and none has any influence over the price
at which goods and services are bought and sold. Such a situation
constitutes the case of "perfect competition," which
is found in textbooks on economics, and nowhere else. In most
modern economies, a few large firms dominate major industries.
There is limited freedom of entry, and these large firms often
have the power to set prices.
In his seminal work on Capitalism, Socialism
and Democracy, the late economist Joseph Schumpeter wrote that
capitalism couldn't survive, because "its very success undermines
the social institutions which protect it, and 'inevitably' creates
conditions in which it will not be able to live." A notable
failing of capitalistic societies is that they promote an unequal
distribution of income, in which the rich get richer and the
poor get poorer.
The ideologues of capitalism only dwell
on its virtues, and ignore its problems. Thus, they do not talk
about the problems of "crony capitalism" that brought
about the Asian financial crisis of 1997. Nor do they discuss
Japan's decade-long spell of economic stagnation. They look past
the dot-com bubble that burst in the US in the spring of 2000
and the wave of corporate scandals that began with Enron and
WorldCom and ultimately touched dozens of American companies.
None of these events register with them.
When Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan raised
interest rates a few years ago to restrain what he dubbed the
"irrational exuberance" of investors, the defenders
of capitalism accused him of destroying $400 billion of wealth.
There was nothing wrong with the American economy, they asserted.
Growth was strong, corporate earnings were up, inflation was
down and job creation was robust.
The year 2000 was a banner year for capitalism.
On January 14, the Dow Jones Industrials Index reached 11,728.
On March 10, the Nasdaq hit 5,049, "knocking aside valuation,
interest-rate and psychological barriers like tenpins."
Since many investors feared that the bubble would burst, Wall
Street analysts put out rosy forecasts of economic growth, seeking
to assuage investors that bull markets don't falter in a sound
economy.
The stock market has now declined three
years in a row, something that last happened when the Axis powers
were over-running the planet. It is worth noting that the S&P
500 Index dropped by 23 percent in 2002, exceeding the 13 percent
drop in 2001 and the 10 percent drop in 2000. It is falling at
an increasing rate. Over the past three years, the S&P Index
has lost 40 percent of its value. The more narrowly focused Dow
Jones Index has lost 28 percent of its value, while the high-tech
Nasdaq has lost 67 percent. First to fall were the Internet stocks,
then came the established companies. General Electric and Microsoft
are down more than 50 percent off their highs, IBM is down 40
percent and Cisco is down more than 80 percent. Overall, investors
are poorer by $6 trillion.
The stock market is at the heart of the
capitalistic economy, and it is not possible to dismiss its travails
as not being a predictor of the real economy. The market creates
its own "economic weather" through the wealth effect.
As stocks rise or fall, the 80 million Americans who own stocks
feel richer or poorer. Ultimately, this affects their consumption
decisions, particularly of big-ticket items such as appliances,
furniture, cars and homes. Consumer spending accounts for two-thirds
of the US GDP, and has a significant impact on it. Thus, it is
not surprising that Wall Street's decline in March 2000 foreshadowed
the recession that came in the first quarter of 2001. In 1982,
a powerful stock rally accurately foretold an economic recovery.
Consumer spending is stalling. Retail
sales during the holiday season, typically accounting for 40
percent of annual sales, were down by 11 percent compared to
last year. Consumer confidence fell in December, according to
the widely used index of the University of Michigan. The number
of people on welfare rose in three-quarters of the states last
summer. This is in contrast to the striking decline that swept
the US in the mid-late 1990s when the economy was booming. Unemployment
forecasts for this year stand at 6 percent, with some economists
predicting 6.5 percent by the spring.
Jeremy Siegel of the Wharton School says
that the Fed, which has dropped short-term interest rates to
1.25 percent, should work with the Treasury to reduce long-term
rates. However, he admits that it is "is possible that even
lower long-term rates will not stimulate the economy. After all,
Japanese long-term bonds are currently below 2 percent and Japan
is still in an economic slump."
The US current account deficit equals
5 percent of GDP, and has been sustained by the desire of non-Americans
to invest in the US. However, the inflow of capital has slowed
down, causing the trade-weighted dollar to go down some 9 percent
since February.
Notwithstanding these sobering developments,
the Wall Street Journal opines that 2003 will be a year of accelerating
growth. It says that historians may find the last three years
are merely a pause in the economic renaissance of the past 20
years, and has labeled the US as the "economy of the year."
Capitalism is in crisis, not just in
America. On a global basis, world trade fell by 1.5 percent in
2001, the first such decline since 1982. It grew by a slim 1
percent in 2002.
The problems of capitalism are structural
in nature. CEOs remain focused on quarterly earnings reports
and with pumping up share prices. Jeffrey Garten, dean of the
Yale school of management, says, "it would be an important
turn of events if the administration and business leaders took
a longer and broader view of the policies that would stimulate
economic growth and strengthen our free market system."
But Garten concedes this is unlikely to happen any time soon.
Andrew Bernstein and the editors of the Wall Street Journal would
do well to dust off their Schumpeter to find out why.
Ahmad Faruqui,
an economist, is a fellow with the American Institute of International
Studies and the author of Rethinking
the National Security of Pakistan. He can be reached
at faruqui@pacbell.net
Yesterday's
Features
Chris White
Deceptions
in Military Recruiting: an Ex-Insider Speaks Out
Tim Llewellyn
Baghdad
Before
Steve Perry
Trent
Lott's Big Sin:
He Was Sooo Old-School
Walter A. Davis
Death's
Dream Kingdom: the American Psyche after 9/11
Anthony Gancarski
Come Fly With Me:
If 9/11 Was a Joke, TSA Was the Punchline
Bernard Weiner
Ellsberg's Secrets and Bush's War
Kurt Nimmo
Desperately Seeking Emmanuel Goldstein
Asif Devji
Yes, Virginia, Santa Really Is American
Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make
a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!
CounterPunch Available Exclusively
to Subscribers:
- CounterPunch Special:
The Persecution of Gershon Legman by Susan Davis: Smut, the Post Office, Commies
and the FBI;
- Reeling Democrats: Is Pelosi the Answer?
- Gandhi v. Hitler: the Secret Race for the Nobel
Prize;
- Sullying Mario Savio's
Memory;
- Lynching Then and Now;
- Earn While You Learn: Chris Whittle and Child Labor;
The Case of the Pompous
Professor;
- The Class Struggle in
Boston: All that
Effort, But What Did They Get?
Remember, the CounterPunch website is
supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide
web audience is soaring , with about seven million hits a month
now. This is inspiring, but the work involved also compels us
to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make
a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe
Now!
Or Call Toll Free 1 800 840 3683
home / subscribe
/ about us
/ books
/ archives
/ search
/ links
/
|
January
4, 2003
Jeffrey St.
Clair
Something
About Butte
Saul Landau
The Bush Vision and the Culture of Power
Annie Higgins
Six Soldiers
Michael Ortiz
Hill
Bush's Armageddon Obsession
Francisco Armada and Carlos
Mutaner
Venezuela: Chomsky's Tropical Nightmare
James T. Phillips
Targeting Americans
Jack Bice
A Fresh World Vision
Robert Fisk
Double Standards in the War on Terror
Chris Clarke
Is a Blue Rose a Rose?
Frank Fugate
How the West (Bank) Was Won
Anis Shivani
Bleak Prospects for Dems
Ben Tripp
Does Bush Know Korean?
Adam Engel
Les Miserable and the Hackers from Hell
Resources:
100s of Links
About 9/11
CounterPunch:
Complete
Coverage of 9/11 and Its Aftermath
Five
Days That
Shook The World:
Seattle and Beyond
By
Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
Photos by Allan Sekula
(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch
Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)
Read
Whiteout and Find Out
How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most
Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban
and Osama bin Laden
Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the
Press
by Alexander
Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
|