home / subscribe / donate / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback / events

 

New Edition of CounterPunch

The Return of Robert Rubin: Kerry, Jobs and the Economy by Alexander Cockburn; Party Favors: the Political Business of Terry McAuliffe by Jeffrey St. Clair; The Kill Zone: Caring for the Wounded in Fallujah by David Martinez. In April, CounterPunch Online was read by 16.1 million viewers--by far our biggest month ever. But remember, we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation for the online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible. Click here to make a (tax deductible) donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Now Available: Hot New CounterPunch T-Shirts!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Cockburn / St. Clair's Scorching New History of a Decade of War
Now Available!

Today's Stories

May 8 / 9, 2004

Cockburn / St. Clair
Torture: as American as Apple Pie

John Chuckman
The Thing with No Brain

May 7, 2004

Human Rights Watch
10 Prisons; 9,000 Prisoners: US Detention Facilities in Iraq

Ron Jacobs
UnAmerican? I Wish It Were So

Robert Fisk
An Illegal and Immoral War

Ahmad Faruqui
The 50th Anniversary of Dien Bien Phu

Alexander Zaitchik
From Terrell Unit in Texas to Abu Ghraib: Doesn't It Ring a (Prison) Bell?

Mike Whitney
The Price of Victory

Norman Solomon
This War, Racism and Media Denial

M. Shahid Alam
A Comic Apology

May 6, 2004

Jeffrey St. Clair
They Did It for Jessica: Smeared with Shit; Kicked to Death

Kathy Kelly
May Day in Pekin Prison: Prison Labor for the War Machine

Werther
The Sunk Cost Fallacy: War as Vegas Casino Game

Lawrence Ferlinghetti
Totalitarian Democracy

Robert Fisk
"Smoke Him": Video Shows Wounded Men Being Shot by US Helicopter

John Janney
Torturing the Way to Freedom?

Christopher Ketcham
Outlaw Heterosexual Marriage Now!

Alan Farago
Dead Oceans: So Long, Thanks for the Fish

Sam Hamod
Bush on Arab TV: Worthless and Demeaning

James Brooks
Sullen Spring

William S. Lind
On the Brink of Defeat in Iraq

 

May 5, 2004

Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba
Complete US Army Report on Abuse of Iraqi Prisoners

Kathleen and Bill Christison
Kerry: a Lost Cause for Progressives?

Will Youmans
Deal with the Devil: a Palestinian Zionist and the End of the World

Patrick B. Barr
Terrorists R Us: the Powerful are Exempt from the Label

Lawrence Magnuson
Nightline's All-American Morgue

Greg Moses
Pocketbook of Denuded Ideals

Niranjan Ramakrishnan
Tormenting Prisoners, Torturing Truth

Lee Ballinger
Cinco de Mayo and Unity

Gilbert Achcar
Bush's Cakewalk into the Iraq Quaqmire

Website of the Day
Operation Phoenix & Iraq

 

May 4, 2004

Human Rights Watch
A Timeline of Torture and Abuse Allegations and Responses

Kurt Nimmo
The CIA Privatized Torture

David Peterson
CBS, Self-Censorship & Iraq

Barry Lando
CACI's Private Torture Chambers

Patrick Cockburn
Torture: Iraqis Disgusted, But Not Surprised

Dr. Susan Block
Indecent Insurgents: Watch What You Say

Fidel Castro
A Mindless, Unnecessary War

Mike Whitney
Empire of Torture

Sonali Kolhatkar
How to Stop the War: Demonstrate Against John Kerry

Josh Frank
The Lost Sierra Club

Stan Goff
The Role: Another Open Letter to US Troops in Iraq

Agustin Velloso
Spare Us Your Disgusting Ethics

Stew Albert
American Know-How

Website of the Day
Scenes from a Cover-Up

 

May 3, 2004

Virginia Tilley
Let the Wall of Silence Fall

May 1 / 2, 2004

Patrick Cockburn
An Army in Disgrace, a Policy in Tatters, the Real Prospect of Defeat

Robert Fisk
"Good Guys" Who Can Do No Wrong

Alexander Cockburn
Watching Niagara: Stupid Leaders, Useless Spies, Angry World

Heather Williams
Gringo, We're Going Home: Latin American Troops Flee Iraq

Diane Rejman
An Army Vet on Torture in Iraq: Abu Ghraib as My Lai?

Diane Christian
Blood Spilling: Osama, Bush and Sharon Speak the Same Language

Patrick Cockburn
Seems Like Old Times in Fallujah

Dave Lindorff
Bush's Torturous Logic: Shocked, Shocked, Shocked

Chris Floyd
Suicide Bomber: Neocons, Nihilists and Annihilation

April 29 / 30, 2004

Dave Zirin
A Pawn in Their Game: the Unlonesome Death of Pat Tillman

Kathy Kelly
The Warden's Tour

Greg Weiher
Fallujah and the Warsaw Ghetto: the Banality of Evil

Michael S. Ladah
Terrorism and Assassination: the Ultimate Depception

Patrick Cockburn
The Fallujah Mutinies

 

 

April 28, 2004

Christopher Brauchli
Meet Congressman Know-Nothing: Tom Tancredo

Wendy Brinker
The Politics of the Numb

Faisal Kutty
The Dirty Work of Canadian Intelligence

John Chuckman
Seeking the Evil One

Mike Whitney
Flag-Draped Coffins and the Seattle Times

Tom Mountain
Rwanda and the F***** Word

Graeme Greenback
The Iraqi Alamo: a CNN/CIA Production

Tracy McLellan
The War Comes Home

M. Junaid Alam
We are the Barbarians

William Loren Katz
Iraq, the US and an Old Lesson

 


April 27, 2004

James Davis
The Colombia 3 Acquitted

Dave Lindorff
Chalabi as Prosecutor

Bruce Schneier
Terrorist Threats and Political Gain

Cockburn / Sengupta
British Generals Resist Calls for More Troops to Aid Americans in Iraq

Walt Brasch
Presidential Letters: The Day I Was Asked to Feed an Elephant

Saul Landau
The Empire in Denial and the Denial of Empire


April 26, 2004

Patrick Cockburn
Crossing the Shia Line: US Troops Prepare to Enter Najaf

Wayne Madsen
Trading Places: Will the US Go the Way of the USSR?

Grover Furr
Protest, Rebellion, Commitment

Elaine Cassel
Lies About the Patriot Act

Mickey Z.
Inspired by Pat Tillman?

Greg Moses
Bremer's De-De-Ba'athjfication Gambit

Gila Svirsky
Anarchy in Our Souls

Uri Avnery
Vanunu and the Terrible Secret


April 24 / 25, 2004

William A. Cook
Tweedledee and Tweedledum: Kerry and Bush Melt into One

Jeffrey St. Clair
Stryking Out: a General, GM and the Army's Latest Tank

Brandy Baker
A Revitalized Women's Movement? Let's Hope So

Robert Fisk
A Warning to Those Who Dare Criticize Israel in the Land of Free Speech

Ben Tripp
October Surmise: a Case of Worst Scenarios

Nelson Valdés
"Submit or Die": Iraq and the American Borg

Lucson Pierre-Charles
Haiti's Return to the Future

Kurt Nimmo
The CIA Killed Pat Tillman

Mark Scaramella
Does Anybody Know Anything?

Patrick Cockburn
The Return of Saddam's Generals

Gary Engler
Welcome to La Paz: a Vacation in Tear Gas

Col. Dan Smith
Whistling in the Dark: Israel, Palestine and Bush

Greg Weiher
Iraq is Utterly Unlike Vietnam...

Elaine Cassel
Life on the Outside: a Review

Vanessa Jones
Letter from Australia: Why an Independent Won Sydney

Jim French
Agriculture's Bullied Market

Hammond Guthrie
Al Aronowitz, Bob Dylan and The Beatles

Poets' Basement
Jones, Holt, Albert, LaMorticella


April 23, 2004

Ron Jacobs
The Only Solution is Immediate Withdrawal

Dave Lindorff
Imagination Deficit Disorder

Mokhiber / Weissman
Contractors and Mercenaries: the Rising Corporate Military Monster

Norman Solomon
Country Joe Band, 2004: "What Are We Fighting For?"

Cynthia McKinney
All Things Are Not Equal: the Perils of Globalization

CounterPunch Wire
A Bitch Called Wanda

Karyn Strickler
Sierra Club, Inc.

Hammond Guthrie
Yellow Caked in the Face

Paul de Rooij
Graveyard of Justifications: Glossary of the Iraqi Occupation

 


April 22, 2004

Patrick Cockburn
When Terror Came to Basra: "I Saw a Minibus of Children on Fire"

Tanya Reinhart
The Wall Behind Disengagement

Lance Selfa
Why is Kucinich Still in the Race?

Josh Frank
Street Fighting Man? Kucinich's Pulled Punches

Sen. Robert Byrd
Bush Owes America Answers on Iraq

William S. Lind
Why We Get It Wrong

Mickey Z.
Undoing the Latches

Robert Jensen
Why They Fast: Remembering the Victims of the World Bank

John L. Hess
The New York Times from 30,000 Feet

 

April 21, 2004

Gary Leupp
Yeats on Iraq

Alfredo Castro
Colombia's Forgotten Prisoners

Dr. Susan Block
Bush's Taliban Drug Deal

William A. Cook
George 1 to George 2

Jack Random
Iraq and Vietnam

Jean-Guy Allard
Alarcon Meets the Editors

Mike Whitney
Charade in the Desert

Bill Christison
Only Major Policies Changes Can Help Washington Now

 

 


April 20, 2004

Dave Lindorff
Bush and Kerry Share a Problem

Stan Cox
Wal-Mart's Magic Numbers

Bruce Anderson
On Listening to Air America

Joseph Kalvoda
Czech Mate for Condi

Greg Moses
Yesterday's Intelligence

Stan Goff
The Democrats and Iraq

Website of the Day
Santorum Happens

 

 


April 19, 2004

Kurt Nimmo
The "Central Hand" of the Resistance

Mike Whitney
Bob Woodward's Imperial Trifles

Douglas Valentine
52 Pick-Up and the 100-to-1 Rule

John Chuckman
The Sharon Annex: Evil Does Often Triumph

Doug Giebel
Welcome to the Club

Rahul Mahajan
Hospital Closings and War Crimes

 

 

April 16 / 18, 2004

Robert Fisk
Bush Legitimizes Terror

Saul Landau
Subverting Brazil and Cuba

Dave Lindorff
Paying for War: $2,150 per Family and Counting

Brandy Baker
Fallujah's Collateral Damage

Mickey Z.
The Left Attacks from the Right

Bruce Jackson
The Bush Press Conference: Gott Mit Uns

Norman Solomon
How the "NewsHour" Changed History

Alexander Cockburn
Bush, Kerry and Empire

 

April 15, 2004

Greg Moses
Follow the Families, Not the Script

Virginia Tilley
The Carnage According to Gen. Kimmitt: Just Change the Channel

Ron Jacobs
They Coulda Been Champions of the World: Hurricane Carter and Ron Kovic

Michael Neumann
A Happy Compromise: Hate Crimes Reporting in the Toronto Globe and Mail

 

April 14, 2004

Tom Reeves
Return to Haiti: an American Learning Zone

Reza Fiyouzat
Japan and Iraq

Ron Jacobs
What Bush Really Said

Diane Christian
The Real Passion


 

Hot Stories

Alexander Cockburn
Behold, the Head of a Neo-Con!

Subcomandante Marcos
The Death Train of the WTO

Norman Finkelstein
Hitchens as Model Apostate

Steve Niva
Israel's Assassination Policy: the Trigger for Suicide Bombings?

Dardagan, Slobodo and Williams
CounterPunch Exclusive:
20,000 Wounded Iraqi Civilians

Steve J.B.
Prison Bitch

Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber
True Lies: the Use of Propaganda in the Iraq War

Wendell Berry
Small Destructions Add Up

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

 

Subscribe Online

 

Weekend Edition
May 8 / 9, 2004

War in Iraq: Improvised, Impulsive, Irrational

Humpty Dumpty is Falling

By BRIAN CLOUGHLEY

When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less."

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."

"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master. That's all."

['Alice Through the Looking Glass', Lewis Carroll, 1872]

Granted, this is an administration that doesn't want us to believe what they said. They want us to believe what they SAY they said.

[Ellen Goodman, Boston Globe, May 2, 2004]

Humpty Dumpty Bush is falling. His desperate manoeuvres and outright lies to try to justify his grotesque war on Iraq have been exposed for what they are. I don't know if Senator Kerry will be the saviour of America, but on that subject am reminded of the action of an American friend some years ago when the name of President Clinton came up. This old chum is in the US military and is for apple pie, flag, Guns 'R' Us, and a Rottweiler in every yard ; in politics he is slightly to the right of the late Adolf Hitler, and I asked him how he could salute commander-in-chief Clinton, given his obvious contempt for him. He looked at me, grimaced, put the thumb and forefinger of his left hand on either side of his nostrils and whipped up a salute with the right.

Clinton will be known better for his devious dissemblance rather than for what he achieved for his country. Infamously, he uttered the pathetic words "It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is," which damned him utterly. But there are plays on words and the meanings of words in more recent times that would make Bill Clinton wonder if 'is' means anything atall.

I'm not criticizing the Marine colonel at Falluja who went into deep modification mode with the English language when he said "We don't want to rubblize the city [because] that will give the enemy more places to hide." Hell, I can verb a noun as good as the next person. If he doesn't want to rubblize cities, well, bully for him. It beats destroying them, anyday, even if his motive was a trifle lacking in the human touch. The marines don't refrain from rubblizing cities, you understand, in order to spare women and children. The hell with women and children.

Here's part of a report from Dahr Jamail, one of the very few US journalists who managed to get into Falluja during the siege : "One of the bodies they brought to the clinic was that of an old man who was shot by a sniper outside of his home, while his wife and children sat wailing inside. The family couldn't reach his body, for fear of being sniped by the Americans. His stiff body was carried into the clinic with flies swarming above it." Well, at least the sniper wasn't rubblizing the place. Just destroying people. This is what one young Marine sniper boasted about one of his victims : "I'll let him scream a bit to destroy the morale of his buddies, then I'll use a second shot." These are the words of an American citizen in uniform, loyally serving Humpty Bush, as recorded by another brave journalist, Rahul Mahajan, also in Falluja. By any definition, this sniper is a psychopathic criminal.

But the Marines didn't actually retreat from Falluja. Oh dear me, no. Reuters reported that "Brig Gen Mark Kimmitt . . . insisted the Marines were not "withdrawing" . . . but were simply "repositioning"." Of course. It doesn't matter what the real meaning of the word 'retreat' is, because it is not a White House Definition. The dictionary gives it as "Go back; retire; relinquish a position", but in new Humpty-Bush double-think, through-the-looking-glass, upside-down-speak the Marines didn't "go back or retire or relinquish a position". They "repositioned" by scuttling out of Falluja and handed the place over to an Iraqi General who had been in Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard before commanding 38th Infantry Division.

Suddenly, out of the blue, the US army or the Marines or Bremer or Donald Trump or Elvis or whoever is in charge in Iraq decided that General Jasim Mohammed Saleh was a really good guy who should come into Falluja, dressed in his old uniform as a Saddam Hussein Baathist military officer, and take over the city. Then, a couple of days later, someone (White House? Pentagon? Michael Jackson?) reversed that decision and put another general in charge and demoted Saleh to be his second-in-command. (Who is paying Saleh's wages? The US? It would be interesting to know.) But of course they didn't tell Saleh, who comes from Falluja and has a considerable following there, that he was being replaced by another fellow. These people don't try to confuse us and the Iraqis only with words : they create chaos by taking decisive action then decisively changing it. Nothing is thought through. The entire conduct of the war in Iraq is improvised, impulsive and irrational.

Nobody seems to know where Bremer fits into all this, least of all, it seems, Bremer, who is surrounded by gun-toting mercenaries whenever he dares to come out from his palace behind all the concrete and wire. Does he report to Powell? Does he take orders from Rumsfeld? Who calls the shots (literally) in Iraq? (It's certainly not the puppet 'Governing Council'.) Mind you, Bremer is just the man for the job of Gauleiter. He is truly flexible, which is an essential characteristic for such an appointment. He is the man who on February 26, 2001 said about Bush "The new administration seems to be paying no attention to the problem of terrorism. What they will do is stagger along until there's a major incident and then suddenly say, 'Oh, my God, shouldn't we be organized to deal with this?' "

That was a remarkably accurate call. He was proved absolutely right. But on May 2, 2004, the critical and prophetic Bremer changed his mind. His words "The new administration seems to be paying no attention to the problem of terrorism" were suddenly altered to "I am strongly supportive and grateful for the President's leadership and strategy in combating terrorism and protecting American national security throughout his first term in office." You've got to hand it to the man for sheer downright chutzpah. Or you might think that he is an unprincipled, toadying, fart-catching asshole who changes his words and opinions to suit the people at the top of the fetid, worm-riddled dungheap that is the Bush administration.

Here's Gauleiter Bremer on 23 April: "If these bands [in Falluja] do not surrender their military weapons and instead continue to use them against Iraq and Iraqi and coalition forces, offensive operations will resume." Now, sure, the Marines stood off and sniped old men and kids and let the air force pound the hell out of Falluja, so in the strictest sense of the words (it all depends on what 'is' is) perhaps they were not carrying out "offensive operations" as such. They just shot a whole bunch of civilians and a few Iraqi freedom fighters and bombed the city to hell. Not rubblizing it, of course ; merely destroying buildings with 'precision' bombing. And use of the word 'precision' is yet another example of the Humpty people's twisted language.

A 'precision' bomb might hit exactly the place it is aimed at. But it was actually admitted by a spokesman that one of them did in fact miss its target. Just one, mind you ; just one teensy-weensy, itsy-bitsy, dinky-doodle 500 pound bomb missed its target. And what did it rubblize, one wonders? (Remember that a 10 pound device wrapped round the torso of a suicide bomber can kill thirty people.) Just a few dozen Iraqis, maybe? But occupation troops don't think it is worthwhile or necessary to count dead human beings if they are Iraqi dead human beings, so we don't know how many were killed. The BBC team that went to Falluja on May 4 reported : "Ali Hassan took us to his neighbour's house. He told us it was hit by two rockets, bringing the roof down on the families of three brothers and killing, he says, 36 people. The bodies of five children are still said to be under the rubble. "Were they terrorists?" he asks. "What did they do wrong? Women and children [died]. Is this the democracy and freedom the Americans brought us?" "

It isn't only words that are used to confuse us. Figures feature fatuously, too ; as when Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz "was asked about the toll [of US deaths in Iraq] at a hearing of the House Appropriations subcommittee" on April 30. That was the day on which Associated Press reported "As of Friday, April 30, 732 U.S. service members have died since the beginning of military operations in Iraq last year, according to the Department of Defense. Of those, 530 died as a result of hostile action and 202 died of non-hostile causes."

You would expect the Deputy Defense Secretary appointed by Humpty Bush, whose troops are fighting a bloody and barbaric war that has caused the wholly unnecessary deaths of hundreds of members of the US armed forces, to know how many of them had been killed. To be sure, Wolfowitz has all the warmth and generous feelings of a frog on an iceberg, but command of facts and figures is the least the American people might expect from the second senior man in the Pentagon. Well . . . no. Not exactly. In fact, far from exactly, because Wolfowitz answered, just as the latest death reports were coming in to his office, that the number of dead Americans was "approximately 500 of which--I can get the exact numbers--approximately 350 are combat deaths."

This appalling little squirt who has never heard a shot fired in anger ; this nauseating apology for a human being ; this perambulating piece of excrement, did not know, on the day he testified to Congress about US involvement in Iraq, how many Americans had died there. He underestimated by, as he might say, "approximately", a third. When did he stop counting? Did he ever begin counting? It doesn't seem to matter to him or to the other soulless cretins in the Humpty Bush administration exactly how many people have been killed fighting the war they ordered.

But Wolfowitz breezed through it. There was no criticism by anyone. Never mind. Nobody really cares, because "The question is, who is to be Master; that's all."

We can have a quiet laugh about the military's latest mangling of the language in such instances as "emergency landing due to ground fire", which means "the helicopter was shot down", and so on, but when the lies become so blatant that it's obvious the liars don't give a damn about the truth, then we should really start worrying. Take the great survivor, George Tenet, who will say anything to protect himself, Bush, the administration and everything else except the Constitution and his oath to tell the truth. When he appeared in front of the 9/11 Commission he swore he had not spoken with Bush in August 2001. In the Bush administration this means [not verbatim, of course] "I did speak with Bush in August 2001 and in fact flew to Texas on August 17 to speak with him and spoke with him again in Washington on August 31." Simple, really. And we wouldn't know anything about it if someone hadn't asked an awkward question. The words "I didn't speak with the president" mean "I did speak with the president" if you listen to them correctly.--"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less."

The instances of sheer downright lying are too many to mention. But I leave you with two particularly twisted and degenerate pieces of verbal gymnastics that would have made Stalin's propaganda wonks green with envy.

On May 4 Rumsfeld was forced to read out a semi-apology for the vile atrocities carried out by his troops (well, Humpty's troops) in Iraq, which he did with all the moral conviction and humanitarian feeling of a mafia hitman reading aloud the ten commandments. He was then asked if torture had taken place, so sent both brain cells into massive rewind search for the cranial compartment marked 'Obstruct and Deceive 101', forked his tongue, and mumbled : "I think that--I'm not a lawyer. My impression is that what has been charged thus far is abuse, which I believe technically is different from torture. Just a minute. I don't know if the--it is correct to say what you just said, that torture has taken place, or that there's been a conviction for torture. And therefore I'm not going to address the "torture" word." Then he claimed "Well, we informed the world on Jan 16 that these [abuse/torture] investigations were under way."

The international definition of Torture is "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity." So, relax, folks; because Rummy the ratbag doesn't believe that humiliating naked prisoners by forcing them to masturbate and pile on top of each other and otherwise undergo depraved treatment by an organised team of sadists isn't torture. And his claim about having "informed the world" on January 16 that there were "investigations" is also intriguing.

January 16, 2004 was a Friday, and it is usual to release bad news on Fridays, preferably late in the afternoon, so that it won't receive much attention. But the Pentagon site detailing announcements and transcripts and interviews and press releases in January (see <http://www.defenselink.mil> ), does not appear to carry anything about investigations into torture or even 'abuse'. Now, I'm not saying that Rumsfeld lied to us (perish the thought); I'm just making the point that it is difficult to find the announcement to the entire globe that he told us had been made. Perhaps he "misspoke", of course, but for Rumsfeld to state "we informed the world" about investigations concerning vile and degrading treatment of helpless people is somewhat at variance with the May 4 Reuters report that "[the cases of] two Iraqi prisoners [who] were murdered by Americans and 23 other deaths are being investigated in Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States revealed on Tuesday as the Bush administration tried to contain growing outrage over the abuse of Iraqi detainees."

The word--yes, we have to concentrate on words--that leaps out at us here is "revealed". 'Revealed' in May 2004.

But we thought that Rumsfeld had "informed the world" about the investigations on January 16? Well, maybe he had. But even if he did (just how?), he was a bit lax in informing the world about the damning report by Major General Antonio Taguba (one of the few people who come out of this series of squalid dramas with any honour) that was sent to the Pentagon on March 3, two whole months ago. And when did Rumsfeld read that report? Well, he can't say, exactly. Here is the transcript:

"Q : Mr. Secretary, have you yet read the Taguba report?

SEC. RUMSFELD: It's--which--yeah. You're--I think you're talking about the executive summary. That's--I've seen the executive summary, the...

Q. Have you read through it, sir?

SEC. RUMSFELD: I've been through it. Whether--have read every page--no. There's a lot of references and documentation to laws and conventions and procedures and requirements. But I have certainly read the conclusions and the other aspects of it."

The man Rumsfeld is a humbug and a ninny. And, while we are talking of grubby knaves, here is the king humbug and word-mangler to end all word-manglers, Humpty Bush himself. In the White House on April 30 he announced that "there are no longer torture chambers or rape rooms or mass graves in Iraq." What baloney.

Torture chambers? OK, let's call them abuse chambers. Rape rooms? That depends on whether you call rape the forcing of a neon light tube up a prisoner's anus. And as for mass graves . . . have you seen the BBC's photography of graves in Falluja after the US blitzed the city? "Many of the dead who have been buried lie in what was a football pitch. Where people used to go to play, they now go to mourn. There are simple headstones for those who died--civilians and combatants. There was one particular grave where people were praying and grieving. The headstone said here laid the bodies of two baby girls."

Are these mass graves, Chief Charlatan? Or perhaps you "can make words mean so many different things" like the original Humpty Dumpty, and convince yourself that the graves are figments of our imagination. Just like your decency and sense of honour.

But let's all remember that:

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall, Humpty Dumpty had a great fall. All the King's horses, and all the King's men, Couldn't put Humpty together again.

Here's hoping . . . .

Brian Cloughley writes on military and political affairs. He can be reached through his website www.briancloughley.com



Weekend Edition Features for April 24 / 25, 2004

William A. Cook
Tweedledee and Tweedledum: Kerry and Bush Melt into One

Jeffrey St. Clair
Stryking Out: a General, GM and the Army's Latest Tank

Brandy Baker
A Revitalized Women's Movement? Let's Hope So

Robert Fisk
A Warning to Those Who Dare Criticize Israel in the Land of Free Speech

Ben Tripp
October Surmise: a Case of Worst Scenarios

Nelson Valdés
"Submit or Die": Iraq and the American Borg

Lucson Pierre-Charles
Haiti's Return to the Future

Kurt Nimmo
The CIA Killed Pat Tillman

Mark Scaramella
Does Anybody Know Anything?

Patrick Cockburn
The Return of Saddam's Generals

Gary Engler
Welcome to La Paz: a Vacation in Tear Gas

Col. Dan Smith
Whistling in the Dark: Israel, Palestine and Bush

Greg Weiher
Iraq is Utterly Unlike Vietnam...

Elaine Cassel
Life on the Outside: a Review

Vanessa Jones
Letter from Australia: Why an Independent Won Sydney

Jim French
Agriculture's Bullied Market

Hammond Guthrie
Al Aronowitz, Bob Dylan and The Beatles

Poets' Basement
Jones, Holt, Albert, LaMorticella

Google
WWW http://www.counterpunch.org

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /