home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

 

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: The Real Scandal at the Times: Why Not Give Jayson Blair a Pulitzer? After all They Gave Them to Safire and Gerth; What About the Framing of Wen Ho Lee? Falling for the Jessica Lynch Fraud? Judy Miller's Missing WMDs? Blair, the Early Years; Meet the Minister of Sleaze: Deputy Interior Secretary Steve Griles; He Still Works for Big Oil and Strip Miners; Uses 90-Year Old Women as Human Shields; The Crash of the American Economy; Smearing Rachel Corrie's Memory; The Origins of Chalabi: Is He a Creature of Israeli Intelligence? Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring, with more than 60,000 visitors a day. This is inspiring news, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Coming Soon!
From Common Courage Press

Recent Stories

May 20, 2003

Linda Heard
The Cage of Occupation

Edward Said
The Arab Condition

 

May 19, 2003

CounterPunch Wire
"Terror" Slut Steve Emerson Eats Crow

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
A Letter to Kofi Annan on Powell's Missing Evidence

Ross Vachon
Dennis Miller's New Gig: the Last Refuge of Goofy?

John Chuckman
Blair's Awkward Lies

Matt Vidal
Corporate Media and the Myth of the Free Market

Michael S. Ladah
The Fine Print to Bush's Road Map

Robert Fisk
Bush's Eternal War Backfires

Elaine Cassel
Clarence Thomas, Still Whining After All These Years

Jonathan Freedland
Ann Coulter's Appalling Magic

Steve Perry
Play It Again, O-Sam-a

 

May 17 / 18, 2003

Uri Avnery
The Children's Teeth

Peter Linebaugh
An American Tribute to Christopher Hill

Gary Leupp
Nepal Today

Rock and Rap Confidential
The Republican Plot Against the Dixie Chicks

Walter Sommerfeld
Plundering Baghdad's Museums

Ron Jacobs
Condy Rice's Yipping Tirades

Thomas P. Healy
Dubya Does Indy

Tarif Abboushi
Bush, Sharon and the Roadmap

Francis Boyle
Debating US War Crimes in Iraq

Mark Davis
An Interview with Richard Butler

Richard Lichtman
American Mourning

Michael Ortiz Hill
Overcoming Terrorism

Adam Engel
Uncle Sam is YOU!

Alan Maas
The Best News Show on TV

Poets' Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Albert

Elaine Cassel
Good Enough for an Alien

Website of the Weekend
The 37 Americans Who Run Iraq

Song of the Weekend
Talkin' Sounds Just Like Joe McCarthy Blues

 

May 16, 2003

Leah Wells
In Iraq Water and Oil Do Mix

Ben Tripp
Fear Itself

Sharon Smith
The Resegregation of US Schools

Ramzy Baroud
Does Defeat Have to be So Humiliating?

Sam Hamod
A Nation of Fear

Phil Reeves
Baghdad Pays the Price

Robert McChesney
The FCC's Big Grab

Mark Engler
Those Who Don't Count

Steve Perry
We're All Extras in Bush's Movie

Website of the Day
Iraq and Our Energy Future

 

May 15, 2003

Ayesha Iman and Sindi Medar-Gould
How Not to Help Amina Lawal: The Hidden Dangers of Letter Writing Campaigns

Julie Hilden
Moussaoui and the Camp X-Ray Detainees: Can He Get a Fair Trial?

Tanya Reinhart
Bush's Roadmap: a Ticket to Failure

Laura Carlsen
Here We Go Again: NAFTA Plus or Minus?

Kenneth Rapoza
The New Fakers: State Dept. Undercuts New Yorker's Goldberg

Stew Albert
A Story I Will Tell

Steve Perry
Bush's Little Nukes

Website of the Day
Strip-o-Rama

 

May 14, 2003

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Jason Leopold
The Pentagon and Hallburton: a Secret November Deal for Iraq's Oil

David Lindorff
Fighting the Patriot Act: Now It's Alaska

John Chuckman
Giggling into Chaos

Jack McCarthy
Twin Towers of Journalism: Racism and Double Standards

Wayne Madsen
Assassinating JFK Again

M. Junaid Alam
The Longer View

Paul de Rooij
The New Hydra's Head:
Propagandists and the Selling of the US/Iraq War

James Reiss
What? Me Worry?

Steve Perry
More on Saudi Arabia Bombings

Website of the Day
A Tribute to Ted Joans

 

May 13, 2003

Saul Landau
Clear Channel Fogs the Airwaves

Michael Neumann
Has Islam Failed? Not by Western Standards

Uri Avnery
My Meeting with Arafat

Steve Perry
The Saudi Arabia Bombing

Jacob Levich
Democracy Comes to Iraq: Kick Their Ass and Grab Their Gas

William Lind
The Hippo and the Mongoose: a Question of Military Theory

The Black Commentator
Fraud at the Times: Blaming Blacks for White Folks' Mistakes

Stew Albert
Asylum

Hammond Guthrie
An Illogical Reign

Website of the Day
Sy Hersh: War and Intelligence

 

May 12, 2003

Chris Floyd
Bush, Bin Laden, Bechtel, and Baghdad

Dave Lindorff
America's Dirty Bombs

Sam Hamod and Elaine Cassel
Resisting the Bush Administration's War on Liberty

Uzi Benziman
Sharon and Sons, Inc.

Jason Leopold
The Decline and Fall of Thomas White

Rich Procter
George Jumps the Shark

Federico Moscogiuri
Going to Israel? Sign or Else

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/12

Book of the Day
Fooling Marty Peretz

Website of the Day
T-Shirts to Protest In

 

 

 

 

 

Hot Stories

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Elaine Cassel
Civil Liberties Watch

Michel Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I Saw Marines Kill Civilians"

Uzma Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War: What America Says Does Not Go

Paul de Rooij
Arrogant Propaganda

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

May 21, 2003

The Fatuous Defense Cabal

Newt, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz

By BRIAN CLOUGHLEY

There should be a shake-up in the manner Washington handles foreign policy. The first thing that should happen is official barring of Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz from commenting on matters other than defence in its most confined definition

Bush has almost achieved his objective of rendering internationalism inoperative. There is rejoicing in much of Washington that international cooperation on other than solely US terms is to all intents non-existent and that bilateralism and fatuously-titled "coalitions" are the only foreign relations' engagement routes he is prepared to take. Inevitably his foreign policy is in a condition of pandemic flux, but this is not the fault of the State Department's professional diplomats who have to interpret as best they can the lurches and non-sequiturs of the Bush administration in its erratic but determined pursuit of world domination.

In the next edition of Foreign Policy magazine (July), Newt Gingrich, disgraced former Speaker of the US House of Representatives (yet still a member of the Pentagon's Defence Policy Board), will regale the world with some novel reasons for America's failures in promoting its interests abroad. At least he admits there are problems, but his identification of the virus contaminating US dealings with foreign countries is barely credible.

Gingrich is yet another war-hawk who avoided service in Vietnam (the Defence Policy Board, reporting to Rumsfeld and until recently headed by the (also disgraced) Richard Pearle who remains a "valued member" of the organisation, is stacked with them), and has an unsavoury personal history, but this hasn't stopped him giving weird prescriptions for saving America from the foreign demons lurking in the pongy passages of his fevered mind.

According to Gingrich, the fault with Washington's foreign relations lies with the wimps of the State Department. The blurb for his no doubt subtly-argued thesis to be published in Foreign Policy reads "Why is anti-American sentiment rising unabated around the globe? Try the US State Department, which has abdicated values and principle in favour of accommodation and passivity. Only a top-to-bottom reform and culture shock will transform the State Department into an effective communicator of President George W Bush's foreign policy."

It sounds as if Newt, who is a sensitive soul (he demanded his first wife sign divorce papers while she was in hospital recovering from cancer surgery), is seeking to appear again on the Washington stage which he left so precipitately following his censure by the House for ethics violations, thereby disabling the Republican Party in mid-term elections--a much more serious crime in some eyes.

It seems Gingrich is trying to pave the way for a political comeback by attacking those whom he imagines can't defend themselves because they are public servants. The evil Senator McCarthy was good at this, and his main assaults and insults, too, were reserved for the nation's diplomats, as when he declared "I have here in my hand a list of 205--a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department".

When Gingrich gave a speech to the American Enterprise Institute last month ago he was at his most bombastic and splenetic in declaring Powell's visit to Damascus to meet the Syrian president to have been worse than ill-advised. He insulted Powell by saying his meeting with a "terrorist-supporting, secret police-wielding dictator is ludicrous" and castigated the State Department by claiming its (sic) Middle East policy "will clearly throw away all the fruits of hard-won victory" in the Bush war on Iraq. The man is off his trolley, and his allegation that the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs is guilty of fostering "a culture of propping-up dictators, coddling the corrupt (a bit rich, coming from the ethical Newt) and ignoring the secret police" is just plain daft.

There is a rumour in Washington that Rumsfeld approved Newt's attack on Powell and his department, and this isn't hard to believe if only because Rumsfeld is so bent it is a wonder he doesn't sometimes meet himself coming back along the corridor. But the vulnerability of this tactic is Newt's professed assumption that foreign policy is defined by the State Department, which is nonsense.

His absurd jibes were robustly countered by the American Foreign Service Association which represents the 10, 500 professionals in the State Department. Its head, John Naland, wrote to Gingrich that "You have essentially accused these employees of treachery... Your charges are spurious", but the bold Newt ignored the riposte. His attack has backfired for the moment, but it appears he is regrouping and that the next foray is about to be launched.

This is not to say that there should not be a shake-up in the manner Washington handles foreign policy. Of course there should be. The first thing that should happen is official barring of Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz from commenting on matters other than defence in its most confined definition, which would improve America's world standing and foreign relations enormously.

State Department selection procedures need to be shaken up, too, because there are three dozen US ambassadors who have no qualifications for their jobs other than having provided handsome donations or favours to the Republican party or to Bush personally. (It has ever been thus, of course, whichever party was in power.) To appreciate my point, please imagine yourself to be an American diplomat of great competence with long experience of the Middle East. You are an Arabic speaker verging on the highest levels of your distinguished career. The most important embassy in the Middle East (apart from Tel Aviv) is Riyadh. But you don't get that post because the appointment went to monoglot Robert Jordan, the campaign donor and lawyer who represented Bush "during a potentially sticky 1990s Securities and Exchange Commission investigation into insider trading at Bush's now-defunct oil company, Harkin Energy Corporation". (Thanks to <www.opensecrets.org> for this information.)

The ambassadors to France (Howard Leach; $399,359 to the Republicans), Italy (Melvin Sembler; $127,600), and Spain (George Argyros; $134,000) are other examples of heads of mission in important countries who bought their appointments. (There are thirty others in less high-profile capitals.) This is improper treatment of competent career professionals and is no way to promote respect for US foreign policy, so one has to agree about the need for constructive reform. But the trouble is that the Newt approach is redolent of demolition by diatribe. One wonders if we might hear, someday, "I have in my hand a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of Al Qaeda... who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department..."

Brian Cloughley is a former military officer who writes on international affairs. His website is www.briancloughley.com


Today's Features

CounterPunch Wire
"Terror" Slut Steve Emerson Eats Crow

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
A Letter to Kofi Annan on Powell's Missing Evidence

Ross Vachon
Dennis Miller's New Gig: the Last Refuge of Goofy?

John Chuckman
Blair's Awkward Lies

Matt Vidal
Corporate Media and the Myth of the Free Market

Michael S. Ladah
The Fine Print to Bush's Road Map

Robert Fisk
Bush's Eternal War Backfires

Elaine Cassel
Clarence Thomas, Still Whining After All These Years

Jonathan Freedland
Ann Coulter's Appalling Magic

Steve Perry
Play It Again, O-Sam-a

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /